Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Meat Science
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/meatsci
Effect of captive bolt gun length on brain trauma and post-stunning hind T
limb activity in finished cattle Bos taurus
⁎
Helen C. Klinea, , Dana R. Wagnera, Lily N. Edwards-Callawaya, Lacey R. Alexanderb,
Temple Grandina
a
Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
b
Cargill Protein Group, 825 E Douglas Ave, Wichita, KS 67202, USA
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Hind limb post stunning kicking in properly stunned unconscious cattle is a safety hazard for employees. Three
Captive bolt different captive bolt lengths of 15.2 cm (STRD), 16.5 cm (MED), and 17.8 cm (LON) were evaluated for amount
Steers of tissue damage and hind limb kicking in a Jarvis USSS-1 pneumatic stunner. The air pressure setting was
Heifers 1378.95 to 1447.90 pKa for all captive bolts. All 45 test cattle were rendered unconscious with a single shot.
Bos taurus
There was a trend (P = .06) for less kicking to occur when the 16.5 cm length bolt was used in the stunner.
Visual appraisal of the brains on the split heads indicated that the shortest bolt caused the least amount of brain
damage. The brainstems were intact for all cattle regardless of captive bolt treatment. Young fed English,
Continental European, and Holstein steers and heifers can be effectively stunned without visible brainstem
disruption.
1. Introduction causing pain (Finnie, 1993; Grandin, 2009; Terlouw, Bourguet, & Deiss,
2016).
Ensuring animal welfare at the time of slaughter is an essential part Most commercial fed slaughter facilities use a standard captive bolt
of the commercial processing system. Additionally, in United States length of 15.2 cm for Jarvis pneumatic stunners. In these stunners, only
Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspected facilities it is a federal 9.02 cm of the bolt actually penetrates into the animal's skull. Longer
requirement to render livestock unconscious before slaughter, as stated captive bolts are commercially available and some processing compa-
in 9 CFR 313 (Humane Slaughter Of Livestock United States nies have started using them in the belief that the longer bolts may
Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service (1987)). cause more brain damage and increase the effectiveness of the stun.
In large commercial cattle slaughter facilities in the United States, Although some companies have been using the longer bolt, there is a
pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt guns are the primary need for research to determine the extent of the brain damage caused
stunning tool. The mode of action of a penetrating captive bolt is by these longer bolts. The first objective of this study was to determine
concussion and trauma to the brain. A metal rod is ejected from the if length of captive bolt had an effect on brain damage. The second
muzzle of the captive bolt gun via a supply of pressurized air (Finnie, objective of this study was to determine if the length of stunning bolt in
1997). The bolt is propelled through the animal's skull into the brain a pneumatic captive-bolt stunner influences the frequency of hind limb
tissue, after which the bolt is retracted (Finnie, 1997). A secondary post-stunning kicking in cattle. Hind limb post-stunning kicking is a
method of euthanasia is recommended to ensure death occurs; in cattle safety hazard for commercial plant employees. Cattle that are properly
destined for slaughter exsanguination is used (Leary et al., 2013). stunned and unconscious may kick and still have hind limb movements
Pneumatically powered captive bolt guns are powered by pressur- (Terlouw, Bourguet, Deiss, & Mallet, 2015).
ized air and do not require the operator to reload a charge after each
stun, thus often making it the first choice of potential stunning tools for
the fast processing speed of a large commercial slaughter facility.
Additionally, captive bolt guns, when operated correctly and main-
tained, are effective at rendering cattle instantly unconscious without
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: helen.kline@colostate.edu (H.C. Kline).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.05.004
Received 11 July 2018; Received in revised form 3 May 2019; Accepted 3 May 2019
Available online 06 May 2019
0309-1740/ Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).
H.C. Kline, et al. Meat Science 155 (2019) 69–73
70
H.C. Kline, et al. Meat Science 155 (2019) 69–73
3. Results
A
Skull thickness, cm All animals were properly stunned and rendered unconscious during
B
Area of brain that displayed damage, cm this study. All animals in this study were assessed for a lack of a righting
C
Brain length, cm
D
Brain width, cm reflex once rendered unconscious. For stunning characteristics, accu-
E
Brainstem with no visible disruption racy of stunning (P = .53), penetration depth (P = .41), skull thickness
(P = .90), brain length (P = .60), and brain width (P = .90) did not
Fig. 1. Bovine brain trauma analysis.
differ among the three captive bolt length treatments (Table 1).
Table 1
Main effects of captive bolt length on brain trauma measurements postmortem activity score (N = 45).
Measurement Captive bolt treatment1
⁎
Accuracy of stunning 4 4 4 0.2 0.53
Penetration depth, cm 5.9 6.4 6.5 0.6 0.41
Skull thickness, cm 2.0 2.0 1.9 0.2 0.9
Brain length, cm 5.6 1.3 3.1 2.9 0.6
Brain width, cm 9.6 9.8 9.7 0.5 0.9
Brain damage, cm 2.4a 3.1b 3.5b 0.3 < 0.03
71
H.C. Kline, et al. Meat Science 155 (2019) 69–73
A
STANDARD captive bolt length (15.2 cm) bovine brain tissue damage
B
Medium captive bolt length (16.5 cm) bovine brain tissue damage
C
Long captive bolt length (17.8 cm) bovine brain tissue damage
Fig. 2. Bovine brain trauma by captive bolt length treatment.
the bolt length, this would provide another safety measure for workers between treatments. This seems to suggest that, in this study, the longer
in that area. bolts did not have an effect on worker accuracy of stunning cattle in
Results from this study indicated that all of the captive bolt treat- commercial slaughter facility conditions. The cattle were held on a
ment lengths resulted in damage to brain tissue, causing cerebra-cor- center track conveyor restrainer which may have had an effect on the
tical damage rendering the cattle unconscious. The assessment of un- angle of the shot.
consciousness included a lack of righting reflex, limp tongue, lack of If applied to a larger more in-depth study, this methodology would
menace reflex, and lack of rhythmic breathing. Although not evaluated benefit from assessment of forelimb kicking as well as post-stunning
in this study, assessing penetration angle, of the captive bolt tract, hind limb kicking for all captive bolt lengths to assess the different rates
would have allowed researchers to see if bolt length had an effect on the of post-stunning kicking at the shackle conveyor belt and exsanguina-
angle at which the pneumatic stunner was fired. Industry professionals tion positions where employee safety is a concern. Commercial industry
suggested that using a longer bolt could cause an increased amount of professionals expressed concerns of specified risk material (SRM) dis-
brain damage and decrease the chance of the cattle returning to sen- persion with the longer captive bolt that could be addressed with an
sibility. The repercussions of ineffective initial stuns from a regulatory enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect glial fibrillary acidic
standpoint, as well as from the animal welfare perspective, are critical protein (GFAP) (Hossner et al., 2006), a central nervous system specific
and the commercial slaughter industry will support potential methods protein that is not normally found in blood and thus, which would in-
to reduce the chances of this event occurring. Although no animals dicate central nervous system tissue dispersal within the bovine blood.
returned to consciousness in this study, more research is required to
investigate the process of nerve death and the rate of post-stunning leg 5. Conclusion
activity in cattle at commercial slaughter facilities.
There was no disruption to the pons, midbrain, or medulla ob- The purpose of this study was to assess the differences between
longata, referred to as the “brainstem”, using any captive bolt length in varying captive bolt lengths in brain tissue damage and post-stunning
this study as determined by visual observation of the brain within the hind limb kicking. Based on the results of this study, it was found that
split skulls. Previous studies indicated that brain stem disruption was increased bolt length is associated with different levels of brain damage;
present after captive bolt stunning (Gilliam et al., 2012). However, however, the brainstem was not disrupted regardless of bolt length. The
Gilliam et al. (2012) conducted their study in a controlled laboratory amount of hind limb post-stunning kicking was not significantly dif-
setting with a hand-held captive bolt gun on bovine cadaver skulls. The ferent between treatments. The process of nerve death, captive bolt
hand held Model Jarvis Power Actuated Stunner with the heavy duty length, and the rate of post-stunning leg activity in cattle at commercial
bolt extends 12.065 cm and the Jarvis USSS-1 stunner pneumatic cap- slaughter facilities is a complex dynamic and this was an attempt to
tive bolt extends 9.017 cm with the standard bolt. This difference in begin to understand these relationships and improve employee safety in
length likely influences the locations of brain damage. Splitting skulls commercial facilities.
without a 12–24 h chill time made the damage assessment of the brain
tissue challenging. Without the 12–24 h chill time the brain tissue was Declaration of interest
very gelatinous and did not hold true to its shape, making it difficult to
assess damage that could be specifically attributed to the bolts being None.
assessed in this study. A 12–24 h chill time is recommended before
splitting the skulls, along with using a band saw instead of a brisket saw References
for more accurate damage assessment. If further studies were to be
conducted researchers would use a brain diagram on transparent plastic Finnie, J. (1993). Brain damage caused by a captive bolt pistol. Journal of Comparative
to overlay on the split brain to assess damage to specific brain struc- Pathology, 109(3), 253–258.
Finnie, J. (1997). Traumatic head injury in ruminant livestock. Australian Veterinary
tures and regions. Journal, 75(3), 204–208.
There was some concern that an increased bolt length may lead to Gilliam, J., Shearer, J., Woods, J., Hill, J., Reynolds, J., Taylor, J., ... Snider, T. (2012).
stunner employee fatigue due to increased air pressure for the LON Captive-bolt euthanasia of cattle: Determination of optimal-shot placement and
evaluation of the cash special euthanizer kit® for euthanasia of cattle. Animal Welfare,
treatment (increased air pressure was applied to all treatments in this 21(1), 99–102.
study, not just the LON treatment). To assess worker fatigue, accuracy Grandin, T. (2007). Livestock handling and transport. Oxfordshire, UK: CABI.
scores for stunning were assessed for 15 skulls, per captive bolt treat- Grandin, T. (2009). Recommended captive bolt stunning techniques for cattle. Fort Collins.
Retrieved from http://www.grandin.com/humane/cap.bolt.tips.html, Accessed date:
ment; these skulls were collected at the end of the 8 h work shift. The
15 October 2017.
assumption was if the knocker became fatigued, his accuracy score Hossner, K. L., Yemm, R. S., Sonnenshein, S. E., Mason, G. L., Cummings, B. A., Reddy, M.,
could decrease. However, average accuracy scores did not differ ... Belk, K. E. (2006). Comparison of immunochemical (enzyme-linked im-
munosorbent assay) and immunohistochemical methods for the detection of central
72
H.C. Kline, et al. Meat Science 155 (2019) 69–73
nervous system tissue in meat products. Journal of Food Protection, 69(3), 644–650. and killing. Meat Science, 118, 133–146.
Leary, S. L., Underwood, W., Anthony, R., Gwaltney-Brant, S., Poison, A., & Meyer, R. Terlouw, E. C., Bourguet, C., Deiss, V., & Mallet, C. (2015). Origins of movements fol-
(2013). AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2013 edition. (In Proceedings of lowing stunning and during bleeding in cattle. Meat Science, 110, 135–144.
the). United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service (1987). 9
Terlouw, C., Bourguet, C., & Deiss, V. (2016). Consciousness, unconsciousness and death CFR 313 - humane slaughter of livestock regulations. Vol. 2, 146–152.
in the context of slaughter. Part I. neurobiological mechanisms underlying stunning
73