Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By J. GOETZ"
ABSTRACT IJ,ICROFOCUSED
TYPE CORRELATION CURVES
Thi.s paper discusses the application of the continuous RECORDED BY THE THREE
dip meter, an instrument which not onl:3o' determines dips ELECTRODES
,,
and tops of formations but also )'ields basic information
on sedimentology and stratigraph}'. After a brief descrip-
BOREHOLE
,\
tion of the apparatus and the methods of plotting its
readings, the author explains the inteqnetat.ion of in-
FORMATION
BOUNDARY 'S .:
formation for \"arlou5 g-eologic features - reefs, sands PLANE
-
---.-
J r
)
and unconformities. All of the examples are from oil wells
in 'Vestern Canada, and the influence of the continuous
dipmeter on petroleum exploration is stressed.
\; ?
.2 -,----'
i'
\ l.
INTRODUCTION
"" (. (
~
r'
,
A
l-1est: _ _
East 0
--0
10 20 Reefs are among the geological features most ef-
fectively defined by an interpretation of continuous
--0 dipmeter surveys. On the flanks of reefs, dips reflect
Zone A
"VE --0
--0
drape uver the reef. This drape is caused both by
original deposition on the sloping sides of the reef
--0 and by subsequent differential compaction _of the
S overlying sediments. Dips in the draping beds point
Zone B away from the reef crest and are usually steepest im-
mediately above the point of reef penetration. Within
the reef proper, the absence of stratified bedding
EXAMPLE
leads to computation of random dips of widely vary-
DIP: 10° N 45° E ! ing directions and amounts. Thus, the plot of dip data
:,' 0- from a well on a reef flank yields a characteristic pat-
Zone C tern of dips - gradually increasing as the reef is
-4 T approached from above, reaching a maximum imme-
Figure 8.-Jlfcthod diately above the reef and becoming very random in-
of plotting Figun~ 4.-Schematic example of side the reef.
computed dips_ dip plots.
An example of a dip plot from a well on the east
'.,'
fl~nk of the Fort Nelson Slave Point reef is shown
A hypothetical cross section and the corresponding in Figure 5. This draping dip increases over the in-
dipmeter chart are shown in Figu1'e 4. Opposite Zone terval from 5,900 feet to the reef top at 6,252 feet. In
A, the changing westerly dip is indicated by vectors the 80 feet of shale immediatel)' above the reef, the
pointing west and indicating 5- to 19-degree dips. In pronounced easterly dip trend is maintained but there
Zone B, the dip is a constant 9 degrees to the east. is greater dispersion in dip magnitude. Some of the-
The random dips shown in Zone C include, from the dip vectors indicate 5 to 10 degrees greater dip than
top, 5 degrees to the north, 4 degrees east, 12 degrees the basic 12 to 15 degrees. This feature is somewhat
south and 9 degrees west. analogous to foreset bedding and can result from sub-
aqueous flow of unconsolidated sediments. In any
INTERPRETATION event, the plot of data is typical for a well penetrat-
ing a fore-reef facies and indicates a major reef de-
With the dipmeter results plotted, the next step is velopment to the west.
interpretation. Just \\'hat information is obtained Additional geological information is often required
from the vector plots? This question may be more to extract maximum information from the dip data.
difficult than is apparent at first glance. It is true In a well penetrating a reef crest, for example, little
that in some formations - for example, deep water or no draping occurs. Only when it is known that the
shales deposited belo,\-~ the wave base - the time-
equivalent bedding planes and the lithologic unit
boundaries are almost paralleL In such cases, the dip
vectors reflect structural dip.
However, in other rocks the bedding planes and
the bed boundaries may be at angular variance. Pres-
ent equipment can detect resistivity effects of beds
less than 1 inch thick. The device may respond to OEVIlNIAN BIONE ~EEF
tology.
Interpretation of continuous dipmeter data is most
effective when additional geologic knowledge is also ~EEF TOP (SLA\ POINT)
features - reefs, sands and unconformities. All of Figu,re 5.-Plot of dip dat(J, b'om well drilled tlwough the
the examples are from wells in Western Canada. /fn·e-reef fruies into the Sla1Je Point reef.
j"" .
--. !
I
6)01' -,
I ~tl6lE
"
~
::: .~
" L. Stl6Ll 5 ..110
-
.r~
--"..- ~'>.'"
."
", . ~.~
'""
.-
,
Fi[/ltI'.,g.-Bcadt-r/('jlosif('rI .<;(/110' I'e/kds II luu' :/urdh-
('usttr!y di}J, willi illtl') 1/a{ I'QJ"iutWlIS til JJwgllilrrdl' CCru:-lI'tI
oy (',.os,~-,~tnrfirimti(JH.
Figl/i"(' fi_-.4 wdl I,"olJl the back-J'e!!! facies on the L('duc
rl'C/ CJ-llil,jts rUJI(rOlJ! dips (If)Ou~ the nof'" top.
O' , <:
Tlw dip plot In F/[f1/t'(' {j is an example from ~\ well
Ll'" drilled on the back-reef flank of a Leduc reef. Th..:!
l
fact that the o\'erl:'ting beds are linu.!stone, with al-
\1 .._
most a complete abEent:e uf !-ihalc. i..:; primarily re-
!-;ponsible for the lack of a dr,lping trend. Fi"st, the
random nature of the dip diHgram is chilractcristir
z~
of reef core nr of non-bedded limestone. wherein the
cakulated dip:::; are likely to bl~ the result of vugs or
fractures. Second, the competE'nt nature of the over-
:;;-
,~
~
beds are shale. It is interesting to note that the dip
J.
vectol·s in the upper part of the Leduc reef appear
grouped in various pattern:s. In the tup 12 feet a
,~ northwesterly dip is indicated, with the ~teepest dill
<'~;;
<'
~ occurring at the shallowest de[lth Hnd wiLh lesser dip,..:;
below. This particular patteI'll is characteristic of
-< foreset deposition and thu~ :-;ugge~t~ that the reef
top is not a true bioherm at this poillt, but rather is
t:- ~
~ 11000
made up of bedded detrital limestone. Such bedded
material is usually deposited ill a direction away from
a reef crest or micro-atoll. Therefore, the dip pattern
. d. in the top few feet of the Leduc reef suggests a
f' s; residual reef high to the southeast.
'''$'
~
~
The gamm~'l ray log and dip plot in Fiyw'c 7 were
obtained from a well in the Pine Creek gas field,
I~· where the target formation is the Leduc reef. In this
,,~
- _J
j
LEOUC
,,~
';
'\
,
'~J
"
;
I !,i(1
" ~ ~ ~ M QlmMOO
,
rl T
,{ II
STIlIKE WLLEY bNo
-700 .ub."", ,
'"
I! " -
'{~ --~~-----lI3200
, -1 \
J"., ,...,
.. f
,
,
-.1
,f ---------j1325P
I r
..jl Figll1·e IO.-Rcsistivity CU1"VeS and dip plot from Well
J 1 "A", dTilled th?·ough the Mississippian unconfol'mity in
Sll.NO the Balztry u?-eu_ T}~e kI'UJsisrrippiLJ,n is highe?· and the
II basal Cretaceous target sand is missing_ The dip plot indi-
~T SHALE B SILT cates that the sur;ace of the llfississippian deepens to
r the west.
f
~ , 1(;-23
t
l.N1:IJt<FlIR"'ITY VIlNIAPiI
2640' _E
-~
'"
Figun~ lO.-Resistivity curves and dip plot {rom Well
stTike-valley sand indicates that tll(!, well is north of the -700 lubsl:.a
valley a:ds.
B tv.F.KER
3200
the reef is expected to build up at the rate of 12 de-
grees to the south\vest_ In the 50 feet of section im-
mediately above the reef, the dips indicate an east
trend and vary more in magnitude_ This section, as
indicated by the gamma ray log, is considerably more
calcareolls than the overlying shales, and is probably
composed largel)' of detrital reef material from a local
reef front high to the west. This hole was subsequent-
ly sidetracked 700 feet to the southwest. The reef Was
penetrated at a subsea depth which ' ..'as approximate-
I)' 150 feet shallower than in the original hole, and
confirmed the predicted 12-degree slope of the reef
front. [":
Sands
3300
Both the e...xternal shape and the internal cross- ~ : ".
stratification of a sand formation are functions of the
depositional environment. Because the continuous dip-
meter often defines both of these parameters, it offers
an effective means for predicting sand development.
For instance, in the example shown in Figure 8, the Figura It.-Well liB". drilled 2,640 feet. west of Well
"Air (see Figure 10), encountered the Mississippian at
southeasterly dips of var}'ing magnitude indicate that the 1UJ?'mal depth and penetrated a thick basal Cretaceous
the strike of this beach-deposited sand is southwest- sand.
northeast. Depositional information of this nature is
most effective in the hands of stratigraphers and sedi- Unconfonnities
mentologists, where it can be merged with the other
geologic data at their disposaL Angular unconformities are easily recognized as a
The dip plot of a section including a strike-valley plot of continuous dipmeter data by an abrupt change
- sand is shown in Figure 9. The high-angle cross-stra- in dip trend. However, very low angle unconformities.
tification within the sand is typical of strike-valley such as often found in '\Vestern Canada, may be more
deposition - with the croSs bedding directed away difficult to detect. Generally, for low-angle uncon-
from an erosional high. In this example, the uncon- formities, moat significance is placed on the dips of
formable surface dips to the south and thus locates the beds immediately overlying the unconformable
the well north of the strike-valley axis. surface. If the erosional surface is irregular, the
J
~~ tE- ~
. . _- -\-=:- ....~
;, -<
I
~
~~ ,-- ~
c ",,:::'
=0 ;> c
,~
--
--
*
--"">-
~~
.~
~
/",:
~
-~
,-""
;,...-
-
liIlA'IITE "'AS'" 56.'10
,, , ,
Figul"e 12.-Dip plot }'rum a well on the east-sOHtJUust
jfal/k of the gl"anitt' high. Tile granite-w0-8h sand 1.'1 Figure 1-1.-A{teT the well in F'ignrf!, 1'2. was lIJhilJstoc1~od
missing. to the sOIlUwast, a Hew hole pcnetrated 20 ft'et of grallitc-
wash 1JQ Y sum/.