Video Blogging Project Guidelines

1. The vlog shall be done or made by the group.

2. The time duration for the vlog should be 3 minutes (minimum) or 5 minutes (maximum)
3. The vlog should show or present one chosen advocacy of the group.
4. Offensive, vulgar or derogatory language is strictly prohibited.
5. The group must use English language in the vlog. Providing subtitles may also be utilized.
6. The group must submit their output on or before May 17, 2019 to the instructor.
7. The group must then upload the video blog on Facebook on May 17, 2019.
8. The score of the output will be divided into two: 70% will be coming from the rubric below and 30% will be coming from the views and relevant
or insightful comments gathered by the group on Facebook.
9. The corresponding points for the views and comments are as follows:
Highest number of views – 20 Highest number of comments - 10
2nd Highest number of views -18 2nd Highest number of comments - 8
3rd Highest number of views – 16 3rd Highest number of comments - 7
4th Highest number of views n- 14 4th Highest number of comments - 6
10. The views and comments that will be covered in the scoring are those from the day of the upload to May 21, 2019. Hence, the groups are given
five days to share their advocacy vlog to the public.
 ADVANCED
10 ADVANCED
(10)
PTS
The group has excellently
meet the required elements
Contribution for the video blog such as the
advocacy, the time duration
and the like.
Appropriate, engaging, very
creative, and respectful to
Content Quality others. Vlog is in-depth,
clearly presents the advocacy
and is persuasive.
Vlog has originality and flair,
Speech & Grammar emphasizing important
points; contains no errors in
grammar.
Video is well lit and frames
subject appropriately. Editing
Video Quality
enhances cohesiveness of
vlog.
Sound is clear and volume is
Sound Quality
appropriate.
The vlog is very effective in
Effectiveness
conveying its advocacy or
message.
The vlog excellently catches
the attention of the audience.
Audience Impact
The vlog leaves audience
realization and insights.
PROFICIENT
PROFICIENT
(8)
9 PTS
The group has adequately meet
the required elements for the
video blog.
The vlog is appropriate and
somehow engaging. Adequate
delivery of the message being
conveyed.
Speech is fluent. Vlog may
contain one or two errors in
grammar; errors do not impede
viewer's understanding.
Video is well lit and frames the
subject within the frame without
excessive movement.
Vlog is understandable and
volume is appropriate.
The vlog is effective but does
not clearly manifest its advocacy
The vlog adequately leaves the
audience insights. Adequate
number of audience is
interested.
TOTAL SCORE
DEVELOPING
7 PTS DEVELOPING
(6)
The group meets some of the
required elements of the vlog.
Some of the vlog’s content are
not relevant to the group’s
advocacy. Lacks persuasiveness.
Vlog may contain several errors
in grammar; errors may impede
viewer's understanding. Speech
lack fluency.
Video is fairly well lit within
minimal movement. Subject is
usually within the frame.
Vlog somewhat difficult to hear
or is occasionally too loud.
The vlog is somehow effective.
However, inconsistency in its
message can be seen.
The vlog catches the interest of
few people.
BEGINNING
5 PTS BEGINNING
SCORE
(5)
The group’s vlog does not
meet the required
elements at all.
Vlog is not engaging,
irrelevant, or difficult to
identify the message
conveyed.
Vlog may contain
significant errors in
grammar; errors may
cause confusion for the
viewer. Speech is choppy
without complete
sentences or clear topic.
Camera may be jerky,
making it difficult to view,
poorly lit, or subject not
clearly in video.
Vlog is difficult to hear or
is too loud.
The vlog is not effective at
all and is inconsistent at
all times.
The vlog is not interesting
and is disturbing to the
audience.