You are on page 1of 70

Shirish Patel and Associates

Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL


Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

INDEX

Cl. Description Page

No. No.
1.0 Design Methodology 2

2.0 References 5

3.0 List of drawings 6

4.0 Assumption 7

5.0 Cross section propoerties 8

6.0 Force summary 13

7.0 Summary of Cross-section Properties 16

8.0 Summary of Stresses due to bending moments 17

9.0 Cable details & Cable Profile 19

10.0 Resultant stresses immediately after transfer of prestress 26

11.0 Loss in prestress 28

12.0 Permissible stresses 30

13.0 Resultant stresses at various stages 31

14.0 Ultimate force summary 33

15.0 Design for Bending 34

16.0 ULS shear force design 35

17.0 Girder reinforcement design 37

18.0 End Block design 39

Appendix - A : STAAD Analysis ( DL & SIDL) 42

Appendix - B : STAAD Analysis ( Live Load ) 88

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

1.0) INTRODUCTION

1.1 ) General
In the following pages design of precast prestressed post-tensioned I girder of 17.875m is presented.
The super-strucutre is modelled as 3-D structure in STAAD-Pro software as per design requirement.
The girder is modelled as beam element where as deck slab as plate element.
Forces due to vehicle is calcuated by running the moving vehicle in STAAD-Pro software.
Critical forces as obtained from STAAD analysis at 9 sections (refer Fig-1) is used for design of super-structure

The design has been carried generally in accordance with IRS-CBC-2003 & approved design basis report
Summary of bending moments and shear forces at various section are given in CL. 6.0 respectiviely.
The girders will be simply supported under dead loads due to self weigth of girder and
deck slab.

The girders will be casted in casting yard. Prestressing will be done in two stages. The
The first stage prestressing will be done after concrete attains compressive strength of 35 Mpa.
The girders will then be lifted from the casting bed, allowing the casting bed for another cycle of casting.
Second stage prestressing will be done after concrete attains compressive strength of 45 Mpa. The
girders will be lifted and placed in position. Deck slab will then be casted
by in situ concrete and untensioned reinforcement.

1.2) Loading
The design loading considered is as per design basis report as follows :
The following loads are considered for design of superstructure
I) Dead Load
ii) Superimposed Dead Load
iii) Live Load
iv) Launching girder load
a) Dead Load (DL)
The dead load is assessed based on the volume of material using following densities:
Prestressed concrete : 25 kN/m3
Reinforced concrete : 25 kN/m3
Plain concrete : 23 kN/m3

Rail plinth is considered as dead load as per DBR.

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

b) Super Imposed Dead Load (SIDL) Double Track


Refer DBR Cl.no. 2.8

c) Live Load
The Train Live Load will be the “Modern Rolling Stock” type, with the two following axle configurations:
15t 15t 15t 15t

2.45 2.20 12.5 2.20 2.45

Coefficient of Dynamic Impact (CDA) as per IRS-CBC is considered


d) Launching girder
At present launching girder details of Reach 1 Project are adopted since details of launching girder of this project
are not available till today .

1.3) Prestressing cable layout :


The cables are stressed from one end only. Thre are three cables ( cab. No. one is 12 T15 and
cables no. 2 & 3 is 19 T15). Cable no. 1 has parabolic profile. Cable no. 2 has parabolic profile followed by
straight profile. The cable profile is shown in fig 5.

1.4) Losses
a) Losses due to friction and effect of slip :
This is calculated for each cable seperately. The effect of slip is then calculated. These
calculations are tabulated in cl 9.9 to 9.11. The value of fixed length is then rechecked so that
the loss of elongation matches with slip. These values are than transferred to subsequent calculation sheets

b) Losses due to elastic shortening :


Losses due to elastic shortening is calculated in accordance with IRS:CBC
Average concrete stress is calculated in cl 10.0 and 10.1

c) Loss of prestress due to Creep, Shrinkage and Relaxaxtion :


These losses are calculated in accordance with IRS: CBC. The results of these calculation are
summerised in cl 11.0

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

1.5) Bending stress check at Initial and Final condition :


Bending stresses are checked after each stage of prestressing after taking into account appropriate
losses and at service condition.

1.6) Check at Ultimate Load Condition :


This is checked at various section as shown in cl 15.0 The strength at section is checked
as per latest IRS: CBC. It is seen that the factor of safety provided is more than that required as per IRS.

1.7) Design for shear:


The design for shear is presented in cl. 16.0

1.8) Prestressing steel :


Prestressing steel shall be seven wires, low relaxation, super stabilized strands with a nominal
diameter of 15.7mm confirming to the requirements of Is: 14268-1995-Class 2( Table 1 and 2)

Diameter of strand = 15.20 mm


Area of strand = 140 mm2
Ultimate tensile strength = 260.40 KN per cable
Jacking Force = 75 %
Characteristic strength of Prestressing Steel = 1860 Mpa
Modulus of elasicity of strand = 195000 Mpa

1.9) Clear Cover to Reinforcement


For Girder = 40 mm
Deck slab = 25 mm

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Private Limited Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL

2.0) REFERENCES

i) IRS-CBC- 2003
ii) IRC -18 -2000
III) Design Basis Report
iv) Launching girder details of reach 1
Drawing no. 246-NCC-NMRCL-LG-GAD-01 TO 07
246-NCC-NMRCL-LG-ERECTION-01 TO 08
246-NCC-NMRCL-LG-AUTO-01 TO 06

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Private Limited Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL

3.0 ) LIST OF DRAWINGS

1) R2D02-SPA-CV-BAS-207-00-00-DGA-3001 TO 3004 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT :- STATION PIERS


2) R2D02-SPA-CV-BAS-NR2-00-00-DDP-7001 SUPER TSRUCUTRE DETAILS OF I GIRDER " 17.875M " SPAN
3) R2D02-SPA-CV-BAS-NR2-00-00-PSD-7201 SUPERSTRUCTURE PRESTRESSED DETAILS : I- GIRDER(17.875mSPAN)

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Private Limited Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL

4.0 ) Assumptions :

1) 1st stage Prestressing force will be transferred to the girder at 7 days


Concrete grade = 35
Concrete strength at transfer = 28 Mpa
2) 2nd Stage prestress should be applied when girder gains M45 strength

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

5.2) Calculation of section properties : @ Z - Z Axis


Refer fig. No. 3 (Composite section at End portion)
sr no. Area A Y from AY Y2 AY2 Iself Icg
3 2 4 4
bottom m m m m m4
1 1 x 1.1 = 1.10 0.55 0.61 0.30 0.33 0.1109 0.1528
2 1.789 x 0.25 = 0.447 1.225 0.55 1.50 0.67 0.0023 0.1053

Summation = 1.55 1.15 1.00 0.11 0.258

Grade of concrete :
Precast girder = 50 Mpa 2000
Deck slab = 40 Mpa 250
Width of deck slab = 2000 mm 2
Eq. Widh of deck slab = 1789 mm 1000
T Y
Center of gravity from bottom = Yb = 0.745 m
Z 1100
Moment of inertia z-z @ c.g. = INA = 0.258 m4

Center of gravity from top = Yt = 0.605 m


1000
Section modulus @ top = Zt = 0.427 m 3

Fig -3
Section modulus @ bottom = Zb = 0.346 m3

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

5.1) Calculation of section properties : @ Z - Z Axis


Refer fig. No. 4 (Precast section at End portion)
sr no. Area Y from AY Y2 AY2 Iself Icg
bottom
1 1 x 1.1 = 1.10 0.55 0.61 0.30 0.33 0.111 0.111

Summation = 1.10 0.61 0.33 0.11 0.111

Grade of concrete :
Precast girder = 50 Mpa
Deck slab = 40 Mpa 1000 Y
Width of deck slab = 2000 mm 2
Eq. Width of deck slab = 1789 mm 0

Center of gravity from bottom = Yb = 0.550 m


1 1100
Moment of inertia z-z @ c.g. = INA = 0.111 m
4

Center of gravity from top = Yt = 0.550 m

Section modulus @ top = Zt = 0.202 m3 1000


Fig - 4
Section modulus @ bottom = Zb = 0.202 m3

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

5.3) Calculation of section properties : @ Z - Z Axis


Refer fig. No. 2 (Precast section at Intermediate portion)
sr no. Area m 2
Y from AY Y2 AY2 Iself Icg
botto m m2 m2 m3 m4 m4
1 0.3 x 0.15 x 2 = 0.09 1.03 0.09 1.05 0.09 0.000 0.0223
2 0.3 x 0.15 x 0.5 x 2 = 0.05 0.90 0.04 0.81 0.04 0.000 0.0063
3 0.3 x 0.15 x 0.5 x 2 = 0.05 0.30 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.000 0.0024
4 0.3 x 0.25 x 2 = 0.15 0.13 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.001 0.0252
5 0.4 x 1.1 = 0.44 0.55 0.24 0.30 0.13 0.044 0.0446

Summation = 0.770 0.41 0.27 0.05 0.101

Grade of concrete :
Precast girder = 50 Mpa m = 0.894
Deck slab = 40 Mpa Y
Width of deck slab = 2000 mm
Eq. Widrh of deck slab = 1789 mm 0 150
1 1000
Center of gravity from bottom = Yb = 0.529 m 2 150
300 400
Moment of inertia z-z @ c.g. = INA = 0.101 m 4

1100 Z
Center of gravity from top = Yt = 0.571 m 5
300
Section modulus @ top = Zt = 0.176 m3 150 3
250 4
Section modulus @ bottom = Zb = 0.191 m3

1000

Fig - 2

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

5.4) Calculation of section properties : @ Z - Z Axis


Refer fig. No. 1 (Composite section at Intermediate portion)
sr no. Area m2 Y from AY Y2 AY2 Iself Icg
bottom m m2 m2 m3 m 4
m4
1 0.3 x 0.15 x 2 = 0.09 1.025 0.092 1.051 0.095 0.000 0.005
2 0.3 x 0.15 x 0.5 x 2 = 0.05 0.900 0.041 0.810 0.036 0.000 0.001
3 0.3 x 0.15 x 0.5 x 2 = 0.05 0.300 0.014 0.090 0.004 0.000 0.011
4 0.3 x 0.25 x 2 = 0.15 0.125 0.019 0.016 0.002 0.001 0.066
5 0.4 x 1.1 = 0.44 0.550 0.242 0.303 0.133 0.044 0.069
6 1.78885 x 0.25 = 0.4472 1.225 0.548 1.501 0.671 0.002 0.089

Summation = 1.217 0.955 0.942 0.048 0.240

Grade of concrete :
Precast girder = 50 Mpa m = 0.8944 2000
Deck slab = 40 Mpa
Width of deck slab = 2000 mm 6 250
Eq. Widrh of deck slab = 1789 mm 1789
1 1000 150
Center of gravity from bottom = Yb = 0.784 m 2 150
400
Moment of inertia z-z @ c.g. = INA = 0.240 m 4
300

Center of gravity from top = Yt = 0.566 m 5 1100


300
Section modulus @ top = Zt = 0.425 m3 3 150
4
Section modulus @ bottom = Zb = 0.306 m3 250

1000

Fig - 1

475252832.xls
Note :
1) The sections mentioned above are the node numbers as provided in staad model.
2) Prestressbc con - Refer 18.DE.CB-13, Appendix-F, page no.
3) Mc : Mchange is the additional moments caused in the final continuous structure by the bottom cable prestress force
4) Pr : Parasatic moments are the secondry moments due to cap cables.
5) DL : Self wt. of girder moments
6) Pp : Wt. of parapet
7) SIDL : Super imposed dead load
8) LL : Passenger car load
9) BR : Braking and traction force
10) SC : Shrinkage creep
11) DS : Differential settlement
12) TE : Temperature effects
13) DT : Differential temperature effects
14) EQ : Longitudinal earthquake

475252832.xls 05/11/202007:01:38
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
6.0) Force Summary
6.1) Bending moment summary
SPAN = 17.875 M Section Interval = 3.156
SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775
Girder wt. M1 0 -35 240 635 720 635 240 -35 0

Deck slab M2 0 -35 165 470 536 470 165 -35 0

SIDL M3 0 -80 240 710 810 710 240 -80 0


Walkway LL M4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Train LL M5 0 -70 495 1230 1325 1230 495 -70 0
Launching
girder M6 0 -1 350 1152 1788 1567 476 -1 0
EQ M9 0 -28 143 381 424 381 143 -28 0
Load Comb : Service 0 -243 1238 3310 3686 3310 1238 -243 0
DL+1.2SIDL+1.1LL
Load Comb : Launching 0 -71 755 2257 3044 2672 881 -71 0
DL+Launching

6.2) Shear force at summary


SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775
Girder wt. V1 -10 200 137 56 0 56 137 200 -10
Deck slab
V2 -15 135 98 36 0 36 98 135 -15
+Walkway
SIDL+Parapet V3 -15 215 155 54 0 54 155 215 -15
Walkway LL V4 0 0 0 0 0
Train LL V5 -12 353 302 187 110 187 302 353 -12
Launching
girder V6 0 140 140 132 124 80 330 325 0
EQ V9 -7 113 87 42 14 42 87 113 -7
Load Comb : Service -56 981 753 363 121 363 753 981 -56
DL+1.2SIDL+1.1LL
Load Comb : Launching -25 475 375 224 124 172 565 660 -25
DL+Launching girder

M1 = Moment due to Girder self weight in KN-m


M2 = Moment due to Deck slab in KN-m
M3 = Moment due to SIDL in KN-m
M4 = Moment due to Footpath live load in KN-m
M5 = Moment due to LL (including impact factor) in KN-m
M6 = Moment due to launching girder in KN-m
M9 = Moment due to earthquake force in KN-m

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants
Note :-Pvt.
LoadsLtd.
of Launching girder are found to be not governing ( Refer LC : Service & LC : Launching)

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

7.0) Summary of Sectional properties :

Precast section (Ref. fig 2 & 4)


section Dist. Depth Area C.G. C.G. INA Zt Zt girder Zb
point of (m2) from top (m) from bott. (m) 4
(m ) (m ) 3
(m ) 3
(m3)
anchorage Yt Yb

End Sec. 1.1 1.100 0.550 0.550 0.111 - 0.202 0.202


Intermediate 1.1 0.770 0.571 0.529 0.101 - 0.176 0.191
Transition
Portion 1.1 0.935 0.561 0.529 0.101 - 0.180 0.191

Composite section : Deck slab thickness = 0.25 m (Ref. fig 1 & 3)


section Dist. Depth Area C.G. C.G. INA Zt Zt girder Zb
2) 4 3 3
point of (m from top (m) from bott. (m) (m ) (m ) (m ) (m3)
anchorage Yt Yb
End Sec. 1.35 1.547 0.605 0.745 0.258 0.427 0.727 0.346
Intermediate 1.35 1.217 0.566 0.784 0.240 0.425 0.762 0.306
Intermediate 1.35 1.217 0.566 0.784 0.240 0.425 0.762 0.306

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

8.0 ) Summary of Stresses due to bending moments : (Ref. cl 6.0 & 7.0 )
SECT. A B C D E F G H I
Precast Zt girder 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Section Z b 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
M1 ft gir 0.00 -0.17 1.36 3.60 4.08 3.60 1.36 -0.17 0.00
fb 0.00 0.17 -1.26 -3.33 -3.78 -3.33 -1.26 0.17 0.00
M2 ft gir 0.00 -0.17 0.94 2.66 3.04 2.66 0.94 -0.17 0.00
fb 0.00 0.17 -0.87 -2.46 -2.81 -2.46 -0.87 0.17 0.00
Composi Zt 0.427 0.427 0.425 0.425 0.425 0.425 0.425 0.427 0.427
Section Zt girder 0.727 0.727 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.727 0.727
Zb 0.346 0.346 0.306 0.306 0.306 0.306 0.306 0.346 0.346
M3 ft 0.00 -0.19 0.56 1.67 1.91 1.67 0.56 -0.19 0.00
ft gir 0.00 -0.11 0.32 0.93 1.06 0.93 0.32 -0.11 0.00
fb 0.00 0.23 -0.78 -2.32 -2.64 -2.32 -0.78 0.23 0.00
M4 ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft gir 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
fb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
M5 ft 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
ft gir 0.00 -0.10 0.65 1.61 1.74 1.61 0.65 -0.10 0.00
fb 0.00 0.20 -1.62 -4.01 -4.32 -4.01 -1.62 0.20 0.00
M8 P/A 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76
NET ft -0.14 -0.14 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.14 -0.14
ft gir 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.32 1.32
fb -0.42 -0.42 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.42 -0.42

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

P = 925 kN
Acomp sect = 1.22 m2
P/A = 0.76 N/mm2

CREEP REDUCTION FACTOR = 0.43 (Ref. IRS: CBC)


DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAG STRAIN = 0.000136
Ec = 5000 40 = 31623 Mpa
DIFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE STRESS (In slab) = 0.000136 x 0.43 x 31623 = 1.85 Mpa
Restraining stress
P = 1.85 x 2000 x 250 = 925 Kn
Moment due to differential shrinkag = 925 x 0.441 = 407 KN-m
Stress due to differential shrinkage :
ft 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.95
ft gir 0.56 0.56 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.56 0.56
fb -1.18 -1.18 -1.33 -1.33 -1.33 -1.33 -1.33 -1.18 -1.18
M8 P/A slab 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76
ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ft (net) 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76
ft gir 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
fb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

9.0) Details of cable :

i) Nos. of strand in cable no. 1 = 1 x ### = 1E-07 Nos.

ii) Nos. of strand in cable no. 2 = 1 x 19 = 19 Nos.

iii) Nos. of strand in cable no. 3 = 1 x 19 = 19 Nos.

4) Nos. of strand in cable no. 4 = ### x 19 = 1.9E-05 Nos.

Total no. of strands = 38

Ultimate stress of each strand = 1860 N/mm2

Area of each strand = 140 mm2

Total area of prestressing steel = 38 x 140 = 5320 mm2

Ultimate strength of each strand = 260400 N


= 260 Kn
Ultimate strength of cables
Total strength of cable no. 1 = 1E-07 x 260.4 = 0 Kn

Total strength of cable no. 2 = 19 x 260.4 = 4948 Kn

Total strength of cable no. 3 = 19 x 260 = 4948 Kn

Total strength of cable no. 4 = 2E-05 x 260.4 = 0.0049 Kn

Factored strength of cables


Factored strength of cable no. 1 = 3E-05 x 0.75 = 0 Kn

Factored strength of cable no. 2 = 4948 x 0.75 = 3711 Kn

Factored strength of cable no. 3 = 4948 x 0.75 = 3711 Kn

Factored strength of cable no. 4 = 0.005 x 0.75 = 0.0037 Kn

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

9.1 ) Equation of cables, Exit angle, Total length of cable : ( Ref drawing no.
R2D02-SPA-CV-BAS-NR2-00-00-PSD-7201 )

Sr. Cable No. Y1 X1 Angle at start Parabolic Straight Total


No. Tan(theta) In Degrees Length Length Length
1 cab. No. 1 950 - 525 = 425 9388 0.0905 5.17 18801 0.0 18801

2 cab. No. 2 600 - 325 = 275 6232 0.0883 5.04 12479 6312 18791

3 cab. No. 3 250 - 125 = 125 6232 0.0401 2.30 12466 6312 18778

4 cab. No. 4 0 - 125 = -125 9388 -0.0266 -1.5259 9391.9 0.0 9391.9

9.2 ) Cable ordinates and c.g. from bottom about various section in (mm) :
section A B A B C D E F G H I L M
X 0 0 0.000 0.450 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.700 18.325 18.775 #REF! #REF!

cab. No. 1 950 950 950 910 783 573 525 573 783 910 950 950 950.0

cab. No. 2 600 600 600 562 447 325 325 325 447 562 600 125 600.0

cab. No. 3 250 250 250 233 181 125 125 125 181 233 250 250 250.0

cab. No. 4 0 0 0 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 0 0 0


Combined
c.g. of 1 & 3 250 233 181 125 125 125 181 233 250
cables from
bottom
Combined
c.g. of all 425 425 425 397 314 225 225 225 314 397 425 425 425.0
cables from
bottom

Nos. of strand in cable no. 1 = 1E-07


Nos. of strand in cable no. 2 = 19
Nos. of strand in cable no. 3 = 19
Nos. of strand in cable no. 4 = 1.9E-05
Total = 38

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

9.3 ) Horizontal angle at various section (in Radians ) :


section A B A B C D E F G H I L
X 0 0 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775 #REF!

cab. No. 1 0.0908 0.0908 0.091 0.0864 0.0706 0.030 0.000 0.0305 0.0706 0.0864 0.0908 0.0908

cab. No. 2 0.0885 0.0885 0.088 0.0821 0.0589 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0589 0.0821 0.0885 0.0885

cab. No. 3 0.0401 0.0401 0.0401 0.0372 0.0268 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0268 0.0372 0.0401 0.0401

cab. No. 4 -0.0266 ### 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ###

9.4 ) Horizontal angle at various section (in Degree ) :


section A B A B C D E F G H I L
X 0 0 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775 #REF!

cab. No. 1 5.2 5.2 5.202 4.951 4.048 1.745 0.000 1.745 4.048 4.951 5.202 5.2

cab. No. 2 5.1 5.1 5.070 4.702 3.377 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.377 4.702 5.070 5.1

cab. No. 3 2.3 2.3 2.300 2.134 1.534 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.534 2.134 2.300 2.3

cab No. 4 -1.5 -1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ###

9.5 ) Forces after losses due to slip in each cable (KN) : ( Ref. cl 6.4 & 6.5 )
section A B A B C D E F G H I L
X 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 2.08 6.23 9.39 12.54 16.70 18.33 18.78

cab. No. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

cab. No. 2 0 0 3313 3319 3343 3405 3427 3448 3500 3475 3468 #REF!

cab. No. 3 0 0 3364 3369 3386 3430 3451 3473 3518 3530 3525 #REF!

cab. No. 4 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
9.6 ) Total Forces after losses due to slip (KN) :
section A B A B C D E F G H I Avg
X 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 2.08 6.23 9.39 12.54 16.70 18.33 18.78

cab. No. 1 1 Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

cab. No. 2 1 Nos 0 0 3313 3319 3343 3405 3427 3448 3500 3475 3468 #REF!

cab. No. 3 1 Nos 0 0 3364 3369 3386 3430 3451 3473 3518 3530 3525 #REF!

cab. No. 4 1E-06 Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 0 6677 6688 6729 6835 6878 6922 7018 7005 6993 #REF!

Avg. force in cable = 6861 KN Avg. stress in cable 1 1281 N/mm2 = 0.689 UTS
2
Avg. stress in cable 1 1282 N/mm = 0.689 UTS
Force per strand = 6861 = 181 KN
38

Avg. Stress in cable = 181 x 1000 = 1290 N/mm2 = 0.693 UTS


140.0

9.7 ) Horizontal component of force at various section (in KN ) :


section A B A B C D E F G H I
X 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 2.08 6.23 9.39 12.54 16.70 18.33 18.78 0.00

cab. No. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

cab. No. 2 0 0 3300 3308 3337 3405 3427 3448 3494 3463 3454 #REF!

cab. No. 3 0 0 3362 3367 3385 3430 3451 3473 3517 3528 3523 #REF!

cab. No. 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 6661 6675 6722 6835 6878 6922 7011 6991 6977 #REF!

9.8 ) Vertical component of force at various section (in KN ) :


section A B A B C D E F G H I
X 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 2.08 6.23 9.39 12.54 16.70 18.33 18.78 0.00

cab. No. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #REF!

cab. No. 2 0 0 293 272 197 0 0 0 206 285 306 #REF!

cab. No. 3 0 0 135 125 91 0 0 0 94 131 141 #REF!

cab. No. 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 428 398 288 0 0 0 300 416 448 #REF!

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

9.9 ) 'Calculation of Friction Losses and Slip For cable 1:

Cable 1 1E-07 T15 k= 0.002 m= 0.17


Area= 0 mm2 Es= 195000 MPa
P ult 0 kN
P jacking 0.750 0 kN
Point A B C D E F G H I
X 0.000 0.450 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775
Y 0.95 0.9102 0.783 0.5731 0.525 0.573 0.783 0.9102 0.95
DX 0.450 1.625 4.156 3.156 3.156 4.157 1.625 0.450
DY 0.040 0.1273 0.2098 0.0481 0.0481 0.2098 0.1273 0.0398
parabola parabola parabola parabola parabola parabola parabola parabola
q 0.0908 0.0864 0.0706 0.0305 0.0000 0.0305 0.0706 0.0864 0.0908
Change in angle 'Dq 0.0044 0.0201 0.0603 0.0908 0.1212 0.1614 0.1772 0.1816
l 0.452 1.6251 4.159 3.160 3.164 4.175 1.633 0.452 18.820
Total length 'L' 0.452 2.077 6.235 9.396 12.559 16.734 18.367 18.820
mq+kl 0.0016 0.0076 0.0227 0.0342 0.0457 0.0609 0.0669 0.0685
Friction coefficcient 1.000 0.9984 0.9925 0.9775 0.9664 0.9553 0.9409 0.9353 0.9338

Prestressing Force 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Effect of Slip 6 mm
Fix pt dtst from A = 15.61 m

Point A B C D E F Fixed Pt G H I
X 0.000 0.450 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 15.610 16.7 18.325 18.775
Before slip 0 0.450 0 1.625 0 4.156 0 3.156 0 3.156 0 3.07 0 0 0 0
After slip 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Average loss of force 0 0 0 0 0 0
loss of elongation 6.00 mm

Elongation at jacking 3.23 11.57 29.30 21.97 21.75 28.32 10.96 3.02 130 mm
elongation

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

9.10 ) 'Calculation of Friction Losses and Slip For cable 2:

Cable 2 19 T15 k= 0.002 m= 0.17


Area= 2660 mm2 Es= 195000 MPa
P ult 4948 kN
P jacking 0.750 3711 kN
Point A B C D E F G H I
X 0.000 0.450 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775
Y 0.6 0.5617 0.447 0.325 0.325 0.325 0.447 0.5617 0.6000
DX 0.450 1.625 4.156 3.156 3.156 4.157 1.625 0.450
DY 0.038 0.1144 0.1223 0 0.0000 0.1223 0.1144 0.0383
parabola parabola parabola straight straight parabola parabola parabola
q 0.08849 0.0821 0.0589 0 0 0 0.0589 0.0821 0.0885
Change in angle 'Dq 0.0064 0.0296 0.0885 0.0885 0.0885 0.1474 0.1706 0.177
l 0.452 1.6252 4.161 3.160 3.160 4.172 1.633 0.452 18.815
Total length 'L' 0.452 2.077 6.238 9.398 12.558 16.730 18.363 18.815
mq+kl 0.002 0.0092 0.0275 0.0338 0.0402 0.0585 0.0657 0.0677
Friction coefficcient 0.998 0.9909 0.9729 0.9667 0.9606 0.9432 0.9364 0.9345
1 0.998 0.9889 0.962 0.93 0.8934 0.8426 0.7890 0.7374
Prestressing Force 3711 3703 3677 3610 3587 3565 3500 3475 3468
Effect of Slip 6 mm
Fix pt dtst from A = 16.300 m

Point A B C D E F Fixed Pt G H I
X 0.000 0.450 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.300 16.7 18.325 18.775
Before slip 3711 0.450 3703 1.625 3677 4.156 3610 3.156 3587 3.156 3565 3.757 3506 3500 3475 3468
After slip 3313 3319 3343 3405 3427 3448 3506 3500 3475 3468
Average loss of force 391 359 269 183 138 58
loss of elongation 6.00 mm

Elongation at jacking 3.23 11.56 29.23 21.92 21.79 28.41 10.98 3.03 130 mm
Elomgation

9.11) Calculation of Friction Losses and Slip For cable 3:

Cable 3 19 T15 k= 0.002 m= 0.17


Area= 2660 mm2 Es= 195000 MPa
P ult 4948 kN
P jacking 0.750 3711 kN
Point
475252832.xls
A B C D E F G H I L
X 0.000 0.450 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775 0
Y 0.25 0.2326 0.181 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.181 0.2326 0.2500 0
DX 0.450 1.625 4.156 3.156 3.156 4.157 1.625 0.450 -18.78
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Prestressing force after slip :


No. of cable :
cab. 1 = 1
cab. 2 = 1
cab. 3 = 1
cab. 4 = 1E-06

Section Cable no. 1 Cable no. 2 Cable no. 3 TOTAL Eq.


X Y Po Po * Y X Y Po Po * Y X Y Po Po * Y Po Po * Y Y
0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 ###
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ###
A 0 0.95 0 2E-05 0 0.6 3313 1988 0 0.25 3364 841.05 6677 2829 0.424
B 0.45 0.91 0 2E-05 0.45 0.562 3319 1864 0.45 0.23 3369 783.6 6688 2648 0.396
C 2.075 0.783 0 1E-05 2.075 0.447 3343 1496 2.075 0.18 3386 611.54 6729 2107 0.313
D 6.231 0.573 0 1E-05 6.231 0.325 3405 1107 6.231 0.13 3430 428.72 6835 1535 0.225
E 9.387 0.525 0 9E-06 9.387 0.325 3427 1114 9.387 0.13 3451 431.43 6878 1545 0.225
F 12.54 0.573 0 1E-05 12.543 0.325 3448 1121 12.543 0.13 3473 434.16 6922 1555 0.225
G 16.7 0.783 0 1E-05 16.7 0.447 3500 1566 16.7 0.18 3518 635.45 7018 2201 0.314
H 18.33 0.91 0 2E-05 18.325 0.562 3475 1952 18.325 0.23 3530 821.16 7005 2773 0.396
I 18.78 0.95 0 2E-05 18.775 0.6 3468 2081 18.775 0.25 3525 881.36 6993 2962 0.424
J 18.78 0 #REF! #REF! 18.775 0 #REF! #REF! 18.775 0 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Horizontal component of force after slip :


Section Cable no. 1 Cable no. 2 Cable no. 3 TOTAL Eq.
X Y Po Po * Y X Y Po Po * Y X Y Po Po * Y Po Po * Y Y
0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 ###
0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 ###
A 0 0.95 0 2E-05 0 0.60 3300 1980 0 0.25 3362 840.38 6661 2820 0.423
B 0.45 0.91 0 2E-05 0.45 0.56 3308 1858 0.45 0.23 3367 783.06 6675 2641 0.396
C 2.075 0.78 0 1E-05 2.075 0.45 3337 1493 2.075 0.18 3385 611.32 6722 2104 0.313
D 6.231 0.57 0 1E-05 6.231 0.33 3405 1107 6.231 0.13 3430 428.72 6835 1535 0.225
E 9.387 0.53 0 9E-06 9.387 0.33 3427 1114 9.387 0.13 3451 431.43 6878 1545 0.225
F 12.54 0.57 0 1E-05 12.543 0.33 3448 1121 12.543 0.13 3473 434.16 6922 1555 0.225
G 16.7 0.78 0 1E-05 16.7 0.45 3494 1563 16.7 0.18 3517 635.23 7011 2198 0.314
H 18.33 0.91 0 2E-05 18.325 0.56 3463 1945 18.325 0.23 3528 820.59 6991 2766 0.396
I 18.78 0.95 0 2E-05 18.775 0.60 3454 2073 18.775 0.25 3523 880.65 6977 2953 0.423
L 18.78 0.00 #REF! #REF! 18.775 0.00 0 0 18.775 0.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 6.1: Summary of Prestressing forces initial after locking the cables

Bottom Eq. C.g. Area s avg ecc length sav*lgth


Po (Kn) Cables Mpa m m
0.00 0 #DIV/0! 1.10 0.000
0.00 0 #DIV/0! 1.10 0.000 #DIV/0! 0.00 0.00
A 0.00 6677 0.42 1.10 6.070 0.126 0.000 0.00
B 0.45 6688 0.40 1.10 6.080 0.154 0.450 2.73
C 2.08 6729 0.31 0.77 8.739 0.215 1.625 9.88
D 6.23 6835 0.22 0.77 8.876 0.304 4.156 36.32
E 9.39 6878 0.22 0.77 8.933 0.304 3.156 28.01
F 12.54 6922 0.22 0.77 8.989 0.304 3.156 28.19
G 16.70 7018 0.31 0.77 9.114 0.215 4.157 37.37
H 18.33 7005 0.40 1.10 6.368 0.154 1.625 14.81
I 18.78 6993 0.42 1.10 6.357 0.126 0.450 2.87
18.78 #REF! #REF! 1.1 #REF! #DIV/0! 0.00 0.00
Avg. 6861 Total 18.775 160.2

Grade of concrete fck = 35 MPa


Concrete Strength @ 21 days 28 MPa
Ec 5000 fck = 26458 MPa
Elastic shortening of girder due to stressing of all bot cables (ungrouted) 6.05 mm
Area of Prestressing Steel Bottom Cables 1 to 3 5320 mm2

Es 195000 MPa

Elastic shoretning to be considered for computing loss of prestress 3.03 mm

Loss due to Elastic Shortening cables: = 167 kN = 2.4 %


= 2.44 %

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Table 5.2 : Summary of Prestressing forces initial after loss due to elastic shortening

X= Bottom Cables
Po ecc
0.00 -167 #DIV/0!
A 0.00 6510 0.126
B 0.45 6521 0.154
C 2.08 6562 0.215
D 6.23 6668 0.304
E 9.39 6711 0.304
H 12.54 6754 0.304
I 16.70 6851 0.215
J 18.33 6838 0.154
K 18.78 6826 0.126
18.78 #REF! #DIV/0!
Avg. 6693

Po = 6693 kN
Initial stress = 1258 N/mm2
Fpt = 1860 N/mm2
Po/Fpt = 0.676 UTS
Relax. Loss = 0.044 x 1258 = 55.36 N/mm2

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Loss of prestress due to shrinkage and creep

Calculation of loss due to creep and shrinkage (IRS:CBC Table-3)

Shrinkage Strain assuming prestressing after 21 days 0.0002


Creep Strain @ 90% maturity for 10 MPa 0.00051
E creep 19608 MPa f = 1.35
Prestress at midspan Po 6711 kN
s co at mid span @ cog of cable = P*(1/A+e*(e-ep)/I)-Mdl*e/I
M DL= 720 kNm Ac= 0.77 m2
ecc= 0.304 m I= 0.101 m4
e parasatic ep= 0m As= 5320 mm2
s co = 6824(1/1.12+0.76*(0.76-0)/0.511)-6824*0.77/0.511 = 12.69 MPa
r = As/Ac= 0.0069 m= 0.8
m = 'Es/Ec 7.37
DP = m r (s co Ac f + e cs Ec Ac)/(1+m r )*(1+mf)) 869 kN

Relaxation Loss = 0.5 stress x As


= 0.5 x 55.36 x 5320 = 147 kN

Total loss due to creep, shrinkage and relaxation = 1016 kN


= 15.1 %
At service condition
Po = 5677 kN
Initial stress = 1067 N/mm2
Fpt = 1860 N/mm2
Po/Fpt = 0.574 UTS
Relax. Loss = 0.019 x 3 x 1067 = 60.8 N/mm2
= 324 kN
= 5.7 %

Thus total loss = 5.7 + 15.1 = 20.8 %


(increasing 20% as per IRC : 18 CL. 7.2.4) = 25.0 %

Total Loss = 25.0 %

% instantaneous loss = 2.44 %

Balance loss = 25.01 - 2.44 = 22.6 %

Final Prestressing Force @ Midspan 5694 kN

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

10.0 ) Resultant stresses immediately after first stage prestress (Only precast section considered) : ( Ref cl 8 & 9 )
Cable 2 to be stressed
Section A B C D E F G H I

Horizontal Force
in Cable - 2 (kn) 3300 3308 3337 3405 3427 3448 3494 3463 3454
Area of section
(m2) 1.100 1.100 0.770 0.770 0.770 0.770 0.770 1.100 1.100
4
Moment of Inertia, I(m ) 0.111 0.111 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.111 0.111
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.550 0.550 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.550 0.550
c.g. of cable from
bottom (m) 0.600 0.562 0.447 0.325 0.325 0.325 0.447 0.562 0.600
Eccentricity -0.050 -0.01 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.08 -0.01 -0.05
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
3
Zb (m ) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A Mpa 3.00 3.01 4.33 4.42 4.45 4.48 4.54 3.15 3.14
P e/ Zt Mpa -0.82 -0.19 1.54 3.93 3.95 3.98 1.61 -0.20 -0.86
P e/ Zb Mpa -0.82 -0.19 1.42 3.63 3.66 3.68 1.49 -0.20 -0.86
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa 3.8 3.2 2.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.9 3.3 4.0
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 2.2 2.8 5.8 8.1 8.1 8.2 6.0 2.9 2.3
stress due to M1
At top Mpa 0.0 -0.2 1.4 3.6 4.1 3.6 1.4 -0.2 0.0
At bottom Mpa 0.0 0.2 -1.3 -3.3 -3.8 -3.3 -1.3 0.2 0.0
Resultant stress
At top Mpa 3.8 3.0 4.2 4.1 4.6 4.1 4.3 3.2 4.0
At bottom Mpa 2.18 3.0 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.8 4.8 3.1 2.28
Depth of girder (m) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

Stress at
c.g. of cable 3.07 3.01 4.36 4.54 4.40 4.61 4.57 3.15 3.22
Allowable stress
At top Mpa 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0
At bottom Mpa -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Remarks
At top Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
At bottom Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Avg. stress at c.g. of cable = 3.9 N/mm2

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

10.1 ) Resultant stresses immediately after SECOND stage prestress (Only precast section considered) : ( Ref cl 8 & 9 )
Cable 3 to be stressed
Section A B C D E F G H I

Horizontal Force
In cable (kn) 3362 3367 3385 3430 3451 3473 3517 3528 3523
Area of section
(m2) 1.10 1.10 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 1.10 1.10
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.55 0.55 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.55 0.55
c.g. of 2nd stage cable
from bottom (m) 0.250 0.233 0.181 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.181 0.233 0.250
Eccentricity 0.300 0.32 0.348 0.404 0.40 0.404 0.348 0.317 0.300
e = Yb - c.g.
I (m4) 0.111 0.111 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.111 0.111
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Zb (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A Mpa 3.06 3.06 4.40 4.45 4.48 4.51 4.57 3.21 3.20
P e/ Zt Mpa 5.00 5.30 6.68 7.85 7.90 7.95 6.94 5.55 5.24
P e/ Zb Mpa 5.00 5.30 6.18 7.26 7.30 7.35 6.42 5.55 5.24
Effect of second stage prestress
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa -1.9 -2.2 -2.3 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -2.4 -2.3 -2.0
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 8.1 8.4 10.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.0 8.8 8.4
Resultant stress after II-stage prestress
At C.G. of II-stage cable 5.8 6.2 7.6 7.5 7.2 7.6 8.0 6.5 6.1
due to SECOND stage prestress
At C.G. of II-stage cable 2.6 2.9 5.3 7.2 7.2 7.3 5.5 3.0 2.7
due to FIRST stage prestress
At C.G. of I-stage cable
due to SECOND stage prestress 2.6 2.9 5.3 7.2 7.3 7.3 5.6 3.1 2.7

Avg. stress at c.g. of cable = 11.8 N/mm2


(II-stage cable)
Avg. stress at c.g. of cable = 4.9 N/mm3
(I-stage cable)

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
11.0 ) LOSSES IN FIRST STAGE PRESTRESS :
( As per IRC : 18-2000, Cl 11)

i) Due to creep of concrete :


Creep strain between 3 days = 0.00083 - 0.00044 = = 0.00039 ( IRC 18 Table 2 )
and 21 days (50% & 90% maturity)
Loss = 0.00039 x 3.9 x 195000 = 29.5 N/mm2 = 2.3 %
10

ii) Due to shrinkage of concrete :


strain due to residual shrinkage: 0.00043 - 0.00020 = = 0.00023 ( IRC 18 Table 3 )
Between 3 and 21 days
Loss = 0.00023 x 195000 = 44.9 N/mm2 = 3.5 %

iii) Loss due to relaxation of H.T. steel at first stage loss :


@ 0.689 UTS = 2.363 x 1 = 2.36 % ( IRC 18 - 2000 , Table 4A )
Total loss = 2.3 + 3.5 + 2.36
= 8.13 %

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
11.1 ) LOSSES IN SECOND STAGE PRESTRESS :

i) Due to creep of concrete :


Loss = 0.00044 x 11.8 x 195000 = 101.1 N/mm2 = 7.8 %
10

ii) Due to shrinkage of concrete :


Loss = 0.00020 x 195000 = 39 N/mm2 = 3.0 %

iii) Loss due to relaxation of H.T. steel at service : ( Low relaxation steel) ( IRC 18 - 2000 , Table 4A )
@ 0.689 fp = 2.363 x 3 = 7.089 %

Total loss =( 7.8 + 3.0 ) x 1.2 + 0.0 + 7.1 x 1.2 )= 21.5 %


( increased 20% as per IRC:18 CL 7.2.4)

% instantaneous loss = 0.00 %

Balance loss = 21.54 - 0.00 = 21.5 %

11.2 ) Additional loss in first stage cable due to second stage prestressing
Additional stress at c.g. of first stage cable due to second stage prestressing = 4.9 N/mm2

i) Loss due to elastic shortening :


= 1 x modular ratio x avg. stress in concrete at c.g. of cable
2
Grade of concrete at the time of stressing = 40 N/mm2
Ec = 5000 x 40
= 31623 N/mm2
m = 195000 = 6.2
31623
Loss = 0.5 x 6.2 x 4.9 = 15.1 N/mm2 = 15.12 = 1.2 %
1290
ii) Due to creep of concrete :
= 0.00044 x 4.9 x 195000 = 42.1 N/mm2 = 3.3 %
10

iii) Due to shrinkage of concrete :


= 0.0002 x 195000 = 39 N/mm2 = 3.0 %

iv) Loss due to relaxation of H.T. steel at service condition( Low relaxation steel)
@ 0.633 fp = 1.663 x 3 = 4.989 % ( IRC 18 - 2000 , Table 4A )

Total loss =( 3.26 + 3.02 ) x 1.2 + 1.17 + 4.99 x 1.2 )= 14.7 %


( increased 20% as per IRC:18 CL 7.2.4)

% instantaneous loss = 1.2 %


Balance loss = 14.71 - 1.17 = 13.5 %

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Resultant stresses immediately after SECOND stage prestress (Only precast section considered) :
Cable 1 & 2 to be stressed.
Section A B C D E F G H I

Horizontal Force
in Cable (kn) 3300 3308 3337 3405 3427 3448 3494 3463 3454
Area of section
(m2) 1.10 1.10 0.770 0.770 0.770 0.770 0.770 1.10 1.10
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.55 0.55 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.55 0.55
c.g. of 2nd stage cable
from bottom (m) 0.250 0.233 0.181 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.181 0.233 0.250
Eccentricity 0.30 0.317 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.32 0.30
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Zb (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A Mpa 3.00 3.01 4.33 4.42 4.45 4.48 4.54 3.15 3.14
P e/ Zt Mpa 4.91 5.21 6.58 7.79 7.84 7.89 6.89 5.45 5.14
P e/ Zb Mpa 4.91 5.21 6.09 7.21 7.25 7.30 6.37 5.45 5.14
Effect of second stage prestress
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa -1.9 -2.2 -2.2 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -2.4 -2.3 -2.0
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 7.9 8.2 10.4 11.6 11.7 11.8 10.9 8.6 8.3
Effect of first stage prestress
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa 3.82 3.20 2.80 0.49 0.50 0.50 2.93 3.35 4.00
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 2.18 2.82 5.76 8.06 8.11 8.16 6.03 2.95 2.28
Stress after Losses in I-stage prestress
8.13% gir top 3.81 3.20 2.80 0.49 0.50 0.50 2.93 3.35 3.99
bot. 2.18 2.81 5.75 8.05 8.10 8.15 6.02 2.94 2.28
stress due to M1
At top Mpa 0.0 -0.2 1.4 3.6 4.1 3.6 1.4 -0.2 0.0
At bottom Mpa 0.0 0.2 -1.3 -3.3 -3.8 -3.3 -1.3 0.2 0.0
Resultant stress after first stage prestress
At top 3.8 3.0 4.2 4.1 4.6 4.1 4.3 3.2 4.0
At bottom 2.2 3.0 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.8 4.8 3.1 2.3
Stress after II-stage prestress
gir top 1.91 1.00 0.55 -2.88 -2.89 -2.91 0.57 1.04 2.00
bot. 10.09 11.03 16.17 19.68 19.80 19.93 16.93 11.54 10.56
Resultant stress after II-stage prestress
At top Mpa 1.9 0.8 1.9 0.7 1.2 0.7 1.9 0.9 2.0
At bottom Mpa 10.1 11.2 14.9 16.3 16.0 16.6 15.7 11.7 10.6
Depth of girder (m) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

Stress due to II-stage prestress


at c.g. of cable(second stage) 8.23 9.01 12.78 14.57 14.34 14.79 13.42 9.42 8.61
Stress due to II-stage prestress
at c.g. of cable(first stage) 5.62 5.90 9.63 11.73 11.64 11.90 10.09 6.18 5.89
Allowable stress
At top Mpa 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
At bottom Mpa -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Renarks
At top Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
At bottom Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Avg. stress at c.g. of cable = 11.7 N/mm2
(II-stage cable)
Avg. stress at c.g. of cable = 8.7 N/mm3
(I-stage cable)

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

12.0 ) Permissible stresses as per IRS : Concrete Bridge Code

1) Permissible temperory stresses in concrete at first stage prestressing: (Ref. IRS : Cl. 16.4.2.2, Table 24)
a) compressive stress = 0.5 x fci
fci = 0.8 x fck
grade of concrete fck = 35 N/mm2
fci = 0.8 x 35
= 28 N/mm2
compressive stress = 0.5 x 28
= 14 N/mm2 < 0.4fck = 14 Mpa

b) Tensile stress = 1 N/mm2

2) Permissible temperory stresses in concrete at second stage prestressing: (Ref. IRS : Cl. 16.4.2.2, Table 24)
a) compressive stress = 0.5 x fci
fci = 0.8 x fck
grade of concrete fck = 50 N/mm2
fci = 0.8 x 50
= 40 N/mm2
compressive stress = 0.5 x 40
= 20 N/mm2 < 0.4fck = 20 Mpa

b) Tensile stress = 1 N/mm2

3) Permissible stresses in concrete during service: (Ref. IRS : Cl. 16.4.2.2, Table - 23)

a) compressive stress = 0.4 x fck


= 0.4 x 50
= 20 N/mm2

b) Tensile stress => No tensile stress is permitted


in full live load condition

4) Permissible tensile stress in temperature case as per IRC : 6 -2014/ cl. 215.5 = 2/3*0.7sqrt(fck)
= -3.3 Mpa

475252832.xls
Shrish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
6.2.0) Effect of Differential temperature :
h = 1.35
Temperature rise h1= 0.15 h2= 0.25 h3= 0.15 rise fall
a 17.8 10.6 a
Temperature fall h1= 0.25 h2= 0.25 h3= 0.25 h1 4 h1
h4= 0.25 h2 0.7 b
c h2 c
Ec 35355 MPa
a 1.17E-05 Ds 0.41366 MPa/C 1.35
A 1.217214 d
I 0.240342 d h3 0.8 e
Y top 0.565555 z top 0.425
y bot 0.784445 z bot 0.306 h3 h4 f
e 2.1 6.6

I) Self equlibriting stress :


a) Temperature rise :
Temp rise temp stress width thickness avg str Axial lever Mom x "-P/A " "-M/I*y" Net
if restrained
a 17.8 -7.36 1.33 1.66 -4.37
Flange 2.00 0.15 -4.5 -1353 0.506 -685 0.394
b 4.0 -1.65 1.33 1.22 0.89
Flange 1.00 0.20 -1.0 -199 0.338 -67 0.389
0.8 -0.33 1.33 0.63 1.63
Web etc 0.40 0.05 -0.2 -3 0.199 -1 0.333
c 0.0 0.00 1.33 0.49 1.82
d 0.0 0.00 1.33 -1.86 -0.53
Bottom fl 1.0 0.15 -0.4 -65 -0.734 48 0.667
e 2.1 -0.87 1.33 -2.30 -1.84
Resultant P= -1620 M= -705

475252832.xls
Shrish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
b) Temperature fall :
Temp fall temp stress width thickness avg str Axial lever Mom x "-P/A " "-M/I*y" Net

a -10.6 4.38 -1.12 -0.471 2.79


Flange 2.00 0.2 2.3 935 0.49 463 0.354
b -0.7 0.29 -1.12 -0.305 -1.14
Web etc 1.00 0.15 0.2 30 0.30 9 0.429
-0.28 0.12 -1.12 -0.180 -1.19
0.40 0.10 0.1 2 0.38 1 0.333
c 0 0.00 -1.12 -0.180 -1.30

d 0.0 0.00 -1.12 0.237 -0.89


Web etc 0.40 0.25 0.2 17 -0.45 -7 0.667
e -0.8 0.33 -1.12 0.445 -0.35
Bottom fl 1.0 0.25 1.5 383 -0.69 -265 0.631
f -6.6 2.73 -1.12 0.654 2.26
Resultant P= 1367 M= 200
(Assuming 1.0 Mpa residual compressive stress )
Moment due to the tensile stress = 1.26 x 0.25 x 1x 0.7844
2
= 123.65 kN-m
Reinforcement required = 542 mm2

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

TEMPARATURE REINFORCEMENT
Refer to Cl.no. 13
Stress distribution in temparature case is as follows

-2.37
250 x
5.38

1100

6.83

x = 76.6 mm
Temp Force = 90.96 KN

Reinforcement requirement
= 379 mm^2/m

Provide Ast Y 10 @ 200 = 392.5 mm^2/m

Refer Drg.no. R2D02-SPA-CV-BAS-NR2-00-00-DRE-7302 Bar mark 53

Provided Ast Y 10 @ 100 = 785 mm^2/m > Required

475252832.xls Temp -reinf


Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
13.0 ) Resultant stresses at final stage :
Section A B C D E F G H I
First stage prestressing
P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top 3.82 3.20 2.80 0.49 0.50 0.50 2.93 3.35 4.00
P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 2.18 2.82 5.76 8.06 8.11 8.16 6.03 2.95 2.28
% Instantaneos loss due top
to first stage
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
prestressing
0.0 bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Girder self wt. ( M1 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 1.36 3.60 4.08 3.60 1.36 -0.17 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.17 -1.26 -3.33 -3.78 -3.33 -1.26 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 3.82 3.03 4.16 4.09 4.58 4.10 4.29 3.18 4.00
bot. 2.18 2.99 4.50 4.73 4.33 4.83 4.77 3.12 2.28
% loss due to first stage top
prestressing gir top 0.31 0.26 0.23 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.27 0.32
8.13 bot. 0.18 0.23 0.47 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.49 0.24 0.19
Resultant stress gir top 3.51 2.77 3.93 4.05 4.54 4.06 4.05 2.90 3.67
bot. 2.00 2.76 4.03 4.07 3.67 4.17 4.28 2.88 2.10
Second stage prestressing
P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top -1.94 -2.24 -2.28 -3.39 -3.41 -3.44 -2.37 -2.35 -2.04
P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 8.06 8.36 10.57 11.71 11.79 11.86 10.98 8.76 8.44
Resultant stress gir top 1.56 0.53 1.65 0.66 1.12 0.62 1.68 0.56 1.63
bot. 10.06 11.12 14.60 15.78 15.46 16.03 15.26 11.64 10.54
% loss due to elastic top
shortening gir top 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.05
1.2 bot. 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.03 0.03
Resultant stress gir top 1.52 0.49 1.62 0.65 1.12 0.62 1.65 0.52 1.59
bot. 10.04 11.09 14.53 15.69 15.36 15.93 15.19 11.61 10.51
% loss due to second top
gir top -0.42 -0.48 -0.49 -0.73 -0.74 -0.74 -0.51 -0.51 -0.44
stage prestressing
21.5 bot. 1.74 1.80 2.28 2.52 2.54 2.56 2.37 1.89 1.82
% balance loss in first top
stage cable due to
second stage gir top 0.52 0.43 0.38 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.40 0.45 0.54
prestressing
13.5 bot. 0.30 0.38 0.78 1.09 1.10 1.10 0.82 0.40 0.31
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.54 1.73 1.32 1.79 1.29 1.76 0.57 1.49
bot. 8.00 8.90 11.48 12.08 11.73 12.27 12.01 9.32 8.39
Deck slab( M2 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 0.94 2.66 3.04 2.66 0.94 -0.17 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.17 -0.87 -2.46 -2.81 -2.46 -0.87 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.37 2.67 3.98 4.82 3.95 2.70 0.40 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.08 10.61 9.61 8.92 9.81 11.14 9.49 8.39

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

1.2 top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
SIDL ( M3 ) gir top 0.00 -0.13 0.38 1.12 1.28 1.12 0.38 -0.13 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.28 -0.94 -2.78 -3.17 -2.78 -0.94 0.28 0.00
top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.234 3.04 5.10 6.10 5.07 3.07 0.27 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.35 9.67 6.83 5.75 7.03 10.20 9.77 8.39

Walkway LL ( M4 ) top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.234 3.04 5.10 6.10 5.07 3.07 0.27 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.35 9.67 6.83 5.75 7.03 10.20 9.77 8.39
1.1 top 0.00 -0.15 1.06 2.63 2.83 2.63 1.06 -0.15 0.00
Train LL ( M5 ) gir top 0.00 -0.09 0.59 1.47 1.58 1.47 0.59 -0.09 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.18 -1.47 -3.65 -3.93 -3.65 -1.47 0.18 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.37 1.74 4.64 5.12 4.64 1.74 -0.37 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.15 3.63 6.57 7.68 6.54 3.67 0.18 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.54 8.20 3.18 1.81 3.38 8.74 9.95 8.39
Differential Shrinkage top -0.14 -0.14 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.14 -0.14
( M8 ) gir top 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.32 1.32
bot. -0.42 -0.42 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.42 -0.42
Resultant stress top -0.13 -0.51 1.61 4.51 4.99 4.51 1.61 -0.51 -0.14
gir top 2.74 1.47 4.93 7.86 8.98 7.83 4.96 1.50 2.80
bot. 7.59 9.12 7.63 2.61 1.24 2.81 8.17 9.54 7.97
Remarks gir top Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
bot. Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Permissible stress gir top 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
bot. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temperature ( - 40) top 0.00 0.00 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 0.00 0.00
( M6 ) gir top 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.00 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top -0.13 -0.44 -2.37 -0.19 0.20 -0.19 -2.37 -0.44 -0.14
gir top 2.74 1.51 5.38 7.91 8.97 7.88 5.41 1.54 2.80
bot. 7.59 9.04 6.83 2.80 1.56 3.00 7.36 9.45 7.97
Temperature ( 10 ) top 0.00 0.00 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 0.00 0.00
( M7 ) gir top 0.00 0.00 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 0.00 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.00 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top -0.13 -0.37 -0.62 0.85 1.15 0.85 -0.62 -0.37 -0.14
gir top 2.74 1.55 4.20 6.33 7.34 6.31 4.23 1.58 2.80
bot. 7.59 8.96 9.31 6.27 5.16 6.46 9.84 9.37 7.97

gir top Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
/ Bot
Remarks

Maximum tensile stress in cast in situ slab is less than permissible 4.4Mpa. Hence Safe.

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
13.0 ) Resultant stresses at final stage :
Section A B C D E F G H I
First stage prestressing
P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top 3.82 3.20 2.80 0.49 0.50 0.50 2.93 3.35 4.00
P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 2.18 2.82 5.76 8.06 8.11 8.16 6.03 2.95 2.28
% Instantaneos loss due top
to first stage
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
prestressing
0.0 bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Girder self wt. ( M1 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 1.36 3.60 4.08 3.60 1.36 -0.17 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.17 -1.26 -3.33 -3.78 -3.33 -1.26 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 3.82 3.03 4.16 4.09 4.58 4.10 4.29 3.18 4.00
bot. 2.18 2.99 4.50 4.73 4.33 4.83 4.77 3.12 2.28
% loss due to first stage top
prestressing gir top 0.31 0.26 0.23 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.27 0.32
8.13 bot. 0.18 0.23 0.47 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.49 0.24 0.19
Resultant stress gir top 3.51 2.77 3.93 4.05 4.54 4.06 4.05 2.90 3.67
bot. 2.00 2.76 4.03 4.07 3.67 4.17 4.28 2.88 2.10
Second stage prestressing
P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top -1.94 -2.24 -2.28 -3.39 -3.41 -3.44 -2.37 -2.35 -2.04
P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 8.06 8.36 10.57 11.71 11.79 11.86 10.98 8.76 8.44
Resultant stress gir top 1.56 0.53 1.65 0.66 1.12 0.62 1.68 0.56 1.63
bot. 10.06 11.12 14.60 15.78 15.46 16.03 15.26 11.64 10.54
% loss due to elastic top
shortening gir top 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.05
1.2 bot. 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.03 0.03
Resultant stress gir top 1.52 0.49 1.62 0.65 1.12 0.62 1.65 0.52 1.59
bot. 10.04 11.09 14.53 15.69 15.36 15.93 15.19 11.61 10.51
% loss due to second top
gir top -0.42 -0.48 -0.49 -0.73 -0.74 -0.74 -0.51 -0.51 -0.44
stage prestressing
21.5 bot. 1.74 1.80 2.28 2.52 2.54 2.56 2.37 1.89 1.82
% balance loss in first top
stage cable due to
second stage gir top 0.52 0.43 0.38 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.40 0.45 0.54
prestressing
13.5 bot. 0.30 0.38 0.78 1.09 1.10 1.10 0.82 0.40 0.31
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.54 1.73 1.32 1.79 1.29 1.76 0.57 1.49
bot. 8.00 8.90 11.48 12.08 11.73 12.27 12.01 9.32 8.39
Deck slab( M2 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 0.94 2.66 3.04 2.66 0.94 -0.17 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.17 -0.87 -2.46 -2.81 -2.46 -0.87 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.37 2.67 3.98 4.82 3.95 2.70 0.40 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.08 10.61 9.61 8.92 9.81 11.14 9.49 8.39

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

1.2 top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
SIDL ( M3 ) gir top 0.00 -0.13 0.38 1.12 1.28 1.12 0.38 -0.13 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.28 -0.94 -2.78 -3.17 -2.78 -0.94 0.28 0.00
top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.234 3.04 5.10 6.10 5.07 3.07 0.27 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.35 9.67 6.83 5.75 7.03 10.20 9.77 8.39

Walkway LL ( M4 ) top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.22 0.68 2.00 2.29 2.00 0.68 -0.22 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.234 3.04 5.10 6.10 5.07 3.07 0.27 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.35 9.67 6.83 5.75 7.03 10.20 9.77 8.39
Train LL ( M5 ) top 0.00 -0.15 1.06 2.63 2.83 2.63 1.06 -0.15 0.00
gir top 0.00 -0.09 0.59 1.47 1.58 1.47 0.59 -0.09 0.00
1.1 bot. 0.00 0.18 -1.47 -3.65 -3.93 -3.65 -1.47 0.18 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.37 1.74 4.64 5.12 4.64 1.74 -0.37 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.15 3.63 6.57 7.68 6.54 3.67 0.18 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.54 8.20 3.18 1.81 3.38 8.74 9.95 8.39
Temperature ( - 40) top -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50 -3.50
( M6 ) gir top 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72
bot. -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47 -1.47
Resultant stress top -3.50 -3.87 -1.76 1.14 1.62 1.14 -1.76 -3.87 -3.50
gir top 2.14 0.86 4.35 7.29 8.40 7.26 4.38 0.89 2.20
bot. 6.53 8.07 6.73 1.71 0.34 1.91 7.26 8.48 6.92
Temperature ( 10 ) top 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23
( M7 ) gir top -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91 -0.91
bot. 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81
Resultant stress top -1.27 -1.64 0.47 3.37 3.86 3.37 0.47 -1.64 -1.27
gir top 1.23 -0.048 3.44 6.37 7.49 6.35 3.47 -0.02 1.29
bot. 8.34 9.88 8.54 3.52 2.15 3.72 9.07 10.29 8.72
Differential Shrinkage top -0.14 -0.14 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.14 -0.14
( M8 ) gir top 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.32 1.32
bot. -0.42 -0.42 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.42 -0.42
Resultant stress top -1.40 -1.78 0.34 3.24 3.72 3.24 0.34 -1.78 -1.40
gir top 2.55 1.27 4.73 7.67 8.78 7.64 4.77 1.30 2.61
bot. 7.92 9.46 7.97 2.95 1.58 3.15 8.50 9.88 8.31
Mchange top 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
( M10 ) gir top 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
bot. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Resultant stress top -1.40 -1.78 0.3 3.2 3.7 3.2 0.3 -1.78 -1.40
gir top 2.5 1.3 4.7 7.7 8.8 7.6 4.8 1.3 2.6
bot. 7.9 9.5 8.0 2.9 1.6 3.1 8.5 9.9 8.3
Permissible stress gir top 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
bot. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Remarks gir top Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
bot. Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

Maximum tensile stress in cast in situ slab is less than permissible 4.4Mpa. Hence Safe.

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates ROB in lieu of Lvl. crossing No. 30/B at CH. 323/35-37
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Between Simultala abd Bharharwa Stns. ( RJB-P1-P4)

Resultant stresses at final stage :


PERMISSIBLE INCREASE IN 1.000

Section C D E F G H I J K
First stage prestressing
P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top 3.82 3.20 2.80 0.49 0.50 0.50 2.93 3.35 4.00

P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 2.18 2.82 5.76 8.06 8.11 8.16 6.03 2.95 2.28

% Instantaneos loss top


due to first stage
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
prestressing

bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0
Girder self wt. ( M1 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 1.36 3.60 4.08 3.60 1.36 -0.17 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.17 -1.26 -3.33 -3.78 -3.33 -1.26 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 3.82 3.03 4.16 4.09 4.58 4.10 4.29 3.18 4.00
bot. 2.18 2.99 4.50 4.73 4.33 4.83 4.77 3.12 2.28
% balance loss due top
to first stage
gir top 0.31 0.26 0.23 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.27 0.32
prestressing

bot. 0.18 0.23 0.47 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.49 0.24 0.19
8.13
Resultant stress gir top 3.51 2.77 3.93 4.05 4.54 4.06 4.05 2.90 3.67
bot. 2.00 2.76 4.03 4.07 3.67 4.17 4.28 2.88 2.10
Second stage prestressing

P/A - Pe/Zt gir gir top -1.94 -2.24 -2.28 -3.39 -3.41 -3.44 -2.37 -2.35 -2.04

P/A + Pe/Zb bot. 8.06 8.36 10.57 11.71 11.79 11.86 10.98 8.76 8.44

% Instantaneos loss top


due to second stage
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
prestressing

bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0
Resultant stress gir top 1.56 0.53 1.65 0.66 1.12 0.62 1.68 0.56 1.63
bot. 10.06 11.12 14.60 15.78 15.46 16.03 15.26 11.64 10.54
% balance loss due top
to second stage
gir top -0.42 -0.48 -0.49 -0.73 -0.74 -0.74 -0.51 -0.51 -0.44
prestressing

bot. 1.74 1.80 2.28 2.52 2.54 2.56 2.37 1.89 1.82
21.5
% loss in first stage top
cable due to second
gir top 0.56 0.47 0.41 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.43 0.49 0.59
stage prestressing

bot. 0.32 0.41 0.85 1.18 1.19 1.20 0.89 0.43 0.34
14.7
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.54 1.73 1.32 1.79 1.29 1.76 0.57 1.49
bot. 8.00 8.90 11.48 12.08 11.73 12.27 12.01 9.32 8.39
Deck slab( M2 ) gir top 0.00 -0.17 0.94 2.66 3.04 2.66 0.94 -0.17 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.17 -0.87 -2.46 -2.81 -2.46 -0.87 0.17 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.37 2.67 3.98 4.82 3.95 2.70 0.40 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.08 10.61 9.61 8.92 9.81 11.14 9.49 8.39
top 0.00 -0.19 0.56 1.67 1.91 1.67 0.56 -0.19 0.00
SIDL ( M3 ) gir top 0.00 -0.11 0.32 0.93 1.06 0.93 0.32 -0.11 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.23 -0.78 -2.32 -2.64 -2.32 -0.78 0.23 0.00
top 0.00 -0.19 0.56 1.67 1.91 1.67 0.56 -0.19 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.26 2.98 4.91 5.89 4.89 3.01 0.29 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.31 9.83 7.29 6.27 7.49 10.36 9.72 8.39

475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates ROB in lieu of Lvl. crossing No. 30/B at CH. 323/35-37
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Between Simultala abd Bharharwa Stns. ( RJB-P1-P4)

top
% balance loss gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.0 bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress gir top 1.42 0.26 2.98 4.91 5.89 4.89 3.01 0.29 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.31 9.83 7.29 6.27 7.49 10.36 9.72 8.39
Footpath LL ( M4 ) top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.26 2.98 4.91 5.89 4.89 3.01 0.29 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.31 9.83 7.29 6.27 7.49 10.36 9.72 8.39
IRC LL ( M5 ) top 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
gir top 0.00 -0.10 0.65 1.61 1.74 1.61 0.65 -0.10 0.00
1 bot. 0.00 0.20 -1.62 -4.01 -4.32 -4.01 -1.62 0.20 0.00
Resultant stress top 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
gir top 1.42 0.16 3.63 6.53 7.63 6.50 3.66 0.19 1.49
bot. 8.00 9.51 8.21 3.28 1.95 3.48 8.74 9.93 8.39

top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Temperature ( - 40)

gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
( M6 )

bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1

top 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
Resultant stress

gir top 1.42 0.16 3.63 6.53 7.63 6.50 3.66 0.19 1.49

bot. 8.00 9.51 8.21 3.28 1.95 3.48 8.74 9.93 8.39
1

top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Temperature ( 10 )

gir top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
( M7 )

bot. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1

top 0.00 -0.16 1.16 2.89 3.12 2.89 1.16 -0.16 0.00
Resultant stress

gir top 1.42 0.16 3.63 6.53 7.63 6.50 3.66 0.19 1.49

bot. 8.00 9.51 8.21 3.28 1.95 3.48 8.74 9.93 8.39
1

top -0.14 -0.14 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.14 -0.14
Differential Shrinkage

gir top 1.32 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.32 1.32
( M8 )

bot. -0.42 -0.42 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.57 -0.42 -0.42
1

top -0.13 -0.30 1.03 2.76 2.99 2.76 1.03 -0.30 -0.14
Resultant stress

gir top 2.74 1.48 4.92 7.82 8.92 7.80 4.96 1.51 2.80

bot. 7.59 9.09 7.64 2.71 1.38 2.91 8.18 9.51 7.97
1

475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates ROB in lieu of Lvl. crossing No. 30/B at CH. 323/35-37
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Between Simultala abd Bharharwa Stns. ( RJB-P1-P4)

475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates ROB in lieu of Lvl. crossing No. 30/B at CH. 323/35-37
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Between Simultala abd Bharharwa Stns. ( RJB-P1-P4)

475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

14.0 ) Ultimate force summary

Load factor for various loads:


D.L. = 1.25 EQ = 1.25
SIDL = 2 EQLL = 0.7
Walkway LL = 1.5 Launching
Train LL = 1.75 Girder = 1.3
11.1 ) Ultimate B.M. at various section :
SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775
Girder wt. M1 0 -44 300 794 900 794 300 -44 0
Deck slab M2 0 -44 206 588 670 588 206 -44 0
SIDL M3 0 -160 480 1420 1620 1420 480 -160 0

Launching Girder M4 0 -1 455 1498 2324 2037 619 -1 0


Train LL M5 1 -123 866 2153 2319 2153 866 -123 0
LC : Constr. SUM 0 -88 506 1381 1570 1381 506 -88 0
LC : Service SUM 1 -370 1853 4954 5509 4954 1853 -370 0
Earthquake load M9 0 -34 178 476 530 476 178 -34 0
LC : EQ SUM 0 -331 1511 4138 4647 4138 1511 -331 0
LC : LG SUM 0 -89 961 2879 3894 3418 1125 -89 0

11.2 ) Ultimate S.F. at various section :


SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775
Girder wt. V1 -13 250 171 70 0 70 171 250 -13
Deck slab V2 -19 169 123 45 0 45 123 169 -19
SIDL V3 -30 430 310 108 0 108 310 430 -30

Launching Girder V4 0 182 182 172 161 104 429 423 0


Train LL V5 -21 618 529 327 193 327 529 618 -21
LC : Constr. SUM -31 419 294 115 0 115 294 419 -31
LC : Service SUM -82 1467 1132 550 193 550 1132 1467 -82
Earthquake load M9 -8 141 108 52 17 52 108 141 -8
LC : EQ SUM -78 1237 923 406 94 406 923 1237 -78
LC : LG SUM -31 601 476 287 161 219 723 841 -31

SIDL = 2
Footpath LL = 1.5
Train LL = 1.75
11.3 ) Ultimate S.F.. at various section for calculating Longitudinal shear:
SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.543 16.7 18.325 18.775
Deck slab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SIDL V3 -30 430 310 108 0 108 310 430 -30
FPLL V4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IRC LL V5 -21 618 529 327.25 193 327 528.5 617.75 -21
SUM -51 1048 839 435.25 193 435 838.5 1048 -51

Note :- Loads at Launching girder movement are found to be not governing ( Refer LC : Service & LC : LG )
Legends :-
LC : Constr. Construction stage Load combination
LC : Service Service Stage load combinations
LC : EQ Earthquake Load Combination
LC : LG Launching girder Load combination

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

15.0) Design for moment at ultimate strength :

Mu = fpb Aps (d-0.5x) (IRS: CBC, Cl. 16.4.3.2)

fpu = 1860 Mpa


Aps = 5320 mm2
b= 400 mm
d= 1300 mm
Es = 195000 Mpa

fpu Aps = 0.38


fck b d

x/dt = 0.634 (Ref. IRS:CBC, Table 25)


fpb / (0.87 fpu) = 0.77 (Ref. IRS:CBC, Table 25)
Strength factor = 1.15

fpb = 1246 Mpa


neutral axis, X= 682 mm at mid span

Stress in the outermost tendon = 11.784 Mpa


2) Strain in outermost tendon = 0.000060
Allowable strain in tendon = 0.005 + fpu/Es gm
= 0.0133

Table 6.3: Calculation of Ultimate Moment Capacity at Various Sections


Grade of concrete = 50 N/mm2
Depth of girder = 1.1 m
c.g. of steel tendons from bottom = c.g.st
Aps = (19+19)*141 = 5320 mm2

Sect. c.g.st x Aps fpb Mult. steel Mult. Req. Remark


(m) (m) (mm2) (N/mm2) (kn-m) (kn-m)
A 0.425 0.55 5320 1246 6779 1 safe

B 0.397 0.57 5320 1246 6720 -426 safe

C 0.314 0.63 5320 1246 6545 2130 safe

D 0.225 0.68 5320 1246 6359 5697 safe

E 0.225 0.68 5320 1246 6359 6335 safe


F 0.225 0.68 5320 1246 6359 5697 safe

G 0.314 0.63 5320 1246 6545 2130 safe

H 0.397 0.57 5320 1246 6720 -426 safe

I 0.425 0.55 5320 1246 6779 0 safe

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

15.0 ) Ultimate shear resistance of a section uncracked in flexure ( Vco) :

Section A B C D E F G H I

Horizontal force
in Cable (kn) 6661 6675 6722 6835 6878 6922 7011 6991 6977

Area of section
(mm2) 1.55 1.55 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.217 1.55 1.55
Composite
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(m) 0.745 0.745 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.745 0.745

c.g. of cable from


bottom (mm) 0.42 0.40 0.31 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.31 0.40 0.42

Eccentricity 0.32 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.32
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.427 0.427 0.425 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.43
3
Zb (m ) 0.35 0.35 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.35 0.35
I - precast 0.111 0.111 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.111 0.111
I - Comp 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.26 0.26
Ay- precast 0.151 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.15
Ay-comp 0.28 0.28 0.348 0.348 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.28
ytp 0.55 0.55 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.55 0.55
ytc 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.60 0.60
ft gir (1.5DL+2SIDL) 0.00 -0.56 3.57 9.83 11.18 9.83 3.57 -0.56 0.00
fcm 0.00 -0.20 1.60 4.40 5.01 4.40 1.60 -0.20 0.00
yb-c 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.75 0.75
yb-p 0.55 0.550 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.55 0.55
x1 0.400 0.515 0.740 1.037 1.037 1.037 0.740 0.515 0.400
0.000 -1.259 -0.344 1.960 1.972 1.985 -0.360 -1.318 0.000
fcp1 3.29 3.08 3.65 2.66 2.68 2.70 3.82 3.22 3.44
fcp = 0.8fcp1+fcm 2.632 2.260 4.516 6.531 7.149 6.558 4.653 2.376 2.755
b 0.930 0.930 0.330 0.330 0.330 0.330 0.330 0.930 0.930
Vc1 -31 419 294 115 0 115 294 419 -31
fs -0.046 0.614 1.169 0.457 0.000 0.457 1.169 0.614 -0.046
ft 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697 1.697
safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe
Vc2 2383 1710 474 748 883 749 482 1742 2417
Vco 2352 2129 768 863 883 864 776 2161 2385

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
16.1) SHEAR FORCE DUE TO (DEAD LOAD + DECK SLAB )
Grade of concrete = 50 N/mm2
Thickness of web
At end sections = 1000 mm
At intermidiate sec = 400 mm
No. of webs = 1
Dia. Of duct = 105 mm
Max. principle tensile stress = 0.24 * Fck = 1.7 Mpa
Depth of Composite section = 1.35 m

Tab. :Section uncracked in flexure : Section A B C D E F G H I


b = Thickness of web deducting dia. Of duct (in mm) 930 930 330 330 330 330 330 930 930
(assuming ducts are grouted)
d = over alldepth of girder (mm) 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100
ft = Max. principle tensile stress 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
fcp = compressive stress at c.g. of section 3.00 3.01 4.33 4.42 4.45 4.48 4.54 3.15 3.14
due to prestress
Vco = Ult. shear resistance of a uncracked section in flexure (kn) 1935 1937 778 784 786 787 791 1965 1964
2
= 0.67 x b x d x ft + fcp x ft )

Section cracked in flexure :


fpt = compressive stress at bottom due to prestress 8.00 8.7 12.7 15.4 15.5 15.6 13.3 9.1 8.4
INA in m4 0.258 0.258 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.258 0.258
Yb = 0.745 0.745 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.745 0.745
db = Distance from extereme compression fibre of the tendons 0.93 0.95 1.04 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.04 0.95 0.925
at the section under consideration
Mcr = ( 0.37x fck + fpt) x I/Yb 3679 3931 4703 5522 5552 5582 4867 4075 3811
Mu in (kn-m) 0 -88 506 1381 1570 1381 506 -88 0
Vu in (kn) -31 419 294 115 0 115 294 419 -31
Vcr = 0.037 x b x db x fck + Mcr Vu / Mu #DIV/0! -18579 2819 557 97 562 2913 -19269 #DIV/0!
Min. Vcr = 0.1 x b x d x fck 723 723 257 257 257 257 257 723 723
Vertical cable force component after losse in (kn) 0.13 230 213 155 0 0 0 162 223 240
Vc = Vco + vertical cable force after losses 2165 2150 2973 557 97 562 3075 2189 2204
Vc 2165 2150 2973 557 97 562 3075 2189 2204
SR not SR not SR not SR not SR not SR not SR not SR not SR not
Remark : if Vu > Vc shear reinf.(SR) Required req. req. req. req. req. req. req. req. req.
Required Shear reinforcement (SR) per web in mm2 / mm
Asv = Vu-Vc +0.4 b dt x 1 -5.55 -4.00 -6.80 -0.72 0.13 -0.73 -7.07 -4.12 -5.66
Sv 0.87 x fy x dt No. of web
Min. shear reinforcement required per web in mm2 / mm
Asv = 0.4 x b x 1 1.03 1.03 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 1.03 1.03
Sv 0.87 x fy No. of web
Provide shear reinforcement Leg 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
tor 12 12 10 12 12 12 12 12 12
@ c/c 100 100 200 200 200 200 200 100 100
shear reinforcement provided i mm2 / mm 1.13 1.13 0.39 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 1.13 1.13
Remark safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
16.2 ) DESIGN OF SHEAR AT SERVICE STAGE
Grade of concrete = 50 N/mm2
Thickness of web
At end sections = 1000 mm
At intermidiate sec = 400 mm
No. of webs = 1
Dia. Of duct = 105 mm
Max. principle tensile stress = 0.24 * Fck = 1.7 Mpa

Section uncracked in flexure : Section A B C D E F G H I


L
b = Thickness of web deducting dia. Of duct (in mm) 930 930 330 330 330 330 330 930 930
(assuming ducts are grouted)
d = over alldepth of girder (mm) 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350
ft = Max. principle tensile stress 0.24 x fck 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
fcp = compressive stress at c.g. of section 3.00 3.01 4.33 4.42 4.45 4.48 4.54 3.15 3.14
due to prestress
Vco = Ult. shear resistance of a uncracked section in flexure (kn) 2375 2377 955 962 964 966 971 2412 2410
2
= 0.67 x b x d x ft + fcp x ft )

Section cracked in flexure :


fpt = compressive stress at bottom due to prestress 8.0 8.7 12.7 15.4 15.5 15.6 13.3 9.1 8.4
INA in m 4
0.258 0.258 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.258 0.258
Yb = 0.745 0.745 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.784 0.745 0.745
db = Distance from extereme compression fibre of the tendons 0.93 0.95 1.04 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.04 0.95 0.925
at the section under consideration
Mcr = ( 0.37x fck + fpt) x I/Yb 3679 3931 4703 5522 5552 5582 4867 4075 3811
Mu in (kn-m) 1 -370 1853 4954 5509 4954 1853 -370 0
Vu in (kn) -82 1467 1132 550 193 550 1132 1467 -82
Vcr = 0.037 x b x db x fck + Mcr x Vu / Mu -432071 -15348 2964 710 291 717 3064 -15919 #DIV/0!
Min. Vcr = 0.1 x b x d x fck 888 888 315 315 315 315 315 888 888
Vertical cable force component after losse in (kn) 230 213 155 0 0 0 162 223 240
Vc = Vco + vertical cable force after losses 2605 2590 1109 962 964 966 1133 2636 2651
Vc/2 1302 1295 555 481 482 483 566 1318 1325
SR not SR not SR not SR not SR not SR not SR not SR not
SR req.
Remark : if Vu > Vc, shear reinf.(SR) Required req. req. req. req. req. req. req. req.
Required Shear reinforcement (SR) per web in mm2 / mm
Asv = Vu-Vc +0.4 b dt x 1 -7.01 -2.24 0.43 -0.65 -1.53 -0.66 0.36 -2.37 -7.15
Sv 0.87 x fy x dt No. of web
Min. shear reinforcement required per web in mm2 / mm
Asv = 0.4 x b x 1 1.03 1.03 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 1.03 1.03
Sv 0.87 x fy No. of web
Provide shear reinforcement Leg 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 4
tor 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
@ c/c 100 100 200 200 200 200 200 100 100
shear reinforcement provided mm2 / mm 4.52 4.52 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 4.52 4.52
Remark safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe

Asv req/ mm2 / mm Vertical shear 0.59 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.3 0.41 0
Asv req/ mm2 / mm Longitudinal shear -2.0 1.8 0.9 -0.6 -1.5 -0.6 0.9 1.8 -2.0
TOTAL Asv req/ -1.4 2.1 1.1 -0.3 -1.2 -0.3 1.2 2.2 -2.0
Stirrups provide mm2 / mm 4.5 4.5 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.5 4.5
Additional req. -5.9 -2.5 0.0 -1.5 -2.3 -1.5 0.0 -2.3 -6.49
Provide shear reinforcement Leg 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 4
tor 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
@ c/c 100 100 200 200 200 200 200 100 100
shear reinforcement provided mm2 / mm 4.52 4.52 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 4.52 4.52
Remark safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe safe

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

17.0) GIRDER REINFORCEMENT (IRS:CBC, Cl. 15.9.4.2)


1) At end section
a) In vertical direction = 0.18 % of c/s area in plan
= 0.18 x 1000 x 1000 = 1800 mm2
100
Steel required on each face = 900 mm2
Provided steel Tor 12 @ 100 c/c giving Ast = 1131 mm2 > 900 Safe

b) In horizontal directio = 0.15 % of gross area with concrete grade M40


= 0.15 x 1000 x 1100 = 1650 mm2
100
Steel required on each face = 825 mm2

Provided steel Tor 12 @ 100 c/c giving Ast = 1131 mm2


Tor 12 @ 100 c/c giving Ast = 1131 mm2
2262 mm2 > 825 Safe
2) At Intermidiate section
A) In Web
i) In vertical direction = 0.18 % of c/s area in plan
= 0.18 x 400 x 1000 = 720 mm2
100
Steel required on each face = 360 mm2

Provided steel Tor 10 @ 125 c/c giving Ast = 628 mm2 > 360 Safe

ii) In horizontal directio = 0.15 % of gross area with concrete grade M40
= 0.15 x 400 x 400 = 240 mm2
100
Steel required on each face = 120 mm2

Provided steel Tor 10 @ 200 c/c giving Ast = 393 mm2 > 120 Safe

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

B) In Bottom Bulb
i) In vertical direction = 0.18 % of c/s area in plan
= 0.18 x 1000 x 1000 = 1800 mm2
100
Steel required on each face = 900 mm2

Provided steel Tor 12 @ 100 c/c giving Ast = 1131 mm2 > 900 Safe

ii) In horizontal directio = 0.15 % of gross area with concrete grade M40
= 0.15 x( 1000 x 250 )+ ( 150 x 300 ) +
100
+( 400 x 150 )
2
= 533 mm

Prov. 6 Nos. - Tor 16 giving Ast = 1206 mm2 > 533 Safe

C) In Top Bulb
i) In vertical direction = 0.18 % of c/s area in plan
= 0.18 x 1000 x 1000 = 1800 mm2
100
Steel required on each face = 900 mm2

Provided steel Tor 12 @ 100 c/c giving Ast = 1131 mm2 > 900 Safe

ii) In horizontal directio = 0.15 % of gross area with concrete grade M40
= 0.15 x( 1000 x 150 )+ ( 150 x 300 ) +
100
+( 400 x 150 )
2
= 383 mm

Prov. 6 Nos. - Tor 12 giving Ast = 679 mm2 > 383 Safe

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

18.0) DESIGN OF END BLOCK

The End Block is designed as per IRS:CBC, Table 27


Horizontal Direction
1) Cable 5 T15 :
Bursting tensile force in the End Block ( F bst ) :

Width of End Block (2 Yo ) = 1000 mm


Width of loaded area (2 Ypo) = 145 mm

Force in tendon = Pk = 391 kn

Ypo = 72.5 = 0.145


Yo 500

Fbst = 0.23
Pk

Therefore, Bursting tensile force = Fbst = 0.23 x 390.6

= 89.84 kn

Area of steel required = 89.84 x 1000


0.87 x 415

= 248.8 mm2

Provide 6 Nos. Tor 16 mm dia. 4 Legged stirrups

Giving Ast = 4825 mm2 > 249 mm2 Safe

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
2) Cable 19 T15 :
Bursting tensile force in the End Block ( F bst ) :

Width of End Block (2 Yo ) = 1000 mm


Width of loaded area (2 Ypo ) = 275 mm

Force in tendon = Pk = 3711 kn

Ypo = 137.5 = 0.275


Yo 500

Fbst = 0.23
Pk

Therefore, Bursting tensile force = Fbst = 0.23 x 3711

= 853.5 kn

Area of steel required = 853.5 x 1000


0.87 x 415

= 2364 mm2

Provide 6 Nos. Tor 16 mm dia. 4 Legged stirrups

Giving Ast = 4825 mm2 > 2364 mm2 Safe

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Vertical Direction
1) Cable 19 T15 :
Bursting tensile force in the End Block ( F bst ) :

Width of End Block (2 Yo ) = 350 mm


Width of loaded area (2 Ypo) = 275 mm

Force in tendon = Pk = 3711 kn

Ypo = 137.5 = 0.7857


Yo 175

Fbst = 0.11
Pk

Therefore, Bursting tensile force = Fbst = 0.11 x 3711

= 408.2 kn

Area of steel required = 408.2 x 1000


0.87 x 415

= 1131 mm2
No. of cables = 3 Nos.
Total steel required = 3392 mm2
Provide 6 Nos. Tor 16 mm dia. 4 Legged stirrups

Giving Ast = 4825 mm2 > 3392 mm2 Safe

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
6.0) interface reiforcement design
6.1 ) Longitudinal shear at the interface of deck slab and Prestressed precast girder
(Section Through slab: Shear plane - 2) (Ref. IRS:CBC, Cl. 17.4.2.3)
Ls = Length of shear plane -1 = 1 x 1000 = 1000 mm
fck = 40 Mpa
Width of slab = 2 - 1 = 1.00 m
m = 0.894
Eq. Width = 0.894 x 1.0 = 0.894 m
A = 0.894 x 0.25 = 0.224 m2
Length of shear plane - 2 = 2 x 250 x 1.0 = 500 mm
Additional Area of slab reinf. required, Ae = = 175 mm2/m

SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0.00 0.45 2.08 6.23 9.39 12.54 16.70 18.33 18.78
V -78 1237 923 406 94 406 923 1237 -78
ytop comp. 0.605 0.605 0.566 0.566 0.566 0.566 0.566 0.605 0.605
y1 = ytop - df 0.480 0.480 0.441 0.441 0.441 0.441 0.441 0.480 0.480
A 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224
Ay1 0.107 0.107 0.099 0.099 0.099 0.099 0.099 0.107 0.107
b 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
I comp. 0.258 0.258 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.258 0.258
V1 = VAy1/b I -0.065 1.028 0.757 0.333 0.077 0.333 0.757 1.028 -0.065
Total Shear Force
in slab -14 230 169 74 17 74 169 230 -14
Shear force at
section 2-2 -4 57 42 19 4 19 42 57 -4
a) K1 fck Ls 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
b) 0.7 Ae fy 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61
Remarks Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

250
1 1
2 1000

475252832.xls Long-shear-slab
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

6.2 ) Longitudinal shear at the interface of deck slab and Prestressed precast girder
(Section at the interface of deck slab and girder: Shear Plane 1)
Ls = Length of shear plane - 1 = 1 x 1000 = 1000 mm
fck = 40 Mpa
m = 0.894
Width of slab = 2.0 m
Thickness of slab = 0.25 m
A = 2.0 x 0.25 x 0.894 = 0.447 m2
Area of bot.reinf. Of slab, Ae =
Sec - A, B, H, I 2 x Y12 @ 100 = 4524 mm2/m = 0.45%
+ stirrups 2 x Y12 @ 100 OK
( Bar no. 10a & 10b in drg no. R2D02-SPA -CV-BAS-207-00-00-DRE-7301 )
Sec - C to G 2 x Y12 @ 200 = 2262 mm2/m
+ stirrups 2 x Y12 @ 200
( Bar no. 07a & 07b in drg no. R2D02-SPA -CV-BAS-207-00-00-DRE-7301 )

SECTION A B C D E F G H I
Distance 0 0.45 2.075 6.231 9.387 12.54 16.7 18.325 18.78
V -78 1237 923 406 94 406 923 1237 -78
ytop comp. 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.60 0.60
y1 = ytop - df 0.48 0.48 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.48 0.48
A 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Ay1 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21
b 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
I comp. 0.258 0.258 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.258 0.258
V1 = VAy1/b I -0.065 1.0 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.0 -0.1
VL = V1 x b -65 1028 757 333 77 333 757 1028 -65
a) K1 fck Ls 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600
b) 0.7 Ae fy 1583 1583 792 792 792 792 792 1583 1583
Remarks Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

250
1 1
2 1000

475252832.xls Long-shear-interface
Shirish Patel and Associates
KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Tab. 6.2 : Resultant stresses immediately after second stage prestress (Only precast section considered) :
Section B C D E F G H I J K

Horizontal Force
in cable (kn) 6661 6675 6722 6835 6878 6922 7011 6991 6977
Area of section
(mm2) 1.10 1.10 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 1.10 1.10
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.55 0.55 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.55 0.55
c.g. of cable from
bottom (mm) 0.42 0.40 0.31 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.31 0.40 0.42
Eccentricity 0.13 0.15 0.21 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.21 0.15 0.13
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Zb (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A Mpa 6.06 6.07 8.73 8.88 8.93 8.99 9.10 6.36 6.34
P e/ Zt Mpa 4.13 5.06 8.18 11.76 11.84 11.91 8.53 5.30 4.32
P e/ Zb Mpa 4.13 5.06 7.56 10.88 10.95 11.02 7.89 5.30 4.32
P/A - Pe/Zt Mpa 1.9 1.0 0.6 -2.9 -2.9 -2.9 0.6 1.1 2.0
P/A + Pe/Zb Mpa 10.2 11.1 16.3 19.8 19.9 20.0 17.0 11.7 10.7
stress due to M1
At top Mpa 0.0 -0.2 1.4 3.6 4.1 3.6 1.4 -0.2 0.0
At bottom Mpa 0.0 0.2 -1.3 -3.3 -3.8 -3.3 -1.3 0.2 0.0
Resultant stress
At top Mpa 1.9 0.8 1.9 0.7 1.18 0.7 1.9 0.9 2.0
At bottom Mpa 10.2 11.3 15.0 16.4 16.1 16.7 15.7 11.8 10.7
Depth of girder (m) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

Stress at
c.g. of cable 6.99 7.52 11.29 13.21 13.05 13.40 11.80 7.88 7.33

Avg. stress at c.g. of cable = 10.3 N/mm2

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls 60
Shirish Patel and Associates
KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
LOSSES IN PRESTRESS

1) Loss due to elastic shortening :


= 1 x modular ratio x avg. stress in concrete at c.g. of cable
2

Grade of concrete at the time of stressing = 28 N/mm2


Ec = 5700 x 28
= 30161.6 N/mm2
m = 195000 = 6.5
30161.6
Loss = 0.5 x 6.5 x 3.9 = 12.5 N/mm2 12.5 = 1.0 %
1290
2) Due to creep of concrete :
creep strain at = 0.00051
at 0.8fck
Loss = 0.00051 x 3.9 x 195000 = 38.6 N/mm2
10
= 38.6 x 1 = 38.6 N/mm2 = 2.99
CREEP, SHR, 153 = 11.9 %
1290
3) Due to shrinkage of concrete :
strain due to residual shrinkage after 21 days : 0.00022
Loss = 0.00022 x 195000 = 42.9
= 42.9 x 1 = 42.9 N/mm2 = 3.33 %

Additional loss in service condition = 2.99 + 3.33 = 6.32 %

4) Due to relaxation of H.T. steel : ( Assuming normal relaxation steel)


Losses @ 0.684 x fp = 4.625 x 3= 14 N/mm2
= 4.625 x 1290 = 60 N/mm2
100
59.6428 x 1.2 = 71.6 N/mm2 = 5.55 %
( increase 20% as per IRC:18 CL 7.2.4)

Total Losses = 165.6 N/mm2

% total loss = 166 = 12.84 %


1289.6

% instantaneous loss 12.5 = 0.97 %


1290

Balance loss = 12.84 - 0.97 = 11.9 %

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
475252832.xls 61
Shirish Patel and Associates
DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd. KOCHI METRO

Tab. 6.2 : Resultant stresses immediately after SECOND stage prestress (Only precast section considered) :
Section B C D E F G H I J K

Horizontal cable
Force (kn) 3300 3308 3337 3405 3427 3448 3494 3463 3454
Area of section
(mm2) 1.10 1.10 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 1.10 1.10
c.g. of c/s from bottom
(mm) 0.550 0.550 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.529 0.550 0.550
c.g. of I-stage cable from
bottom (mm) 0.950 0.910 0.783 0.573 0.525 0.573 0.783 0.910 0.950
Eccentricity -0.40 -0.36 -0.25 -0.04 0.00 -0.04 -0.25 -0.36 -0.40
e = Yb - c.g.
Zt (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20
Zb (m3) 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
P/A 3.00 3.01 4.33 4.42 4.45 4.48 4.54 3.15 3.14
P e/ Zt 4.91 5.21 6.58 7.79 7.84 7.89 6.89 5.45 5.14
P e/ Zb 4.91 5.21 6.09 7.21 7.25 7.30 6.37 5.45 5.14
Effect of second stage prestress
P/A - Pe/Zt -1.9 -2.2 -2.3 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -2.4 -2.3 -2.0
P/A + Pe/Zb 8.1 8.4 10.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.0 8.8 8.4
Resultant stress
At top -1.9 -2.2 -2.3 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 -2.4 -2.3 -2.0
At bottom 8.1 8.4 10.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.0 8.8 8.4
Depth of girder (m) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

Stress due to II-stage


prestress at c.g. of cable -0.58 -0.41 1.42 3.84 4.53 3.89 1.48 -0.43 -0.61

Avg. stress at c.g. of cable = 1.5 N/mm2

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
475252832.xls 62
Shirish Patel and Associates
KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

6.5.6) Calculation of deflection (at midspan)

Span = 18.78 m

Downward deflection :
Dead load moment M1 = 1256 Kn-M
SIDL M2 = 810 Kn-M
Footpath LL M3 = 0 Kn-M
TRAIN LL M4 = 1325 Kn-M

Concrete grade fck = 50 N/mm2


Ec = 5700 x fck = 40305.09 N/mm2
= 4E+07 Kn/m2

Moment of inertia = 0.240342 x 1.00E+13


of Composite girder
Deflection due to UDL = 5x M L2
48 EI

Due to M1 = 5x 1256 x 18.775 2


48 40305087 x 0.2403

= 0.004761 m
= 4.8 mm

Due to M2 = 5x 810 x 18.775 2


48 40305087 x 0.2403

= 0.00307 m
= 3.1 mm

Due to M3 = 5x 0x 18.775 2
48 40305087 x 0.2403

= 0m
= 0.000 mm

Due to M4 = 5x 1325 18.775 2


48 40305087 x 0.2403

= 0.005022 m
= 5.022 mm

Downward deflection = 12.9 mm

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
475252832.xls 66
Shirish Patel and Associates
KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Upward deflection due to prestress :


Total prestressiing force = 6861 Kn
c.g. of cable at mid-span = 225.0 mm
= 0.225 m
Eccentricity of cable at mid- = 0.20 m
mid-span

Upward deflection : = P e L2
8 EI
= 1x 6861 x 0.20 x 18.775 2
8 4E+07 x 0.240342

= 0.006 m
= 6.4 mm

Upward deflection after = 6.4 x ( 1- 0.13 )


prestress losses
= 5.537 mm

Net deflection during = 12.9 - 5.5 = 7.317 mm ( I.e. downward)


service condition

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls
475252832.xls 67
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

11.4 ) Design for moment at ultimate strength :


i) By yielding of steel :
= 0.9 db As fp
ii) By crushing of concrete :
= [( 0.176 x b x db2 x fck) + { 2/3 x (0.8 x (Bf - b) x (db -t/2)x t x fck} ]

Calculation of Ultimate Moment Capacity at Various Sections


Grade of concrete = 50 N/mm2
Depth of girder = 1.35 m
c.g. of steel tendons from bottom = c.g.st
As = (3*3*19)*98.7 = 5320 mm2

Sect. c.g.st db As fp Mult. steel Bf b t Mult. conc. Mult. Provided Mult. Req. Remark
(m) (m) (mm (N/mm
2) 2)
(kn-m) (m) (m) (m) (kn-m) (kn-m) (kn-m)
B 0.425 0.93 5320 1860 8238 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 0 #REF!

C 0.425 0.93 5320 1860 8238 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 1 #REF!

D 0.397 0.95 5320 1860 8486 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! -370 #REF!

E 0.314 1.04 5320 1860 9226 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 1853 #REF!

F 0.225 1.13 5320 1860 10019 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 4954 #REF!

G 0.225 1.13 5320 1860 10019 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 5509 #REF!

H 0.225 1.13 5320 1860 10019 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 4954 #REF!

I 0.314 1.04 5320 1860 9226 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 1853 #REF!

J 0.397 0.95 5320 1860 8486 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! -370 #REF!

K 0.425 0.93 5320 1860 8238 #REF! 0.00 0.24 #REF! #REF! 0 #REF!

475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

475252832.xls 07:01:3905/11/2020
Shirish Patel and Associates KOCHI METRO DMRC
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Cable ordinates and c.g. from bottom about various section in (mm) :
section A B C D E F G H I
X 0 0.225 0.45 1.263 2.075 4.153 6.231 7.809 9.387 10.965 12.543 14.622 16.700 17.513 18.325 18.550 18.775

cab. No. 1 0.950 0.930 0.910 0.843 0.783 0.657 0.573 0.537 0.525 0.537 0.573 0.657 0.783 0.843 0.910 0.930 0.950

cab. No. 2 0.600 0.580 0.562 0.500 0.447 0.356 0.325 0.325 0.325 0.325 0.3250 0.356 0.447 0.500 0.562 0.580 0.600

cab. No. 3 0.250 0.241 0.233 0.204 0.181 0.139 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.139 0.181 0.204 0.233 0.241 0.250

cab. No. 4 0 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 0

file:///conversion/tmp/scratch/475252832.xls 39
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

15.0) Design for moment at ultimate strength :

Mu = fpb Aps (d-0.5x) (IRS: CBC, Cl. 16.4.3.2)

fpu = 1860 Mpa


Aps = 5320 mm2
b= 400 mm
d= 1050 mm
Es = 195000 Mpa

fpu Aps = 0.47


fck b d

x/dt = 0.653 (Ref. IRS:CBC, Table 25)


fpb / (0.87 fpu) = 0.75 (Ref. IRS:CBC, Table 25)
Strength factor = 1.15

fpb = 1214 Mpa


neutral axis, X= 539 mm at mid span

Stress in the outermost tendon = 11.784 Mpa


2) Strain in outermost tendon = 0.000060
Allowable strain in tendon = 0.005 + fpu/Es gm
= 0.0133

Table 6.3: Calculation of Ultimate Moment Capacity at Various Sections


Grade of concrete = 50 N/mm2
Depth of girder = 1.1 m
c.g. of steel tendons from bottom = c.g.st
Aps = (19+19)*141 = 5320 mm2

Sect. c.g.st x Aps fpb Mult. steel Mult. Req. Remark


(m) (m) (mm2) (N/mm2) (kn-m) (kn-m)
A 0.425 0.41 5320 1214 5462 0 safe

B 0.397 0.43 5320 1214 5403 -101 safe

C 0.314 0.48 5320 1214 5228 582 safe

D 0.225 0.54 5320 1214 5040 1588 safe

E 0.225 0.54 5320 1214 5040 1806 safe


F 0.225 0.54 5320 1214 5040 1588 safe

G 0.314 0.48 5320 1214 5228 582 safe

H 0.397 0.43 5320 1214 5403 -101 safe

I 0.425 0.41 5320 1214 5462 0 safe

475252832.xls
Shirish Patel and Associates
Nagpur Metro Rail Project, Reach-2 MMRCL
Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Reinforcement comparison

Refer Design document no. R2D02-SPA-CV-BAS-NR2-00-00-DCL-1014 , Cl.no.7.4

Reinf.Required for Reinf. Provided


Location & Dirn.
Bar marks Mx+Mxy or My+Mxy Remark
Of reinf. Bar Dia @ Spacing Provided ( mm^2/m)
( mm^2/m)

Long. Reinf. @
52 1000 Y12@100 1130 OK
the Bottom of Slab

Long. Reinf. @
51 402 Y10@100 785 OK
Top of slab

Trans. Reinf @
54 988 Y12@100 1130 OK
Bottom of slab

Trans. Reinf. @
Top of slab at 53 545 Y10@100 785 OK
Midspan
Long. Reinf @ Reinforcement required is due to local excessive
Top of the slab 51 1000 Y10@100 785 stresses , can be ignored but if it required by you we
Near Diaphragm will change reinforcement to Y12@100

475252832.xls Reinf Comparision


Shirish Patel and Associates Development of Metro Link IL FS Transportation
Consultants Private Limited From Sikandarpur station Network Ltd. (ITNL)
to Sector 56 ( South Extension )
End diaphragm Shear Reinforcement design

The diaphragm is connected to seismic restrainer through HTS bolts. Thus diaphragm will be subjected to bending and
shear under longitudinal loads.
As Free end diaphragm is not subjected to any loading , nominal reinforcement is provided in the free end diaphragm .
The dead loads , SIDL on each girder is obtained from the support reaction as obtained from appendix-A
Longitudinal seismic coefficient = 0.45
vertical seismic coefficient 0.3
Loading
Girder Rail plinth Parapet Total
Dead load 1358 KN 210 KN 237 KN 1805 KN ( Refer Dsg Doc no. 81.GE.525.R0)
SIDL 210 KN
Total 2015 KN
Longitudinal
seismic loads 1814 KN

vertical seismic
loads 605 KN

C/l of Girder

Long. Seismic Force

0.85 0.85

Seismic Restainer 0.75 0.75 Seismic Restainer


1.5

Bending moment in diaphragm in horizontal plane


= 907 x 1.00 x 0.85 = 771 kN-m

Shear force ,long.direction ,Vuh= 1814 kN

Loading in vertical direction:


Girder Rail plinth Parapet Total ULS factor ULS,Vuv SLS factor SLS,Vsv
Dead load 1358 KN 210 KN 237 KN 1805 KN 1.25 2256 1 1805
SIDL 210 KN 210 KN 2 420 1.2 252
Live Load 750 KN 750 KN 1.75 1313 1.1 825
Braking force : 235 KN
Total 2015 KN
Total 3989 2882
with seismic load 3957

a.i) Check for Bending moment, horizontal (MY):


SLS ULS LL
kN-m kN-m kN-m
Design Moment = 110 1233 0

Side reinforcement:
Beam width mm = 1950 mm
Beam depth mm = 650 mm Clear cover 50 mm
effective cover = 99.5 mm
D eff = 550.5
Concrete Grade 50 MPa Conc capacity ultimate 4432 kNm/m
Reinforcement grade 500 MPa
Reinforcement provided Provide y 25 @ 18 Nos. 8836 mm2
Max no. of bar in one layer 9 Nos. No. of layers = 2

475252832.xls End Diaphragm 05/11/2020 07:01:39


Shirish Patel and Associates Development of Metro Link IL FS Transportation
Consultants Private Limited From Sikandarpur station Network Ltd. (ITNL)
Ult Moment capacity 0.87. Fy. As.z z = (1-1.1 fy As/fcktob Sector
d )*d 56 ( South Extension
1924 kNm
)
z/d( lever arm factor) = 0.909 Safe
Lever arm factor eff 0.91

Total Reinf. Provided Provide y 25 @ 18 Nos. Pt=0.82%

b) Check Crack Width


SLS moment = 110 kN-m
conc.
Es 195000 Mpa Grade = 50 Mpa
h 650 mm Cover = 50 mm
d 550.5 mm m= 5.600
pt 0.0082 m pt = 0.0461 n= 0.261
j 0.91 fst = 25 MPa e s= 0.000127
Cover (Cmin) 50 mm spacing = 140 mm bar dia = 25
dc 170 mm acr = 109 e 1= 0.000160
h= 650 (h-dc) = 480 Strain Reduction -0.467759

bt = 1950 a' = 650 As = 8836 0.4679186


Mq = 110 Mg = 1 em = 0.0001600

Crack width = 3 acr.em/(1+2(acr-cnom)/(h-dc)) ( Cl 15.9.8.2.1 (a)/IRS-CBC ) = 0.04 mm < 0.2


Safe

a.ii) Check for Bending moment, vertical (MZ):


SLS ULS LL
kN-m kN-m kN-m
Design Moment = 519 718 0

1994 1994

360 360

2200

Bottom reinforcement:
Beam width mm = 650 mm
Beam depth mm = 1950 mm Clear cover 50 mm
effective cover = #REF! mm
D eff = #REF!
Concrete Grade 40 MPa Conc capacity ultimate #REF! kNm/m
Reinforcement grade 500 MPa
Reinforcement provided Provide y 32 @ 4 Nos. 3217 mm2
Max no. of bar in one layer 4 Nos. No. of layers = 2
Ult Moment capacity 0.87. Fy. As.z z = (1-1.1 fy As/fck b d )*d #REF! kNm
z/d( lever arm factor) = #REF! #REF!
Lever arm factor eff #REF!

Total Reinf. Provided Provide y 32 @ 4 Nos. #REF!

Capacity ratio:
1233 + 718 = #REF!
1924 #REF!

b) Check Crack Width


SLS moment = 519 kN-m
conc.
Es 195000 Mpa Grade = 40 Mpa

h 1950 mm Cover = 50 mm
d #REF! mm m= 7.000
pt #REF! m pt = #REF! n= #REF!
j #REF! fst = #REF! MPa es= #REF!
Cover (Cmin) 50 mm spacing = 140 mm bar dia = 0
dc #REF! mm acr = 70 e1= #REF!
h= 1950 (h-dc) = #REF! Strain Reduction #REF!

bt = 40 a' = 1950 As = 3217 #REF!


Mq = 149 Mg = 370 em = #REF!

Crack width = 3 acr.em/(1+2(acr-cnom)/(h-dc)) ( Cl 15.9.8.2.1 (a)/IRS-CBC ) #REF! mm < 0.2


#REF!

475252832.xls End Diaphragm 05/11/2020 07:01:39


Shirish Patel and Associates Development of Metro Link IL FS Transportation
Consultants Private Limited From Sikandarpur station Network Ltd. (ITNL)
Force Summary Refer Design document no. R2D02-SPA-CV-BAS-NR2-00-00-DCL-1014
to Sector 56 ( South Extension ) , Appx A
Diaphragm Between Girder G3 & G2
Mu = 40 Knm
Tu = 305 Knm
Vu = 45 Knm

B= 600 mm D= 1350 mm
Reinf . Provided 4Y32 %pt. = 0.40 %

b.i) Check for vertical Shear :


Design shear = 45 kN
Shear stress = 45 x 1000 = 0.06 N/mm2
600 x 1294 mm
Fck for shear 40 Mpa
tc = 0.543 N/mm2 (IRS/CBC/ Tab 15)
s = 0.788
s Vc = 0.428 Safe Provide Min Reinf.
Min. Asv / sv = 0.66 mm2/mm
Asv / sv req. = 0.05 mm2/mm
Provide Y 12 - 2 legged stirrups @ 200 C/C
Asv/ sv prov = 1.13 mm2/mm Safe

d) Check for torsion :


Torsion moment= = 305 kN-m
Girder is designed for torsion as per IRS-CBC / Cl. 15.5.4.
Permissible torsional shear stress (minimum) = 0.42 Mpa as per tab 17 / IRS-CBC
Permissible torsional shear stress (maximum)= 4.75 Mpa as per tab 17 / IRS-CBC
hmin = = 600
hmax= = 1350
Torsional shear stress = 610 x 1000 x 1000 = 1.47 Mpa
(Ref. IRS/CBC/ cl. 15.4.4.4(b) 360000 x 1150
Provide Torsional Reinf.

Torsion reinf. = Ast/Sv = T / (1.6*x1*y1*0.87 fy)


Longitudinal reinf = AsL / SL = Ast/Sv

' x1 ' Smaller dim. of stirrups mm 488


' y1 ' larger dim of stirrups mm 1238
Torsion reinf. Ast/Sv = AsL/SL mm2/mm 0.87 (Area of one leg of closed stirrup of section)
Provide torsion reinf. of Y 12 - 2 legged stirrups @ 200 C/C
Asv/ sv prov = 0.57 mm2/mm Unsafe

475252832.xls End Diaphragm 05/11/2020 07:01:39

You might also like