You should spend about 

40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic.
Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the
price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or
experience.
You should write at least 250 words.

Media plays an important part in our lives. However, some people believe that
the famous people are negatively depicted by the media while others reckon that
media is the first source that produces the famous people. For many reasons,
which will be discussed below,  I strongly believe that positive media does not
affect the famous people, unlike the negative one which interferes with their
private lives.

It is widely agreeable that the positive media makes us well informed about the
famous people. To illustrate, we can become so familiar to those famous people
and we can get benefit from their good merits. Additionally, we will be able to
apply their good conducts in our lives. Needless to say, all people are affected
only by the famous people. Consequently, we can imitate them in whatever is
positive. In this way, I believe that media should continue to show us those
famous people so that we can develop and lead a comfortable life.

Media plays an important role to make someone famous. Mass people from all
around the world know about the fame of someone through the media. So in a
way, media helps someone to get famous. It is a bad practice for reporter and
journalist to take vengeance against some famous celebrities. This should be
completely avoided. I completely agree that the famous people should be given
their privacy and should not be followed everywhere they go to. This is a basic
human right that they often can't enjoy.

The second reason why the positive media is important for famous people is that
it enormously increases the fame of those people. Additionally, such famous
people will drastically be known all over the world. Hence, the famous people will
not only gain their fame medially but rather they will be materialistically and
morally rich ones. Accordingly, it can be noticed that famous people get their
fame from the media and they will be so grateful to such promising and positive
media.

On the other hand, when the negative media is employed in the lives of famous
people, it will upset them. In other words, all of us know that some curious media
always want to know everything about the famous people. Moreover, it always
interferes in their lives and chases them wherever they go. Undoubtedly, such
famous people will utterly become dissatisfied with the so-called media since it
penetrates their privacy. As a result, this kind of media is surely unwelcome in all
communities.

To recap, we have to differentiate between the two kinds of media mentioned

above. Positive media contributes widely to the production of famous people
while the bad one extremely affects the privacy of those famous people. Hence,
we should do our best to encourage the positive media and to prevent such
negative one.

The modern era has seen umpteen changes with necessary groundwork that

were entrenched in the past century of various advancements. The current

topic of _______ can be addressed further through careful considerations

which will intimately evaluate the topic. There are opposing views to every

stance, and this topic is no different. I intend to put forth the case that will

convey a detailed account regarding the perks and flaws of the issue.

To review the first case of the topic, one can put the case forth by stating that

proponents of the topic argue for the positive implications. My case can be

further elaborated with a great degree of evaluation that these favourable

circumstances lead to a better outcome regarding the dilemma of the topic. In

addition, there is no denying the fact that the final context is in the favour of
the argument. However, an opposing point of view cannot be ignored, which is

that opponents also present a convincing case against the topic.

If we consider another school of thought on the issue, the naysayers regarding

the topic argue regarding the regressive effects of the topic. Moreover, it is

quite evident that the resulting conditions can cause detrimental after-effects.

Consequently, one can confidently state that one cannot avoid the

consideration of the drawbacks of the topic.

In essence, the current topic can be summarized as there are both pros and cons regarding the topic.