You are on page 1of 6

ED6466

Literature Review & Theoretical/Conceptual Frameworks


Literature Review in Qualitative Research
Should:

● Establish context for qualitative research study


● Contain critical analysis of previous research studies
● Provide an analytical argument and draw conclusions
● Engage with theories and establish them in relation to the
current work
Questions to Consider
● What do we already know about the proposed topic?
● Has anyone else ever conducted the same study?
● Has anyone else even conducted a similar study?
● How is the work situated when compared with completed works?
● What do we still need to know about the proposed topic?
● Why is this research word doing in the light of other research already
completed?
● What assumptions about the topic are apparent in the literature?
(Savin Baden & Major, 2012, p. 113)
Taking a Critical Stance
Literature Review ● Demonstrate comprehensive
coverage of field
● Show contextual understanding
● Critique various positions and
traditions
Trafford & Lesham (2008), adapted from Savin ● Engage critically with significant
Baden & Major (2013), p. 113. work
● Draw on literature with a
different focus to one’s own
Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK:

A theory is an attempt to explain a A concept is a general idea generated


phenomenon from specific instances (often part of
a theory)
-the use of theory in qualitative research to
provide a conceptual grounding for the study
-the structure for organising and supporting
-the lens through with the researcher views the ideas: the MAP
world
- a key idea taken from the literature that can
- complementary to philosophical framework guide study design
Key points for Assignment #2 - Literature Review
1. 6.5 - 10 pages, double-spaced, APA format
2. Begin with summary of purpose and topic
3. State grand theory and other tacit theories if necessary
4. Continue argument and description from assignment #1
5. State the underlying assumptions (of your work and of others)
6. Demonstrate knowledge of research
7. Demonstrate gaps in research
8. Refine/redefine/expand research questions by embedding in the larger
tradition

You might also like