Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sarah Eggleston
SCED/THEA 4980
The school I was teaching this unit at was in a suburban area in northern Utah. The area
was a predominantly white with a minimal mix of Hispanic or Latino and Asian population and
was also mainly from a middle-class to upper-middle-class economical standing. The theatre
class that the unit itself was taught in had 27 students total and was mainly comprised of females
(22 females, 5 males), and majority of the students were white with about 4 students that were
Hispanic and about 2 students that were Asian. None of the students in the class had any
noticeable disabilities, but there is a possibility that some of the students had some other
disabilities that I didn’t know about because I didn’t have access to that information.
There were at least 2 female students that regularly didn’t come to class and out of those two
there was one that before the end of the term ended up dropping the class entirely. I never met
this student that dropped the class, and the other female student only came to class twice out of
the entire term. There were 2-3 male students who also had attendance issues, but for the most
part came to and actively participated in class. Out of the female students, there were about 4
students that were shy and didn’t particularly like speaking in front of large groups, and about
another 3 students who felt some sort of loneliness or lack of comradery/friendship within the
class. This last bit of information was found out over the several weeks of classes and through
parent teacher conferences where parents expressed concern for their students.
The class this unit was taught in was a Drama 2 class, which was a class meant for mainly
freshman students with minimal theatrical background, and the purpose of the class was to assist
students so they could progress to the more advanced theatre classes along with to see students’
potential and talent in a structured space. Since this unit was taught about halfway through the
year, the students had already built up some of their theatrical fundamentals. The instructional
EGGLESTON 3
ICAP UNIT REFLECTION
standards presented in this unit brought many of those developing fundamentals together and
allowed students to build up their performance skills even more. Before the unit was taught I
gauged students’ interests and which areas of theatre they wanted to grow in, and they chose the
general topic of 10-minute one-acts for this unit and that’s what I based my instructional
standards on; it was something the students felt they were ready for and could handle over the
The standards presented aligned with my mentor teacher’s long-term goals because it
allowed students to develop and showcase their talents, which was one of the purposes of the
class in general. The standards used also assisted students in gaining an understanding of the
work behind a performance, along with the experience of performing. This aligned with my
mentor teacher’s long-term goals for the class because it allowed us to see students’ talent,
potential, work ethic in a production setting, and guided them towards the more advanced theatre
To make sure that all my lesson plans aligned with my mentor teacher’s long-term goals, I
checked everything off with him before diving into the unit. When I introduced the topic of my
chosen unit, he loved the idea and thought it would be great for the students in the class, and that
they’d all do well with the given project. He also thought it would be a great learning opportunity
for me as a teacher to give that large of a project and teach that long of a unit. Overall, he
believed the unit was a great idea to incorporate into the class, and fully supported me in
The class was Drama 2, however it was made for starting out freshman with some theatrical
background, so I based the instructional standards on the Utah secondary level 1 and 2 theatre
core standards, along with some professional theatre standards. Due to the nature of the class, I
EGGLESTON 4
ICAP UNIT REFLECTION
figured the level 1 standards with a mix of level 2 standards would be appropriate. The state core
standards are also loosely based on professional theatre standards, and so mixing those standards
seemed reasonable and was fairly easy to do. I thought it would be beneficial for the students as
well to learn about professional theatre and would add to their educational experience.
With all of the contextual factors taken into consideration, plus collaboration and careful
planning with my mentor teacher, the students met the instructional and state core standards put
into place in the unit lessons. Although there were some hiccups along the way, it was not due to
standards.
I planned several opportunities for assessment throughout the unit. In total, there were
about eight major points of assessment: a memorization check, a blocking check, the first
preview, an analysis assignment, a second preview, a dress/tech preview, the performance, and a
peer grade. I would say there were two different pre-assessments for this unit, the first being the
initial ‘assignment’ given before the unit truly started. I asked the students what genre of a play
they’d like to be in, and I allowed them to choose one person they would like to work with
throughout the unit project. This was for me to see who was friends with whom, what the
students were interested in, and how I could arrange the groups.
The second one that I would count as another pre-assessment would be their first preview.
This was the first time that I saw the students truly act with a script and see the work that they
had put into it at this point in time. I had planned two more previews before they performed so
that I could see their growth from the first preview – which is why I would consider this a pre-
assessment – but also so that I could help them and give them feedback so they had the
EGGLESTON 5
ICAP UNIT REFLECTION
opportunity to get better and grow. This pre-assessment aligned with the instructional standards
of performing in a production setting and was part of the unit a bit more than the other pre-
assessment, although it doesn’t necessarily mean the other pre-assessment was any less
For post-assessment I also had two types: the final performance, and a peer grade. The
performance was to show their growth from their first preview, but to show their acting talent
and preparation. The peer grade was a grade their peers gave each other to show how hard each
of them worked on the final performance and the project in general. I had both of these post-
assessments because sometimes in the arts students can ‘get by’ with just talent instead of hard
work, but with the peer grade it combats that and shows me the work ethic of the students instead
of just their talent. These post-assessments also showed me that students met the learning
In theatre, it is often hard to assess a student’s work since a lot of it is subjective, but if the
teacher sets out specific areas to assess without bias then it makes things easier; this is what the
scoring sheets for region and state drama competition are meant to do. With those areas of
critique already set out and with clear objective areas for assessment, plus the fact that students
are already somewhat familiar with those or will come to be familiar with them, the areas of
critique on the scoring sheets seemed like a reasonable choice for state criteria based assessment
for my unit. I created rubrics and outlines for the assessment points in the unit based on those
areas on the scoring sheets to stay objective in assessing the students’ work.
During the first preview that students showed me, I took notes and gave them a participation
grade for at least performing and showing me their work. I took notes every preview shown to
me, along with their final performance. I have attached the notes taken during the previews and
EGGLESTON 6
ICAP UNIT REFLECTION
performances along with my grid of assessments and groupings for students. From the first
preview to the final performance, there was significant improvement in the students’ acting,
preparation, blocking, and memorization. I believe that the lessons throughout the unit and the
suggestions given from my mentor teacher, the TA’s, and myself truly helped the students
progress in their talent and their work towards their goal of reaching the more advanced theatre
classes.
Overall, using criteria from a state provided scoring sheet to assess the students’ work and
using the state core standards to shape the learning objectives worked very well for this unit. The
students made great progress, learned more about the production process, and developed their
understanding of theatrical fundamentals. The learning objectives and goals for the classroom
were met through this unit, and the assignments accurately assessed the students’ progress and
work.
The entire process of creating this unit was somewhat difficult. My mentor teacher left it
completely open for me design and take control of, which was part of the difficulty. The other
part was trying to design a unit that aligned with my mentor teacher’s long-term goals even
though I wasn’t going to be there after the end of this unit. The fact that my mentor teacher left
the term completely open for me to take control and plan was freeing, but it made me nervous as
well. Often with creativity even a little bit of boundaries is great for creation and helps with
coming up with ideas, but there were almost no boundaries put on me from my mentor teacher
and so I had to pull the unit idea out of basically nowhere. I’m really glad that I asked the
students their opinions on what they would like to do and where their interests lay, because that
gave me the idea for the unit topic/project. I would like to think that in my own classroom and
with my own vision/goals for the class and program, unit and lesson planning would go a bit
In my own classroom I still want to ask my students where their interests are and what
subjects/projects they’d like to do because by asking those questions, it showed the students that
I cared what they thought, that their opinions and wants were important, they shaped their own
curriculum, and I earned their respect a little bit right off the bat. I think those are important
There are several challenges that I faced with teaching this unit. There were students that I
certainly struggled with, there were unexpected surprises that popped up and had to be dealt with
right in the moment, and lessons that had to be rearranged within the unit, but that just taught me
that flexibility and perseverance was that much more important in teaching, and planning for the
unexpected was just as important as planning for the expected. The students that I struggled with
EGGLESTON 10
ICAP UNIT REFLECTION
weren’t that bad in reality, and I learned how to get through to them eventually (it was through
building a relationship with them and earning their respect). The lessons being rearranged didn’t
truly affect the overall lesson, they were just minor inconveniences that had to be dealt with; they
weren’t even that inconvenient, just unexpected. Being flexible and perseverant definitely helped
my mood throughout teaching the unit, which in turn I believe helped my students’ attitudes and
learning. I would definitely count my flexibility a victory for this entire experience.
Although we talk about challenges quite a bit, there were several small victories that
happened. I managed to get a student to show up to class a few times and to actually participate
and interact in class, which I was not at all expecting. I believe how I dealt with that student and
that whole situation was just what it needed to be for that student. The other victories would be
the interactions with the students. The few students I struggled with at first that I was able to
eventually build a relationship with would definitely count at victories in my book as well. How
I went about building the assignments went great as well, and I feel were beneficial for the
students which would count as a victory. My favorite assignment would be the blocking
assignment since the students reacted to that mini lesson exceptionally well, and they vocally
Throughout this process I learned that planning and writing down my plans is probably my
least favorite part of the job, along with assessing and grading. I want my students to succeed,
but if they don’t put in the work or show up, it’s very difficult for them to do so in a performing
art. That’s why assessing and grading was difficult, but assessing in general wasn’t bad. By
assessing my students’ work and performances it showed me where they were struggling, where
they excelled, and what they needed help with. It gave me lesson plan ideas as well since some
standards and making sure that it also meets the students’ needs for success, plus following what
the school administration wants. There are plenty of restrictions, although those restrictions are
helpful with planning because it allows creativity to flow and some of the best lessons can
happen. Also when I plan it can help me get excited about what I’m doing with my students,
which helps get them excited too. I just dislike writing down my plans no matter how necessary
they are for me and for administration, but I understand and respect the necessity behind it all.
I also learned that I love teaching. Sometimes when the students don’t vocally respond to the
lessons, it’s hard to gauge whether they are learning or it can be discouraging, but I truly love
seeing the students understand the content and being able to interact, help, and coach the
students. Seeing the students improve in their talent and work is very rewarding and I thoroughly
enjoy teaching, even with the planning, assessing, and other challenges.
Out of this whole process nothing seemed outrageously difficult, besides possibly finding a
good place in the classroom to set up my computer for the Zoom observations due to the set up
of my classroom, but even that wasn’t very difficult. Another difficulty I had was coming up
with ideas for my unit since I didn’t have much guidance in that area. Although that was
difficult, communicating with my mentor teacher about his goals for the class and talking with
the students about what they were interested in helped with that. I had a wonderful mentor
teacher and mentor program in general with a great support system backing me up. What could
have been easier about the whole process is clearer communication with my mentor teacher. We
worked very well together and communication wasn’t an issue at all, just having regular
meetings with my mentor teacher to discuss what was going on might have made things slightly
easier throughout. We were very busy and he had a lot of people that wanted to talk to him all
EGGLESTON 12
ICAP UNIT REFLECTION
the time, but if I had been more persistent about having regular meetings then it would have
happened.
Overall, I believe this whole process was a good indication of what teaching will be like in
my own classroom. I thoroughly enjoyed the process even with its challenges, difficulties, and
my least favorite parts. I understand that teaching isn’t just teaching, and that there is so much
more to it and to accept one part of the job I have to accept all parts of the job. I greatly enjoyed
the experience and taking on the role of teacher, and I am excited to have my own classroom and