Professional Documents
Culture Documents
appropriate support
The RQ is clear, but is framed as if the novel
were history- It is a historical novel, but it is
important to treat it as a work of fiction that
might reflect US attitudes in some ways. It
should not, however, be used as if it were
pure history.
RQ stated clearly.
RQ stated
relatively
clearly This is possible but
complicates the
argument if using
both book and
movie.
There are a
number of errors
noted thus far
though they do not
interfere with
meaning overall.
There is a context given and the topic is
generally clear. There is also an attempt to
assign some significance to the topic. Not a
strong introduction, but just enough to get the
marks by meeting the basic requirements.
source for
this info?
Pronoun
reference
here is not
clear.
There is a mix of the book and the film version being used
as sources for information. These are different genre and
may have a different emphasis, thus it could present
problems unless the film closely follows the novel. This is
not indicated anywhere in the essay.
good support to show social status and prejudice.
reference ?
interesting
quote - how
does this
section
support the
RQ?
Give an
example from
the text
Again, a rather
random choice
of experience
without much
context
Relying on retelling
bits but not really
connecting them.
Interesting
reaction- analyze
this reaction in
the context of the
RQ
Why not?
Show an example
context is
not clear
Quite a short section and little
connection to the RQ except to
summarize.
The point is not clear.
Any evidence?
This seems to be
an essential quote
yet it gets no
analysis.
This section may have
come earlier to help set the
social context - placing it
here doesn't seem to have
any real purpose.
reference? Why is
this important?
Explain/analyze the
significance of this.
In the
novel or
in
history?
OK - this is
consistent
This summary is
fairly consistent
with what was
presented in the
essay.
There is decent knowledge of the works and how the characters fit in
the social context of the times. There is an attempt to provide textual
support to bolster the argument, however, the analysis is weak
generally. The dependence on a narrative style falls short. Overall, the
candidate show some knowledge and at least a basic understanding of
the social context of the work and how it reflects the reality of the times
through the maids' eyes.