Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Grinding Technologies PDF
Grinding Technologies PDF
in cement grinding
quality parameters:
• workability
• water demand
• strength
• durability of concrete
Particle size distribution in RRSB-diagram
Horomill® (70 %)
VRM (60 %)
HPGR (50 %)
specific surface
Evolution of comminution technologies
Chronology:
Manual comminution
Hammer mechanism (ca. 1512)
Edge runner (ca. 1800)
Ball mill (ca. 1890)
Vertical roller mill (ca. 1930)
High pressure grinding rolls (ca. 1985)
Horomill®
Manual comminution (16th century)
F
Comminution mechanisms in different
grinding systems
v
impact
ball mill
F
F’
VRM
friction
F’
F
HPGR
F
F F
compression
F
Comminution mechanisms in the ball mill
v
impact
ball mill
F
F’
friction F
F’
F compression
F
Ball mill for dry grinding
Intermediate diaphragm
Advantages Disadvantages
• combined drying and grinding • for high moisture
external drying
• reliable - long service life
necessary
• wide PSD
• high energy demand
• high fineness
• no explicit stress area
• good for abrasive materials
Objectives
• Lower grinding energy demand than ball mills
• Comminution to a large extent by using the
compression
• Comminution in an explicit “compression zone”
Principle design of vertical roller mills
grits separator
rejects
gear box
Vertical roller mills for raw material grinding
• Energy consumption:
70 % of a ball mill for cement
50 % of a ball mill for slag
• Fineness:
max. 4 500 cm²/g for cement
max. 6 000 cm²/g for slag
• Moisture required for stabilising the
grinding bed – less influence on
cement quality
• Low wear costs
• Throughput up to 300 t/h
High pressure grinding rolls
Feed material
Compacted cakes
High pressure grinding rolls – main features
• Disadvantages:
- Drying capacity is limited to 4 % feed moisture
- Application only for non-abrasive raw materials, due to
wear of deglomerator
Application of high pressure grinding rolls for cement
grinding
VRM
Speed: Horomill®
Limited by centrifugation
of material
Bed thickness:
Medium
12°
HPGR
Speed:
Limited to 1 - 1,5 m/s 6° 18°
because of vibrations
Bed thickness: Speed:
RRSB slope -- 0.85 to 1.1 *) 0.85 to 1.1 1.0 to 1.1 1.05 to 1.1
specific energy
demand % 100 60 to 70 50 to 60 70
(closed circuit)
*)
open - closed circuit
Comparison of different systems for slag grinding
Single particle
clinker comminution
100
with highest
raw meal efficiency!
10 (target oriented
stress)
quartz
1 limestone
clinker
Higher efficiency
of comminution by
compression!
Compression
Impact
Pahl:
mass specific work WM [J/g] „Zerkleinerungstechnik“
Throughput-speed-behaviour of different mill types
Throughput [t/h]
Specific power demand [kWh/t]
• VRM: depends on grinding- •
P/M
M
table-diameter and number of Vertical roller mill
~2,00
rollers
operating
•
M
point
• HPGR: linear correlation only
• High pressure grinding rolls
for low circumferential speed of P/M
M
rolls
•
M
12
limit of free dosed
Power demand [kW]
Related grinding force [kN/mm]
material feeding
10
HPGR:
8 • Operation point
not adjustable
6
related grinding force • Independent
power demand adjustment of
4 Bond index
grinding force and
thickness of
2 grinding bed not
Example: possible
0 limestone
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
0...6 mm
Dimensionless feed throughput
Objectives for future developments
Independent
adjustment of
grinding force and
Comminution by thickness of grinding
compression bed
Other comminution technologies for cement grinding?
Ball mill
• High energy consumption
• Reliable - long service life of the wearing parts
• Limitation in feed moisture – at high feed moisture external
drying necessary
High pressure grinding rolls
• High energy savings
• Limitation in feed moisture – with external drying no
limitation in material moisture
• Maximum achievable fineness 4 000 cm²/g (clinker)
Summary (2)