PAMANTASAN N

i G LUNGSOD NG MAYNILA

FFECT OF SILICA SAND ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AS PARTIAL

REPLACEMENT OF CEMENT

A Case Study Presented to the Faculty of

College of Engineering and Technology
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila

In Partial Fulfillment of the Course

ESC313 – Engineering Probability and Statistics

BENEDICTO, John Rhey A.

DE GUZMAN, Cristine Jhona S.
JACALNE, Gwynelle Q.
LANSANG, Carlo James A.
MAANO, Maria Chelsea M.
RAMOS, Jeslyn Marinella
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering

September, 2016

i
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study becomes a reality with the help and solicitous support of many individuals. The
researchers would like to extend their sincere thanks to all of them.
Foremost, they want to praise God Almighty for the wisdom He bestowed upon them, the
strength, the peace of mind and good health to be able to finish this research.
They would like to express their gratitude towards their family for the encouragement which
helped them in completion of this paper. To their friends, block mates who shares their
knowledge to the researchers, thank you!
To their adviser, Engr. Reynaldo Peñas for imparting his knowledge and expertise about this
research.
And lastly, the researchers would like to express their gratitude towards each other without one
of them they wouldn’t be able to finish this case study.

i
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION

A. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................1

B. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY.......................................................................2

C. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM......................................................................2

D. OBJECTIVES...................................................................................................2

E. SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS..............................................................................3

F. DEFINITION OF TERMS...................................................................................3

II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

A. FOREIGN LITERATURE AND STUDIES............................................................4

C. SYNTHESIS OF RELATED LITERATURE TO THE CASE STUDY........................6

III. METHODOLOGY

A. PROCEDURES.................................................................................................7

B. EXPERIMENT SET-UP.....................................................................................9

IV. DATA AND COMPUTATION

A. PRESENTATION OF DATA GATHERED............................................................11

B. COMPUTATION...............................................................................................12

V. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS................................................................................17

B. CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................17

C. RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................................................17

BIBLIOGRAPHY

APPENDICES

ABOUT THE PROPONENTS

ii
 LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 1. FLOW CHART.....................................................................................10

FIGURE 2. SCATTER AND PLOT DIAGRAM……………………………………...14

FIGURE 3.A ACTUAL RESULT …………………………………………………..V

FIGURE 3.B ACTUAL RESULT ………………………………………………….VI

FIGURE 4. STANDARD MEASURE FOR SPECIMEN ……………………………...VII

iii
 LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1. DATA OBTAINED FROM THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST..............11

TABLE 2. CALCULATED DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS PARAMETERS........................12

TABLE 3. REGRESSION AND CORRELATION ANALYSIS.......................................13

iv
 CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Introduction

A cement is a binder, a substance used in construction that sets and hardens and can bind
other materials together. The most important types of cement are used as a component in the
production of mortar in masonry, and of concrete, which is a combination of cement and an
aggregate to form a strong building material. It is a dry powder which acts as the “glue” that
gives strength to structures and a major component of mortar and concrete. It is also used in
the production of the many structures that make up the modern world including buildings,
bridges, harbors, runways, and roads. It is also used for facades and other decorative features
on buildings.
The constant demand for all these structures, increasingly from the developing world, means
that cement is the second most consumed commodity in the world after water. There are
varying reports about the emission of Carbon Dioxide ( CO 2) in the production of Portland

cement and in every 1 cubic meter of it there’s a 0.9 CO 2 that produced. Since, the
consumption of cement is inevitable, the use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs)
may be the great solution to reduce and conserve the burden of the environment. Silica sand is
a cement replacement commodity with a low price and is resulting from one atom of Silicon
with two atoms of Oxygen ( SiO2). It is a major compound of sand, rock, and mineral ores
which consist of crystalline. (Chaudhary, Jyotsana Lalit, et. al, 2015). Silica sand is a fine form
of silica quartz which contains a high a proportion of silica (up to 99% SiO2).
Silica sand is one of the most common varieties of sand found in the world. It is used for
a wide range of applications, and can be purchased from various suppliers throughout the
world. Silica sand is used in industrial processing, to make glass, as fill, and to create molds
and castings. Moreover, Silica sand is widely used in the construction industry, it is put to use
in flooring compounds, mortars, specialty cements, stucco, roofing shingles, and asphalt
mixture to provide packing density and flexural strength (and compressive strength when it
comes to cement replacement) without adversely affecting the chemical properties of the
binding system.

1
B. Background of the Study

A study on compressive strength model of silica sand cement mortars (with the
conformance of Standard Test Method for compressive strength of Hydraulic cement mortar 2
in. x 2 in.) with different variations or amount 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% were observed.
Silica sand was used to partially replace Portland cement and the mortars were then tested for
compressive strength.
The results showed that the compressive strength of cement with the replacement of 5% silica
sand decreased. However, when the cement was replaced by a 10% of silica sand the said
property increased. And decreases when 15% of silica sand was replace but then again
increases in 20% of silica sand.
As the results are conducted, the researchers yielded that the amount of silica sand to be
partially replaced in the cement should be up to 10% as it is the only variation that is accepted
using the Testing of Hypothesis.
C. Statement of the Problem
This study aims to answer the following problems:
1. What are the averages of the compressive strengths of each variation that can be used
as the parameter of this study?
2. What is the relationship between the two parameters (percentage variation against the
mean compressive strength for each mix)?
3. Is there a significant difference in the control mix and the other percentage variation?
D. Objectives
1. General Objective
1. To determine the compressive strength parameters using the descriptive statistics:
mean, standard deviation and variance.
2. To determine the relationship between the two variables (percentage variation
against the mean compressive strength for each mix) using the Pearson Moment-
Correlation Coefficient and choose the best fit model.
3. To know the significant difference in the control mix and the other variations by
testing the hypothesis using a 95% confidence level.
2. Specific Objective

2
 2.1 The researchers’ goal is to assimilate if silica sand is applicable as partial replacement
for cement.
2.2 What specific percentage or amount of silica sand would increase the compressive
strength of the cement (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%)
E. Scope and Limitations
The researchers wanted to know if there’s an alternative way to reduce the consumption
of cement which causes a high number of CO 2 in the environment. Since the use of cement is
inevitable, the researchers came up with the idea of replacing an amount of cement in a
concrete with silica sand.

The study will only focus on the characteristics of silica sand which can help to increase the
properties of cement such as compressive strength. And to assimilate the possibility of use of
silica sand as partial replacement of cement in concrete.
F. Definitions of Terms

Aggregate - a material or structure formed from a loosely compacted mass of fragments or

particles.
Cement - a substance used in construction that sets and hardens and can bind other materials
together.
Compressive strength - the resistance of a material to breaking under compression.
Concrete - is a mixture of paste and aggregates, or rocks. The paste, composed of Portland
cement and water, coats the surface of the fine (small) and coarse (larger) aggregates.
Portland cement - cement that is manufactured from limestone and clay and that hardens under
water.
Silica sand - is quartz that over time, through the work of water and wind, has been broken
down into tiny granules.

3
 CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter shows the related literature and studies after the thorough search done by the
researchers. This section provides findings and conclusions of past investigations which are
relevant to the present study and it will likewise display the synthesis to fully understand and
comprehend the research to be finished.
FOREIGN LITERATURE AND STUDIES
Topic: Silica Sand in Concrete
Silica sand can be utilized in making concrete mix as partial replacement of fine
aggregate. [1] Silica sand was utilized as a partial substitution of cement in concrete.
Substitution levels were 3-24% at an interval of 3%. A nominal mix (1:1.667:3.33) with 0.5
water cement ratio was used. Specimens were cast to determine the compressive and split
tensile strength. The referral conventional concrete as well as the concrete made using silica
sand as a substitution of cement were tried and tested for compressive & split tensile strength
after 7, 28 & 56 days curing. Results displayed that silica sand (up to 12%) can effectively be
used as a partial replacement of cement in concrete without risking the quality and strength of
concrete.
The study was conducted to observe and learn the effect of silica sand on strength of
Portland Pozzolana cement concrete. Results of compressive strength of silica sand are as
follows:
The compressive strength of referral concrete as well as silica sand concrete is given in table
4.2. It is evident from this table that strength increases with addition of silica sand up to certain
replacement levels (12%). After that it decreases.

4
Topic: Silica Sand as Fine Material
Silica sand is acquired from a raw material (locally available in mamuara village in Kutch
district). [2] After washing the raw material, the silica sand is separated by sieve size 1.18 of
raw material. From the raw material different size of silica sand are separated by different size
of sieve. Sand size of 30 mesh to 80 mesh (500 micron) is used in the glass industries. Sand
size 1.18mm to 600 micro can be used in making concrete mix as a substitution of fine
aggregate.
Concrete produced using silica sand waste as fine aggregate was studied for compressive
strength. Silica sand was utilized as substitution of fine aggregate by various percentage for
making concrete of M-20, with w/c ratio 0.50 & 0.45. The percentage replacement will be 0 -
70% at an interval of 10% with natural fine aggregates. For making concrete OPC-53 grade
cement is used. Cubes will be casted and tested for compressive strength as well as for
durability properties. Optimum replacement of silica sand can be used in structural concrete.
The study was conducted to observe and learn the effect of silica sand as fine material on
concrete. Results of compressive strength of silica sand are as follows:

By the substitution of silica sand in concrete, the compressive strength was decreased
to 30% replacement and afterwards increased up to 50% replacement after starts decreasing up
to 70% replacement, compressive strength was increasing 0.22% at 50% replacement compare
to normal concrete for mix –1
By the substitution of silica sand in concrete, the compressive strength was decreased
up to 30% replacement and afterwards increased up to 50% replacement after starts decreasing
up to 70% replacement, compressive strength was increasing 1.21% at 50% replacement
compare to normal concrete for mix –2

5
SYNTHESIS:
The review of related literature was used to further develop the study to be finished. It
gave a theoretical basis for the present study and conveyed ideas that has been established on a
topic. Through the information and data provided on International Journal of Research in
Engineering and Technology (IJRET) “Use of Silica Sand as Cement Replacement in PPC
Concrete” and International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology
(IJIRST) “Effect of Use of Silica Sand as Fine Material in Concrete”, it was observed that
silica sand has the ability to become a replacement of cement on a concrete at a certain
replacement level but also has the ability to diminish the compressive strength at a certain
replacement level. Through this related literature, other people working in the same field were
identified and the present study was put in a wider perspective as the related literature
displayed other opposing views and other possible results.

6
 CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
Gathering the materials required for this experiment were bought and built in order to
perform this case study. The mortars were built with a volume of 8 cubic inches. Using the
materials; jigsaw, ruler, measuring tape, a pencil or marker, and of course plywood, the mortar
cubes were successfully made.

In this study, the sand was always 2.75% grams referring to the weight of the cement
powder, adding the referred percentage of silica sand and the rest was cement powder, with a
total weight of 300 grams.

There were 5 tests with 5 trials containing 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of silica sand. In
the 1st trail, 8.25 grams of sand and 291.75 grams of cement powder were mixed. By adding a
decent amount of water using a cup, it successfully made the cement and the sand look like
pudding. A hammer was used to make sure that there were no large particles in order to mix
the cement and the sand more easily.

7
 The proponents used 1:2.75 cement ratio following the ASTM C109. If the cement is now
seemed to be tangible enough, it was then placed in the mortar. Something hard were used in
order to push and spread the cement equally in the box to avoid getting bubbles and possibly
trapped air, the cement block must be pure and doesn’t break easily. In this case, small
rectangular shaped plywood was used.

5 mortars were built for each set of trials. Each set were referring to the percentage of
silica sand that were replaced on cement powder, with a total of 25 mortars. Marking each
mortar to its corresponding percentage of silica sand can prevent confusion.

By repeating the process to the remaining trials, this experiment lasts 6 hours. Teamwork
is the key for finishing this experiment.

8
Measurements for the remaining trials; 15 grams of silica sand, 7.8 grams of sand and 277.2
grams of cement powder were used for trial 2. For trial 3, 30 grams of silica sand, 7.4 sand,
and 262.6 grams of cement powder were used. For trial 4, 45 grams of silica sand, 7 grams of
sand, and 248 grams of cement powder were used. For trial 5, 60 grams of silica sand, 6.6
grams of sand, and 233.4 grams of cement powder were used.

After 24 hours, checking if the cements were dry or still wet is a must. After confirming the
cement was completely dry, it then cured for 7 days and after that the mortars were transported
to the testing lab to test its compressive strength.

9
 Effect of Silica Sand on the Compressive strength of
Concrete

Cement Mortar with Silica Sand

Analysis of Materials Used

Mix Design

Control Mix 5% Silica Sand 10% Silica 15% Silica 20% Silica
Sand Sand Sand

7 Days Curing

Compressive Strength
Test

Statistical Test

Result and Discussion

Conclusion

Report Writing

10
 Figure 1 (Flow Chart)
CHAPTER IV
DATA AND COMPUTATION

A. Presentation of Data Gathered

Table 1 Data obtained from the Compressive Strength Test

Compressive Strength (at Maximum load and Strength)
Percentag 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
e
Units kN MP kN MP kN MPa kN MPa kN MPa
a a
Sample 1 12.83 4.82 10.02 3.97 8.14 3.15 7.0 2.97 10.6 4.34
7 4
Sample 2 15.64 5.89 9.80 3.64 13.32 4.95 5.2 2.20 8.89 3.57
9
Sample 3 13.42 5.15 9.54 3.62 11.30 4.32 6.4 2.56 8.38 3.33
1

Table 1 shows the results of the Compressive Strength Test conducted on each sample of
mortar cube. The mortar cubes that have been tested are a mix of cement, sand and silica sand.
The amount of sand in the mix is fixed while the amount of cement and silica sand varies. It
varies as the cement is being replaced by the silica sand with 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%.
All the mortar cubes undergo a curing process of 7 days.
The results presented under the unit of kilonewton (kN) are the maximum load applied
while the results under the unit of megapascal (MPa) are the compressive strength obtained.
There are 3 samples of mortar cube per percentage of silica sand that replaced the cement.
Mortar Cubes having 0% of silica sand as replacement for cement obtained a compressive
strength of 4.82, 5.89, and 5.15 megapascal, and the maximum load applied are 12.83, 15.64,
and 13.42 kilonewton, for samples 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Mortar Cubes having 5% of silica sand as replacement for cement obtained a compressive
strength of 3.97, 3.64, and 3.62 megapascal, and the maximum load applied are 10.02, 9.80,
and 9.54 kilonewton, for samples 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

11
 Mortar Cubes having 10% of silica sand as replacement for cement obtained a
compressive strength of 3.15, 4.95, and 4.32 megapascal, and the maximum load applied are
8.14, 13.32, and 11.3 kilonewton, for samples 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Mortar Cubes having 15% of silica sand as replacement for cement obtained a
compressive strength of 2.97, 2.20, and 2.56 megapascal, and the maximum load applied are
7.07, 5.29, and 6.41 kilonewton, for samples 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Mortar Cubes having 20% of silica sand as replacement for cement obtained a
compressive strength of 4.34, 3.57, and 3.33 megapascal, and the maximum load applied are
10.64, 8.89, and 8.38 kilonewton, for samples 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
B. Computation
B.1. Descriptive Statistics
Table 2 Calculated Descriptive Statistics Parameters
% of Parameters (in MPa)
Mean ( x́ ) Variance ( S x2 ) Standard Deviation ( S x )
Silica
Sand
0 5.29 - -
5 3.74 0.04 0.20
10 4.14 0.83 0.91
15 2.58 0.15 0.39
20 3.75 0.28 0.53

Descriptive Statistics Formula

Mean or Average: x́=

∑x (Equation 1)
n
∑
2 (x− x́)2
Variance: s = (Equation 2)
n−1

∑ (x −x́)2
Standard Deviation: s=
√ n−1
(Equation 3)

Table 2 shows the calculated Mean, Variance, and Standard Deviation for the data
gathered, or the values of compressive strength, as per percentage of silica sand in the mortar
cube.
With the use of Equation 1 for computing the mean, the data obtained were 5.29, 3.74,
4.14, 2.58, and 3.75, for 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of silica sand, respectively.

12
 With the use of Equation 2 in getting the variance, the data obtained were 0.04, 0.83,
0.15, and 0.28, for 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of silica sand, respectively.
With the use of Equation 3 for standard variation, the data obtained were 0.20, 0.91, 0.39,
and 0.53, for 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of silica sand, respectively.

B.2. Regression and Correlation

Table 3 Regression and Correlation Analysis

Mathematical Pearson Product Moment

Model Correlation Coefficient ( r )
Linear -0.29282
Exponential -0.28791
Power -0.32352
Hyperbolic -0.32970

Regression and Correlation Formula

Linear: y= A +Bx (Equation 4)
n ∑ xy – ∑ x ∑ y
Where B= 2 ,
n ∑ x2 −( ∑ x )
(Equation 5)
And A= ý−B x́ (Equation 6)
Correlation of Coefficient
n ∑ xy – ∑ x ∑ y
r=
2 2
√ ( n∑ x −(∑ x ) ) (n ∑ y −(∑ y ) )
2 2

(Equation 7)
Exponential: y=a ebx (Equation 8)
Simple Power: y=ax b (Equation 9)
ax
Hyperbolic: y= (Equation 10)
x +b

13
 Table 3 shows the Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient ( r ) for the different
mathematical model (Linear, Exponential, Power, and Hyperbolic).
The Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient ( r ) is obtained by using the
Equation 7; percentage of silica sand against the mean for compressive strength for each mix.
As presented, the r-values are all negative, exhibiting an inverse relationship. Meaning, as the
percentage of silica sand increases, the compressive strength decreases; and vice versa.
The best fit model for the gathered data is the hyperbolic model since, among the four r-
values calculated; the absolute value of the r-value for the hyperbolic model is the nearest
value to 1.

4.5 Scatter and Plot Diagram

Mean Compressive Strength

4
3.5
3
2.5 Linear
2 Exponential
1.5 Simple Power
1 Hyperbolic
0.5 Scatter
0
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Percentage of Silica sand

Figure 2 (Scatter and Plot Diagram)

B.3. Testing of Hypothesis

For 5% silica sand:
a) H 0 :μ=5.29
H 1 : μ ≠ 5.29 (Two-sided test)
b) α =0.05 (0.025 on each side)
c) Critical region: P ( t<−4.303 )∧P ( t> 4.303 )
v = n – 1 (degree of freedom)

14
v=3–1
v=2

d) x́=3.74 , μ=5.29 ,σ =0.20 , n=3

x́−μ 3.74−5.29
t= = =−13.423
e) σ /√n 0.20
√3
f) Since t = -13.423 which is less than -2.920, we should reject the null hypothesis.
For 10% silica sand:
a) H 0 :μ=5.29
H 1 : μ ≠ 5.29 (Two-sided test)
b) α =0.05 (0.025 on each side)
c) Critical region: P ( t<−4.303 )∧P ( t> 4.303 )
v = n – 1 (degree of freedom)
v=3–1
v=2

d) x́=4.14 , μ=5.29 , σ=0.91, n=3

x́−μ 4.14−5.29
t= = =−2.189
e) σ /√n 0.91
√3
f) Since t = -2.189 which is greater than -2.920, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
For 15% silica sand:
a) H 0 :μ=5.29
H 1 : μ ≠ 5.29 (Two-sided test)
b) α =0.05 (0.025 on each side)
c) Critical region: P ( t<−4.303 )∧P ( t> 4.303 )
v = n – 1 (degree of freedom)
v=3–1
v=2

d) x́=2.58 , μ=5.29 , σ =0.39 , n=3

x́−μ 2.58−5.29
t= = =−12.036
e) σ /√n 0.39
√3

15
 f) Since t = -12.036 which is less than -2.920, we should reject the null hypothesis.

For 20% silica sand:

a) H 0 :μ=5.29
H 1 : μ ≠ 5.29 (Two-sided test)
b) α =0.05 (0.025 on each side)
c) Critical region: P ( t<−4.303 )∧P ( t> 4.303 )
v = n – 1 (degree of freedom)
v=3–1
v=2

d) x́=3.75 , μ=5.29 , σ =0.53 , n=3

x́−μ 3.75−5.29
t= = =−5.033
e) σ /√n 0.53
√3
f) Since t = -5.033 which is less than -2.920, we should reject the null hypothesis.
B.4. Analysis and Interpretation
In this chapter, the gathered data or the values of the compressive strength of a mortar
cube with a mix of silica sand has been presented. It is very noticeable that the compressive
strength decreases as the percentage of silica sand that replaces the cement increases. In
which in the calculations of correlation of coefficient has been proven. Also, the researchers
are able to test the hypothesis and it turns out that the amount of silica sand to be replaced in
the cement should only be up to 10%. It is the percentage of silica sand that would somehow
increase the compressive strength of the cement. Using the calculations presented in this
chapter, the researchers are able to achieve the objectives of the study and finalize the
conclusions.

16
 CHAPTER V
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Summary of Findings

The result of the compressive strength test is shown in Table 1. An inverse relationship
can be drawn by observing the data of the percentage mix of Silica sand and its compressive
strength. Computed values for mean and variance are in Table 2. The 15% Silica sand mix
sample have shown a low compressive strength but its variation with respect to the mean is
very small. The compressive strength average increases as the percentage mix of Silica sand
decreases. This indicates that an ample addition of Silica sand in place of cement
composition can enhance the compressive strength of the concrete.
B. Conclusion

The average compressive strength of the concrete mortars decreases with an increase in
percent composition of silica sand. A hyperbolic model showed a strong correlation between
the percent compositions of silica sand against the average compressive strength of the
samples.

17
 Further study and experimentation about the effect of silica sand by means of more
trials can obtain more data. Having different percentages greater than what has been used can
establish a better regression model for the correlation of the two parameters used in this
study.
C. Recommendations

In this kind of study, materials should be first concerns. It is recommended to

afford the materials from a well-known companies or groups, not on any hardware. It
is because companies know what the materials consist of including its physical and
chemical properties and components, and precautionary measures of handling them.
For example: Silica sand and silica fume, even though having the same word but they
have different meaning and study to be concern. It is also researchers concern of its
locality or its source. It is good to get the materials near your place in order to do the
experiments earlier to prevent of getting big mistakes.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] Jyotsana Lalit Chaudhary1, Alvin Harison2, Vikas Srivastava3, “Use of Silica Sand
as Cement Replacement in PPC Concrete” IJRET: International Journal of Research in
Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN:2321-7308, Volume: 04
Issue: 11| Nov-2015, Available @http://www.ijret.org
[2] Kerai Jignesh, “Effect of Use of Silica Sand as Fine Material in Concrete” IJIRST–
International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology| Volume 2|
Issue 01| June2015.

18
19
 APPENDICES

Figure 3.a (Actual Result)

v
vi
 Figure 3.b (Actual Result)

Figure 4 (ASTM c 109 standard measure for specimen molds)

vii
 ABOUT THE PROPONENTS

BENEDICTO, JOHN RHEY A.

2252 D M. Natividad St, Sta. Cruz, Manila
Manila |jr_benedicto@yahoo.com|

AFFILIATIONS IN ORGANIZATION
Association of Civil Engineers Students
Member

EDUCATION
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2014-2019
Tertiary
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
General Luna corner Muralla St. Intramuros, Manila

Araullo High School, 2010-2014

Secondary
UN Avenue corner Kalaw St.

Cecilio Apostol Elementary School, 2004-2010

Primary
F. Yuseco St. Sta Cruz Manila

PERSONAL DATA
Date of birth: September 12,1997
Place of birth: Manila
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Catholic

viii
 DE GUZMAN, CRISTINE JHONA S.
B5 L10 Jasper St. Tierra de Sta. Maria, Bulacan
Bulacan | jhonadeguzman@gmail.com |

AFFILIATIONS IN ORGANIZATION
Association of Civil Engineers Students
Member

EDUCATION
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2014-2019
Tertiary
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
General Luna corner Muralla St. Intramuros, Manila

St. Paul College of Bocaue, 2010-2014

Secondary
Turo, Bocaue, Bulacan

Little Angels Montessori School of Bulacan, 2004-2010

Primary
Km 38. Pulong Buhangin, Bulacan

PERSONAL DATA
Date of birth: October 4, 1997
Place of birth: Manila
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Catholic

ix
 JACALNE, GWYNELLE Q.
440 A Herbosa St. Tondo, Manila
Manila | nellejacalne@gmail.com |

AFFILIATIONS IN ORGANIZATION
Association of Civil Engineers Students
Member

EDUCATION
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2014-2019
Tertiary
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
General Luna corner Muralla St. Intramuros, Manila

Ramon Magsaysay High School, 2010-2014

Secondary
España, Manila

General Maximino Hizon Elementary School, 2004-2010

Primary
Abad Santos, Manila

PERSONAL DATA
Date of birth: May 15, 1998
Place of birth: San Juan
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Catholic

x
 LANSANG, CARLO JAMES A.
39 Macabagdal Street Caloocan City
Caloocan | carlo0331.S9@gmail.com |

AFFILIATIONS IN ORGANIZATION
Association of Civil Engineers Students
Member

EDUCATION
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2014-2019
Tertiary
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
General Luna corner Muralla St. Intramuros, Manila

Camp General Emilio Aguinaldo High School, 2010-2014

Secondary
Cubao, Quezon City

University of the East, 2004-2010

Primary
Sangandaan, Caloocan

PERSONAL DATA
Date of birth: March 31, 1998
Place of birth: Caloocan
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Catholic

xi
 MAAÑO, MARIA CHELSEA M.
705 T. Anzures St. Sampaloc, Manila
Manila | chelsea.maano@gmail.com |

AFFILIATIONS IN ORGANIZATION
Association of Civil Engineers Students
Member

EDUCATION
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2014-2019
Tertiary
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
General Luna corner Muralla St. Intramuros, Manila

Holy Trinity Academy, 2010-2014

Secondary
Balic-balic, Sampaloc, Manila

Holy Trinity Academy, 2004-2010

Primary
Balic-balic, Sampaloc, Manila

PERSONAL DATA
Date of birth: September 5, 1997
Place of birth: Manila
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Catholic

xii
 RAMOS, JESLYN MARINELLA
1010 F. Yuseco St. Tondo, Manila
Manila | jeslynramos97@gmail.com |

AFFILIATIONS IN ORGANIZATION
Association of Civil Engineers Students
Member

EDUCATION
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, 2014-2019
Tertiary
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
General Luna corner Muralla St. Intramuros, Manila

Ramon Magsaysay High School, 2010-2014

Secondary
España, Manila

Andres Bonifacio Elementary School, 2004-2010

Primary
Ipil, Tayuman

PERSONAL DATA
Date of birth: November 5, 1997
Place of birth: Manila
Nationality: Filipino
Religion: Catholic

xiii
xiv