General

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
DIVISION OF ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE
Sirawai District
SIRAWAI CENTRAL SCHOOL

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: AMYL L. MONTEMOR Name of Rater: NECITAS T. TRASMONTE
Position: Teacher I Position: ESHT-I
Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019 Date of Review:
Division: Zamboanga del Norte

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL Rating
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
1. Applied June 2018 7.5% Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge of Showed No Quality 3 3 3 3.00 0.23
knowledge of to April of content and its ofcontent and its content and its knowledge of acceptable
content within 2019 integration within and integration within and integration within and content and its evidence
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

across subject areas across subject areas across subject areas integration was shown
and across as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 within and
curriculum with a with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 across subject
Basic Education Services

teaching areas. rating of 7 areas as shown

in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of No Efficiency
lessons using MOV 1 using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and the given MOV acceptable
and supported by supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of evidence
any 1 of the other of the other given the other given MOV was shown
given MOV MOV

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL Rating
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
2. Used a range June 2018 7.5% Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No Quality 4 3 3 3.50 0.26
of teaching to April different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
strategies that 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence was
promote reading, promote reading, promotereading, promote reading, shown
enhance learner writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
achievement in numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
literacy and shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
numeracy skills. a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Efficiency

learnercentered centered lessons as learnercentered learner-centered acceptable
lessons as evidently evidently shown in lessons as evidently lesson as evidently evidence was
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in any of the shown
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of given MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV the other MOV given
Basic Education Services

given given

Timeliness
3. Applied a June 2018 7.5% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No Quality 3 3 3.00 0.23
range of teaching to April teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies acceptable
strategies 2019 that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical evidence was
and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative shown
todevelop critical and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS as thinking and/or
and creative as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with other HOTS
thinking, as well with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 a rating of 5 asshown in MOV 1
as other higher with a rating of 4
order thinking
skills.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Efficiency
lessons as evidenced as evidenced by lessons as lesson as acceptable
by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidenced by evidenced by evidence
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 of the was shown
of the other given of the other given supported by given MOV
MOV MOV any 1 of the
other given
MOV

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL Rating
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
4. Managed June 2018 7.5% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No Quality 3 4 3.50 0.26
classroom to April management management management management acceptable
structure to 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that engage strategies that evidence was
engage learners in engage learners in learners in activities/ engage learners in shown
engage learners, activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as tasks as shown in activities/ tasks as
individually or in shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with MOV 1 with a rating of shown in MOV 1
groups, in a rating of 7 a rating of 6 5 with a rating of 4
meaningful
exploration,
2. Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners

discovery and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No Efficiency
hands-on lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of acceptable
MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the and any 1 of the other the acceptable evidence was
activities within a the other acceptable other acceptable acceptable MOV MOV shown
range of physical MOV MOV
learning
Basic Education Services

environments.
Timeliness

5. Managed June 2018 7.5% Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No Quality 4 4 4.00 0.30
learner behavior to April management management management management acceptable
constructively by 2019 strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of evidence
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that learner behavior was shown
promote positive promote positive promote positive and that promote
and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent non-violent discipline positive and non-
discipline to discipline as shown discipline as shown as shown in MOV violent discipline
ensure learning in MOV submitted in MOV submitted submitted with a as shown in MOV
focused with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 rating of 5 submitted with a
environments. rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 of Submitted any 1 of No Efficiency
of the given of the given the given strategies as the given strategies acceptable
strategies as strategies as observed in 2 lessons as observed in only evidence
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 1 lesson was shown
lessons lessons

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL Rating
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
2. Learning Environment and Diversity of 6. Used June 2018 7.5% Quality Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied No Quality 3 3 3.00 0.23
differentiated, to April teaching strategies to teaching strategies teaching strategies to differentiated acceptable
developmentally 2019 address learner to address learner address learner teaching strategies evidence was
diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in to address learner shown
appropriate MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of diversity as shown
learning of 7 of 6 5 in MOV 1 with a
experiences to rating of 4
address learners’
gender, needs, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No Efficiency
Learners

strengths, differentiated differentiated differentiated teaching differentiated acceptable

interests and teaching strategies in teaching strategies in strategies in 2 lessons teaching strategy in evidence
at least 2 lessons as at least 2 lessons as as evidenced by MOV only strategies as was shown
experiences.
evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 1 and supported by observed in only 1
and supported by and supported by any 1 of the other lesson
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptableMOV
Basic Education Services

acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
7. Planned, June 2018 7.5% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No Quality 4 4 4.00 0.30
managed and to April implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced shown
developmentally and learning process and learning process and learning process teaching and
3. Curriculum and Planning

sequenced as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 learning process as

teaching and with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1
learning with a rating of 4
processes to meet
curriculum Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Efficiency
requirements and developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced evidence
varied teaching and learning process and learning process and learning process teaching and was shown
contexts. as evidently shown in as evidently shown as evidently shown in learning process as
MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported evidently shown in
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 by any 1 of the other any 1 of the given
of the other given of the other given given MOV MOV
MOV MOV

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL Rating
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
2. Learning Environment and Diversity 8. Participated in June 2018 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No Quality 3 3 3.00 0.23
collegial to April participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ acceptable
discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meetings meeting to discuss evidence
meetings to discuss meetings to discuss to discuss teacher/learner was shown
use teacher and teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
learner feedback feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as
to enrich teaching instruction as instruction as shown instruction as shown shown in the MOV
of Learners

practice. shown in the in the MOV in the MOV submitted submitted

MOV submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No Efficiency

least 4 LACs/ FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meetings LAC/FGD/ meeting acceptable
meetings as meetings as as evidently shown in as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in evidently shown in any 1 of the given in any 1 of the shown
Basic Education Services

any 1 of the given any 1 of the given MOV given MOV

MOV MOV

Timeliness
9. Selected, June 2018 7.5% Quality Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and No Quality 4 4 4.00 0.30
developed, to April varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and used varied acceptable
organized and 2019 learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, teaching and evidence
including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to learning resources, was shown
used appropriate address learning address learning address learning including ICT, to
teaching and goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in address learning
3. Curriculum and Planning

learning MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of goals as shown in
resources, of 7 of 6 5 MOV 1 with a rating
including ICT, to of 4
address learning
goals.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No Efficiency
varied teaching and teaching and teaching and learning teaching and acceptable
learning resources, learning resources, resources, including learning resource, evidence was
including ICT, as including ICT, as ICT, as evidently including ICT, as shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 and evidentl shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of any of the
supported by any 1 supported the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
of the acceptable by any 1 of the
MOV acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL Rating
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
10. Designed, June 2018 7.5% Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, Designed, No Quality 4 4 4.00 0.30
selected, to April organized and used organized and used selected, selected, acceptable
organized and 2019 diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative organized and organized and evidence
and summative and summative used diagnostic, used diagnostic, was shown
used diagnostic, assessment assessment formative and formative and
formative and strategies consistent strategies consistent summative summative
summative with curriculum with curriculum assessment assessment
assessment Quality requirements as requirements as strategies strategies
strategies shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV consistent with consistent with
consistent with with a rating of 7 1 with a rating curriculum curriculum
of 6 requirements as requirements as
curriculum shown in MOV shown in MOV 1
requirements. 1 with a rating with a rating of 4
of 5
4. Assessment and Reporting
Basic Education Services

Submitted at
least 4 varied
Submitted 3
varied
Submitted 2
varied
Submitted 1 No Efficiency
assessment assessment assessment assessment tool acceptable
tools as tools as tools as as evidently evidence
Efficiency evidently shown
in any 1 of the
evidently shown
in any 1 of the
evidently shown
in any 1 of the shown in any of was shown
acceptable acceptable acceptable the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
11. Monitored June 2018 7.5% Consistently monitored and
evaluated learner progress
Frequently monitored and
evaluated learner progress
Occasionally monitored and
evaluated learner progress and
Rarely monitored and
evaluated learner progress
No
acceptable Quality 3 3 3 3.00 0.23
and evaluated to April and achievement using learner and achievement using achievement using learner and achievement using evidence
attainment data as shown in learner attainment data as attainment data as shown in the learner attainment data as was shown
learner progress 2019 the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted MOV submitted shown in the MOV
Quality
and achievement submitted

using learner
attainment data.
Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No Efficiency
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable acceptable
Efficiency least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV shown

Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No Timeliness

were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed acceptable
Timeliness across 4 across 3 across 2 in only 1 quarter evidence
quarters quarters quarters was shown
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL Rating
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
12. June 2018 7.5% Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No Quality 3 3 3 3.00 0.23
Communicated to April showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and acceptable
promptly and 2019 and clear and clear and clear clear evidence
clearly the communication of communication of communication of communication was shown
learners’ needs, the learners’ the learners’ the learners’ of the learners’
progress and needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
achievement to and achievement and achievement and achievement and
key stakeholders, to key to key to key achievement to
including parents/ stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, key
guardians. Quality including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ stakeholders,
guardians as guardians as guardians as including
shown in the shown in the shown in the parents/
4. Assessment and Reporting

MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted guardians as

Basic Education Services

shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No Efficiency

combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 of the given acceptable
least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV evidence
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown
Efficiency

Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No Timeliness

were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed acceptable
across 4 across 3 across 2 in only 1 quarter evidence
quarters quarters quarters was shown
Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL Rating
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA
QET
RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
13. Performed June 2018 10% Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No Quality 5 5 5.00 0.50
various related to April performed various performed various performed various various related acceptable
works/activities 2019 related work/activities related related work/activities work/activities that evidence
that contribute to the work/activities that that contribute to the contribute to the was shown
that contribute to teaching learning contribute to the teaching learning teaching learning
the teaching- Quality process as shown in teaching learning process as shown in process as shown
5. Plus Factor

learning the MOV submitted process as shown in the MOV submitted in the MOV
process. the MOV submitted submitted

Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No Efficiency

least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the acceptable
Efficiency kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable evidence
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown
MOV

Timeliness

3.58
OVERALL RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENT

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES

Range Adjectival Rating
4.500 - 5.0 Outstanding
3.500 - 4.4 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.4 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.4 Unsatisfactory
below 1.49 Poor

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

NECITAS T. TRASMONTE CLAUDINE JOY M. QUILATON JUANITO D. CABAÑOG JR

ESHT-I Teacher I ESHT-I
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
DIVISION OF ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE
Sirawai District
DACON LEARNING CENTER

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Employee: CHEYLUZ P. NARZABAL Name of Rater: JUANITO D. CABAÑOG JR
Position: Teacher I Position: ESHT-I
Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019 Date of Review:
Division: Zamboanga del Norte

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
1. Applied June 2018 7.5% Quality
knowledge of to April
content within 2019
and across
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

curriculum
teaching areas.
Basic Education Services

Efficiency
 1. Conte
Ba
Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
2. Used a range June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
of teaching to April
strategies that 2019
enhance learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy
skills.
Efficiency Efficiency
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Basic Education Services

Timeliness
3. Applied a June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
range of to April
teaching 2019
strategies
todevelop
critical and
creative
thinking, as
well as other
higher order
thinking skills.
 critical and

1. Cont
B
creative
thinking, as
well as other
higher order Efficiency Efficiency
thinking skills.

Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
to April
4. Managed 2019
classroom
structure to
engage learners,
individually or
in groups, in
earning Environment and Diversity of Learners

meaningful
exploration, Efficiency Efficiency
discovery and
hands-on
activities within
Basic Education Services

a range of
physical
learning
environments.
Timeliness
Basic Education Se

2. Learning Environment and Di

June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
to April
2019
5. Managed
learner behavior
constructively
by applying
positive and
non-violent
discipline to Efficiency Efficiency
ensure learning
focusedenviron
ments.

Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Ratee Rater Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
6. Used June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
2. Learning Environment and Diversity of

differentiated, to April
developmentall 2019
y appropriate
learning
experiences to
address
learners’ Efficiency Efficiency
Learners

gender, needs,
strengths,
interests and
experiences.
cation Services

Timeliness
Basic Education Servi
7. Planned, June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
managed and to April
implemented 2019
developmentall
3. Curriculum and Planning
y sequenced
teaching and
learning
processes to
meet Efficiency Efficiency
curriculum
requirements
and varied
teaching
contexts.

Timeliness
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
8. Participated June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
2. Learning Environment and Diversity

in collegial to April
discussions that 2019
use teacher and
learner
feedback to
of Learners

enrich teaching
practice.

Efficiency Efficiency
ion Services

Timeliness
Basic Education Services
9. Selected, June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
developed, to April
organized and 2019
used
appropriate
3. Curriculum and Planning

teaching and
learning
resources,
including ICT,
to address Efficiency Efficiency
learning goals.

Timeliness
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
10. Designed, June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
selected, to April
organized and 2019
used diagnostic,
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies Efficiency Efficiency
consistent with
curriculum
requirements.
Reporting
Services
 4. Assessment and Reporting
Basic Education Services
Timeliness

11. Monitored June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality

and evaluated to April
learner progress 2019
and
achievement
using learner
attainment data.

Efficiency Efficiency

Timeliness Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
 12. June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
Communicated to April
promptly and 2019
clearly the
learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to
key
stakeholders,
including
parents/
guardians.
4. Assessment and Reporting
Basic Education Services

Efficiency Efficiency

Timeliness Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
 Weight PERFORMANCE
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET Ratee Rater Mid-Year Review Result

Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

13. Performed June 2018 10% Quality Quality
various related to April
works/activities 2019
that contribute
to the teaching-
5. Plus Factor

learning
process.

Efficiency Efficiency

Timeliness

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

JUANITO D. CABAÑOG JR CHEYLUZ P. NARZABAL JUANITO D. CABAÑOG JR

ESHT-I Teacher I ESHT-I
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 3.550 VS

RATEE -RATER AGREEMENT

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of this appraisal and the
performance rating with the consent of approving DepEd Officials

Name of
Name of Name of Approving
Employee: EMILY L. PEREZ Superior: JULIOUS P. BOLAY-OG Authority: LOURMA I. POCULAN
Signature: Signature: Signature:
Date: 5/4/2019 Date: 5/4/2019 Date: 5/4/2019
 PART II: COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development.
2. Understands personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and takes into
account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to achieve
goals.
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
Professionalism and Ethics
1. Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and Ethical
Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713).
2. Practice ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of
his/her actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and
punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.
5. Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve
system and help others improve their effectiveness.
Results Focus
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work in
terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required.
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency.
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance.
Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently, or
improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
Teamwork
1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment across
the organization.
3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4 4
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
accomplish organization goals and objectives.
Service Orientation
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues
and concerns.
4 4
3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepEd
strategies and directions.
5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures that will
further enhance service delivery.
Innovation
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new ideas,
processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving
personal productivity to create higher value and results.
3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions.
4 4
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit
and organization.
5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness and
the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
OVERALL COMPETENCY RATING 4.000

Strengths
A. Functional Competencies
kra 4, Objective 10, designed,
selected, organized and used
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment strategies
consistent with curriculum
requirements.
B. Core Behavioral Competencies
Professionalism and Ethics
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
DIVISION OF ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE
Sirawai District
BITUGAN ELEMNTARY SCHOOL
PART IV : DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Action Plan
Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)
Attend seminars/workshop and LAC
Objective 1, KRA 4 Monitored
Sessions in designing and selecting,
and evaluated learner progress and
organizing and using diagnostic tests, Year - round Local Funds
achievement using learner attainment
formative, summative assessment
data.
startegies.
Innovation - Examine the root cause
of problems and suggest effective
solutions. Foster new ideas, Coaching Regular Coaching Local Funds
processes, and suggest better ways to
do things.
Ratee Rater: Approving Authority:
ROLLY N. MARFIL JULIOUS P. BOLAY-OG LOURMA I. POCULAN, EdD
Teacher I HT-1 ASDS
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
DIVISION OF ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE
Sirawai District
Sirawai Central School

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACH

CRITICAL INCIDENCE
DATE OUTPUT
DESCRIPTION
ublic of the Philippines
artment of Education
IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
F ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE
Sirawai District
wai Central School

NITORING AND COACHING FORM

IMPACT ON JOB/
SIGNATURE (Rater / Ratee)
ACTION PLAN
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
Name of Employee: AMYL L. MONTEMOR Name of Rater:
Position: Teacher I Position:
Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019 Date of Review:
Division: ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE

Objectives Means of Verification Description of the MOV Presented

 NECITAS T. TRASMONTE
TEACHER - 1

Description of the MOV Presented Annotations

 PORTFOLIO RATING
Name of Employee: CLAUDINE JOY M. QUILATON Name of Rater: JUANITO D. CABAÑOG JR.
Position: Teacher I Position: ESHT-I
Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019 Date of Review:
Division: ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE

Numerical Ratings
KRA Weight per KRA Weight per Score
Objectives Objective Q E T Ave.

Objective 1 7.50% 3 3 3.000 0.225

1 22.50%
Objective 2 7.50% 4 3 3.500 0.263

Objective 3 7.50% 3 3 3.000 0.225

Objective 4 7.50% 3 4 3.500 0.263

2 22.50%
Objective 5 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300

Objective 6 7.50% 3 3 3.000 0.225

Objective 7 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300

3 22.50%
Objective 8 7.50% 3 3 3.000 0.225

Objective 9 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300

Objective 10 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300

4 22.50%
Objective 11 7.50% 3 3 3 3.000 0.225

Objective 12 7.50% 3 3 3 3.000 0.225

5 10.00%
Objective 13 10.00% 5 5 5.000 0.500

Final Rating 3.575

Adjectival Rating Very Satifactory