Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDEX
No. No.
1.0 Design Methodology 2
2.0 References 5
4.0 Assumption 7
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
1.0) INTRODUCTION
1.1 ) General
In the following pages design of precast prestressed post-tensioned I girder of 17.875m is presented.
The super-strucutre is modelled as 3-D structure in STAAD-Pro software as per design requirement.
The girder is modelled as beam element where as deck slab as plate element.
Forces due to vehicle is calcuated by running the moving vehicle in STAAD-Pro software.
Critical forces as obtained from STAAD analysis at 9 sections (refer Fig-1) is used for design of super-structure
The design has been carried generally in accordance with IRS-CBC-2003 & approved design basis report
Summary of bending moments and shear forces at various section are given in CL. 6.0 respectiviely.
The girders will be simply supported under dead loads due to self weigth of girder and
deck slab.
The girders will be casted in casting yard. Prestressing will be done in two stages. The
The first stage prestressing will be done after concrete attains compressive strength of 35 Mpa.
The girders will then be lifted from the casting bed, allowing the casting bed for another cycle of casting.
Second stage prestressing will be done after concrete attains compressive strength of 45 Mpa. The
girders will be lifted and placed in position. Deck slab will then be casted
by in situ concrete and untensioned reinforcement.
1.2) Loading
The design loading considered is as per design basis report as follows :
The following loads are considered for design of superstructure
I) Dead Load
ii) Superimposed Dead Load
iii) Live Load
iv) Launching girder load
a) Dead Load (DL)
The dead load is assessed based on the volume of material using following densities:
Prestressed concrete : 25 kN/m3
Reinforced concrete : 25 kN/m3
Plain concrete : 23 kN/m3
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
c) Live Load
The Train Live Load will be the “Modern Rolling Stock” type, with the two following axle configurations:
15t 15t 15t 15t
1.4) Losses
a) Losses due to friction and effect of slip :
This is calculated for each cable seperately. The effect of slip is then calculated. These
calculations are tabulated in cl 9.9 to 9.11. The value of fixed length is then rechecked so that
the loss of elongation matches with slip. These values are than transferred to subsequent calculation sheets
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Private Limited Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
2.0) REFERENCES
i) IRS-CBC- 2003
ii) IRC -18 -2000
III) Design Basis Report
iv) Launching girder details of reach 1
Drawing no. 246-NCC-NMRCL-LG-GAD-01 TO 07
246-NCC-NMRCL-LG-ERECTION-01 TO 08
246-NCC-NMRCL-LG-AUTO-01 TO 06
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Private Limited Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Private Limited Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
4.0 ) Assumptions :
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Grade of concrete :
Precast girder = 50 Mpa 2000
Deck slab = 40 Mpa 250
Width of deck slab = 2000 mm 2
Eq. Widh of deck slab = 1789 mm 1000
T Y
Center of gravity from bottom = Yb = 0.745 m
Z 1100
Moment of inertia z-z @ c.g. = INA = 0.258 m4
Fig -3
Section modulus @ bottom = Zb = 0.346 m3
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Grade of concrete :
Precast girder = 50 Mpa
Deck slab = 40 Mpa 1000 Y
Width of deck slab = 2000 mm 2
Eq. Width of deck slab = 1789 mm 0
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Grade of concrete :
Precast girder = 50 Mpa m = 0.894
Deck slab = 40 Mpa Y
Width of deck slab = 2000 mm
Eq. Widrh of deck slab = 1789 mm 0 150
1 1000
Center of gravity from bottom = Yb = 0.529 m 2 150
300 400
Moment of inertia z-z @ c.g. = INA = 0.101 m 4
1100 Z
Center of gravity from top = Yt = 0.571 m 5
300
Section modulus @ top = Zt = 0.176 m3 150 3
250 4
Section modulus @ bottom = Zb = 0.191 m3
1000
Fig - 2
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Grade of concrete :
Precast girder = 50 Mpa m = 0.8944 2000
Deck slab = 40 Mpa
Width of deck slab = 2000 mm 6 250
Eq. Widrh of deck slab = 1789 mm 1789
1 1000 150
Center of gravity from bottom = Yb = 0.784 m 2 150
400
Moment of inertia z-z @ c.g. = INA = 0.240 m 4
300
1000
Fig - 1
475252832.xls
Note :
1) The sections mentioned above are the node numbers as provided in staad model.
2) Prestressbc con - Refer 18.DE.CB-13, Appendix-F, page no.
3) Mc : Mchange is the additional moments caused in the final continuous structure by the bottom cable prestress force
4) Pr : Parasatic moments are the secondry moments due to cap cables.
5) DL : Self wt. of girder moments
6) Pp : Wt. of parapet
7) SIDL : Super imposed dead load
8) LL : Passenger car load
9) BR : Braking and traction force
10) SC : Shrinkage creep
11) DS : Differential settlement
12) TE : Temperature effects
13) DT : Differential temperature effects
14) EQ : Longitudinal earthquake
475252832.xls 05/11/202007:01:38
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
6.0) Force Summary
6.1) Bending moment summary
SPAN = 17.875 M Section Interval = 3.156
SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775
Girder wt. M1 0 -35 240 635 720 635 240 -35 0
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants
Note :-Pvt.
LoadsLtd.
of Launching girder are found to be not governing ( Refer LC : Service & LC : Launching)
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
8.0 ) Summary of Stresses due to bending moments : (Ref. cl 6.0 & 7.0 )
SECT. A B C D E F G H I
Precast Zt girder 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Section Z b 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
M1 ft gir 0.00 -0.17 1.36 3.60 4.08 3.60 1.36 -0.17 0.00
fb 0.00 0.17 -1.26 -3.33 -3.78 -3.33 -1.26 0.17 0.00
M2 ft gir 0.00 -0.17 0.94 2.66 3.04 2.66 0.94 -0.17 0.00
fb 0.00 0.17 -0.87 -2.46 -2.81 -2.46 -0.87 0.17 0.00
Composi Zt 0.427 0.427 0.425 0.425 0.425 0.425 0.425 0.427 0.427
Section Zt girder 0.727 0.727 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.727 0.727
Zb 0.346 0.346 0.306 0.306 0.306 0.306 0.306 0.346 0.346
M3 ft 0.00 -0.19 0.56 1.67 1.91 1.67 0.56 -0.19 0.00
ft gir 0.00 -0.11 0.32 0.93 1.06 0.93 0.32 -0.11 0.00
fb 0.00 0.23 -0.78 -2.32 -2.64 -2.32 -0.78 0.23 0.00
M4 ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft gir 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
fb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
M5 ft 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
ft gir 0.00 -0.10 0.65 1.61 1.74 1.61 0.65 -0.10 0.00
fb 0.00 0.20 -1.62 -4.01 -4.32 -4.01 -1.62 0.20 0.00
M8 P/A 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76
NET ft -0.14 -0.14 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.14 -0.14
ft gir 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.32 1.32
fb -0.42 -0.42 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.42 -0.42
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
P = 925 kN
Acomp sect = 1.22 m2
P/A = 0.76 N/mm2
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
9.1 ) Equation of cables, Exit angle, Total length of cable : ( Ref drawing no.
R2D02-SPA-CV-BAS-NR2-00-00-PSD-7201 )
2 cab. No. 2 600 - 325 = 275 6232 0.0883 5.04 12479 6312 18791
3 cab. No. 3 250 - 125 = 125 6232 0.0401 2.30 12466 6312 18778
4 cab. No. 4 0 - 125 = -125 9388 -0.0266 -1.5259 9391.9 0.0 9391.9
9.2 ) Cable ordinates and c.g. from bottom about various section in (mm) :
section A B A B C D E F G H I L M
X 0 0 0.000 0.450 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.700 18.325 18.775 #REF! #REF!
cab. No. 1 950 950 950 910 783 573 525 573 783 910 950 950 950.0
cab. No. 2 600 600 600 562 447 325 325 325 447 562 600 125 600.0
cab. No. 3 250 250 250 233 181 125 125 125 181 233 250 250 250.0
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
cab. No. 1 0.0908 0.0908 0.091 0.0864 0.0706 0.030 0.000 0.0305 0.0706 0.0864 0.0908 0.0908
cab. No. 2 0.0885 0.0885 0.088 0.0821 0.0589 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0589 0.0821 0.0885 0.0885
cab. No. 3 0.0401 0.0401 0.0401 0.0372 0.0268 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0268 0.0372 0.0401 0.0401
cab. No. 4 -0.0266 ### 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ###
cab. No. 1 5.2 5.2 5.202 4.951 4.048 1.745 0.000 1.745 4.048 4.951 5.202 5.2
cab. No. 2 5.1 5.1 5.070 4.702 3.377 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.377 4.702 5.070 5.1
cab. No. 3 2.3 2.3 2.300 2.134 1.534 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.534 2.134 2.300 2.3
cab No. 4 -1.5 -1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ###
9.5 ) Forces after losses due to slip in each cable (KN) : ( Ref. cl 6.4 & 6.5 )
section A B A B C D E F G H I L
X 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 2.08 6.23 9.39 12.54 16.70 18.33 18.78
cab. No. 2 0 0 3313 3319 3343 3405 3427 3448 3500 3475 3468 #REF!
cab. No. 3 0 0 3364 3369 3386 3430 3451 3473 3518 3530 3525 #REF!
cab. No. 4 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
9.6 ) Total Forces after losses due to slip (KN) :
section A B A B C D E F G H I Avg
X 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 2.08 6.23 9.39 12.54 16.70 18.33 18.78
cab. No. 2 1 Nos 0 0 3313 3319 3343 3405 3427 3448 3500 3475 3468 #REF!
cab. No. 3 1 Nos 0 0 3364 3369 3386 3430 3451 3473 3518 3530 3525 #REF!
Total 0 0 6677 6688 6729 6835 6878 6922 7018 7005 6993 #REF!
Avg. force in cable = 6861 KN Avg. stress in cable 1 1281 N/mm2 = 0.689 UTS
2
Avg. stress in cable 1 1282 N/mm = 0.689 UTS
Force per strand = 6861 = 181 KN
38
cab. No. 2 0 0 3300 3308 3337 3405 3427 3448 3494 3463 3454 #REF!
cab. No. 3 0 0 3362 3367 3385 3430 3451 3473 3517 3528 3523 #REF!
cab. No. 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 6661 6675 6722 6835 6878 6922 7011 6991 6977 #REF!
cab. No. 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 428 398 288 0 0 0 300 416 448 #REF!
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Prestressing Force 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Effect of Slip 6 mm
Fix pt dtst from A = 15.61 m
Point A B C D E F Fixed Pt G H I
X 0.000 0.450 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 15.610 16.7 18.325 18.775
Before slip 0 0.450 0 1.625 0 4.156 0 3.156 0 3.156 0 3.07 0 0 0 0
After slip 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Average loss of force 0 0 0 0 0 0
loss of elongation 6.00 mm
Elongation at jacking 3.23 11.57 29.30 21.97 21.75 28.32 10.96 3.02 130 mm
elongation
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Point A B C D E F Fixed Pt G H I
X 0.000 0.450 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.300 16.7 18.325 18.775
Before slip 3711 0.450 3703 1.625 3677 4.156 3610 3.156 3587 3.156 3565 3.757 3506 3500 3475 3468
After slip 3313 3319 3343 3405 3427 3448 3506 3500 3475 3468
Average loss of force 391 359 269 183 138 58
loss of elongation 6.00 mm
Elongation at jacking 3.23 11.56 29.23 21.92 21.79 28.41 10.98 3.03 130 mm
Elomgation
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Table 6.1: Summary of Prestressing forces initial after locking the cables
Es 195000 MPa
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Table 5.2 : Summary of Prestressing forces initial after loss due to elastic shortening
X= Bottom Cables
Po ecc
0.00 -167 #DIV/0!
A 0.00 6510 0.126
B 0.45 6521 0.154
C 2.08 6562 0.215
D 6.23 6668 0.304
E 9.39 6711 0.304
H 12.54 6754 0.304
I 16.70 6851 0.215
J 18.33 6838 0.154
K 18.78 6826 0.126
18.78 #REF! #DIV/0!
Avg. 6693
Po = 6693 kN
Initial stress = 1258 N/mm2
Fpt = 1860 N/mm2
Po/Fpt = 0.676 UTS
Relax. Loss = 0.044 x 1258 = 55.36 N/mm2
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Loss of prestress due to shrinkage and creep
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
10.0 ) Resultant stresses immediately after first stage prestress (Only precast section considered) : ( Ref cl 8 & 9 )
Cable 2 to be stressed
Section A B C D E F G H I
Horizontal Force
in Cable - 2 (kn) 3300 3308 3337 3405 3427 3448 3494 3463 3454
Area of section
(m2) 1.100 1.100 0.770 0.770 0.770 0.770 0.770 1.100 1.100
4
Moment of Inertia, I(m ) 0.111 0.111 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.111 0.111
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.550 0.550 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.550 0.550
c.g. of cable from
bottom (m) 0.600 0.562 0.447 0.325 0.325 0.325 0.447 0.562 0.600
Eccentricity -0.050 -0.01 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.08 -0.01 -0.05
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
3
Zb (m ) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A Mpa 3.00 3.01 4.33 4.42 4.45 4.48 4.54 3.15 3.14
P e/ Zt Mpa -0.82 -0.19 1.54 3.93 3.95 3.98 1.61 -0.20 -0.86
P e/ Zb Mpa -0.82 -0.19 1.42 3.63 3.66 3.68 1.49 -0.20 -0.86
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa 3.8 3.2 2.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.9 3.3 4.0
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 2.2 2.8 5.8 8.1 8.1 8.2 6.0 2.9 2.3
stress due to M1
At top Mpa 0.0 -0.2 1.4 3.6 4.1 3.6 1.4 -0.2 0.0
At bottom Mpa 0.0 0.2 -1.3 -3.3 -3.8 -3.3 -1.3 0.2 0.0
Resultant stress
At top Mpa 3.8 3.0 4.2 4.1 4.6 4.1 4.3 3.2 4.0
At bottom Mpa 2.18 3.0 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.8 4.8 3.1 2.28
Depth of girder (m) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
Stress at
c.g. of cable 3.07 3.01 4.36 4.54 4.40 4.61 4.57 3.15 3.22
Allowable stress
At top Mpa 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0
At bottom Mpa -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Remarks
At top Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
At bottom Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Avg. stress at c.g. of cable = 3.9 N/mm2
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
10.1 ) Resultant stresses immediately after SECOND stage prestress (Only precast section considered) : ( Ref cl 8 & 9 )
Cable 3 to be stressed
Section A B C D E F G H I
Horizontal Force
In cable (kn) 3362 3367 3385 3430 3451 3473 3517 3528 3523
Area of section
(m2) 1.10 1.10 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 1.10 1.10
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.55 0.55 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.55 0.55
c.g. of 2nd stage cable
from bottom (m) 0.250 0.233 0.181 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.181 0.233 0.250
Eccentricity 0.300 0.32 0.348 0.404 0.40 0.404 0.348 0.317 0.300
e = Yb - c.g.
I (m4) 0.111 0.111 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.111 0.111
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Zb (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A Mpa 3.06 3.06 4.40 4.45 4.48 4.51 4.57 3.21 3.20
P e/ Zt Mpa 5.00 5.30 6.68 7.85 7.90 7.95 6.94 5.55 5.24
P e/ Zb Mpa 5.00 5.30 6.18 7.26 7.30 7.35 6.42 5.55 5.24
Effect of second stage prestress
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa -1.9 -2.2 -2.3 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -2.4 -2.3 -2.0
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 8.1 8.4 10.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.0 8.8 8.4
Resultant stress after II-stage prestress
At C.G. of II-stage cable 5.8 6.2 7.6 7.5 7.2 7.6 8.0 6.5 6.1
due to SECOND stage prestress
At C.G. of II-stage cable 2.6 2.9 5.3 7.2 7.2 7.3 5.5 3.0 2.7
due to FIRST stage prestress
At C.G. of I-stage cable
due to SECOND stage prestress 2.6 2.9 5.3 7.2 7.3 7.3 5.6 3.1 2.7
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
11.0 ) LOSSES IN FIRST STAGE PRESTRESS :
( As per IRC : 18-2000, Cl 11)
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
11.1 ) LOSSES IN SECOND STAGE PRESTRESS :
iii) Loss due to relaxation of H.T. steel at service : ( Low relaxation steel) ( IRC 18 - 2000 , Table 4A )
@ 0.689 fp = 2.363 x 3 = 7.089 %
11.2 ) Additional loss in first stage cable due to second stage prestressing
Additional stress at c.g. of first stage cable due to second stage prestressing = 4.9 N/mm2
iv) Loss due to relaxation of H.T. steel at service condition( Low relaxation steel)
@ 0.633 fp = 1.663 x 3 = 4.989 % ( IRC 18 - 2000 , Table 4A )
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Resultant stresses immediately after SECOND stage prestress (Only precast section considered) :
Cable 1 & 2 to be stressed.
Section A B C D E F G H I
Horizontal Force
in Cable (kn) 3300 3308 3337 3405 3427 3448 3494 3463 3454
Area of section
(m2) 1.10 1.10 0.770 0.770 0.770 0.770 0.770 1.10 1.10
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.55 0.55 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.55 0.55
c.g. of 2nd stage cable
from bottom (m) 0.250 0.233 0.181 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.181 0.233 0.250
Eccentricity 0.30 0.317 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.32 0.30
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Zb (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A Mpa 3.00 3.01 4.33 4.42 4.45 4.48 4.54 3.15 3.14
P e/ Zt Mpa 4.91 5.21 6.58 7.79 7.84 7.89 6.89 5.45 5.14
P e/ Zb Mpa 4.91 5.21 6.09 7.21 7.25 7.30 6.37 5.45 5.14
Effect of second stage prestress
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa -1.9 -2.2 -2.2 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -2.4 -2.3 -2.0
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 7.9 8.2 10.4 11.6 11.7 11.8 10.9 8.6 8.3
Effect of first stage prestress
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa 3.82 3.20 2.80 0.49 0.50 0.50 2.93 3.35 4.00
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 2.18 2.82 5.76 8.06 8.11 8.16 6.03 2.95 2.28
Stress after Losses in I-stage prestress
8.13% gir top 3.81 3.20 2.80 0.49 0.50 0.50 2.93 3.35 3.99
bot. 2.18 2.81 5.75 8.05 8.10 8.15 6.02 2.94 2.28
stress due to M1
At top Mpa 0.0 -0.2 1.4 3.6 4.1 3.6 1.4 -0.2 0.0
At bottom Mpa 0.0 0.2 -1.3 -3.3 -3.8 -3.3 -1.3 0.2 0.0
Resultant stress after first stage prestress
At top 3.8 3.0 4.2 4.1 4.6 4.1 4.3 3.2 4.0
At bottom 2.2 3.0 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.8 4.8 3.1 2.3
Stress after II-stage prestress
gir top 1.91 1.00 0.55 -2.88 -2.89 -2.91 0.57 1.04 2.00
bot. 10.09 11.03 16.17 19.68 19.80 19.93 16.93 11.54 10.56
Resultant stress after II-stage prestress
At top Mpa 1.9 0.8 1.9 0.7 1.2 0.7 1.9 0.9 2.0
At bottom Mpa 10.1 11.2 14.9 16.3 16.0 16.6 15.7 11.7 10.6
Depth of girder (m) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
1) Permissible temperory stresses in concrete at first stage prestressing: (Ref. IRS : Cl. 16.4.2.2, Table 24)
a) compressive stress = 0.5 x fci
fci = 0.8 x fck
grade of concrete fck = 35 N/mm2
fci = 0.8 x 35
= 28 N/mm2
compressive stress = 0.5 x 28
= 14 N/mm2 < 0.4fck = 14 Mpa
2) Permissible temperory stresses in concrete at second stage prestressing: (Ref. IRS : Cl. 16.4.2.2, Table 24)
a) compressive stress = 0.5 x fci
fci = 0.8 x fck
grade of concrete fck = 50 N/mm2
fci = 0.8 x 50
= 40 N/mm2
compressive stress = 0.5 x 40
= 20 N/mm2 < 0.4fck = 20 Mpa
3) Permissible stresses in concrete during service: (Ref. IRS : Cl. 16.4.2.2, Table - 23)
4) Permissible tensile stress in temperature case as per IRC : 6 -2014/ cl. 215.5 = 2/3*0.7sqrt(fck)
= -3.3 Mpa
475252832.xls
Shrish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
6.2.0) Effect of Differential temperature :
h = 1.35
Temperature rise h1= 0.15 h2= 0.25 h3= 0.15 rise fall
a 17.8 10.6 a
Temperature fall h1= 0.25 h2= 0.25 h3= 0.25 h1 4 h1
h4= 0.25 h2 0.7 b
c h2 c
Ec 35355 MPa
a 1.17E-05 Ds 0.41366 MPa/C 1.35
A 1.217214 d
I 0.240342 d h3 0.8 e
Y top 0.565555 z top 0.425
y bot 0.784445 z bot 0.306 h3 h4 f
e 2.1 6.6
475252832.xls
Shrish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
b) Temperature fall :
Temp fall temp stress width thickness avg str Axial lever Mom x "-P/A " "-M/I*y" Net
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
TEMPARATURE REINFORCEMENT
Refer to Cl.no. 13
Stress distribution in temparature case is as follows
-2.37
250 x
5.38
1100
6.83
x = 76.6 mm
Temp Force = 90.96 KN
Reinforcement requirement
= 379 mm^2/m
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
1.2 top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
SIDL ( M3 ) gir top 0.00 -0.13 0.38 1.12 1.28 1.12 0.38 -0.13 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.28 -0.94 -2.78 -3.17 -2.78 -0.94 0.28 0.00
top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.234 3.04 5.10 6.10 5.07 3.07 0.27 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.35 9.67 6.83 5.75 7.03 10.20 9.77 8.39
Walkway LL ( M4 ) top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.234 3.04 5.10 6.10 5.07 3.07 0.27 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.35 9.67 6.83 5.75 7.03 10.20 9.77 8.39
1.1 top 0.00 -0.15 1.06 2.63 2.83 2.63 1.06 -0.15 0.00
Train LL ( M5 ) gir top 0.00 -0.09 0.59 1.47 1.58 1.47 0.59 -0.09 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.18 -1.47 -3.65 -3.93 -3.65 -1.47 0.18 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.37 1.74 4.64 5.12 4.64 1.74 -0.37 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.15 3.63 6.57 7.68 6.54 3.67 0.18 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.54 8.20 3.18 1.81 3.38 8.74 9.95 8.39
Differential Shrinkage top -0.14 -0.14 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.14 -0.14
( M8 ) gir top 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.32 1.32
bot. -0.42 -0.42 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.42 -0.42
Resultant stress top -0.13 -0.51 1.61 4.51 4.99 4.51 1.61 -0.51 -0.14
gir top 2.74 1.47 4.93 7.86 8.98 7.83 4.96 1.50 2.80
bot. 7.59 9.12 7.63 2.61 1.24 2.81 8.17 9.54 7.97
Remarks gir top Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
bot. Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Permissible stress gir top 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
bot. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temperature ( - 40) top 0.00 0.00 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 0.00 0.00
( M6 ) gir top 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.00 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top -0.13 -0.44 -2.37 -0.19 0.20 -0.19 -2.37 -0.44 -0.14
gir top 2.74 1.51 5.38 7.91 8.97 7.88 5.41 1.54 2.80
bot. 7.59 9.04 6.83 2.80 1.56 3.00 7.36 9.45 7.97
Temperature ( 10 ) top 0.00 0.00 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 0.00 0.00
( M7 ) gir top 0.00 0.00 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 0.00 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.00 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top -0.13 -0.37 -0.62 0.85 1.15 0.85 -0.62 -0.37 -0.14
gir top 2.74 1.55 4.20 6.33 7.34 6.31 4.23 1.58 2.80
bot. 7.59 8.96 9.31 6.27 5.16 6.46 9.84 9.37 7.97
gir top Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
/ Bot
Remarks
Maximum tensile stress in cast in situ slab is less than permissible 4.4Mpa. Hence Safe.
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
13.0 ) Resultant stresses at final stage :
Section A B C D E F G H I
First stage prestressing
P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top 3.82 3.20 2.80 0.49 0.50 0.50 2.93 3.35 4.00
P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 2.18 2.82 5.76 8.06 8.11 8.16 6.03 2.95 2.28
% Instantaneos loss due top
to first stage
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
prestressing
0.0 bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Girder self wt. ( M1 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 1.36 3.60 4.08 3.60 1.36 -0.17 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.17 -1.26 -3.33 -3.78 -3.33 -1.26 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 3.82 3.03 4.16 4.09 4.58 4.10 4.29 3.18 4.00
bot. 2.18 2.99 4.50 4.73 4.33 4.83 4.77 3.12 2.28
% loss due to first stage top
prestressing gir top 0.31 0.26 0.23 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.27 0.32
8.13 bot. 0.18 0.23 0.47 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.49 0.24 0.19
Resultant stress gir top 3.51 2.77 3.93 4.05 4.54 4.06 4.05 2.90 3.67
bot. 2.00 2.76 4.03 4.07 3.67 4.17 4.28 2.88 2.10
Second stage prestressing
P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top -1.94 -2.24 -2.28 -3.39 -3.41 -3.44 -2.37 -2.35 -2.04
P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 8.06 8.36 10.57 11.71 11.79 11.86 10.98 8.76 8.44
Resultant stress gir top 1.56 0.53 1.65 0.66 1.12 0.62 1.68 0.56 1.63
bot. 10.06 11.12 14.60 15.78 15.46 16.03 15.26 11.64 10.54
% loss due to elastic top
shortening gir top 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.05
1.2 bot. 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.03 0.03
Resultant stress gir top 1.52 0.49 1.62 0.65 1.12 0.62 1.65 0.52 1.59
bot. 10.04 11.09 14.53 15.69 15.36 15.93 15.19 11.61 10.51
% loss due to second top
gir top -0.42 -0.48 -0.49 -0.73 -0.74 -0.74 -0.51 -0.51 -0.44
stage prestressing
21.5 bot. 1.74 1.80 2.28 2.52 2.54 2.56 2.37 1.89 1.82
% balance loss in first top
stage cable due to
second stage gir top 0.52 0.43 0.38 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.40 0.45 0.54
prestressing
13.5 bot. 0.30 0.38 0.78 1.09 1.10 1.10 0.82 0.40 0.31
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.54 1.73 1.32 1.79 1.29 1.76 0.57 1.49
bot. 8.00 8.90 11.48 12.08 11.73 12.27 12.01 9.32 8.39
Deck slab( M2 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 0.94 2.66 3.04 2.66 0.94 -0.17 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.17 -0.87 -2.46 -2.81 -2.46 -0.87 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.37 2.67 3.98 4.82 3.95 2.70 0.40 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.08 10.61 9.61 8.92 9.81 11.14 9.49 8.39
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
1.2 top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
SIDL ( M3 ) gir top 0.00 -0.13 0.38 1.12 1.28 1.12 0.38 -0.13 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.28 -0.94 -2.78 -3.17 -2.78 -0.94 0.28 0.00
top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.234 3.04 5.10 6.10 5.07 3.07 0.27 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.35 9.67 6.83 5.75 7.03 10.20 9.77 8.39
Walkway LL ( M4 ) top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.234 3.04 5.10 6.10 5.07 3.07 0.27 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.35 9.67 6.83 5.75 7.03 10.20 9.77 8.39
Train LL ( M5 ) top 0.00 -0.15 1.06 2.63 2.83 2.63 1.06 -0.15 0.00
gir top 0.00 -0.09 0.59 1.47 1.58 1.47 0.59 -0.09 0.00
1.1 bot. 0.00 0.18 -1.47 -3.65 -3.93 -3.65 -1.47 0.18 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.37 1.74 4.64 5.12 4.64 1.74 -0.37 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.15 3.63 6.57 7.68 6.54 3.67 0.18 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.54 8.20 3.18 1.81 3.38 8.74 9.95 8.39
Temperature ( - 40) top -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50
( M6 ) gir top 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72
bot. -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47
Resultant stress top -3.50 -3.87 -1.76 1.14 1.62 1.14 -1.76 -3.87 -3.50
gir top 2.14 0.86 4.35 7.29 8.40 7.26 4.38 0.89 2.20
bot. 6.53 8.07 6.73 1.71 0.34 1.91 7.26 8.48 6.92
Temperature ( 10 ) top 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23
( M7 ) gir top -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91
bot. 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81
Resultant stress top -1.27 -1.64 0.47 3.37 3.86 3.37 0.47 -1.64 -1.27
gir top 1.23 -0.048 3.44 6.37 7.49 6.35 3.47 -0.02 1.29
bot. 8.34 9.88 8.54 3.52 2.15 3.72 9.07 10.29 8.72
Differential Shrinkage top -0.14 -0.14 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.14 -0.14
( M8 ) gir top 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.32 1.32
bot. -0.42 -0.42 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.42 -0.42
Resultant stress top -1.40 -1.78 0.34 3.24 3.72 3.24 0.34 -1.78 -1.40
gir top 2.55 1.27 4.73 7.67 8.78 7.64 4.77 1.30 2.61
bot. 7.92 9.46 7.97 2.95 1.58 3.15 8.50 9.88 8.31
Mchange top 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
( M10 ) gir top 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
bot. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Resultant stress top -1.40 -1.78 0.3 3.2 3.7 3.2 0.3 -1.78 -1.40
gir top 2.5 1.3 4.7 7.7 8.8 7.6 4.8 1.3 2.6
bot. 7.9 9.5 8.0 2.9 1.6 3.1 8.5 9.9 8.3
Permissible stress gir top 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
bot. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Remarks gir top Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
bot. Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Maximum tensile stress in cast in situ slab is less than permissible 4.4Mpa. Hence Safe.
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates ROB in lieu of Lvl. crossing No. 30/B at CH. 323/35-37
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Between Simultala abd Bharharwa Stns. ( RJB-P1-P4)
Section C D E F G H I J K
First stage prestressing
P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top 3.82 3.20 2.80 0.49 0.50 0.50 2.93 3.35 4.00
P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 2.18 2.82 5.76 8.06 8.11 8.16 6.03 2.95 2.28
bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0
Girder self wt. ( M1 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 1.36 3.60 4.08 3.60 1.36 -0.17 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.17 -1.26 -3.33 -3.78 -3.33 -1.26 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 3.82 3.03 4.16 4.09 4.58 4.10 4.29 3.18 4.00
bot. 2.18 2.99 4.50 4.73 4.33 4.83 4.77 3.12 2.28
% balance loss due top
to first stage
gir top 0.31 0.26 0.23 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.27 0.32
prestressing
bot. 0.18 0.23 0.47 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.49 0.24 0.19
8.13
Resultant stress gir top 3.51 2.77 3.93 4.05 4.54 4.06 4.05 2.90 3.67
bot. 2.00 2.76 4.03 4.07 3.67 4.17 4.28 2.88 2.10
Second stage prestressing
P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top -1.94 -2.24 -2.28 -3.39 -3.41 -3.44 -2.37 -2.35 -2.04
P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 8.06 8.36 10.57 11.71 11.79 11.86 10.98 8.76 8.44
bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0
Resultant stress gir top 1.56 0.53 1.65 0.66 1.12 0.62 1.68 0.56 1.63
bot. 10.06 11.12 14.60 15.78 15.46 16.03 15.26 11.64 10.54
% balance loss due top
to second stage
gir top -0.42 -0.48 -0.49 -0.73 -0.74 -0.74 -0.51 -0.51 -0.44
prestressing
bot. 1.74 1.80 2.28 2.52 2.54 2.56 2.37 1.89 1.82
21.5
% loss in first stage top
cable due to second
gir top 0.56 0.47 0.41 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.43 0.49 0.59
stage prestressing
bot. 0.32 0.41 0.85 1.18 1.19 1.20 0.89 0.43 0.34
14.7
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.54 1.73 1.32 1.79 1.29 1.76 0.57 1.49
bot. 8.00 8.90 11.48 12.08 11.73 12.27 12.01 9.32 8.39
Deck slab( M2 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 0.94 2.66 3.04 2.66 0.94 -0.17 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.17 -0.87 -2.46 -2.81 -2.46 -0.87 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.37 2.67 3.98 4.82 3.95 2.70 0.40 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.08 10.61 9.61 8.92 9.81 11.14 9.49 8.39
top 0.00 -0.19 0.56 1.67 1.91 1.67 0.56 -0.19 0.00
SIDL ( M3 ) gir top 0.00 -0.11 0.32 0.93 1.06 0.93 0.32 -0.11 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.23 -0.78 -2.32 -2.64 -2.32 -0.78 0.23 0.00
top 0.00 -0.19 0.56 1.67 1.91 1.67 0.56 -0.19 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.26 2.98 4.91 5.89 4.89 3.01 0.29 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.31 9.83 7.29 6.27 7.49 10.36 9.72 8.39
475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates ROB in lieu of Lvl. crossing No. 30/B at CH. 323/35-37
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Between Simultala abd Bharharwa Stns. ( RJB-P1-P4)
top
% balance loss gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.26 2.98 4.91 5.89 4.89 3.01 0.29 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.31 9.83 7.29 6.27 7.49 10.36 9.72 8.39
Footpath LL ( M4 ) top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.26 2.98 4.91 5.89 4.89 3.01 0.29 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.31 9.83 7.29 6.27 7.49 10.36 9.72 8.39
IRC LL ( M5 ) top 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
gir top 0.00 -0.10 0.65 1.61 1.74 1.61 0.65 -0.10 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.20 -1.62 -4.01 -4.32 -4.01 -1.62 0.20 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.16 3.63 6.53 7.63 6.50 3.66 0.19 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.51 8.21 3.28 1.95 3.48 8.74 9.93 8.39
top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Temperature ( - 40)
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
( M6 )
bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
top 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
Resultant stress
gir top 1.42 0.16 3.63 6.53 7.63 6.50 3.66 0.19 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.51 8.21 3.28 1.95 3.48 8.74 9.93 8.39
1
top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Temperature ( 10 )
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
( M7 )
bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
top 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
Resultant stress
gir top 1.42 0.16 3.63 6.53 7.63 6.50 3.66 0.19 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.51 8.21 3.28 1.95 3.48 8.74 9.93 8.39
1
top -0.14 -0.14 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.14 -0.14
Differential Shrinkage
gir top 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.32 1.32
( M8 )
bot. -0.42 -0.42 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.42 -0.42
1
top -0.13 -0.30 1.03 2.76 2.99 2.76 1.03 -0.30 -0.14
Resultant stress
gir top 2.74 1.48 4.92 7.82 8.92 7.80 4.96 1.51 2.80
bot. 7.59 9.09 7.64 2.71 1.38 2.91 8.18 9.51 7.97
1
475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates ROB in lieu of Lvl. crossing No. 30/B at CH. 323/35-37
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Between Simultala abd Bharharwa Stns. ( RJB-P1-P4)
475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates ROB in lieu of Lvl. crossing No. 30/B at CH. 323/35-37
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Between Simultala abd Bharharwa Stns. ( RJB-P1-P4)
475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
SIDL = 2
Footpath LL = 1.5
Train LL = 1.75
11.3 ) Ultimate S.F.. at various section for calculating Longitudinal shear:
SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775
Deck slab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SIDL V3 -30 430 310 108 0 108 310 430 -30
FPLL V4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IRC LL V5 -21 618 529 327.25 193 327 528.5 617.75 -21
SUM -51 1048 839 435.25 193 435 838.5 1048 -51
Note :- Loads at Launching girder movement are found to be not governing ( Refer LC : Service & LC : LG )
Legends :-
LC : Constr. Construction stage Load combination
LC : Service Service Stage load combinations
LC : EQ Earthquake Load Combination
LC : LG Launching girder Load combination
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Section A B C D E F G H I
Horizontal force
in Cable (kn) 6661 6675 6722 6835 6878 6922 7011 6991 6977
Area of section
(mm2) 1.55 1.55 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.55 1.55
Composite
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(m) 0.745 0.745 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.745 0.745
Eccentricity 0.32 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.32
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.427 0.427 0.425 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.43
3
Zb (m ) 0.35 0.35 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.35 0.35
I - precast 0.111 0.111 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.111 0.111
I - Comp 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.26 0.26
Ay- precast 0.151 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.15
Ay-comp 0.28 0.28 0.348 0.348 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.28
ytp 0.55 0.55 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.55 0.55
ytc 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.60 0.60
ft gir (1.5DL+2SIDL) 0.00 -0.56 3.57 9.83 11.18 9.83 3.57 -0.56 0.00
fcm 0.00 -0.20 1.60 4.40 5.01 4.40 1.60 -0.20 0.00
yb-c 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.75 0.75
yb-p 0.55 0.550 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.55 0.55
x1 0.400 0.515 0.740 1.037 1.037 1.037 0.740 0.515 0.400
0.000 -1.259 -0.344 1.960 1.972 1.985 -0.360 -1.318 0.000
fcp1 3.29 3.08 3.65 2.66 2.68 2.70 3.82 3.22 3.44
fcp = 0.8fcp1+fcm 2.632 2.260 4.516 6.531 7.149 6.558 4.653 2.376 2.755
b 0.930 0.930 0.330 0.330 0.330 0.330 0.330 0.930 0.930
Vc1 -31 419 294 115 0 115 294 419 -31
fs -0.046 0.614 1.169 0.457 0.000 0.457 1.169 0.614 -0.046
ft 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697
safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe
Vc2 2383 1710 474 748 883 749 482 1742 2417
Vco 2352 2129 768 863 883 864 776 2161 2385
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
16.1) SHEAR FORCE DUE TO (DEAD LOAD + DECK SLAB )
Grade of concrete = 50 N/mm2
Thickness of web
At end sections = 1000 mm
At intermidiate sec = 400 mm
No. of webs = 1
Dia. Of duct = 105 mm
Max. principle tensile stress = 0.24 * Fck = 1.7 Mpa
Depth of Composite section = 1.35 m
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
16.2 ) DESIGN OF SHEAR AT SERVICE STAGE
Grade of concrete = 50 N/mm2
Thickness of web
At end sections = 1000 mm
At intermidiate sec = 400 mm
No. of webs = 1
Dia. Of duct = 105 mm
Max. principle tensile stress = 0.24 * Fck = 1.7 Mpa
Asv req/ mm2 / mm Vertical shear 0.59 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.3 0.41 0
Asv req/ mm2 / mm Longitudinal shear -2.0 1.8 0.9 -0.6 -1.5 -0.6 0.9 1.8 -2.0
TOTAL Asv req/ -1.4 2.1 1.1 -0.3 -1.2 -0.3 1.2 2.2 -2.0
Stirrups provide mm2 / mm 4.5 4.5 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.5 4.5
Additional req. -5.9 -2.5 0.0 -1.5 -2.3 -1.5 0.0 -2.3 -6.49
Provide shear reinforcement Leg 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 4
tor 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
@ c/c 100 100 200 200 200 200 200 100 100
shear reinforcement provided mm2 / mm 4.52 4.52 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 4.52 4.52
Remark safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Provided steel Tor 10 @ 125 c/c giving Ast = 628 mm2 > 360 Safe
ii) In horizontal directio = 0.15 % of gross area with concrete grade M40
= 0.15 x 400 x 400 = 240 mm2
100
Steel required on each face = 120 mm2
Provided steel Tor 10 @ 200 c/c giving Ast = 393 mm2 > 120 Safe
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
B) In Bottom Bulb
i) In vertical direction = 0.18 % of c/s area in plan
= 0.18 x 1000 x 1000 = 1800 mm2
100
Steel required on each face = 900 mm2
Provided steel Tor 12 @ 100 c/c giving Ast = 1131 mm2 > 900 Safe
ii) In horizontal directio = 0.15 % of gross area with concrete grade M40
= 0.15 x( 1000 x 250 )+ ( 150 x 300 ) +
100
+( 400 x 150 )
2
= 533 mm
Prov. 6 Nos. - Tor 16 giving Ast = 1206 mm2 > 533 Safe
C) In Top Bulb
i) In vertical direction = 0.18 % of c/s area in plan
= 0.18 x 1000 x 1000 = 1800 mm2
100
Steel required on each face = 900 mm2
Provided steel Tor 12 @ 100 c/c giving Ast = 1131 mm2 > 900 Safe
ii) In horizontal directio = 0.15 % of gross area with concrete grade M40
= 0.15 x( 1000 x 150 )+ ( 150 x 300 ) +
100
+( 400 x 150 )
2
= 383 mm
Prov. 6 Nos. - Tor 12 giving Ast = 679 mm2 > 383 Safe
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Fbst = 0.23
Pk
= 89.84 kn
= 248.8 mm2
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
2) Cable 19 T15 :
Bursting tensile force in the End Block ( F bst ) :
Fbst = 0.23
Pk
= 853.5 kn
= 2364 mm2
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Vertical Direction
1) Cable 19 T15 :
Bursting tensile force in the End Block ( F bst ) :
Fbst = 0.11
Pk
= 408.2 kn
= 1131 mm2
No. of cables = 3 Nos.
Total steel required = 3392 mm2
Provide 6 Nos. Tor 16 mm dia. 4 Legged stirrups
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
6.0) interface reiforcement design
6.1 ) Longitudinal shear at the interface of deck slab and Prestressed precast girder
(Section Through slab: Shear plane - 2) (Ref. IRS:CBC, Cl. 17.4.2.3)
Ls = Length of shear plane -1 = 1 x 1000 = 1000 mm
fck = 40 Mpa
Width of slab = 2 - 1 = 1.00 m
m = 0.894
Eq. Width = 0.894 x 1.0 = 0.894 m
A = 0.894 x 0.25 = 0.224 m2
Length of shear plane - 2 = 2 x 250 x 1.0 = 500 mm
Additional Area of slab reinf. required, Ae = = 175 mm2/m
SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0.00 0.45 2.08 6.23 9.39 12.54 16.70 18.33 18.78
V -78 1237 923 406 94 406 923 1237 -78
ytop comp. 0.605 0.605 0.566 0.566 0.566 0.566 0.566 0.605 0.605
y1 = ytop - df 0.480 0.480 0.441 0.441 0.441 0.441 0.441 0.480 0.480
A 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224
Ay1 0.107 0.107 0.099 0.099 0.099 0.099 0.099 0.107 0.107
b 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
I comp. 0.258 0.258 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.258 0.258
V1 = VAy1/b I -0.065 1.028 0.757 0.333 0.077 0.333 0.757 1.028 -0.065
Total Shear Force
in slab -14 230 169 74 17 74 169 230 -14
Shear force at
section 2-2 -4 57 42 19 4 19 42 57 -4
a) K1 fck Ls 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
b) 0.7 Ae fy 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61
Remarks Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
250
1 1
2 1000
475252832.xls Long-shear-slab
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
6.2 ) Longitudinal shear at the interface of deck slab and Prestressed precast girder
(Section at the interface of deck slab and girder: Shear Plane 1)
Ls = Length of shear plane - 1 = 1 x 1000 = 1000 mm
fck = 40 Mpa
m = 0.894
Width of slab = 2.0 m
Thickness of slab = 0.25 m
A = 2.0 x 0.25 x 0.894 = 0.447 m2
Area of bot.reinf. Of slab, Ae =
Sec - A, B, H, I 2 x Y12 @ 100 = 4524 mm2/m = 0.45%
+ stirrups 2 x Y12 @ 100 OK
( Bar no. 10a & 10b in drg no. R2D02-SPA -CV-BAS-207-00-00-DRE-7301 )
Sec - C to G 2 x Y12 @ 200 = 2262 mm2/m
+ stirrups 2 x Y12 @ 200
( Bar no. 07a & 07b in drg no. R2D02-SPA -CV-BAS-207-00-00-DRE-7301 )
SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.54 16.7 18.325 18.78
V -78 1237 923 406 94 406 923 1237 -78
ytop comp. 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.60 0.60
y1 = ytop - df 0.48 0.48 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.48 0.48
A 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Ay1 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21
b 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
I comp. 0.258 0.258 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.258 0.258
V1 = VAy1/b I -0.065 1.0 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.0 -0.1
VL = V1 x b -65 1028 757 333 77 333 757 1028 -65
a) K1 fck Ls 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600
b) 0.7 Ae fy 1583 1583 792 792 792 792 792 1583 1583
Remarks Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
250
1 1
2 1000
475252832.xls Long-shear-interface
Shirish Patel and Associates
KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Tab. 6.2 : Resultant stresses immediately after second stage prestress (Only precast section considered) :
Section B C D E F G H I J K
Horizontal Force
in cable (kn) 6661 6675 6722 6835 6878 6922 7011 6991 6977
Area of section
(mm2) 1.10 1.10 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 1.10 1.10
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.55 0.55 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.55 0.55
c.g. of cable from
bottom (mm) 0.42 0.40 0.31 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.31 0.40 0.42
Eccentricity 0.13 0.15 0.21 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.21 0.15 0.13
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Zb (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A Mpa 6.06 6.07 8.73 8.88 8.93 8.99 9.10 6.36 6.34
P e/ Zt Mpa 4.13 5.06 8.18 11.76 11.84 11.91 8.53 5.30 4.32
P e/ Zb Mpa 4.13 5.06 7.56 10.88 10.95 11.02 7.89 5.30 4.32
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa 1.9 1.0 0.6 -2.9 -2.9 -2.9 0.6 1.1 2.0
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 10.2 11.1 16.3 19.8 19.9 20.0 17.0 11.7 10.7
stress due to M1
At top Mpa 0.0 -0.2 1.4 3.6 4.1 3.6 1.4 -0.2 0.0
At bottom Mpa 0.0 0.2 -1.3 -3.3 -3.8 -3.3 -1.3 0.2 0.0
Resultant stress
At top Mpa 1.9 0.8 1.9 0.7 1.18 0.7 1.9 0.9 2.0
At bottom Mpa 10.2 11.3 15.0 16.4 16.1 16.7 15.7 11.8 10.7
Depth of girder (m) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
Stress at
c.g. of cable 6.99 7.52 11.29 13.21 13.05 13.40 11.80 7.88 7.33
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls 60
Shirish Patel and Associates
KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
LOSSES IN PRESTRESS
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
475252832.xls 61
Shirish Patel and Associates
DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. KOCHI METRO
Tab. 6.2 : Resultant stresses immediately after SECOND stage prestress (Only precast section considered) :
Section B C D E F G H I J K
Horizontal cable
Force (kn) 3300 3308 3337 3405 3427 3448 3494 3463 3454
Area of section
(mm2) 1.10 1.10 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 1.10 1.10
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.550 0.550 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.550 0.550
c.g. of I-stage cable from
bottom (mm) 0.950 0.910 0.783 0.573 0.525 0.573 0.783 0.910 0.950
Eccentricity -0.40 -0.36 -0.25 -0.04 0.00 -0.04 -0.25 -0.36 -0.40
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Zb (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A 3.00 3.01 4.33 4.42 4.45 4.48 4.54 3.15 3.14
P e/ Zt 4.91 5.21 6.58 7.79 7.84 7.89 6.89 5.45 5.14
P e/ Zb 4.91 5.21 6.09 7.21 7.25 7.30 6.37 5.45 5.14
Effect of second stage prestress
P/A - Pe/Zt -1.9 -2.2 -2.3 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -2.4 -2.3 -2.0
P/A + Pe/Zb 8.1 8.4 10.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.0 8.8 8.4
Resultant stress
At top -1.9 -2.2 -2.3 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -2.4 -2.3 -2.0
At bottom 8.1 8.4 10.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.0 8.8 8.4
Depth of girder (m) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
475252832.xls 62
Shirish Patel and Associates
KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Span = 18.78 m
Downward deflection :
Dead load moment M1 = 1256 Kn-M
SIDL M2 = 810 Kn-M
Footpath LL M3 = 0 Kn-M
TRAIN LL M4 = 1325 Kn-M
= 0.004761 m
= 4.8 mm
= 0.00307 m
= 3.1 mm
Due to M3 = 5x 0x 18.775 2
48 40305087 x 0.2403
= 0m
= 0.000 mm
= 0.005022 m
= 5.022 mm
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
475252832.xls 66
Shirish Patel and Associates
KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Upward deflection : = P e L2
8 EI
= 1x 6861 x 0.20 x 18.775 2
8 4E+07 x 0.240342
= 0.006 m
= 6.4 mm
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
475252832.xls 67
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Sect. c.g.st db As fp Mult. steel Bf b t Mult. conc. Mult. Provided Mult. Req. Remark
(m) (m) (mm (N/mm
2) 2)
(kn-m) (m) (m) (m) (kn-m) (kn-m) (kn-m)
B 0.425 0.93 5320 1860 8238 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 0 #REF!
C 0.425 0.93 5320 1860 8238 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 1 #REF!
D 0.397 0.95 5320 1860 8486 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! -370 #REF!
E 0.314 1.04 5320 1860 9226 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 1853 #REF!
F 0.225 1.13 5320 1860 10019 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 4954 #REF!
G 0.225 1.13 5320 1860 10019 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 5509 #REF!
H 0.225 1.13 5320 1860 10019 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 4954 #REF!
I 0.314 1.04 5320 1860 9226 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 1853 #REF!
J 0.397 0.95 5320 1860 8486 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! -370 #REF!
K 0.425 0.93 5320 1860 8238 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 0 #REF!
475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Cable ordinates and c.g. from bottom about various section in (mm) :
section A B C D E F G H I
X 0 0.225 0.45 1.263 2.075 4.153 6.231 7.809 9.387 10.965 12.543 14.622 16.700 17.513 18.325 18.550 18.775
cab. No. 1 0.950 0.930 0.910 0.843 0.783 0.657 0.573 0.537 0.525 0.537 0.573 0.657 0.783 0.843 0.910 0.930 0.950
cab. No. 2 0.600 0.580 0.562 0.500 0.447 0.356 0.325 0.325 0.325 0.325 0.3250 0.356 0.447 0.500 0.562 0.580 0.600
cab. No. 3 0.250 0.241 0.233 0.204 0.181 0.139 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.139 0.181 0.204 0.233 0.241 0.250
file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls 39
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Reinforcement comparison
Long. Reinf. @
52 1000 Y12@100 1130 OK
the Bottom of Slab
Long. Reinf. @
51 402 Y10@100 785 OK
Top of slab
Trans. Reinf @
54 988 Y12@100 1130 OK
Bottom of slab
Trans. Reinf. @
Top of slab at 53 545 Y10@100 785 OK
Midspan
Long. Reinf @ Reinforcement required is due to local excessive
Top of the slab 51 1000 Y10@100 785 stresses , can be ignored but if it required by you we
Near Diaphragm will change reinforcement to Y12@100
The diaphragm is connected to seismic restrainer through HTS bolts. Thus diaphragm will be subjected to bending and
shear under longitudinal loads.
As Free end diaphragm is not subjected to any loading , nominal reinforcement is provided in the free end diaphragm .
The dead loads , SIDL on each girder is obtained from the support reaction as obtained from appendix-A
Longitudinal seismic coefficient = 0.45
vertical seismic coefficient 0.3
Loading
Girder Rail plinth Parapet Total
Dead load 1358 KN 210 KN 237 KN 1805 KN ( Refer Dsg Doc no. 81.GE.525.R0)
SIDL 210 KN
Total 2015 KN
Longitudinal
seismic loads 1814 KN
vertical seismic
loads 605 KN
C/l of Girder
0.85 0.85
Side reinforcement:
Beam width mm = 1950 mm
Beam depth mm = 650 mm Clear cover 50 mm
effective cover = 99.5 mm
D eff = 550.5
Concrete Grade 50 MPa Conc capacity ultimate 4432 kNm/m
Reinforcement grade 500 MPa
Reinforcement provided Provide y 25 @ 18 Nos. 8836 mm2
Max no. of bar in one layer 9 Nos. No. of layers = 2
1994 1994
360 360
2200
Bottom reinforcement:
Beam width mm = 650 mm
Beam depth mm = 1950 mm Clear cover 50 mm
effective cover = #REF! mm
D eff = #REF!
Concrete Grade 40 MPa Conc capacity ultimate #REF! kNm/m
Reinforcement grade 500 MPa
Reinforcement provided Provide y 32 @ 4 Nos. 3217 mm2
Max no. of bar in one layer 4 Nos. No. of layers = 2
Ult Moment capacity 0.87. Fy. As.z z = (1-1.1 fy As/fck b d )*d #REF! kNm
z/d( lever arm factor) = #REF! #REF!
Lever arm factor eff #REF!
Capacity ratio:
1233 + 718 = #REF!
1924 #REF!
h 1950 mm Cover = 50 mm
d #REF! mm m= 7.000
pt #REF! m pt = #REF! n= #REF!
j #REF! fst = #REF! MPa es= #REF!
Cover (Cmin) 50 mm spacing = 140 mm bar dia = 0
dc #REF! mm acr = 70 e1= #REF!
h= 1950 (h-dc) = #REF! Strain Reduction #REF!
B= 600 mm D= 1350 mm
Reinf . Provided 4Y32 %pt. = 0.40 %