## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

http://www.wirelesscommunication.nl/reference/chaptr03/ricenaka/ric...

www.WirelessCommunication.NL

Chapter: Wireless Channels Section: Multipath Fading, Nakagami fading

Rice and Nakagami fading are two generalisations of the model for Rayleigh fading. In literature, often a Nakagami model is used for analytical simplicity in cases where Rician fading would be a more appropriate model. In contrast to common belief, the Nakagami model is not an appropriate approximation for Rician fading. It has an essentially different behaviour for deep fades, such that results on outage probabilities or error rates can differ by orders of magnitude.

Rician Models

To describe microcellular propagation, the Rayleigh model lacked the effect of a dominant line-of-sight component, and Rician model appeared to be more appropriate. For analytical and numerical evaluation of system performance, the expressions for Rician fading are less convenient, mainly due to the occurrence of a Bessel function in the Rician probability density function of received signal amplitude. Approximations by a Nakagami distribution, with simpler mathematical expressions have become popular.

Nakagami Models

The Nakagami fading model was initially proposed because it matched empirical results for short wave ionospheric propagation. In current wireless communication, the main role of the Nakagami model can be summarized as follows It describes the amplitude of received signal after maximum ratio diversity combining. The sum of multiple independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) Rayleigh-fading signals have a Nakagami distributed signal amplitude. This is particularly relevant to model interference from multiple sources. The Nakagami distribution matches some empirical data better than other models The Rician and the Nakagami model behave approximately equivalently near their mean value. This observation has been used in many recent papers to advocate the Nakagami model as an approximation for situations where a Rician model would be more appropriate.

Comparison

In the analysis of outage probabilities or error rates, it is the behavior of the model for signals in deep fades that has the determining effect. As the behavior of the probability density functions for amplitudes near zero differ significantly, approximations based on behavior near the mean are inappropriate. Rician and Nakagami models have a fundamentally different density for deep fades. Modeling a Rician fading signal by a Nakagami distribution of the amplitude leads to overly optimistic results, and discrepancies can be many orders of magnitude. That is, we challenge the accuracy of the last application of the model in the above list.

**Distribution of received power
**

A typical radio channel exhibits multipath reception, which causes fading. The mathematical evaluation of this paper addresses narrowband systems, in which the channel transfer function is sufficiently constant over the signal bandwidth. This corresponds to the assumption that Intersymbol Interference does not play a major role in the performance of the radio links. However, the models also play a role in wideband systems, in which each resolvable bin of reflected waves can be modeled to exhibit flat fading.

Rice

Rician fading assumes a dominant line-of-sight component and a large set of i.i.d. reflected waves. Reflected waves arrive with a random phase offset and the accumulation can be modeled as a phasor addition of signals with random amplitude and phase. This assumption leads to a Gaussian Inphase and Quadrature component, and a corresponding Rician amplitude. It has been shown that the instantaneous power pi received from the i-th user, with pi = ri2/2 and ri the signal amplitude, has the probability density function (pdf)

Nakagami

For Nakagami fading, the instantaneous power has the gamma pdf

where G(m) is the gamma function, with G(m + 1) = m! for integer shape factors m. The mean value is . In the special case that m = 1, Rayleigh fading is recovered, while for larger m the spread of the signal strength is less, and the pdf converges to a delta function for increasing m.

where the Rician K-factor is defined as the ratio of the power in the dominant component and the scattered (multipath) power, is the total local-mean power in the dominant and scattered waves, and I0(.) denotes the modified Bessel function of the first kind and order zero.

1 of 2

22/09/2010 1:47 PM

For Rician fading. As the relation between K and m was based merely on the first and second moments. For Nakagami fading. The Nakagami model is sometimes used to approximate the pdf of the power of a Rician fading signal. Method for Link Evaluation The nakagami approximation appeared less suitable to approximate a Rician channel.WirelessCommunication.nl/reference/chaptr03/ricenaka/ric. so an approximation the pdf of a Rician-fading wanted signal by a Nakagami pdf can be highly inaccurate: Results differ even in first-order behavior. the slope is steeper. Nevertheless other methods are available to make reasonable approximations in numerical evaluations of the outage probability in interference-limited situations.. The probability of deep fades (small pi) differs for these two models. the probability distribution at small powers is For Nakagami fading. while restricting the complexity of calculations.NL © 1999. similar to that of m-branch diversity reception of a Rayleigh fading signal. Outage probabilities however highly depend on the tail of the pdf for small power of the wanted signal. the slope of the outage probability versus C/I is the same as for Rayleigh fading. it is likely to be most accurate for values close to the mean. 2 of 2 22/09/2010 1:47 PM .Sample page http://www. www. we have Here denotes the probability that pi < pth .. with an exponentially distributed power. The results are strikingly different for m larger than one. viz.. Matching the first and second moments of the Rician and Nakagami pdfs gives which tends to m = K/2 for large K. In the special case that the dominant component is zero (K = 0) or m = 1. For Rician fading. Rayleigh fading occurs.wirelesscommunication.

- phn-1178_008v004 LINKPLANNERuploaded bylufrabave
- Link Budgetuploaded byshabeeh
- Walknet Ver.9.2uploaded byWilmer Huaman Pasapera
- MICROWAVE LINK TECHNOLOGY IN COMMUNICATIOuploaded byapi-26871643
- RF Path Analysisuploaded byJames R. Lawrence Sr.
- Frequency Plan _map INFO2uploaded bymalishaheen
- TCIL 17 Microwave Link Designuploaded bymahmoud_awad2012
- Transmission Planning MOD 4uploaded byMoin96
- Microwave Communication- Microwave Componentsuploaded byShuvodip Das
- Slide collection _MW Network Planning_New Issueuploaded byHaider Syed
- set2_transport & networkuploaded bySandeep Agrawal
- DMR 7000uploaded byHugh Tran
- UHF and microwave propagation [Read-Only]uploaded byRikesh Shrestha
- Duplexeruploaded bymanishbharti0786
- DXR NET NMT ION-NMS 2-2.5uploaded bybelunhugo
- Pathloss 4.0 Manualuploaded byréjean_tremblay
- 01-01 cBSS Radio Network Planninguploaded bynaquash151
- PTP Slidesuploaded byPankaj Mishra
- Planing a Microwave Radio Linkuploaded byMofasser Ahmed (Tamal)
- Transmission Planning MOD 3uploaded byMoin96
- Thesis Report Dec 09uploaded byMogul-e Azam
- DXR700TechnicalManualuploaded bybelunhugo
- Microwave Communication & Wave Guidesuploaded byMahmoud Doughan
- SDH Manualuploaded byenggsalujarishi1423
- Best Practices Guide Microwave Radio Systemsuploaded byWilmer Huaman Pasapera
- Plannnig Presentation 01 Oct 2008 v7uploaded byBill Williamson
- Transmission Planning MOD 1uploaded byMoin96
- Space Diversity Alignmentuploaded byala_a_silawi
- belajar-los.ppt-csspreview=trueuploaded bymeecheekoh
- Transmission Planning MOD 2uploaded byMoin96

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Loading