Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GEAR FAILURES
Strength calculus for gears is developed with the purpose of avoiding tooth failure.
The main causes for tooth failure have functional – bad design and/or exploitation – or
technological reasons – undue manufacturing technology and/or material treatments – being
presented as follow.
• The actual load of the gear is higher than the load considered for calculus;
explained by unknowing, during the design stage, of the real running conditions or the real
overloads, vibrations or shocks coming from the driven machine.
• The real stresses on the tooth are higher than the calculated stresses, due to the
existence of higher stress concentrators, like: deficient finishing of tooth surface; incorrect
choose of the fillet radius at the bottom of the tooth, undue machining of the ends of the
tooth etc.
• The existence of dangerous strains inside the material following bad machining or
material treatment.
• The materials are not capable to take over the imposed stresses, due to material’s
deficiency (inclusions, pinches etc.) or bad material treatment (internal fissure, residual
deformations etc.).
• Bad mounting – misalignment between a gear shaft and another driving or driven
shaft – and imperfect lubrication of the gear – contamination of the lubricant, due to longer
periods of running time etc.
The analysis of the failure causes is showing that tooth failure is induced by several
causes, produced in the same time, and also due to another machine elements (shafts,
clutches, bearings) failures.
The main tooth failures are tooth breakage and tooth profile damage.
a b
Fig. 2.1
a b
c d e
Fig. 2.4
between teeth.
The pits, of different dimensions and shapes (fig. 2.5), are first growing to the
bottom of the tooth and then to its head, resistance to pitting being proportional with the
ratio of the profile. After the period of lapping, the pits are small and in relative reduced
number. If they won’t spread and keep their dimensions than pitting won’t be the main
failure of the gear (v. fig. 2.5, a). If, after the period of lapping, the pits will spread and
∗)
At the driving wheel, the initial fractures are developing towards the head and the bottom of the tooth and
at the driven wheel, the initial fractures are developing towards rolling cylinder of the tooth.
increase their dimensions and number, than pitting will be the main cause of gear failure (v.
fig. 2.5, b).
In order to avoid fatigue pitting, the following measures can be drawn:
case-hardening of the tooth profile by specific treatments;
increase of the ratio of the profile by positive addendum tooth correction;
accomplish the contact stress calculus, to limit the contact stress to permissible
value.
a b
Fig. 2.5
Spalling on the tooth profile is another form of material fatigue, appearing in the
case of case-hardening (face hardening after cementation, nitrogen hardening etc.). The
result of spalling is the detach of relative
large crust from the tooth profile (fig. 2.6),
due to fatigue fractures on the boundary
between the superficial hardened layer and
the material body.
Main causes for spalling are: too thin
hardened layer and internal stresses between
the two very different layers(the hardened
layer and the soft body). In order to avoid
spalling, material treatment and
Fig. 2.6
manufacturing technology must be very
careful choose, according to gear dimensions and working conditions.
Seising is a part of wearing failures,
appearing in the case of high loaded and high
speed gears, working on high temperature and
with increased friction between teeth. Seising is
consisting of localised molecular cohesion of the
contacting surfaces, due to the action of high
pressure and the rupture of lubricant film
between them. It’s favourized by high loads and
high temperature, appearing due to high
roughness, manufacturing imperfections, elastic
Fig. 2.7
deformations of teeth and shafts. Seizing is also favourized by improper lubrication
The local welding between the surfaces are breaking and the remaining sharp edges
are creating grooves in the conjugated profile (fig. 2.7)..
In order to avoid or diminish the seizing, the following measures can be taken:
improve of lubrication; decrease of working temperature by cooling devices for lubricant;
increase of manufacturing precision and decrease of surface roughness; increase of shafts
stiffness; accomplish the seizing calculus ∗) .
Abrasive wear is the main cause of failure for gears working at low speeds, in dirty
environment, open gearing or closed gearing with
deficiency on the lubricating or sealing systems. The
abrasive materials, coming from outside, from
detached pits, or from seizing, are getting between
the contact surfaces and act as little cutting tools.
As a result of abrasive wear the involute shape
of the profile changes and increases the clearance
between the conjugated teeth. Gearing becomes
undue, with shocks and noise leading to improper
working conditions or even to tooth breakage, when
the continuity of movement is not assured. In order
to avoid abrasive wear it is necessary the
Fig. 2.8
improvement of lubricating and sealing systems.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the analyze of possible tooth failures:
gear failures appear, mostly due to fatigue pitting or fatigue tooth breaking; gears
must be calculated for contact strength and bending strength;
gear failure is induced by many constructive and functional conditions, so the
calculus methodology must consider the correction of the calculus relations with
several factors;
the materials are very important for gear strength, their treatment being essential
for the reliability of the gear.
Calculus methodology for contact and bending strength is the ISO–DIN methodology,
based on many experimental results and considering several factors of correction.
∗)
Usual for worm gears.
3.3. THERMAL AND THERMOCHEMICAL TREATMENTS
FOR GEAR STEELS
In order to satisfy various working conditions, gears are manufactured from a large
range of materials. Gears used in the construction of the main power transmissions are only
manufactured from steels with thermal or thermochemical treatments. From that reason, this
chapter is only referring to the gear steels and their thermal or thermochemical.
The steels for gear constructions are usually coming from forging or rolling.
Considering the mechanical characteristics and machinability, the steels for gear
constructions can be divided in two classes:
• mild steels, with superficial hardness less than 350 HB;
• hard steels, with superficial hardness higher than 350 HB.
In the case of mild steels, teething and finishing come after thermal treatment. In the
case of hard steels, thermal treatment is interposed between teething and finishing process
(grinding).
The mechanical characteristics of gear steels are highly depending on the quality of
the batch, of the blank material and of the thermal or thermochemical treatment. From this
point of view, the steels are divided in three quality groups []: ML, MQ and ME.
ML quality agrees with low quality steels, MQ quality agrees with steels produced by
experienced manufacturers, with adequate costs and ME quality is a special quality
imposing specific requirements for higher working safety.
Thermal treatments for gear steels are stabilizing annealing, hardening and process
annealing. Thermochemical treatments for gear steels are cementation, nitration (nitrogen
hardening) and carbonitration.