Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=black. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Blackwell Publishing is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Music Analysis.
http://www.jstor.org
I
L. POUNDIE BURSTEIN
S URPRISINGRETURNS:THEVIIX IN BEETHOVENS
OP. 18 NO. 3, ANDITSANTECEDENTS IN HAYDN
Beethoven's quartet
Harmonicimplications
The most breathtaking passage in the first movement of Beethoven's Op. 18
No. 3 comes at the end of its development section (Ex. 1). Here, the develop-
ment climaxes with a strong cadence on aV of the distant key of Ft minor. The
threatened resolution to Ft does not follow, however. Instead, Ct (the root of
Ft's dominant) turns into a leading-note of D major, thus bringing us back to
the composition's main key. The sudden reinterpretation of the Ct creates a
type of tonal crisis which has deep structural ramificationsfor the entire move-
ment. Beethoven's brilliant manner of dealing with the implications of this
unusual strategy indicates a debt to his teacher, Haydn, and also reveals much
about Beethoven's own craft and artistic vision.
As Ex. lb shows, the tonal shift at the end of the development section creates
a VII,tSV-I progression in D major.This progression is an odd one, especially
Ex. 1 (a) Beethoven, String QuartetOp. 18 No. 3, first mvt., bars 156-62
: J ":. ;- - recapitulation
Ft:V D:Vt I
iPe 7S hhf j
tipst# t_>J J C
D: VIIt Vt I
(=V of III)
(b) Middlegroundgraph
Bar 104 112 l44 152 162
136
A B; Bh Ch CX
A BW (B") Ct
BW (B$) Ct
forfissimo pillnissimo
thick texlure thin texlure
distant key holre key
tnpkts senubreves
OtzVzC zmplzcatzons
Bar 1 45 56 61 68 76 90
E#to F#? no!
(E# Fh E)
Chief among these is a foreground chromatic ascent which occurs at the end of
the exposition (see Ex. 2b, bars 104-8). This local ascent anticipates and thus
helps point the way for the ensuing, highly modulatory progression which gov-
erns the entire development section.2
Another important motive connected with the VIIt involves the note Et and
its enharmonic, Ft. As noted earlier in reference to Ex. lb, the Et of the VII,"
chord at the end of the development conflicts with the Eh of the following V
chord. In the progression from VIIt to V, the Et must contradict its natural
ascending tendency by moving downward, in the manner of an Ft. Thus the
harmonic progression fromVIIt toV helps create a large-scale, upper-voice F,tS
E,$E motion, starting in bar 144 (see Ex. 2). This is counterbalanced in bars
104-44 by a large upper-voice E-FeF,} motion.
The E,"/Ftconflict plays an important role in almost all the other sections of
the movement as well. In fact, the very first chromatic pitch of the piece is an
Et, in bar 9. The most startling use of Et, however, occurs in the phrase that
starts in bar 57 (see Ex. 3). Following a tentative cadence to A major, an Et
suddenly appears in bar 62, replacing an expected Et. One initially expects the
EXto resolve upwards as a leading-note to F". This expectation is thwarted,
however, as the Et instead transforms into an Fh.The Et thus does not resolve
up to F";rather, it resolves (as an Ft) down to E (as part of a modulation to C
major).
The manner in which the Et of bars 61ff. ultimately moves down parallels
the situation found at the end of the development section. This may be seen by
comparing Ex. 3 with Ex. 2b. In the passage shown in Ex. 3, an expected mo-
tion to F,}is averted as an Et changes into an Ft. Likewise, in the passage in Ex.
2b, an expected motion to F,"also is averted as an E,"resolves in the manner of
an Ft.Yet while these passages have similar motivic structures, their harmonic
meanings are quite different: whereas the avoidance of a Ft in the exposition
leads to the unstable key of C major, the avoidance of Ft at the end of the
pt t ° | | o tt
recapinllation (interTupted
> cadence)
A B Ch!
16 ni_, As *- * j. g
gA 15 C / mer W
A B Ch C$D DX E A
development leads to the stable tonic key of D major. As a result, these two
passages are in a sense poetic reversals of one another.
The modulation to C major in the passage of bars 68ff. has further motivic
implications. The pitch Ch appears prominently earlier in the exposition (in
bars 27ff.), where - as part of aV7 of IV - the C resolves downwards.3 In the
passage in Ex. 3, the tonicised Ct also ultimately moves down (though it first
feints up to Ct). At the end of the development section, contrastingly, the en-
harmonic pitch Bt reverses this direction by pushing up to Ct.
The tensions between the pitches Ct and Bt are directly confronted within
the recapitulation.The opening of the recapitulation is altered slightly so as to
emphasise the pitch Ct (see Ex. 4a). It is not difficult to hear the connection
between this emphasised Ct and the Bt of a few bars earlierwithin the develop-
ment. But unlike the Bt, the Ct of bar 170 does not continue to ascend. In-
stead, as is shown in Ex. 4b, the ascending line stops upon reaching this Ct.
After a brief detour, however, the bass reverses itself once again to return to Ch,
this time moving up through CXand past D to lead to the dominant, A.
The conflicting tendencies of the Ch and Bt in this work present a kind of
drama, which I outline in the sketch of Ex. 4c (overleaf).Whereas in the exposi-
tion the Cts descend to lead to stable keys, in the development (bars 104-62)
the enharmonic Bt ascends to lead to the most unstable key of the movement.
And in the opening of the recapitulation (166ff.), the Ct first resolves down-
wards (in the manner of the exposition), but then contradicts its natural de-
scending tendency by moving upwards, as though inspired by the example of
bars166-80ff.
A A} B Cq B C4 C,} D D,} E (etc.)
p:## # , q, , . #. h #'
[j"##ff=9 #r $r re #U r t#t f rF rr ¢C
l cIrse r 9 61J $ >
D: IV II6 V 6
Works by Haydn
Harmonicimplications
This special applicationof VII,"was not a discoveryof Beethoven's:he was
anticipatedin this regarda numberof times by Haydn.As I show in Table 1,
Haydn used a VII,"chord or a VII,tFVprogressionimmediatelyprecedinga
returnto the tonic key in severalcompositions.In some of these pieces, the
VII,"is followedby a motionto a prolongedVthatis stronglystated.Such is the
case, for example,in SymphonyNo. 87 (wherethe V that follows the VII#is
prolongedin bars 125-30), SymphonyNo.73 (wherea sequencein bars 150-
60 linkstheVII,"to theV), andin the D majorPianoTrio,No.16 (see Ex. l l, p.
307). In others of these works,however,the returnto the tonic followingthe
in which a
1 Sonata form and sonata-rondoform movementsby Haydn
Table of the
VII,}chord orVIIV progressionimmediatelyprecedes a return
main theme in the tonic key
movement date
work
ivB 1778/9
SymphonyNo. 53 in D major i 1774
SymphonyNo. 55 in E; major ('The Schoolmaster') iv before 1781
SymphonyNo. 62 in D major i before 1779
SymphonyNo.66 in B; major iv before 1779
SymphonyNo. 73 in D major ('La chasse') i 1785
SymphonyNo.87 in A major iv 1791
SymphonyNo.93 in D major iv 1795
SymphonyNo. 104 in D major
i before 1784
Concertofor Piano in D major Hob. XVIII: 11
i 1784
Triofor Piano and Strings Hob. XV:6 in F major ii 1788-89
Triofor Piano and Strings Hob. XV: 12 in B minor i 1790
in D major
Triofor Piano, Flute (orViolin) and Strings Hob. XV: 16
No.4 i 1772
Quartetfor Strings in D major Op. 20 iii 1781
Quartetfor Strings in B minor Op.33 No. lt iv 1793
Quartetfor Strings in G major Op.54 No. 1
i 1773
Sonatafor Piano in E; major Hob. XVI:25 iii 1795
Sonatafor Piano in C major Hob. XVI:50
1775-78
DieFeuersbrunst: 'Der Mann der ist ein Hexenmeister'tt
tNB: this movementis in D major
tt attributedto Haydn
instances. In each of
cadence onVII,"is startlingly abrupt. Ex. 6 cites a few such
chord that is either barely
these examples, theVII,"chord quickly moves to aV
sense of disorientation
stated or aV chord that is (at best) merely implied.The
analogous passage of
in these passages is reminiscent of the effect found in the
the Beethoven quartet.
Piano Sonata and
In the most radical of these instances, such as the EDmajor
motion simulates
Symphony No. 104 (Exs. 6d and 6e, respectively), theVII,tFI
III, thus strongly undermining the sense
an interrupted cadence in the key of
of development
Ex. 6 (a) Haydn, SymphonyNo. 66 in B; major,first mvt., end
end of development
V7
VIIX
SURPRISING
RETURNS 303
...n
I4#"t,>7#b2J¢##"#37¢tr¢7t tD 2
G: VIIX (V8) I
D: VIIX - . - . Q
I
(Ve?)
(d) Haydn, Piano Sonata No. 26 in ESmajor,first mvt., end of development
end of development recapitulation
rit.
l'wEl$ $ i j-ihA
j
EW:VIIX(=vof III) (implied V?) I
'#" ° . 8=8 o i
D: VIIX (noV!) I
Ex. 7 Haydn,Trio for piano and stringsNo. 6 in F Major,first mvt., bars 104-11
(cf. bar 149) recapitulation
PP fI
F: VII} I > v!
(=A V VI)
' -'I
1
1''--
1
I "1
-v
D: V
D: Vr VI VIIX I VI VIIt 11 VI Vt I
F":V I
B:V
RETURNS
SURPRISING 305
j 1,_ I I 1 t1
A (A$) B B C
Bar: 13 30 36 44 46 52 66
I
l9####5 : ?- -- C f
E: I V VI VIIt I
levels of the structure and spans the entire development section. In the finale of
Symphony No. 93, for instance, the VI is prolonged for eleven bars (13848)
before the bass continues to rise to lead to theVII# chord (Ex. 9a). Similarly,in
the second movement of the PianoTrio No. 12, theVI is preceded by an elabo-
rate progression of nine bars (36-43, Ex. 9b). In a sense, these large-scale ris-
ing progressions could be regarded as by-products of the cadence onVI which
often forms the central goal of development sections.9 In a typical develop-
ment section, when the cadence onVI is followed by a retransitionto aV chord,
a largeV-VI-V neighbour-note motion results. Having aVII# chord follow the
cadence to VI, on the other hand, helps to create an expansive V-VI-VII# as-
cent which cuts across the development.l°
Motzvzczmplzcatzons
. . . . .
( T > X#;t4#;;;
ps#t <ffi>;8ybz; ,> J j J J J
(b) bars158-64
ti)tlt; n t n t n t n t n t n t t
(c) Haydn,Trio for piano and stringsNo. 12 in E minor, secondmvt.,bars 29-33
/§ b J3 l l tnf:1 P :1 P g @
9 t"rpJ P) 7 St t t Plnfr
: r : Ir pr
o BlackwellPublishersLtd. 1998
MusicAnalysis,
17/iii (1998)
308 L. POUNDIE BURSTEIN
## y t S- S hr t) |
CQ (C$) B
'Zt# @ L 1 qrf : r
(2) Many of these compositions further anticipate the Beethoven work by ap-
proaching this VII,"chord through a large-scale bass ascent leading from
the V at the end of the exposition. This large-scale ascent helps establish
the VII,"chord at the end of the development as a type of harmonic climax.
(3) Furthermore, some of these pieces, like the Beethoven quartet, exploit
various chromatic motives associated with the emphasisedVII,"chord, par-
ticularly motives involving ,"2and ,"8,and their enharmonic equivalents. In
the works by both Haydn and Beethoven cited here, these motives are
powerful devices for connecting passages which contrast starkly from an
emotional standpoint.
A case
forinfluence
It seems likely that the gesture at the end of the development in Beethoven's
Op. 18 No. 3 was inspired by Haydn. After all, the use of aVII,"at the end of a
development seems too unusual to be accidental. This odd harmonic twist can
hardly be considered a standard part of the musical language of the time. After
a long search, I have only been able to find three pieces by other eighteenth-
century composers that use this strategy, including only two by Mozart (the
finales of his Piano Concertos K. 450 in ESmajor and K. 451 in D major, both
written in March 1784) and one by the obscure composer FriedrichWitt (the
last movement of his Symphony No. 2 in D major).l2
There is no documentary evidence confirming whether or not Beethoven
knew any of the pieces cited in Table 1. Nevertheless, it would be hard to
believe that he was unfamiliar with all of them.l3 Each of these works was
composed before Beethoven started working on his Op. 18 string quartets.
Furthermore, many of them were successful with the public and were re-
printed a number of times within a few years of their initial publication. Of
course, it is within the realm of possibility that yet another obscure composer
of whom I am unaware influenced both Haydn and Beethoven in this regard.It
is also possible that Beethoven coincidentally just happened to use the same
unusual strategy found in many of his teacher's pieces, coincidentally favour-
ing the same key (D major) that Haydn himself preferred for this self-same
strategy.Yetbarring any new evidence to the contrary, it would be reasonable
to assume that Beethoven's audacious use of the majorVII,"chord at the end of
the development in the D major quartet bears the influence of Haydn.
Of course, many people have noted Haydn's influence on Beethoven and on
his Op. 18 quartets. Most of these discussions centre on issues of form, the-
matic development, or general character of the pieces.l4 Among the features
often cited in discussions of Haydn's influence on Beethoven, the predilection
of both composers for masked recapitulations and surprising harmonic shifts
bears the strongest relevance to the present discussion of Op. 18 No. 3.15 But
most such discussions are of a general nature; the use of VII,"discussed here,
on the other hand, provides a clear example of Haydn's influence on a specific
aspect of Beethoven's harmonic and formal thinking.
That Beethoven should be attracted to this device of Haydn's tells much
about his musical personality. Beethoven evidently understood the dramatic
possibilities of this ungainly harmonic manoeuvre involving theVII,"chord; he
realised that its very awkwardnesscould infuse his music with a human quality.
In Op. 18 No. 3, Beethoven shows that he, like Haydn, was willing to grapple
with a seemingly intractable tonal scheme and struggle to work it into the logi-
cal foundations of a composition. In this sense, one might say that in this quar-
tet Beethoven has indeed received the spirit of Haydn, through the hands of
Haydn - and mixed it in with a dose of his own indomitable spirit as well.
NOTES
1. Curiously, whereas the dynamics of the exposition started at piano, the recapitula-
tion starts pianissimo. Of course, many of Beethoven's recapitulations begin at a
louder dynamic level than the exposition. In this work, we see a rare example of a
Beethoven recapitulation that starts at a softer level than the exposition! This
softer dynamic level underlines the sudden decrease in tension at the point of the
recapitulation.
2. This motivic foreshadowing is mentioned Roger Kamien, 'Subtle Enharmonic
Connections, Modal Mixture, and Tonal Plan in Beethoven's Piano Sonata in C
Major, Op.53', in BeethovenForum,1 (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press,
1992) pp. 94-6; see also Joseph Kerman, The Beethoven Quartets (New York:
Knopf,1971), pp.18-19.
3. See bars 28 and 32; see also the emphasised Cqs of bars 16ff. and 43ff. Roger
Kamien notes the motivic connection of these Chs with the B# at the end of the
development in 'Subtle Enharmonic Connections', pp.93-6.
4. See Beth Shamgar, 'On Locating the Retransition in Classic Sonata Form', Music
Review, 41 /i ( 198 1), pp. 13043; and James Webster, Haydn's FarewellSymphony
and the Idea of the ClassicalStyle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1991),
pp.138-46.
5. Regarding developments which end on III#, see David Beach, 'A Recurring Pat-
tern in Mozart's Music', ffiournalof Music Theory,271i (Spring 1983), pp. 1-30;
Charles Rosen, Sonata Forms (NewYork: Norton, 1980), pp. 255-63; and Jan
LaRue, 'Bifocal Tonality in Haydn Symphonies', in Wye J. Allenbrook, Janet
M. Levy and William P. Mahrt (eds.), Conventionin Eighteenth-and Nineteenth-
CenturyMusic: Essays in Honor of LeonardG. Ratner (Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon
Press, 1992), pp. 59-75.
6. Yet another analogous structure can be found in the finale of Beethoven's C major
Piano Concerto, where a modulation first to B major and then to B minor pre-
cedes the large V chord that ushers in the return to the tonic key. See also the
daring use of VII# in Beethoven's Piano Sonata in ES Op. 7, first movement; the
role ofVII# in this sonata is discussed in Carl Schachter, 'Analysis by Key: Another
Look at Modulation', MusicAnalysis, 61iii (1987), pp.289-318.
7. See the discussion regarding Symphony No.104 in Leonard Ratner, ClassicMusic:
Expression,Form,and Style (NewYork:Schirmer,1980), p.227; see also the discus-
sion regarding the ESmajor Piano Sonata in Beth Shamgar, 'The Retransition in
the Piano Sonatas of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven' (PhD diss., NewYork Uni-
versity, 1978), pp.90-98.
8. The term 'false reprise' is most unfortunate, for it wrongly implies a deliberate
ruse on the part of the composer. In actuality, a thematic return in the tonic key
towards the beginning or in the middle of the development section was a standard
feature of sonata forms, and thus the motion to D major here would surely have
been recognised as kind of tonic return; see Peter A. Hoyt, 'The False Recapitula-
tion and the Conventions of Sonata Form' (PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania,
1996) . --
9. See Harold Andrews, 'The Submediant in Haydn's Development Sections', in
Jens Peter Larsen, Howard Sewer and JamesWebster (eds.), Haydn Studies:Pro-
ceedingsof the InternationalHaydn Conference,Washington,D. C., 1975 (NewYork:
Norton, 1981), pp. 465-71; Charles Rosen, Sonata Forms, p. 263; and Laszlo
Somfai, The KeyboardSonatas of XosephHaydn, trans. in collaboration with Char-
lotte Greenspan (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), p.284.
10. Though the development sections of most of the pieces cited in Table 1 are struc-
tured by an expanded rising motion in the bass, a few of these development sec-
tions approach theVII# through different routes. For instance, in Op.33 No.1 and
Op. 54 No. 1, the VII# is approached by a motion from III, and in the D major
Piano Concerto, the VII# is approached via a descent from II.
For other discussions of a development section which approaches a VII# by
means of a large-scale ascent, see the analyses of Haydn's Symphony No. 104 in
Heinrich Schenker, Free Composition,ed. and trans. Ernst Oster (New York:
Longman, 1979), Fig. 114, and Channan Willner, 'Chromaticism and the Medi-
ant in Four Late HaydnWorks', Theoryand Practice,18 (1988), pp.79-114.
11. Unlike the other works discussed here, the VII# chord in this piece does resolve on
the middleground level as aV of III. Nevertheless, the rocking bass motion in bars
114-19 ofthe piano part suggests a F#2chord on the deep level and thus facilitates
the connection of the bass C# of the VII# (in bars 106ff.) with the bass C# of the
dominant chord (in bars 120). As a result, this development section, like the oth-
ers, is to be understood as concluding with aVII>V motion.
12. The Witt symphony may be found in Barry S. Brook (ed.), The Symphony,1720-
1840 (NewYork: Garland Press, 1983). Incidentally, the development section in
the Mozart D major Concerto includes a strong modulation to C major, which
relates enharmonically to the B# that leads to theVII# chord.
13. See Walter Kirkendale, Fugue and Fugato in Rococoand ClassicalChamberMusic,
trans. in collaboration with MargaretBent, (Durham, NC: Duke University Press,
1979), pp.21 lff. for a list of works familiarto Beethoven for which we have certain
¢Blackwell
PublishersLtd. 1998
Music
Analysis,17/iii ( 1998)