APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE 2ND, 11TH, & 13TH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

___________________________________________)
BANK OF AMERICA., ) Lower Court Case No. CV-000879-18/KC
A FICTICIOUS CORPORATION ) Appellate Term Docket # 2018-1001-KC
)
Plaintif )
) MOTION TO DISMISS A VOID JUDGEMENT
vs. ) FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION, FRAUD ON THE
) COURT, DECEPTION AND COLLUSION AND
) LACK OF JURISDICTION
YVONNE JOHNSON )
Corporate Entity ) DEMAND FOR PROOF OF JURISDICTION
vs. ) DEMAND FOR PROOF OF CLAIM
) DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Yvonne Johnson ) DAMAGES AWARDED TO ME
non-corporate entity who )
is not the surety for the
corporate entity Defendant

1. STATE OF NEW YORK )

) SS.:
COUNTY OF KINGS )

2. REBUTTAL OF VERIFIED COMPLAINT

AND DEMAND FOR
PROOF OF CLAIMS

Re: JUDGE DAVID ELLIOT
Re: JUDGE BERNICE D. SIEGAL
Re: JUDGE LIZETTE COLON
Re: JUDGE MICHAEL L. PESCE
Re: JUDGE THOMAS P. ALIOTA
Re: MULLOOLY JEFFREY ROONEY FLYNN LLP (A Fictitious Legal Corporation)
To all concerned:

Now comes, Yvonne Johnson, the Natural Woman – The Complainant Pursuant to Article VI, clause 2 of
the organic Constitution of these united states of America as per the Supremacy Clause.

Affiant has never seen or been presented with any documentation verifying that I have voluntarily,
knowingly, and intentionally, entered into a contract with any civil court, to perform to your demands; and
believe that no such verified documentation exists;

Affiant and this court has never seen or has never been presented with any solid tangible evidence of a
credit card or credit card contract and agreement other than the Attorneys opinions and useless case laws
expressed on paper. Yet this court found it necessary to rule in favor of a thieving criminal law firm with
zero evidence – this was a shakedown and extortion disguised as a “default judgement” with aide of corrupt
judge, corrupt court clerks, and a corrupt appellate term clerk who nullifies all evidence and jurisdictional
claims favorable to the defendant.

I know – this case was not supposed to get this far – it should have ended in room 1101 with Lizzie Colon

This is a clear cut case of ORGANIZED CRIMINAL RACKETEERING under the RICO ACT – and it is
far from over.

AFFIDAVIT OF VALIDATION

I HEREBY ALSO DEMAND TO RECEIVE THE FOLLOWING PROOF OF CLAIMS ANSWERED.

Please respond in an Affidavit of Validation OR VERIFICATION OF CLAIM form under your

full and complete commercial, corporate and personal liability that you have the proofs of your claims.

1. Proof of Claim: That the Complaint filed against me was not a Commercial Crime.

2. Proof of Claim: That a Commercial Crime does not require Jurisdiction and a
Contract.

3. Proof of Claim: That Jurisdiction and Contract were both proven on the RECORD.

4. Proof of Claim: That as judges, David Elliot, Bernice Siegal, Lizette Colon, Michael
Pesce, and Thomas Aliota have subject matter jurisdictional authority in an Article 1
 court.

5. Proof of Claim: That as judges, David Elliot, Bernice Siegal, Lizette Colon, Michael
Pesce, and Thomas Aliota have subject matter jurisdictional authority in an Article 3
court.

6. Proof of Claim: That as judges, David Elliot, Bernice Siegal, Lizette Colon, Michael
Pesce, and Thomas Aliota have subject matter jurisdictional authority in an Article 4
court.

7. Proof of Claim: That David Elliot, Bernice Siegal, Lizette Colon, Michael Pesce, and
Thomas Aliota are judges and not governmental administrators presiding in an
ARTICLE 5 COURT.

8. Proof of Claim: That David Elliot, Bernice Siegal, Lizette Colon, Michael Pesce, and
Thomas Aliota, as judges, are not supposed to maintain and protect my
Constitutional liberties/rights as per their oaths of office.

9. Proof of Claim: That David Elliot, Bernice Siegal, Lizette Colon, Michael Pesce, and
Thomas Aliota, as judges have the authority of their own volition to deprive me of
“Due Process of Law”.

10.Proof of Claim: That Paul Kenny, as Chief Clerk of the Appellate Term 2nd Dept, under
his Oath of Office, under the US Constitution, and under Common Law, have the
Constitutional authority to preside over, adjudicate, and make a ruling on a claim
made against me.

11.Proof of Claim: That Paul Kenny Chief Clerk, and David Elliot, Bernice Siegal, Lizette
Colon, Michael Pesce, and Thomas Aliota, as judges, have the authority under the
Constitution as per their oaths of office, to COMPLETELY deny and dismiss “ALL” my
affidavits, evidences, documents, papers, jurisdictional and constitutional demands
and challenges and all others forms or claims, as per their personal judicial
determinations adjudicated and signed by Paul Kenny.

12.Proof of Claim: That Jurisdiction can not be raised of APPEAL.

13.Proof of Claim: That I raised “Personal Jurisdiction” and not “Subject Matter
 Jurisdiction”.

14.Proof of Claim: Proof of claim – per your lie (Paul Kenny) – that defendant never
challenged subject matter jurisdiction.

15.Proof of Claim: That that Subject Matter Jurisdiction was proven on the record.

16.Proof of Claim: That the claim brought against me was tried, heard, and adjudicated
in a Common Law Jurisdiction and not a Commercial Jurisdiction.

17.Proof of Claim: That Kings County Civil Court – a fictitious financial institution
registered with Dun and Bradstreet under the DUNs # 964919299- had Jurisdiction
to prosecute a claim brought forth by a fictitious Law Firm against a flesh and blood
natural woman.

18.Proof of Claim: That the KINGS COUNTY CIVIL COURT (NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED
COURT SYSTEM) is not a fictitious private corporation registered with Dun and
Bradstreet under the Duns number 964919299.

19.Proof of Claim: That members of the bar (Corrupt Law Firms) can commit fraud on
the Court with the aid of Judges and Clerks by filing false claims with zero evidence
and win fraudulent judgements.

20.Proof of Claim: That a corrupt law firm known as Mullolly Jeffrey Rooney & Flynn LLP
can openly commit fraud under CPL 175 with the aid of the judges and clerks and go
unpunished.

21.Proof of Claim: That by completely stripping, eliminating, and suppressing ALL of my

claims, proofs, documents and demands and leaving me naked BEFORE THE COURT,
without any evidence in support of my case is NOT a violation of my Due Process of
Law and my Constitutional Rights and Liberties.

22.Proof of Claim: That the law allows judges to be handed a document by any corrupt
Attorney, and WITHOUT EVEN READING IT deny and dismiss all of MY motions, all
affidavits, all papers, all documents, all jurisdictional and constitutional demands,
and ALL OTHER GROUNDS, as per the documents you signed.
23.Proof of Claim: That plaintiffs do not have to prove their claims as the moving party
in their verified complaint. And Proof of Claim that a breached contract never has to
be entered into evidence.

24.Proof of Claim: That defendant has to prove the claims of the plaintiffs’ as per your
judicial determination on an Affidavit of Service.

25.Proof of Claim: that a Plaintiff in two sworn affidavits can claim two different dates of
service of a Summons and Complaint and still be awarded a money judgement.
26.See Evidence labeled A

27.Proof of Claim: That Judges and Clerks do not take money from dirty lawyers to slam
dunk default judgements.

28.Proof of Claim: That the natural person is responsible for any claims made against
the corporate Entity.

29.Proof of Claim: That I, Yvonne Johnson, as defendant in error, and a natural woman
have to answer by law any verified complaint from a Fictitious Plaintiff who is the
moving party.

30.Proof of Claim: That this civil court has a verifiable contract signed by me before trial,
giving the court complete jurisdiction over this non-corporate living woman.

31.Proof of Claim: That any Fictitious Entity / Corporation here in the U.S.A., can file a
long-distance verified complaint from another State and does not have to be here to
testify at any court in any trial.

32.Proof of Claim: That a fictitious entity or corporation can sue a living breathing
natural woman in any court.

33.Proof of Claim: That as a Non-Living Fictitious Privately held Corporation, the Kings
County Civil Court judges had the authority to summoned me before their bench.

34.Proof of Claim: That the Law Firm of MULLOOLY JEFFREY ROONEY FLYNN LLP is not a
 privately-owned fictitious corporation and that their cause of actions are not
fraudulent against defendant, the living breathing woman, even though they are
registered with Dun and Bradstreet under the DUNS # of 055896393

35.Proof of claim: That you and the court, corporation, dept etc. has given me full and
complete disclosure over any and all contracts or over anything and everything
claimed.

36.Proof of Claim: That you have complete authority over this Natural non-corporate
living woman.

37.Proof of Claim: That you have complete authority over this living woman upon the
land.

38.Proof of Claim: That you are not a registered member of the Bar Association.

39.Proof of Claim: That the American Bar Association is not a foreign International
Private organization, which makes Bar members foreign agents in a foreign state,
under the Foreign sovereign immunities act (FSIA).

Proof of Claim that Bar members actually have a license to practice law.

Proof of Claim of any lawful law that proves that a non-corporation living man upon
the law, has to pay any court a tax, fine, or judgement.

Proof of Claim that the supreme courts in each State were actually following a state
and federal real law, that permitted the fellow Bar members of the supreme courts,
to allow fellow Bar members in each state and federal government, as part of the
judicial branch of government in each state and federal government courts.

40.Proof of Claim: That you as judge are above the Supreme Court’s rulings and that
you are above the law of this land.

41.Proof of Claim: That the Constitution is not the Supreme Law of this land and/ or in
this or any court and that you do not have to adhere to your oath of office to uphold
 said oath and constitution.

42.Proof of Claim: That you can prove the “LAW” you asked for, that would supply the
proof of why you should not have dismissed all my affidavits, and all documents.

43.Proof of Claim: Of why my affidavits of “No Jurisdiction” was not allowed under the
FSIA.

44.Proof of Claim: Of YOUR AUTHORITY under the organic and corporate constitution to
completely deny a writ of “CORAM NOBIS”.

45.Proof of Claim: That Attorneys can admit hearsay evidence into court.

46.Proof of Claim: That Attorneys can give hearsay testimony with permission granted
from a corrupt judge.

47.Proof of Claim: That Sworn Affidavits and Statements of Facts” will not be admissible
as evidence, when the evidence within the affidavits, will clearly prove the claims of
the defendant.

48.Proof of Claim: That verified complaints are admissible as evidence and sworn
affidavits are not.

49.Proof of Claim: That an unrebutted affidavit's by plaintiffs has standing and will be
completely ignored in your/any court.

50.Proof of Claim: That an article five court is a civil court of record, which was passed
by congress.

51.Proof of Claim: That contract fraud, does not violate a contract and does not makes
it null and void.

52.Proof of Claim: That under the common law and the U.C.C. §1-308 & U.C.C. §1-103.6,
I did not have the right to reserve my rights and to demand a dismissal of these
fraudulent charges.
53.Proof of Claim: That you have not allowed Esquire David A. Jones, to amend with
out full disclosure to me, his new verified complaint in order for you both to refuse
and deny my constitutional rights and liberties to a jury trial.

54.Proof of Claim: That David A. Jones did not file asking for high punitive damages and
fines in the original verified complaint, giving me the right to a jury trial.

55.Proof of Claim: That based upon your actions against my constitutional rights and
liberties that you are not in violation of your oath of office.

56.Proof of Claim: That based upon your actions, you were not an advocate of the
Plaintiffs’ esquire, by stating that verified complaints are admissible as evidence and
that my sworn affidavits are not and won’t be allowed in your court.

57.Proof of Claim: That based upon your actions, that any observer could see that a fair
and impartial trial was not possible in this 9th circuit court.

58.Proof of Claim: That that the affidavit of “notice of fraud upon the court” was
nonsense, as stated by you.

59.Proof of Claim: of why you should not be disqualified because of your numerous
violations of my rights and liberties.

60.Proof of Claim: Of any LAW passed by congress that can deny me, the right to hire
my own court stenographer in a jury trial or at any and all trials.

Affidavit pursuant to 29 United States Code, Title 1746

See Dickerson vs. Wainwright, 626 F.2d Title 1184, held affidavit sworn true and correct under
penalty of perjury has full force of law and does not have to be verified by Notary Public to have
same effect.

Under penalty of perjury I declare that the foregoing facts within this document/verified
complaint/affidavit are true, correct and complete.

Without Prejudice
 _____________________
Yvonne Johnson:
With All Rights Reserved

_____________________________
Yvonne Johnson

Sworn to Before Me
On this ______th Day of August

___________________________
Notary Public