Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maxim
Extra Crunch
My Lists
P
Jake Saper
discussed element of the software
Contributor
industry. In the past, founders could get
away with giving pricing short shrift Jake Saper is a partner at
Emergence Capital.
under the mantra, “the best product will ultimately
win.” No more. More posts by this contributor
Therefore, pricing models that limit usage, like the predominant per-seat per month
structure, limit quality. And thus limit companies.
For the first time in 20 years, there is a compelling argument to make for changing the way
that SaaS is priced. For those selling AI-enabled software, it’s time to examine new pricing
models. And since AI is currently the best-funded technology in the software industry — by
far — pricing could soon be changing at a number of vendors.
Read our latest COVID-19 coverage, and find out more about our events strategy.
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/why-per-seat-pricing-needs-to-die-in-the-age-of-ai/ 1/9
20.03.2020 Why per-seat pricing needs to die in the age of AI | TechCrunch
AI-enabled software will be even more tailored to the individual context of each end-user,
and thus, should command an even higher price. Relying on per-seat pricing gives buyers
an easy point of comparison ($/seat is universalizable) and immediately puts the AI vendor
on the defensive. Moving away from per-seat pricing allows the AI vendor to avoid apples-
to-apples comparisons and sell their product on its own unique merits. There will be some
buyer education required to move to a new model, but the winners in the AI era will use
these discussions to better understand and serve their customers.
Tethering yourself to per-seat pricing will make contract expansion much harder.
Read our latest COVID-19 coverage, and find out more about our events strategy.
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/why-per-seat-pricing-needs-to-die-in-the-age-of-ai/ 2/9
20.03.2020 Why per-seat pricing needs to die in the age of AI | TechCrunch
However, effective AI-based software makes workers significantly more efficient. As such,
seat counts should not need to grow linearly with company growth, as they have in the era
Maxim
of static software. Tethering yourself to per-seat pricing will make contract expansion much
harder. Indeed, it could result in a world where the very success of the AI software will entail
contract contraction. Search
While ROI is a good way to determine how much to charge, do not use ROI as the
mechanism for how to charge. Tying your pricing model directly to ROI created can cause
lots of confusion and anxiety when it comes time to settle up at year-end. This can create
issues with establishing causality and sets up an unnecessarily antagonistic dynamic with
the customer. Instead, use ROI as a level-setting tool and other mechanisms to determine
how to arrive at specific pricing.
A best practice in static software has been to price-discriminate using two-axis pricing
models, the first being volume, traditionally set on a per-seat basis, and the second being
features. The two-axis framework still applies in dynamic land, but the trick is to find a
volume-based lever that doesn’t restrict usage.
Specifically, identify a usage-agnostic metric that both grows as your customer grows
(volume-based) and that your product impacts meaningfully and measurably (value-
derived). A good example of this is Textio, an AI-based augmented writing service that helps
recruiters fill open roles faster. Their pricing is volume-based, tied to the number of hires the
company plans to make, with unlimited usage across unlimited users. This encourages the
buyer to deploy Textio to every recruiter and hiring manager and use it for every hire they
make. In turn, this allows Textio to maximize data collection and, thus, product value.
Read our latest COVID-19 coverage, and find out more about our events strategy.
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/why-per-seat-pricing-needs-to-die-in-the-age-of-ai/ 3/9
20.03.2020 Why per-seat pricing needs to die in the age of AI | TechCrunch
Use this metric as the denominator of your volume-based pricing axis (e.g., per person to
be hired in the case above). It’s best to create buckets so that pricing falls into a reasonable
Maxim
denominator range (e.g., the price is $X per bucket of n to n+1,000 people to be hired)
instead of using granular increments. Layer on the feature-based pricing axis, ideally
positioned to mitigate any potential contraction issues with the volume
Searchaxis.
Real estate is another industry where data networks are being built with strategic pricing.
Companies like CompStak and Crexi gives brokers credits as they submit data to the
system, creating a virtuous flywheel of proprietary commercial real estate data.
One important note: to build the trust critical to underpin such networks, AI vendors will
need very clear policies regarding what metadata is being shared and to invest heavily in
bulletproof infosec practices. Those that succeed will have amongst the strongest
competitive moats (we call them Coaching Networks) in an era in which static software
continues to commoditize.
While it may be too early to dictate exactly how pricing for AI software should be set, I’d
urge vendors to experiment with value-derived, volume-based models that don’t restrict
usage. Regardless of exactly which model they land on, I believe the most successful
players will start to hop off of the per-seat ship before it sinks them.
Week in Review
Read our latest COVID-19 coverage, and find out more about our events strategy.
Startups Weekly
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/why-per-seat-pricing-needs-to-die-in-the-age-of-ai/ 4/9
20.03.2020 Why per-seat pricing needs to die in the age of AI | TechCrunch
The Station
Email *
Startups Subscribe
Videos
Audio
Newsletters
Extra Crunch
Advertise
Tags
Events
Column SaaS —
TC arti cial intelligenceMore
CompStak crexi
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/why-per-seat-pricing-needs-to-die-in-the-age-of-ai/ 5/9
20.03.2020 Why per-seat pricing needs to die in the age of AI | TechCrunch
Search
My Lists
Extra Crunch
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/why-per-seat-pricing-needs-to-die-in-the-age-of-ai/ 6/9
20.03.2020 Why per-seat pricing needs to die in the age of AI | TechCrunch
Josh Constine
1:44 am MSK • March 20, 2020
Maxim
Search
My Lists
Extra Crunch
Despite canceled trade shows, gaming startups can still win an extra
life
Dave Struzzi
1:07 am MSK • March 20, 2020
Read our latest COVID-19 coverage, and find out more about our events strategy.
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/why-per-seat-pricing-needs-to-die-in-the-age-of-ai/ 7/9
20.03.2020 Why per-seat pricing needs to die in the age of AI | TechCrunch
Maxim
Search
Startups
Videos
Audio
Newsletters
Extra Crunch
Extra Crunch Advertise
GC’s Niko Bonatsos on Y Combinator, edtech andEvents
investing in the
shadow of coronavirus —
Danny Crichton More
12:14 am MSK • March 20, 2020
My Lists
YouTube launches dedicated COVID-19 home
page section
Lucas Matney
12:10 am MSK • March 20, 2020
Stocks
Read rise
our latest aftercoverage,
COVID-19 mixed day, with
and find techabout
out more leading
our events strategy.
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/why-per-seat-pricing-needs-to-die-in-the-age-of-ai/ 8/9
20.03.2020 Why per-seat pricing needs to die in the age of AI | TechCrunch
Search
TechCrunch Privacy Policy About Our Ads Code of Conduct Terms of ServiceMy Lists
© 2013-2020 Verizon Media. All rights reserved. Powered by WordPress VIP. Fonts by TypeKit.
Read our latest COVID-19 coverage, and find out more about our events strategy.
https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/why-per-seat-pricing-needs-to-die-in-the-age-of-ai/ 9/9