[1ST Speaker positive] scandal of SH , it may lead people to

This house would boycott the artworks
from the artist who commited sexual
harrashment
Boycott = banned all the distribution of
the artworks related to the artist
Artworks = such as music
believe two wrong perception things :
1. people will tend to believe doing
sexual harashment has a no risk of
punishment
> people will freely to do SH
> the case of SH will mushrooming
> the victims is becoming more and
more by the days

Artist = we talked about entertainer in 2. believe that the supremacy of law

KOREA ONLY, a person who may influence in that country Is one sided
society, especially their fans club. adventages
Imagine that people in the country will
Commited = clearly PROVEN as the have a stigma that the law from the
accused of sexual harassment country is only take sides beside the
popular artist only it will lead the trust
Sexuall harashment means for example of law from people decreasing
spreading letter, notes, picture, video, or
do touchin, patting, punching sexually That two points may lead to the
against a person direct/indirectly without unstabilized of nation,
any inform consent. there will be many cases of
sexual harashments
Mechanism = force the government to And broke the next generation of its
take out all the artworks related to the nation by indirectly legalize
artist through their artist agency the spread of sexuall
As a movement of rejection Sexual harashments
Harashment in the country
So we believe that [motion]
reason The artwork should be stop from
distribution because
 artwork related to the artist can
increase the rise of new fans and it
will lead people to the wrong
person perception.
for example ;
we know the legendary boyband in
Korea such as Super Junior. Their
songs, even nowadays, are still easy to
listen this kind of artworks. It will lead
1. People will tend to adore them
2. people will have a tendency to seek
more information of them. And IF THE
INFORMATION is about SH and people
KNOW that the accuse of SH still got
royalty from its artworks and didn’t
get any intervention towards their
[1ST Speaker negative]
This house would boycott the artworks
from the artist who commited sexual
harrashment

- it will bring unwanted impact

toward agency financial
- we have to prison the accused of
SH but we don’t need to boycott
cause of humanity reason
everyone have a second chance to
make them to be a better person.
In the name of humanity, we have
to let him get a “should-be-
punishment” we don’t need to
boycott the artworks cause it may
have a bigger effects towards
another subject.
We as a good person, we don’t
want to make the agency sufferer
a financial right?
We don’t want to make the agency
paid off what actually they don’t
involved, right?

- solution = we may prison him and

make him regrets what he did was
a very serious trouble and instead
off boycott their artworks, we can
do the better things towards their
spiritual condition by doing
rehabilitation.
 pshycology
 physikiatri
by doing this therapeutic we may
created a new better person,
we don’t need to harm the artist
agency, the law can be stand out
and the important thing is we give
the solution right on the point of
target, the accused of SH
As social right movements, TH condemn
every acts or campaign of obesity
acceptance [ positive ]
Condemn = curse and totally rejected
every social action.
Campaign = is a movement to reach the
goal of obesity acceptance in society
Obesity = here, obesity is not kind of
physiology or healthy phase of human.
It is a diseade that may be lead to the
complication disease.
Obesity according to the WHO
range of BMI. Obbesity have a value of
BMI over than 30.00
BMI or body mass index is kind of
way to measure the body mass class of
humans, the measurement is use a
fraction of weight to height square.
The normal result of BMI is 18,5 –
22.9 , and the obese one is over than
30.
decrease. By doing this little steps
in changing the movement to the
fight obesity we may increase the
healthy nation level!!!!!
2. by joining the campaign of obesity
acceptance, we receive, we
tolerate the unhealthy condition
towards our body.
Imagine, if we do support and
tolerate our unhealthy condition it
may be lead to the behavior of not
getting more attention toward
their body health.
We may not control our diet
anymore and may be lazy for doing
exercise , because in our deep
point of perspective ‘obesity is
something to be acceptance’ . it
may bring harmful towards our
body. By acceptance the obese, it
may conduct some complication
disease that will be explained
more by my second speaker.

Acceptance = support, agree, and

tolerated about obesity .

Obesity acceptance can not be a topic

of social right movement because it is
indirectly support people to get
acceptable towards the disease, “the
obese”
But here, actually we have to fight the
disease not acceptance the disease.

Here are the reason why we curse

every campaigns of obesity acceptance:
1. Rather than acceptance the
disease, we should fight the
disease
We should change the consept of
the campaign to improve the body
health profile. We should
encourage people to rescue their
body health profile so the rate os
obesity in the country will be
Negative
As social right movements, TH condemn
every acts or campaign of obesity
acceptance [ positive ]

Campaign= to keep the body

healthy by fight the obesity.
Accept the obesity by giving an
information of healthy live
For example
SUMO in japan. Because they still
control of their weight they still
get healthy even they are obese
sufferer.
THW force all industrial
companies to have at least one
environmentalist in their board
directors
[positive]
Industrial companies = a public
and a private company
Environmentalist = a person who
concerned with or advocates the
protection of the environment that
is licensed by the government
Board director = is a structure of
companies that has an obligation
to determine the policy in a
company
Force mechanism = send a
mandatory towards all industrial
companies in the reason of a social
movement to support government
project to keep a condusive
industrial environment ( a good
sanitation, a good land choosing, a
pollution, a drainage, etc.)
Reason to government control=
government can control private
company by the reason to protect
the welfare of the individuals and
promote higher standards of
public health, safety, morals, and
general well being.
The use of environmentalist is to
regulate the policy of the
company.
Why it is an urgency to have at
least one environmentalist in a
board director?
1. The board director has a
function of 3
- Determining policy by
reviewing and screens
executive decution
>> if there is a problem
towards the environmental
the environmentalist has
an authority to make a
reviewing towards the
executive in that company.
By this authority , the
condusive industrial
environmental will be
reach
- Trusteeship of the property
and welfare of the
company
- Financial sanction => make
an important financial
decisions like sanctioning of
finance to various project
of environment
development.
2. Another urgency why we have
environmentalist in the
company is according to the
Laurence wills data, the
journalist and environmental
research intern, in 2017 112
enviromental defenders have
been killed by the . All over the
planet. The most dangerous
country is HONDURAS with 49
cases . one of those case is
caused of opposing illegal
loging in amazon That’s why by
having an environmentalist in a
board executive it will save the
authorithy of the
environmentalist to do their
obligation to make a condusive
industrial environment.
 Negative
THW force all industrial
companies to have at least one
environmentalist in their board
directors

- AMDAL [ environmental
impact assessment ]

- TRIAD EPIDEMIOLOGI
Host
Agent
Environment

- Solution = industrial doctor

more compatible,
THW force the artist management to
expel their scandalous artist
[ positive ]

Expel = sign the contract of the artist out

from agency in a reason of personal rules
violation

Scandalous = means that do a sexual

harassment

Force = against the agency through formal

letter towards the artist management in
the reason of disturbing the stabilization
of the country
THW force the artist management to
expel their scandalous artist
[ negative ]