This document discusses responses to queries regarding a digital project management platform for the Mumbai Pune Expressway Missing Link project in Maharashtra, India. It addresses questions about hosting a common data environment, modeling guidelines, asset tagging information, non-geometric asset data, material data incorporation, linking assets to facility management solutions, quantification templates, required simulation studies, model review frequency, as-built model details, site data capture, and model checking responsibilities. The responses indicate the common data environment will be hosted by the client, modeling will follow BS1192:2007+A2:2016 guidelines, and many additional details will be discussed and finalized in workshops with the client.
This document discusses responses to queries regarding a digital project management platform for the Mumbai Pune Expressway Missing Link project in Maharashtra, India. It addresses questions about hosting a common data environment, modeling guidelines, asset tagging information, non-geometric asset data, material data incorporation, linking assets to facility management solutions, quantification templates, required simulation studies, model review frequency, as-built model details, site data capture, and model checking responsibilities. The responses indicate the common data environment will be hosted by the client, modeling will follow BS1192:2007+A2:2016 guidelines, and many additional details will be discussed and finalized in workshops with the client.
This document discusses responses to queries regarding a digital project management platform for the Mumbai Pune Expressway Missing Link project in Maharashtra, India. It addresses questions about hosting a common data environment, modeling guidelines, asset tagging information, non-geometric asset data, material data incorporation, linking assets to facility management solutions, quantification templates, required simulation studies, model review frequency, as-built model details, site data capture, and model checking responsibilities. The responses indicate the common data environment will be hosted by the client, modeling will follow BS1192:2007+A2:2016 guidelines, and many additional details will be discussed and finalized in workshops with the client.
Digital Project Management Platform including 5D-BIM, ERP, GIS Systems for Mumbai Pune
Expressway (MPEW) Missing Link project in the state of Maharashtra
Sr. Queries from Afcons Response from Bentley Response from Ceinsys Tech Ltd No. 1 What would be CDE Client Yes (Common Data Environment) from this MSRDC is hosting CDE (Common project? It will be hosted Data Environment) by LB / Client? 2 Does Consultant scope Yes. Yes. include modeling BIM Process is BS1192- guidelines? They will 2007+A2:2016. EPC contractor and have to adhere to the BEP AE will responsible provided by us? 3 Asset tagging Assets are already identified. It Yes. This will be discussed and information is required needs to be further discussed finalised in consultation with by the client. By when we with MSRDC in AIMS workshop MSRDC during workshop and will receive the Asset and concluded. concluded. tagging register? 4 By when we will receive Same as Point No. 3 above We will discuss during workshop the Asset data and conclude dictionary? 5 Apart from tagging Meta data required for non- register what other geometric is identified. It will be Meta data required for non- information (any kind of discussed and finalized in geometric is identified. It will be non-geometric info) is workshop as mentioned discussed and finalized in expected for asset in Point No. 3 above workshop as mentioned above. management? 6 Is material data to be Out of scope for Bentley for this We will discuss during workshop incorporated in models project and cannot comment. and conclude for asset management? If yes, we need a material master for the same. 7 Is Asset information to be Out of scope for Bentley for this We will discuss during workshop linked with any FM project and cannot comment. and conclude monitoring solution? If yes, formats are to be shared with us. 8 Quantification templates Out of scope for Bentley for this Not yet. This will be decided as are defined? project and cannot comment. required 9 What kind of simulations Out of scope for Bentley for this Construction Simulation and studies are expected project and cannot comment. Project Planning simulation from models? What shall be the Out of scope for Bentley for this Weekly model review is proposed 10 frequency of the Model project and cannot comment. in addition to model review session review? required for MSRDC authority 11 For the creation of the Out of scope for Bentley for this The BIM model will be developed As-built model what level project and cannot comment. for LOD 350, further information of information shall be requirement for as built model will shared? By whom? be decided in consultation with Frequency? Formats? MSRDC 12 Site data capture Out of scope for Bentley for this Site data Captured is required. (photographs) for project and cannot comment. Mechnisum wil be discuseed in monitoring progress. Is it workshop acknowledged? 13 Who will be checking Out of scope for Bentley for this Model checking is to be carried out models with “technical project and cannot comment. by the BIM DDC with Authority intent” Is it sign-off Engineer EPC for incorporation of required? all required engineering details, and to there satisfaction. Sing-Off mechanisum can be descried at EPC contractor level