PTRM-25-R-21 Performance Standards 2.0

Review of Performance Standards for FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Document No: PTRM-25-R-21
Brownfield Upgrade Project Issue: 2.0
ISSUE RECORD
Issue Date Revision History

0.1 04/02/14 Internal Review
1.0 10/02/14 First Issue to Client
2.0 10/06/14 Second Issue to Client following comment
DISTRIBUTION
Mr J Brown OMV Petrom, Romania
File Risktec Solutions Limited, Glasgow.
Risktec Solutions Limited Page 1 of 22

CONTENTS
Issue Record ........................................................................................................................... 1
Distribution ............................................................................................................................. 1
1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 3
1.1 Background................................................................................................................ 3
1.2 Scope and Methodology .............................................................................................. 3
2 REVIEW AGAINST SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS ........................................... 4
2.1 Methodology .............................................................................................................. 4
2.2 Gap Analysis .............................................................................................................. 4
2.3 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 9
3 COMPRESSOR PERFORMANCE STANDARD .................................................. 10
3.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 10
4 OTHER REQUIREMENTS FROM EXISTING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ...... 15
4.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 15
5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................... 21
6 REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 22
Tables
Table 1: FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade Safety Critical Elements .......................... 5
Table 2: PS06–P - Compressors............................................................................................... 11

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
To optimise gas and condensate recovery from the Asset X facility, OMV Petrom plan to upgrade the
current compression capability available from the Central Production Facility (PFCP).
The PFCP-A platform was originally designed with six produced gas compressors:
• 1 x LP gas compressor (420-K-01) for the 2nd stage flash gas from the oil production
separators;
• 2 x HP gas compressors (421-K-01A/B) for the 1st stage flash gas from the oil production
separators plus the compressed gas from the 2nd stage separator;
• 3 x NAG compressors (450-K-01A/B/C) for non-associated or “free” gas.
The HP gas compressors and the NAG compressors were designed to be identical and
interchangeable to an extent. Over the years following the start-up of PFCP-A, the need for non-
associated gas compression never eventuated and two of the NAG compressors were utilised in HP
gas compression service and the remaining NAG compressor was utilised in LP gas compression
service.
Production rates of non-associated gas are declining rapidly and, in 2014, NAG compression is likely
to be required. This project will bring the NAG compressors into their original intended service. The
pressure and flow rate requirements for the NAG compressors are quite different to those
considered in the original design of the facility and the existing NAG compression packages must be
modified for the new service requirements.
In addition, the LP gas compression requirements have increased since the original design of the
PFCP-A facility and the LP gas compression capacity is to be increased.
1.2 Scope and Methodology
The scope of this document is to review the current Performance Standards for the PFCP-A platform
to ensure that they are applicable for the FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade project
(LENAG).
This was carried out by firstly reviewing the Safety Critical Elements (SCE) that were identified for
the project and ensuring that each SCE is adequately covered by the Performance Standards. A
review is then carried out on all other Performance Standards to identify any additional shortfalls
that are outside the scope of the SCE’s. Any shortfalls in the existing Performance Standards are
identified.

2 REVIEW AGAINST SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS

2.1 Methodology
The report Review of Safety Critical Elements for the FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield
Upgrade Project (Reference 1) was used to identify Safety Critical Elements (SCE) applicable to the
FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade Project. The SCEs are addressed by the following
Performance Standards:
• PS06 - Compressors;
• PS08 - Lifting Equipment;
• PS22 - Firewater Distribution System
• PS23 - Deluge, Sprinkler and Mist System;
• PS29 - Emergency Shutdown & Blowdown System; and
• PS20 - ATEXE - ATEX Equipment.
The SCEs were reviewed against the existing Performance Standards, defined above, to determine
whether the Performance Standards were applicable and suitable for the upgrade project and if any
changes are required.
2.2 Gap Analysis
Table 1 provides an assessment of the applicability of the existing Performance Standards to the
FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade Project SCE and highlights any identified gaps.

Review of Performance Standards for FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade Project Document No: PTRM-25-R-21
Issue: 2.0
TABLE 1: FRD LEBADA EAST NAG & LP BROWNFIELD UPGRADE SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS
Safety Critical Element Relevance to Project Performance Standard Review Adequate coverage of SCE
within Performance
Standard?
PS06 – Compressors
Gas compressor system equipped with Compressor upgrade is within scope of Section F1.2 details the specific trip Yes, see Section 3 for detailed
overpressurisation protection (trips via project functions that are required on the breakdown of requirements.
SCADA) compressors.
The Performance Standard would benefit

from the addition of boundary
information in the ‘comprises’ cell,
including the tag numbers of the
compressors
PS08 - Lifting equipment
Cranes equipped with electronic safe-load Mechanical handling and dropped Safe-load indication is addressed by Yes, covered by standard
indication, hook load and load radius, visual objects hazards identify lifting plans as Section F6, capacity indicator function lifting procedures
and audible alarms for the driver. Safety and a preventative control in the project
alarms and cut out prevent operation of HAZID Hooks are covered by Section F4,
crane outside its design limits. Data although load and radius requirements
recording system provides permanent record are not specified
of all lifts enabling preventative maintenance
to be carried out. Special lifts are recorded. Visual and Audible alarms for driver are
not specified
Protection systems to prevent crane

working outside the design limit are
addressed by Section F1
Data recording system and special lifts

requirements are not specified in the
Performance Standard
Cranes marked with Safe Working Load Mechanical handling and dropped Section F1.2 addresses gross overload Yes, covered by standard
(SWL) and fitted with electronic objects hazards identify lifting plans as protection systems. Marking of the lifting procedures
safeguarding system a preventative control in the project cranes with SWL not specified.
HAZID

Issue: 2.0
within Performance
Standard?
Emergency brakes are applied to hold load Mechanical handling and dropped Section F1.2 addresses gross overload Yes, covered by standard
and crane motion is stopped. Crane operator objects hazards identify lifting plans as protection systems lifting procedures
is able to lower the load by manual means. a preventative control in the project
HAZID Section F7.6 addresses brake systems
but not emergency brakes or mechanism
to manually lower loads
Load indicator installed in cranes Mechanical handling and dropped Section F6 addresses capacity indicator Yes, covered by standard
objects hazards identify lifting plans as function lifting procedures
a preventative control in the project
HAZID
Hooks have safety flaps to prevent slipping Mechanical handling and dropped Section F4 addresses hook blocks, Yes, covered by standard
of loads objects hazards identify lifting plans as although safety flaps are not specified lifting procedures
HAZID
Wind speed indicator interlocked with crane Mechanical handling and dropped Wind speed indicators are not covered in Yes, covered by standard
control system objects hazards identify lifting plans as the Performance Standard lifting procedures
HAZID
Fire Fighting Systems
Initiate Emergency Fire-fighting Response Emergency response plans identified PS22 covers fire water distribution for the Yes, potential impact on fire
Procedures. All systems tested, inspected as a recovery control in the project fire fighting systems fighting systems during
and maintained. HAZID following loss of containment / construction
fire / explosion PS23 covers the deluge, sprinkler and
mist systems
Testing, inspection and maintenance of

the fire fighting systems are defined

Issue: 2.0
within Performance
Standard?
PS20 - ATEX Equipment
All third party equipment comply with proper Contractors working on the project Section F1 defines how the integrity of all Yes, all new equipment must
hazardous area ratings must use ATEX rated equipment certified electrical equipment in be suitably ATEX rated
hazardous areas is maintained
F1.3 specifically covers electrical

equipment compliance with hazardous
area ratings
Electrical equipment is suitable for hazardous All electrical equipment on the project Section F1 defines how the integrity of all Yes, all new equipment must
area (ex-rated) must be suitable for the hazardous certified electrical equipment in be suitably ATEX rated
area hazardous areas is maintained
F1.3 specifically covers electrical

equipment compliance with hazardous
area ratings
PS29 - Emergency Shutdown & Blowdown System
Valves fail closed on loss of hydraulic Plant shutdown identified as recovery Section F1.1 specifies fail safe Yes, design must ensure that
pressure control in project HAZID following components valves fail closed on loss of
damage to equipment/loss of hydraulic pressure
containment
Pressure Relief: Blowdown System, initiated Plant blowdown identified as recovery Pressure relief and the initiators are not Yes, design and construction
automatically on overpressure or manually control in project HAZID following specified as part of the Performance work must ensure that
from control room. damage to equipment/loss of Standard, however this should be blowdown system remains
containment included on the Cause and Effects Charts fully operational at all times.
and the Performance Standard does not
require update
Closure of SSIV on oil risers Plant shutdown identified as recovery SSIV’s final elements are not specified as Yes, design and construction
control in project HAZID following part of the Performance Standard, work must ensure that SSIV
damage to equipment/loss of however this should be included on the on oil riser remains fully
containment Cause and Effects Charts and the operational at all times
Performance Standard does not require
update

Issue: 2.0
within Performance
Standard?
Closure of SSIV on gas risers Plant shutdown identified as recovery SSIV’s final elements are not specified as Yes, design and construction
control in project HAZID following part of the Performance Standard, work must ensure that SSIV
damage to equipment/loss of however this should be included on the on oil riser remains fully
containment Cause and Effects Charts and the operational at all times
Performance Standard does not require
update
New
Condensate Drain: Level Control Valve (LCV) Required to reduce back pressure at No applicable Performance Standard No, new Performance
with a restrictive Cv on the NAG suction the NAG suction scrubber liquid outlets identified Standard to be produced as
scrubber liquid outlets (identified in to prevent overpressure in a gas part of the Execute phase.
Reference 2) blowby scenario

2.3 Conclusion
All project SCE’s were found to be addressed in existing Performance Standards, with the following
exceptions:
• The new Condensate Drain SCE, Level Control Valve (LCV) on the NAG suction scrubber
liquid outlets, is not addressed by any of the existing Performance Standards.

3 COMPRESSOR PERFORMANCE STANDARD

3.1 Methodology
The Compressor Performance Standard (PS06) was reviewed in detail to identify requirements that
are applicable to the FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade Project and to identify any
specific shortfalls in either the Performance Standard or the proposed design.

Issue: 2.0
TABLE 2: PS06–P - COMPRESSORS

Performance Standard Performance Standard Performance Standard Actions Required
Requirements Assurance Requirements Verification Requirements
F1 - All Compressors shall be operated within the design operating parameters
F1.1 - Up to date operating Monitoring and control of F1.1.1 - Review operation Ensure the compressor design/operating conditions are
envelope is available compressor operation as per logs – 12 months updated on project completion
operating procedures
Ensure compressor monitoring and control assurance and
verification activities are included in PMS
F1.2 The following systems Calibrate & test the following F1.2.1 Review CMMS records Complete/update trip logic documents and datasheets on
(trip function) are calibrated & systems to ensure the correct – 12 months project completion
function at the correct set set points are implemented
F1.2.2 Witness function Ensure compressor trip system assurance and verification
points as per Trip logic and alarms (Audible &
testing of the safety systems activities are included in PMS
documents and data sheets. visual)/actions initiated as per
trips and alarms – 12 months
the trip logic / Cause & effects
• Seal protection
charts:
• Over-speed protection
• Seal protection
• Vibration monitoring
• Over-speed protection
• Temperature monitoring
• Vibration monitoring
• Low lube oil pressure
• Temperature monitoring
• Over-pressure protection
• Low lube oil pressure
• Over- axial displacement
• Over-pressure
protection
• Over- axial displacement
protection

Issue: 2.0

F2.1 Compressors are free Condition based monitoring as F2.1.1 Inspect the physical Ensure compressor meets specified condition requirement
from damage by impact, scheduled in CMMS conditions of compressors to prior to installation/operation
corrosion, erosion, fatigue, ensure that they are
Predictive inspection program, Ensure compressor condition assurance and verification
vibration etc. with the potential maintained fit for purpose – 12
Alignment activities are included in PMS
to result in loss of containment. months
Visual inspections, as part of
F2.1.2 Review inspection
the plant walk around.
records in track
implementation of corrective
actions– 12 months
F2.2 Critical components such Carry out appropriate F2.2.1 Review of maintenance Define compressor critical components, according to the
as blades, diaphragms, pistons, inspection as scheduled in the records and inspection inspection strategy
cylinders, road piston, are CMMS and prescribed by the strategy – 12 months
Ensure compressor critical components assurance and
inspected as per the inspection compressor inspection
verification activities are included in PMS
strategy strategy.
F2.3 Critical components are Logging of operating hours F2.3.1 Review of maintenance Define the safe operating life for critical components and
replaced prior to expiry of their records to ensure that calculate expiry dates
Scheduled maintenance
safe operating life, or inspected adequate inspection &
activities on lapse of specific Ensure compressor critical components assurance and
/ serviced within the due maintenance has been carried
operating hours (e.g., verification activities are included in PMS
operation period. out on specific times – 12
5000/15000 hrs. etc.) as per
months
manufactures
recommendations
F3.1 Fire suppression system in Compressor enclosure F3.1.1 Review inspection Update the Cause and Effects Charts to include the fire
Compressor enclosure is maintenance activities as records – 12 months suppression system in the compressor enclosure
operable in line with the design scheduled in CMMS
Ensure compressor enclosure fire suppression system
and cause and effect charts.
assurance and verification activities are included in PMS

Issue: 2.0

F3.2 Compressor enclosure Function testing of trip F3.2.1 Witness function Ensure the compressor enclosure
ventilation / pressurisation mechanism for loss of air flow testing – 12 months ventilation/pressurisation system design criteria is
system is functioning as per / pressurisation developed/updated
F3.2.2 review function testing
design criteria.
records – 12 months Ensure compressor ventilation/pressurisation system
assurance and verification activities are included in PMS
F4.1 All predicted failure modes Initial assurance by design. F4.1.1 Review inspection A HAZOP (or other hazard identification process) should
are identified and suitable Ongoing operational assurance program to confirm all failure be undertaken on the detailed design to identify all failure
control, mitigation & monitoring by management of change modes are mitigated – 12 modes and establish suitable controls
measures have been provided. months
Ensure control measure assurance and verification
activities are included in PMS
F5.1 Equipment is inspected, Equipment inspection, testing F5.1.1 - Confirm for a sample Ensure all equipment is inspected, function tested and
function tested and maintained and maintenance are of equipment, including any maintained in line with the Safety Critical Elements–
in accordance with Integrity scheduled through the new equipment, that Integrity Management Guideline (EP-HQ-GDL-008-00)
Management maintenance management inspection, testing and
Ensure compressor equipment assurance and verification
system (CMMS). maintenance is scheduled in
activities are included in PMS
accordance with relevant
Assignment of inspection,
strategy – 12 months
testing & maintenance for new
equipment governed by
management of change
process.

Issue: 2.0

A1 Reliability (probability of A1.1 - Probability of failure on SIL assigned by design and Complete a Safety Integrity Level Assessment for
failure on demand - PFD) values demand for IPF is less than management of change Compressors
of each & every element of designated SIL. procedures.
Ensure SIL system assurance and verification activities are
Compressors instrument
On-going assurance review of included in PMS
protective functions (IPF) shall
function testing results.
not be greater than that
permitted by the integrity
required for each safety
function based on the IEE
61508/61511 methodology for
categorizing & demonstration of
compliance of Safety Integrity
Level (SIL).

4 OTHER REQUIREMENTS FROM EXISTING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

4.1 Methodology
The facility Performance Standards were reviewed to identify requirements that are applicable to the
Compressor FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade Project and any impact upon the
Performance Standards as a result of the project.
Performance Performance Comment Impact on Performance
Standard Standard Title Standard
Number
PS01 Pressure Vessel & All pressure vessels to be Existing Performance
Tanks installed as part of the LENAG Standard provides adequate
project must adhere to the coverage for the proposed
requirements set out in the design; compliance
pressure vessel & tank assessment to be completed
Performance Standard. as part of the Execute phase.
As part of the LENAG
modifications new suction
scrubbers and compressor
discharge bottles are to be
installed.
PS02 Boilers N/A -
PS03 Pipelines N/A -
PS04 Pig Launcher/ Pig N/A -
Receiver
PS05 Pumps The pumps used to remove -
condensate from the LP
suction scrubber are not
directly affected by the LENAG
upgrades.
PS06 Compressors See Section 3 See Section 3
PS07 Gas Turbines N/A -
PS08 Lifting Equipment Any lifting operations during Existing Performance
construction must adhere to Standard provides adequate
the requirements of the lifting coverage for the proposed
equipment Performance design; compliance
Standard. assessment to be completed
as part of the Execute phase.
During normal operations,
lifting equipment is not
expected to be used routinely;
the construction phase will
require numerous, frequent
lifts.
PS09 Structural With the introduction of new Existing Performance
Integrity pipework and equipment Standard provides adequate
associated with the LENAG coverage for the proposed
project, additional structures design; compliance
for personnel access may be assessment to be completed
required. as part of the Execute phase.


Number
PS10 Inert Gas N/A -
Blanketing
PS11 Navigation Aids N/A -
and Collision
Avoidance
PS12 Emergency The LENAG project may alter Existing Performance
Lighting current emergency escape Standard provides adequate
routes and lighting. Any new coverage for the proposed
or altered emergency lighting design; compliance
must adhere to the Emergency assessment to be completed
Lighting Performance as part of the Execute phase.
Standards. Project must
ensure that emergency lighting
will be automatically activated
in an emergency and will
remain active on loss of main
power generation.
PS13 Temp Refuge & During the LENAG construction Existing Performance
Muster phase the personnel on board Standard provides adequate
the platform will be coverage for the proposed
significantly increased. Project design; compliance
must ensure that adequate assessment to be completed
space is provided at muster as part of the Execute phase.
points for all personnel on
board (POB) taking into
consideration the increased
POB during the construction
phase.
PS14 Escape Evacuation The LENAG project may impact Existing Performance
Routes emergency escape routes as Standard provides adequate
raised in FRD Lebada East NAG coverage for the proposed
& LP Brownfield Upgrade design; compliance
Project, Escape, Evacuation assessment to be completed
and Rescue Assessment Report as part of the Execute phase.
(Reference 4).
The altered emergency escape
routes must adhere to the
Escape Evacuation Routes
Performance Standard. Project
must ensure any altered
escape routes are clear,
unobstructed and adequately
sized in adherence with the
Performance Standard.


Number
PS15 Personal Survival During the LENAG construction Existing Performance
Equipment phase the personnel on board Standard provides adequate
(POB) the platform will be coverage for the proposed
increased significantly. Project design; compliance
must ensure that life jackets assessment to be completed
are provided for 100% of as part of the Execute phase.
personnel on board (POB)
during construction.
Project must ensure adequate
numbers of breathing
apparatus are present on
board to assist in emergency
response if required, taking
into account the increased
number of POB.
PS16 Lifeboats During the LENAG project the Existing Performance
aim is to limit personnel on Standard provides adequate
board to 116 (number of coverage for the proposed
beds). If this limit is design; compliance
implemented then the current assessment to be completed
lifeboats/rafts available will as part of the Execute phase
provide adequate room for all
personnel.
PS17 Helicopter N/A -
Facilities
PS18 Alarms & The LENAG project should not -
Communications affect the current alarm and
communication systems.
PS19 Earthing/ The LENAG project will replace Existing Performance
Lightning a large amount of equipment Standard provides adequate
Conductor on PFCP-A. The earthing and coverage for the proposed
Protection lightning strike protection design; compliance
arrangements for the assessment to be completed
equipment will need to be as part of the Execute phase
installed prior to
commissioning. Project must
ensure earthing/ lightning
conductor protection is
installed on new equipment
and adheres to the
Performance Standard (PS19).


Number
PS20 ATEX Equipment All equipment used and any Existing Performance
ex(p) enclosures required on Standard provides adequate
the project must comply with coverage for the proposed
this Performance Standard. design; compliance
assessment to be completed
The compressor project may
as part of the Execute phase
impact on the hazardous area
drawings. The Ex register must
be updated with equipment
used on the project.
The hazardous area drawings
should be reviewed for the
construction phase and normal
operation for all areas
impacted by the project.
PS21 Hazardous Area Due to the external positioning -
HVAC of the equipment to be
modified under LENAG this
Performance Standard is not
considered to be applicable.
PS22 Firewater Firewater supply/distributions -
Distribution should be unaffected by the
System LENAG upgrade.
See PS23 for deluge specific
actions.


Number
PS23 Deluge, sprinklers The project intends to Existing Performance
and mist systems temporarily isolate the water Standard provides adequate
supply to the deluge skid and coverage for the proposed
air supply to the fusible loop, design; compliance
as outlined in FRD Lebada East assessment to be completed
NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade as part of the Execute phase
Project, Dropped Object
Assessment Report (Reference
3).
This PS allows temporary
degradation of a SCE.
However, the project must
ensure that the following are
complied with:
• Company operational risk
assessment procedure;
• Defect management
processes;
• Technical Authority
approval for any
temporary degradation of
a SCE.
The Performance Standard
should be consulted directly
for further information.
This Performance Standard
should not be affected by
normal operation on
completion of the construction
phase.
PS24 Foam Systems N/A -
PS25 Gaseous and Dry N/A -
Powder Fire
Fighting Systems
PS26 Uninterruptable N/A -
Power Supply
(UPS)
PS27 Emergency Emergency generator supply Existing Performance
Generators will be tied into new F&G Standard provides adequate
detection systems and process coverage for the proposed
control instrumentation for the design; compliance
gas compressors. Project must assessment to be completed
ensure that the potential as part of the Execute phase.
increased electrical load on
emergency generator is
assessed for new equipment
involved in the LENAG
upgrade.


Number
PS28 Passive Fire N/A -
Protection
PS29 Emergency As part of the LENAG upgrade Existing Performance
Shutdown and the flare lines are to be Standard provides adequate
Blowdown System upgraded. Ensure that all coverage for the proposed
blowdown systems associated design; compliance
with the compressors adhere assessment to be completed
to the Performance Standard as part of the Execute phase
criteria.
PS30 Relief System As part of the LENAG upgrade Existing Performance
the compressor discharge Standard provides adequate
valves are to be replaced. coverage for the proposed
Project must ensure that the design; compliance
PSVs are calibrated in the assessment to be completed
workshop in accordance with as part of the Execute phase
the Performance Standard and
are added to the inspection
schedule.
PS31 Fire & Gas During the LENAG construction Existing Performance
Detection phase, temporary fire and gas Standard provides adequate
detection will be installed coverage for the proposed
within the construction area. design; compliance
The temporary detection will
provide a signal to the CCR
and will rely on swift operator
action to manually activate the
platform alarm system. Project
must ensure operating
procedure for operator action
upon the activation of the
temporary fire and gas
detection system is written and
distributed to operators.
PS32 Pedestal Crane Pedestal cranes 3 and 5 will be Existing Performance
used extensively for lifting Standard provides adequate
operations during the LENAG coverage for the proposed
upgrade. Project must ensure design; compliance
the pedestal cranes adhere to assessment to be completed
the Performance Standard as part of the Execute phase
prior to construction and lifting
operations for the LENAG
upgrade.
All Management of The Management of Change Existing Performance
Change procedure applies to this Standard provides adequate
project coverage for the proposed
design; compliance

5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The following Recommendations are made:
(1) As part of the Execute phase, review the SCEs identified for the project and confirm all
wording is applicable (e.g. special lifts may be considered a safety critical task rather than a
SCE);
(2) Update Performance Standard, PS06 Compressors, with boundary information for the new
compressors;
(3) Review the ESD Cause and Effects Chart to ensure all initiators and final elements for this
project are included;
(4) Develop a new Drains Performance Standard to include the new LCV on the NAG suction
scrubber liquid outlets;
(5) Complete a compliance assessment of the proposed design against the existing Performance
Standards, as part of the Execute phase, to ensure that each Performance Standard
requirement is met.
Furthermore, all Performance Standards associated with the project would benefit from a
detailed review and alignment with industry best practice where applicable. Improvements to be
considered include:
• Provision of detailed boundary information;
• A link between functional requirements and standards/guidance;
• More relevant and specific requirements; and
• Referencing of relevant maintenance routines for assurance activities.

6 REFERENCES
1. Risktec. Review of Safety Critical Elements for the FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield
Upgrade Project. PTRM-25-R-01 (PE-D-A1011330019-HS-ANL-001-01-E). Issue 1. May 2013
2. FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade Project, Closed and Open Drains Impact
Assessment, NAG-BFFEED-Z-001-00
3. FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade Project, Dropped Object Assessment
Report, PE-D-A1011330019-HS-REP-012-02-E.
4. FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Brownfield Upgrade Project, Escape, Evacuation and Rescue
Assessment Report, PE-D-A1011330019-HS-REP-026-03-E

PTRM-25-R-21 Performance Standards 2.0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PTRM-25-R-21 Performance Standards 2.0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Review of Performance Standards for FRD Lebada East NAG & LP Document No: PTRM-25-R-21

Brownfield Upgrade Project Issue: 2.0

Issue Date Revision History

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 1 of 22

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 2 of 22

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 3 of 22

2 REVIEW AGAINST SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 4 of 22

The Performance Standard would benefit

Protection systems to prevent crane

Data recording system and special lifts

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 5 of 22

Testing, inspection and maintenance of

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 6 of 22

F1.3 specifically covers electrical

F1.3 specifically covers electrical

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 7 of 22

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 8 of 22

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 9 of 22

3 COMPRESSOR PERFORMANCE STANDARD

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 10 of 22

TABLE 2: PS06–P - COMPRESSORS

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 11 of 22

Performance Standard Performance Standard Performance Standard Actions Required

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 12 of 22

Performance Standard Performance Standard Performance Standard Actions Required

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 13 of 22

Performance Standard Performance Standard Performance Standard Actions Required

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 14 of 22

4 OTHER REQUIREMENTS FROM EXISTING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 15 of 22

Performance Performance Comment Impact on Performance

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 16 of 22

Performance Performance Comment Impact on Performance

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 17 of 22

Performance Performance Comment Impact on Performance

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 18 of 22

Performance Performance Comment Impact on Performance

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 19 of 22

Performance Performance Comment Impact on Performance

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 20 of 22

5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 21 of 22

Risktec Solutions Limited Page 22 of 22

You might also like