Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Document ID GU-706
Security Unrestricted
Version 1.0
Keywords: This document is the property of Petroleum Development Oman, LLC. Neither the whole nor any part of this
document may be disclosed to others or reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means
(electronic, mechanical, reprographic recording or otherwise) without prior written consent of the owner.
1.0 SCOPE
This document defines the requirements of static and dynamic stress analysis for piping
connected to various types of processing equipment for the facilities designed according to
ASME B31.3 Process piping code.
This document also defines the requirements of documentation of the piping stress analysis.
All piping systems shall be evaluated and analysed for adequate flexibility in accordance with
this document, applicable COMPANY specifications, Shell DEP, International Codes and
Standards referenced herein, and with stress analysis criteria.
This document provides basic guideline for performing the pipe stress analysis.
ASME B16.5 - Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings NPS 1/2 through NPS 24
Metric/Inch Standard
API 661/ISO 13706 - Air-Cooled Heat Exchanger for General Refinery Service
Also clause 3.7.2 and 3.7.3 of DEP 80.45.10.10 shall be considered for the liquid content in
the flare lines for stress analysis.
Pipe Stress Engineer shall be responsible to identify the critical lines on the project line-list
and prepare a critical line list log.
The approved program for the purpose of computer analysis is “CAESAR II” latest version.
All computer runs shall include temperature, pressure, weight and insulation if any as a
minimum. Guides/Stops shall normally be modelled with no gaps and friction need not be
considered as it is insignificant. Any specific gaps provided on support must be noted on the
stress sketches and the isometrics. Friction shall be included in the analysis for vertical
restraint.
Caesar default unit file (mm.fil) shall be used for the analysis or for deriving project specific
unit file.
The Bourdon effect shall be considered only in the translation and shall be considered for
900 # & above.
All stress critical lines shall be analysed using the project approved software.
The documentation shall be prepared and submitted in the form of stress reports.
Lines which are not categorised as stress critical shall be verified by use of engineering
experience or approximate method, However documentation is not required for these lines
as a part of detailed engineering activity.
Project line list shall be the basis for all the stress calculation.
8.3.2 Pressure
The analysis shall be carried out with the maximum design pressure, operating pressure and
hydro test pressure.
Also the steam out pressure shall be considered in the stress analysis if applicable for that
stress systems.
8.3.3 Temperature
The analysis shall be carried out with the maximum design temperature, minimum process
design temperature and the operating temperature.
In addition to the above, the steam out temperature shall be considered in the stress analysis
if applicable.
The maximum design temperature considered for the stress analysis for un-insulated
aboveground pipes shall not be less that the black bulb temperature (82 deg C) applicable for
the project.
Expansion stress range shall be evaluated for the maximum temperature differential of the
following applicable criteria and also as referred by ASME 31.3, Clause 302.3.5.
Branch connection shall be modelled as per branch table of the applicable piping class.
Stress intensification factors (SIF) indices for 45 degree connection shall be considered
carefully and stated in all the calculations.
In the absence of any SIF Calculation, as a guide line SIF value for 45 degree can be
considered as 2.0 times the SIF values of 90 degree branch.
Reaction forces shall be calculated for both open and closed relief system in line with API RP
520 Part II. A dynamic loading factor (DLF) of 2 shall be considered for all reaction forces.
In mixed flow where slugging is expected in a piping system, slug loads shall be calculated
and applied in both axes axial (Fx) & orthogonal (Fy) directions at all changes of direction.
However for Tees the resultant slug load to be applied only at the flowing directions
Slug force shall be calculated based on formula given below. The slug forces will be acting
on the different elbows at different time and the input in the software shall consider the same.
Where,
Slug force need not to be applied at the elbow in the vertical down comer.
Wind loading shall be considered in all four directions of the horizontal plane +X, -X,+Z & -Z
and not acting simultaneously. For calculating wind load on pipe, the shape factor shall be
taken as 0.7.
Wind force shall be considered for the following piping:
Pipe outside diameter 200 mm (including insulation thickness) and larger for elevation 10 m
and above from the finished ground level.Wind velocity/wind pressure shall be as per civil
design basis or metrological data.
Seismic loads need not be considered unless otherwise specified as Oman is considered to
be under safe Zone.
8.11 Surge
Surge analysis requirement shall be as per DEP 31.38.01.11-Gen clause no 2.3.4. For all the
above ground GRP pipes handling liquids, surge loads to be calculated and applied.
Settlement expected post hydro test shall be considered for all storage tanks or vessels
whose diameter exceeds 2440 mm. The settlement values shall be estimated by civil
engineer.
Tank/vessel settlement shall be considered as sustained vector in stress calculation.
Vessel skirt growth is to be considered and modelled in the stress model; the vessel skirt
growth can be calculated with the following formula
Where
Ts - Average skirt temperature in degree Fahrenheit
Tv - Vessel temperature in degree Fahrenheit
Tamb - Ambient temperature in degree Fahrenheit
F - skirt factor (to be calculated from the below table)
K*h/√t 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
F 1 0.8 0.54 0.38 0.28 0.22 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.1
K*h/√t 24 26 28 30 32 34
F 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
Where,
K - Insulation factor
= 1 for fully insulated line
= 1.7 for fire brick insulation (Applicable for skirt and to check for
saddles)
= 2.7 for un insulated (applicable for trunions)
h - height of the skirt
t - thickness of the skirt.
When the piping system moves up or down due to thermal expansion, conventional rigid
support is not feasible, as it may not take load at all or it may act as a pivot. Under such
condition, it is recommended to use flexible support such as spring hangers. These spring
hangers sustain the primary load by their resistance against compression while allowing for
free thermal expansion.
Spring hangers are of two types:
For Pedestal support (“F” type spring), the horizontal displacement of the pipe is limited to ± 6
mm only. However the horizontal displacement can be permitted up to ± 15 mm if sliding
assembly is considered on the load flange. The limitation on horizontal displacement of pipe is
to avoid overturning of load column of spring due to friction load.
For Hanging supports (Spring Hanger), the angle of deflection due to horizontal displacement
of pipe shall be limited to ± 4 deg.
Variable spring hangers are recommended where the load variation is not exceeding the
values given below for various systems:-
Constant effort hangers provide constant supporting force in both cold and operating
conditions. When piping stresses and reactions are known to be close to allowable, most
preferred type of flexible support is constant support hanger. For critical, high temperature
piping, at hanger location where the vertical movement of piping is high or the load variation is
above the limiting value indicated in clause 8.13.1, then constant effort hangers are
recommended.
Generally, friction shall be considered at all vertical supports, particularly local to sensitive
equipment nozzles and long pipe runs. Application of Teflon or PTFE to supports should be
minimized due to prevailing environmental conditions at oman (Sand storms in desert
condition)
Following Static friction coefficient shall be used in the calculations as per Shell DEP
31.38.01.11-Gen clause 3.5.1.3.3:
Displacement at the tie-in points or terminal points shall be taken as per data provided. In the
absence of such data, piping model shall be extended up to the first fixed point on the tie-
in/terminal point. In the absence of fixed point the model shall be extended to minimum two
change of directions to get the effect of thermal displacement.
Boundary condition shall be considered up to guide support and terminated with appropriate
rotational restraint.
In case tie-in with the buried pipe line, the model shall be extended till the first virtual anchor.
Analysis of buried piping shall be carried out up to virtual anchor for metallic pipe. In case of
non metallic piping entire buried portion to be included in the model.
For buried pipeline analysis shall be as per applicable ASME pipeline codes ASME
B31.4/ASME B31.8/ISO 14692(GRE Piping).
Page 15 Pipe stress analysis design basis Guideline Printed 26/06/13
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Jun-10
Expansion joints/Expansion bellows and other such mechanical devices such as sway
braces, snubber, strut etc., shall not be used without company approval.
Pipe data-Pro database shall be used for rigid weight when actual weight or weight in
CAESAR software library is not available. Bolts weight shall be considered for the pipe
flanges as per the following:-
However, bolt weight shall be considered for all sizes at the equipment nozzles.
Actuated Valve weight can be considered as 1.5 times the manual valve.
All the inactive supports in the maximum temperature design cases shall be removed to
verify with the Code Compliance. Appendix – P of B31.3 shall be used in stress calculation to
ensure the system is safe in spite of support lift-off.
This can be achieved by activating “Implement B31.3 Appendix P as “True” under Code-
Specific setting under “SIF AND STRESSES” in Caesar - II configuration settings and it
should be deactivated once the system is checked for support lift-off.
Insulation density shall be as per DEP 30.46.00.31 gen. – Thermal insulation, equivalent
densities shall be calculated taking into account the cladding weight.
The minimum requirements for pipe stress analysis result shall be in compliance with the
applicable design code i.e. ASME B31.3/ISO 14692.
Pipe sag due to weight of piping and contents should be kept minimum and shall not exceed
15 mm in sustained and hydro test. Where deflection exceeds this amount, pipe supports
shall be added or pipe support span to be reviewed. Temporary supports may only be added
to limit such deflection during hydro test only.
Allowable pipe sag for GRP shall be 12.5 mm as per ISO 14692.
Where free draining is required the pipe sag shall be limited to 3 mm
Flange leakage, calculation shall be carried out based on Equivalent Pressure Method as per
ASME Sec III Div.1, NC-3658.1 or based on bending moment method as per ASME Sec III
Div.1, NC-3658.2 and NC- 3658.3.
As a minimum the flange leakage calculation shall be performed for the following:-
For Sour service - Size 12” and above for all pressure rating
For Sweet Service - Size 12” and above and pressure rating #1500 and
above.
For 10,000 PSI rating - Size 4” and above.
For 10,000 PSI rating, the flange leakage calculation the force and moments shall be within
the limits mentioned in API 6A & 6F.
Two phase lines shall be supported properly with hold downs,guides and axial stop to
avoid/minimize any possibility of vibration, which may occur during operation.
Modal analysis shall be performed for all the mixed flow systems. The natural frequency of
those lines shall be in excess of 4 Hz.
The loads on the equipment shall be limited within the allowable for various equipments listed
below. The nozzle loads shall be qualified for various operating conditions that occur under
various credible scenarios. Stress analysis temperature (at which nozzle load to be checked)
should be checked with process group where large difference occur (> 30 deg C) between
operating and design temperature condition within the line list.
In case of multiple line from equipments connected to a common header, all possible
operating combination shall be considered. Where nozzle load exceeds stated allowable
loads, loads are to be transferred to equipment group in order to communicate this
requirement to the equipment vendor(s).
In case compressor various possible operating scenario including recycle case are to be
considered.
Pressure vessel nozzle loads shall be qualified based on DEP 31.22.20.31, Annex VIII
Where required, nozzle flexibility may be included in the calculation. All calculation shall be
accordance with WRC 537/WRC297
For the nozzle sizes above 24” & Pressure class rating #2500 and above, the calculated loads
shall be verified with static equipment engineer and to be included in the equipment
specification.
The allowable forces and moments on the Air cooled heat exchanger shall be qualified as per
clause 4.1.9 of SP-2070.
The allowable forces and moments on the plate type heat exchanger shall be qualified as per
clause 7.7.10 of Shell DEP 31.21.01.32 for severe Service.
The allowable forces and moments on the fired heater shall be qualified as per clause 9.2 of
API 560/ISO 13705.
The piping nozzle load on the flare stack shall be as per SP 2069.
Loads acting on API centrifugal pump suction and discharge nozzles shall be limited to the
nozzle loadings permitted by the API 610 with factor for Table-5 allowable as 2 for Non-API
pumps nozzle loading shall be limited to allowable values provided by manufacturer.
Loads acting on API rotary pump suction and discharge nozzles shall be limited to the nozzle
loadings permitted by two (2) times the allowable as per clause 6.2 of API 676. For Non-API
pumps nozzle loading shall be limited to allowable values provided by manufacturer.
Loads acting on API reciprocating pump suction and discharge nozzles shall be limited to two
(2) times the nozzle loadings permitted as per clause 6.6 of API 674. For Non-API pumps
nozzle loading shall be limited to allowable values provided by manufacturer.
Small vertical in-line Pumps (15 kW & less) shall be supported immediately adjacent to
suction and discharge flanges using conventional pipe supports. Piping forces shall be
determined considering pump as a rigid but as an un-anchored system of the piping system.
Large vertical pumps furnished with casing foot-mount shall be supported on suitable
foundations
Loads shall be in accordance with two (2) times API 610 as a minimum.
Allowable nozzle loads for metering pumps (designed to API Small vertical in-line Pumps (15
kW & less) shall be supported immediately adjacent to suction and discharge flanges using
conventional pipe supports. Piping forces shall be agreed with the vendor.
As guide line centrifugal compressor nozzle loads shall be three (3) times API 617 (Annex 2E)
or corresponding equivalent of NEMA SM 23 (Clause 8.4.6).
Nozzle load shall be evaluated considering friction on pipe support as well as without friction
on pipe support.
Whenever the calculated loads on the nozzle are above the allowable loads, the same shall
be verified with rotating equipment engineer and to be included in the equipment specification.
The allowable nozzle loads shall be discussed and agreed with rotating equipment engineer
during the start of the project and to be included in the equipment specification.
As a guideline loads indicated in DEP 31.22.20.31, Annex VIII can be considered for the
allowable nozzle load.
In order to prevent the vibration from the pressure pulsation, piping system shall be supported
th
ensuring that its frequency is higher than the critical frequency (normally 4 natural frequency
of the compressor) which needs to be agreed with the vendor.
Compressor vendor shall carry out analogue study for compressor suction and discharge
piping between compressor, suction/discharge knock out drums and air cooler on the piping
layout which meets the requirement of static stress analysis.
If there are changes in piping configuration as an outcome of analogue study, stress analysis
is to be performed again to meet the requirement of nozzle loads. It shall be ensured that the
system meets both the requirement i.e static analysis and analogue study
Pipe rack, pipe supports and all related structures shall be designed to cater for analogue
study outcomes in all aspects.
The above work shall be completed before the compressor vendor carries out an Acoustic
simulations/mechanical response study in accordance woith API 618 para 3.9.
Three (3) times the nozzle allowable as per Annex C of API 619 or corresponding equivalent
of NEMA SM 23(Clause 8.4.6)
For the calculated nozzle loads which exceed the above shall be discussed and agreed with
rotating equipment engineer during the start of the project and to be included in the equipment
specification.
Allowable nozzle loads using nozzle flexibility shall comply with API 650, Appendix-P. As a
guideline, the forces and moments on the tank nozzle to be limited to 20 D and 40 D
respectively, where “D” is the diameter of the nozzle in mm, force in “Newton” and Moments in
“Newton-meter”.
Packaged equipment such as Manifold, MSV, Metering skid etc., to be analysed as an integral
part of connected system. Unless agreed otherwise, the piping to packaged equipment shall
be anchored on the vendor piping as close as to the vendor interface as practical.
Allowable loads applied to equipment other than that covered in clause 9.5.1 to 9.5.13 above
shall be agreed with Mechanical discipline lead. It is recommended that these discussions
take place at the early stages of the project.
Page 20 Pipe stress analysis design basis Guideline Printed 26/06/13
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Jun-10
Anchor-free analysis/Nozzle disconnected case (WNC Case) shall be performed for athe
piping connected to the rotating equipments.
10.0 VIBRATION
The effects of vibration in piping systems shall be investigated where appropriate. Where
necessary, additional stops, guides and hold-downs shall be added in order to reduce
vibration effects.
In addition to the above, during detail engineering a detailed screening check needs to be
done for all type of vibration as stipulated in Appendix-17 of DEP 31.38.01.11 gen.
Surge analysis
Seismic analysis.
Pulsating flow
Trunnion calculation
Effect of Vibration
Hydro-Test case
Operating load case
Sustained load case
Expansion load case
Occasional load case
14.0 DOCUMENTATION
The pipe stress analysis report shall contain the following as a minimum:-
The contents of the above report shall be in line with the Shell DEP 31.38.01.11-Gen clause
No.3.5.1.7
16.0 CHECKLIST
The Checklist shall be completed by pipe stress engineer and checking engineer.
Format of checklist is attached as Appendix-2
T2 Operating Temperature
P1 Design pressure
H Hanger loads
W Weight
NOTE: - In case D1 is used for the tank settlement, D1 shall be treated as sustained vector.
STRESS
SI NO LOAD CASE CONDITIONS
TYPE
STRESS
SI NO LOAD CASE CONDITIONS
TYPE
STRESS
SI NO LOAD CASE CONDITIONS
TYPE
SYS
PROJECT NAME XXXXXX
NO:
PROJECT NUMBER XXXXXXXX DATE
PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CHECKLIST-INPUT
REMARKS/
SI.N Origin
DESCRIPTION Checker COMMENT
O ator
S
I GENERAL
Coordinate axis followed for input modeling -X = North, +Y = Up,
1
-Z = East.
Global coordinates (corresponding to piping stress isometric coordinates)
2
entered at first pipe element node.
II PSI FILE INTERFACING
Change the orientation as per the plant north direction (Rotate 90˚ about
1
vertical axis).
2 Model the equipment with nozzle connection.
3 Update the unit file as per the project requirement.
4 Update the design parameters.
5 Update special execution parameters.
6 Update bend angle and bend Radius.
Delete stiffness values and make it blank, this will allow giving the default
7
value 1 x 10¹².
8 Material selection as per the piping class.
9 Add rigid weight for flanges, valves, Spectacle blind, Spacer.
III INPUT MODELLING
A PIPING
Piping Configuration defined correctly and Coordinates are matching as
1
provided in Isometric drawing.
2 Pipe data (OD, Thickness, Material, and Corrosion allowance.) verified.
3 Insulation (Thickness, Density) verified.
Process parameters (Operating temperature, Design temperature, Design
4
pressure, Test pressure, Fluid density) defined correctly.
5 Is design temp > 82 deg C for un insulated A/G pipe
6 Is design temp > 65 deg C for U/G pipe
7 Allowable stress selected on the first pipe element for each pipe material.
8 Piping Code B31.3 - correctly defined.
9 Bourdon effect consideration (Translation only).
10 Tank Settlement consideration.
11 Liberal Stress Allowable Off.
SYS
PROJECT NAME XXXXXX
NO:
PROJECT NUMBER XXXXXXXX DATE
PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CHECKLIST-INPUT
REMARKS/
SI.N Origin
DESCRIPTION Checker COMMENT
O ator
S
12 Activate Appendix P in Caesar-II Configuration file
For Pipe Diameter including Insulation > 200 mm, and > 10 m above,
13 Wind shape factor of 0.7, applied on the first pipe element. No wind shape
factor to be considered inside pipe racks and shelters in any case.
B FITTING
1 Verify Type of bend (single/Double/No flange) identified.
2 Branch connections specified as per branch table.
3 RF Pad thickness considered for branch reinforcement, If applicable.
4 SIF for lateral branch connections (45°) specified.
SIF for GRP branch Connection specified.
5 Type of reducer modelled properly.
Rigid weights (flange with bolts and nuts accounted for valves, Spectacle
6
blind, Spacer) considered.
7 Flanges & Valve modelled Separately.
8 Slug effects (if any) considered in analysis.
9 PSV Reaction Forces included.
C EQUIPMENT
1 Equipment to be modeled as rigid.
2 Nozzles on Equipments are modeled anchor with Connecting node.
Equipment Skirt growth not considered
D SUPPORT
1 Friction coefficient 0.4 considered on all +Y restraints.
Trunnion modeled as pipe with diameter at least one size lower than that of
2
main pipe. Ambient temperature is considered for the trunnion.
3 Supports are modeled with "Gap=0".
Variable Spring supports - Allowable load variation and Maximum
4
displacement shall be as per stress design basis.
Lines connected to the existing line - Existing line to be modelled till the
4
first line stop and next two guides.
E LOAD CASE EDITOR
1 For Pumps Standby/Operating load Cases.
2 Compressors recycle case.
3 Pump minimum flow recirculation case.
SYS
PROJECT NAME XXXXXX
NO:
PROJECT NUMBER XXXXXXXX DATE
PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CHECKLIST-INPUT
REMARKS/
SI.N Origin
DESCRIPTION Checker COMMENT
O ator
S
4 Caesar II start run option performed and all warning messages reviewed.
5 Load cases are built as per Appendix - 1 of design basis.
6 Thermal stress range from maximum to minimum temperature.
I STRESSES/MODAL ANALYSIS
1 Stress summary are within the corresponding code limits.
2 Slug or Two phase flow – Natural frequency > 4 Hz
II DEFLECTION/DISPLACEMENTS
Vertical deflection (sag) of pipe, in sustained cases limited to 15mm
1
maximum (Including Hydro-Test case).
2 Interference with adjacent pipe due to thermal displacement.
3 Check for expansion loop requirement.
Anchor-free analysis requirement for rotating equipment
4 < 3 mm in axial direction and
< 2 mm in the lateral direction.
The maximum shoe displacement is limited to 125 mm. Displacement
5
more than 125 mm to be highlighted for the selection suitable shoe length.
III FORCES AND MOMENTS - EQUIPMENT NOZZLE
The Piping loads on Nozzles of Rotating Equipments are assessed on
1
face of Nozzle flange.
The Piping loads on Nozzles of Pressure Vessels are assessed at the
2
intersection between Nozzle axis and external surface of Pressure vessel.
IV NOZZLE LOADS QUALIFICATION
1 Nozzle load as per allowable of clause 9.5 of design basis.
V FORCES AND MOMENTS - SUPPORT
Vertical loads on all "+Y" restraints are acting downwards (-FY Load) in all
1
operating load cases.
For Supports, hold down requirements for uplift force checked and
2
highlighted.
Check for excessive forces and moments in the supporting elements and
3
loads optimized.
VI FLANGE LEAKAGE CHECK
1 Flange leakage check performed as per stress design basis.
VII STRESS REQUIREMENTS IN MARKUP ISO
1 Coordinate Axis indicated on PDMS Extracted isometrics.
The location of supports, support types (using Conventional
symbols) and Node number correctly marked on PDMS Extracted
2
isometrics as per the analysis performed and transmitted to
layout/supports group.