Corporate Social Responsibility 3. Responsibility to do good (volunteer/charitable • Responsibilities to the society it operates work) • Economic Perspective ○ business exists to produce g&s demanded by THE CLASSICAL MODEL OF CSR society and à business creates jobs & wealth • Rooted in free market economic theory that benefit society further • Most influential theory of CSR in the last century ○ The law has created corporations – limit the • Milton Friedman liability of indiv for the risks - Resources à Increase Profit à Stay w/in rules of the game of free and open market ECONOMIC MODEL OF CSR • Profit – indication that the business is efficiently & EVALUATING STRATEGY OF WALMART FROM CSR successfully producing g&s the society demands STANDPOINT • Denies that business has any social responsibilities • everyday low prices beyond economic & legal ends for w/c it is created 1. Aggressive policies to keep labor costs down 2. Use of purchasing power to bargain forcefully ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 3. Suppliers outsource production to China • Responsible 4. Outsourced janitorial services - reliable or trustworthy - cause for an event or action 5. Entered new markets defeating competitors - liability/accountability for an event/action 6. Bargained w/ local municipalities to attain creating an obli to make things right again favorable tax & financial incentives - Did Dengvaxia cause the death? • w/o deception and fraud, Walmart’s ethical - Was Dengvaxia responsible for the death? objectives... – Extraordinary ROI & Low Prices • Responsibility as Accountability: Heart of CSR a. More consumer and society benefits - CSR b. Hire more workers o actions a business be held accountable c. Attract more investors o to be concerned w/ society’s interests that d. Expand business should restrict/bind bus. behavior • Utilitarian Principle: act to maximize overall good o What a business should or ought to do for the • Milton Friedman sake of society, even if it comes w/ an - Right of Private Property: Business a Priv economic cost Property - Was Sanofi Pasteur at fault- should it be held 1. corp exec is an employee legally liable? 2. directly responsible to the employers - Should Sanofi Pasteur bear responsibility for 3. to make money but conform w/ law & the death of the children? ethical customs 4. agent of the owners Utilitarian THE CLASSICAL MODEL OF CORPORATE SOCIAL Economic Model RESPONSIBILITY of CSR • Right of Private Property: Business As Private Neoclassical Economics Property Primary responsibility of • pursuing any social objective > max. of profit is business managers: spending someone else’s money for your own 1. Pursue maximum profit purposes à theft 2. Allocate resources to most efficient uses • Business mgmt must pursue max. profits 3. Consumers will be willing to pay • gov’t must have a laissez-faire approach 4. Profit – measure of optimal allocation of resources • Freedom from gov’t reg. & control allows the mkt to 5. Pursuit of product will continuously work for optimal function most efficiently satisfaction of consumer demand: Optimal social good (Utilitarian interpretation) ASSESSMENT OF ECONOMIC MODEL: CHALLENGES DIRECTED AT UTILITARIAN POINT OF BUSINESS ETHICS IS NORMATIVE VIEW • What is the proper role of business mgmt in making • Utilitarian ethics – means & ends, of acts and decisions? consequences • What is the proper role of business in society? • free market economy, focus of manager: • Do business managers have an overriding ethical o contribute to production of beneficial responsibility to serve the interests of stockholders consequences (adequacy of free markets for before acting for society’s interests? maximizing consumer demands) • appropriateness of consequences as legit ethical THREE TYPES OF RESPONSIBILITIES goals 1. Responsibility not to cause harm to others • Market Failure – when pursuit of profit will not • What is fiduciary duty? result in increase in consumer satisfaction • requires mgmt to balance ethical interest of all • General Cases of Market Failure: affected parties a. Externalities à Pollution, Groundwater • requires that mgmt consider the consequences of contamination, Resource depletion, Soil its decision for the well-being of all affected groups erosion, Nuclear water disposal à People • Challenges to Stakeholder theory: downwind, Neighbors, Future generations ○ probs w/ identifying SH and their interests b. Public Good à Clean air, Groundwater, ○ probs deciding what course of action follows Ocean fisheries, Scenic views, Safe streets à from imperative to balance SH interests No guarantee that mkt result in optimal • offer little practical advice to managers satisfaction of public interest c. Indiv pursuit of self-interest à Indiv rationality STRATEGIC MODEL OF CSR: SUSTAINABILITY à Good be achieved w/ cooperation > compet • Social responsibility – mission & strategic vision • Company’s mission – serve social ends (at the very THE MORAL MINIMUM heart of the firm’s mission) • Normal Bowie: pursuit of profit is constrained by an • Firm’s Financial Goals ≤ Envi Consideration obli to obey a moral minimum (ecological, natural environmental, social bottom • This framework distinguishes between: line) ○ Ethical imperatives to cause no harm ○ Ethical imperatives to prevent harm ○ Ethical imperatives to do good • prevent harm or do some good < duty to SHolders Corporate Culture, Governance and • distinguishes between 3 imperatives is a challenge • For every case in w/c SH interests appears to Ethical Leadership conflict w/ interests of employees, consumers, suppliers, or society, mgmt must analyze the situation to determine ethical responsibility CORPORATE CULTURE? • Compliance w/ law is insufficient for an ethically • Every org has a culture. responsible business • culture – share pattern of beliefs, expectations, & meanings that guide the behavior or its members STOCKHOLDER MODEL OF CORPORATE SOCIAL • unspoken yet influential standards & expectations RESPONSIBILITY (dress codes, working hours, & values of firms) • No culture is static (no movement) Economic Model & SH – primary beneficiaries of business • change, but modifying or having any impact on Moral decision culture is like moving an iceberg – one person Minimum cannot alter its course, but strong leaders can have SH & other stakeholders’ ethical a significant impact on a culture. claims over managerial decisions. • firm’s sustaining value Stakehold • Can offer direction and stability in challenging times, er Theory Views SH as investors or financiers > but can also constrain a firm to the common ways of owners. managing issues. • stability – a benefit & a barrier • sets the norms and expectations that will determine THE STAKEHOLDER THEORY • every business affects a wide variety of people, which decisions get made benefiting some and imposing costs on others • great power to shape the indiv who work w/in them • rejects premise that the beneficiaries of business decisions should be investors CULTURE AND ETHICS • William Evans & R. Edward Freeman: Narrow and • where law is incomplete guide for ethical decisions, Broad Stakeholder Theory the corporate culture the determining factor. ○ Narrowly: a SH - “any grp vital to the survival • ethical culture – employees are empowered & and success of the corpo” ○ Broadly: a SH - “any grp or indiv who can affect expected to act in ethically responsible ways even or be affected by the corpo” when law does not require • true a century ago mgmt had an overriding obli to • ex. of cultures encourage & discourage is the two Stock Holders, the law now recognizes a wide range org approaches to relief efforts on Hurricane Katrina of managerial obli to Stake Holders such as in September 2005 consumers, employees, competitors, the ○ bureaucratic hierarchical procedures, Federal environment, and the disabled Emergency Management (FEMA) was unable to respond in a timely manner as it did not fit BUILDING A VALUES-BASED CORPORATE CULTURE their usual rules. 1. Mission Statement & Code of Conduct ○ FEMA Director Michael Brown was eventually 2. Clear Vision Statement removed & replaced with Coast Guard admiral. 3. Process how the cultural shift will occur ○ U.S. Coast Guard is less bureaucratic. Their 4. Implement and follow through unofficial motto is “rescue first, and get permission later.” The Coast Guard empowers Mission Statement (Johnson & Johnson) front-line indiv to solve problems w/o waiting for • We will delight our consumers, treating as if they are authorization. our only consumer, providing w/ a response evident ○ While FEMA & the Coast Guard are similar of our interest and that leaves them w/ clear orgs with similar missions, rules, and legal understanding that they are important to us. regulations, their cultures are very different, & Code (Johnson & Johnson) respective decisions reflect these cultures. • We believe acting ethically and responsibly is not • Besides abstract considerations, an ethical culture only the right thing to do, but also the right thing to can also have a direct practical impact on the do for our business. J&J Code of Business Conduct bottom line. ensures how we do business to a high standard, to • Responsibility for creating & sustaining ethical fulfill our obli to the many stakeholders we serve. corporate cultures lies w/ business leaders. Vision (Johnson & Johnson) • The person that you become, in your attitudes, • Our vision at Johnson & Johnson, is for every values, expectations, mind-set, and habits, will be person to use their unique experiences and significantly determined by the org you work. backgrounds, together to spark solutions that create a better, healthier world. Our mission is to make ETHICAL LEADERSHIP & CORPORATE CULTURE diversity & inclusion our way of doing business. • Ethical Leadership – perceived as people-oriented • Even traditional leadership duties are perceived as BUILDING A VALUES-BASED CORPORATE CULTURE done w/in context of an ethics agenda • Critical to the success of any cultural shift are the ff: • Ethical traits & behavior must be socially visible & 1. Integrating an ethical culture throughout the firm understood (“walking the talk”) to have influence 2. Providing means for enforcement • Corp leaders must advocate & model ethics § includes allowing employees to come w/ qs, • Leadership sets the tone not only via personal concerns, & info about unethical behavior. behavior, but also via allocating corporate • A key element of integration is communication. W/o resources to support and promote ethical behavior. communication, there is no clarity of purpose, priorities, or process. EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP & ETHICAL LEADERSHIP • Ethics & Policy Integration Centre: claims • good or effective not necessarily an ethical leader communication patterns describe the company > • Ken Lay & Jeffrey Skilling of Enron were good and org charts effective and were also unethical leaders. • Reporting ethically suspect behavior is difficult. • 1 key difference – motivators used to achieve goals. ○ “Whistleblowing” can expose & end unethical. • Threats, intimidation, harassment, and coercion can ○ disloyal, harm the business & the whistleblower be used effectively, but modeling, persuasion, and • reporting to external groups can be so harmful, use of one’s role are ethical & effective. internal reporting mechanisms are preferable. • An ethical method of leading, while central, is not • Internal mechanisms for reporting wrongdoing, sufficient to establishing ethical leadership. while preferable, must: • other element involves the goal or end toward which ○ Be effective, Allow anonymity, Protect the the leader leads. rights of the accused, Allow employees to • An exec who makes a business productive, report wrongdoing, Create procedures for efficient, profitable, respects & empowers follow-up and enforcement subordinates, may seem to be effective and ethical. • Internal mechanisms for reporting wrongdoing • But what if business has unethical products – i.e., which have been created by many firms: child porn, pollute envi, or sell weapons terrorists? 1. Responsibilities of ethics officers • Socially responsible goals – necessary for a leader 2. Responsibilities of compliance officers to be fully ethical. 3. Ethics ombudsmen 4. Ethics hotlines