Evaluation Tool For Video Audio Recording

DepEd Evaluation Rating Sheet for Supplementary Reading Materials
Title: ___________________________________________________________________ ISBN: _________________________________________________

Author(s): _______________________________________________________________ Illustrator(s): __________________________________________
Publisher/Distributor(s): ________________________________________________
Copyright Year: __________ Number of Pages: _________ Subject: ______________________________________
Intended for : _____ 4-6 Read Aloud _____ 4-6 Independent Reading
Instructions: Examine the material very carefully and rate it along each evaluation criteria by indicating the appropriate rating (with 4 – Very Satisfactory (VS); 3 – Satisfactory (S); 2 – Fair;
and 1 – Poor). For a rating below 4, write your comments / justifications on each evaluation criterion. If an evaluation criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material is rated 3 on said
criterion. Attach extra sheets if necessary.
Items Page & Line Description of Error Found / Comment Recommended Correction /Revision /Suggestion Rating
No.
Factor 1: Content
1. Content is suitable to the student’s level of
development
#REF!
2. Material contributes to the achievement of

specific objectives of the subject area and
grade/year level for which it is intended.
#REF!
Page 1 of 30
No.
3. Material provides for the development of
higher cognitive skills such as critical thinking,
creativity, learning by doing, inquiry, problem
solving, etc.
#REF!
4. Material handles social content (i.e., gender,

ideological, cultural, religious, racial content)
sensitively.
#REF!
5. Material enhances the development of

DepEd core values: (please check)
__ Maka-Diyos
__ Makatao #REF!
__ Makakalikasan
__ Makabansa
6. Material arouses interest of target reader.
#REF!
Page 2 of 30
No.
7. Adequate warning/cautionary notes are
provided in topics and activities where safety and
health are of concern
#REF!
Total points #REF!
Note: SRM must score at least 21 points out of a maximum 28 points to pass this criterion. #REF!
Page 3 of 30
No.
Factor 2: Format
1. Prints
1.1 Size of letters is appropriate to the
intended user.
1.2 Spaces between letters and words

facilitate reading.
1.3 Font is easy to read.
#REF!
1.4 Printing is of good quality (i.e., no

broken letters, even density, correct
alignment, properly placed screen
registration).
1.5 There are no typographical and

other print errors (e.g., inappropriate or
unclear illustrations, missing labels,
wrong captions, etc.)
Page 4 of 30
No.
2. Illustrations
2.1 Simple and easily recognizable.
2.2 Clarify and supplement the text.
2.3 Properly labeled or captioned (if

applicable)
2.4 Realistic / appropriate colors #REF!
Items Page & Line Description of Error Found / Comment Recommended Correction /Revision /Suggestion
No.
2.5 Attractive and appealing
2.6 Culturally relevant
Page 5 of 30
Page 6 of 30
No.
3. Design and Layout
3.1 Attractive and pleasing to look at
3.2 Simple (i.e., does not distract the

attention of the reader)
#REF!
3.3 Adequate illustration in relation to
text
3.4 Harmonious blending of elements

(e.g.,illustrations and text)
Page 7 of 30
No.
4. Paper and Binding
4.1 Paper used contributes to easy
reading
#REF!
4.2 Durable binding to withstand
frequent use
5. Size and Weight of SRM

5.1 Easy to handle
#REF!
5.2 Relatively light
Total points #REF!
Page 8 of 30
No.
Factor 3: Language
1. Language is engaging, interesting and #REF!
understandable.
2. Flow of ideas is suitable to the level of the #REF!

reader.
3. Vocabulary level is adapted to target #REF!

reader’s experience and understanding.
4. Length of sentences is suited to the #REF!

comprehension level of the target reader.
5. Sentences and paragraph structures are #REF!

varied and interesting to the target reader.
6. There are no grammatical errors. #REF!
Total points #REF!
Page 9 of 30
No.
Factor 4: Up-to-dateness
1. Conceptual errors #REF!
2. Factual errors #REF!
3. Computational errors #REF!
4. Obsolete information #REF!
Total points #REF!
Page 10 of 30
Other Comments
(Please write your comments and

recommendations on the material not captured
in Factors 1 to 4. Use additional sheets if
necessary.)
Recommendation
Note: A material which Failed in at least one of the four factors in this rating sheet should not be recommended for possible use in public schools.
(Please put a check mark in the appropriate box.)
o included
I/We recommend the approval of this supplementary material for possible use in public schools provided that the corrections/revisions
in this report are made. (Publisher must implement all recommended corrections/revisions in their next printing or provide an
errata.)
o
I/We do not recommend the approval of this supplementary material for possible use in public schools for the reasons stated below,
and/or cited in this evaluation report. (Please use separate sheet if necessary.)
(Please sign below and at the back of each page.)
Evaluator(s): Signature(s): __________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
Date:
Page 11 of 30
Level 2 DepEd Evaluation Rating Sheet for Video and Audio Recording
Title: ______________________________________________________________________________________________
Author(s)/Producer: _______________________________ Publisher/Distributor(s): ______________________________
Copyright Year: __________________________________ Length (in minutes): _________________________________
Learning Area: ___________________________________ Language Used: ___________________________________
Type of Resource: Video Recording
Movie Documentary
Instruction Video Others (please specify) __________________________
Audio Recording
Music / Song Instructional Recording Narration
Others (please specify): ______________________________________________
Intended for (Please check): _____ Kinder-Gr. 3 _____ Gr. 4-6 _____ Junior HS _____ Senior HS
Instructions: Examine the material carefully and rate it along each evaluation criterion by encircling the appropriate number [with
4 being Very Satisfactory (VS); 3 - Satisfactory (S); 2 - Fair; and 1 – Poor]. For a rating below 4, write your
comments/justifications on each evaluation criterion. If an evaluation criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material is rated 3 on
said criterion. Attach extra sheets if necessary. Your report may be completed in ink Please write legibly.
Very Poor Not

Factor 1 : Content Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2) Satisfactory (1)
1. Content is suitable to the learners'level of development.

2. Material contributes to the achievement of specific
objectives of the learning area and grade level for which it
is intended.
3. Material provides for the development of higher cognitive
skills such as critical thinking, creativity, learning by doing,
inquiry, problem solving, and 21st Centrury Skills.
4. Material is free of ideological, cultural, religious, racial,
and gender biases and prejudices.
5. Material enhances the development of desirable values
and traits such as: (Put a check mark only to the
applicable values and traits)
5.1 Creativity and Innovation
5.2 Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
5.3 Communication and Collaboration
5.4 Information, Media, and ICT Literacy
5.5 Flexibility and Adaptability
5.6 Social and Cross-cultural Skills
5.7 Productivity and Accountability
5.8 Leadership and Responsibility
5.9 Initiative and Self-direction
Others (please specify) ________________________
7. Adequate warning / cautionary notes are provided in topics
and activities where safety and health are of concern.
Total Points
Note: Resource must score at least 21 points out of a Passed

maximum 28 points to pass this criterion. Please put a check
mark on the appropriate box
Note: Resource must score at least 21 points out of a
mark on the appropriate box Failed
Very Poor Not

Factor 2. Format/Technical Design Satisfactory (3)
1. Volume and quality sound is appropriate.

2. Pacing is effective and appropriate to instructional
purposes.
3. Audio-visual effects (music, sound, graphics, etc) are
appropriate and effective for instructional purposes.
Total Points
Note: Resource must score at least 9 points out of a maximum Passed

16 points to pass this criterion. Please put a check mark on the
appropriate box Failed
Very Poor Not

Factor 3. Presentation and Organization Satisfactory (3)
1. Presentation is engaging, interesting, and

understandable.
2. There is logical and smooth flow of ideas.
3. Vocabulary level is adapted to target reader's experience
and understanding.
4. Length of the video/audio recording is appropriate to the
attention span of the target learner.
Total Points

Very Poor Not

Factor 4. Accuracy and Up-to-dateness of Information Satisfactory (3)
1. Conceptual errors
2. Factual errors
3. Grammatical errors.
4. Computational errors
5. obsolete information
6. Typograpical and other minor errors (e.g., inappropriate or
unclear illustrations, missing labels, wrong captions, etc.)
Total Points

Other Comments
(Please write your comments and recommendations on the material not captured in Factors 1 to 4. Use additional sheet if
necessary.)
Recommendation
Note: Any material that Failed in one of the two Factors in this rating sheet should not be recommended for possible use in
public schools.
(Please put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate box.)
I / We recommend the approval of this material for possible use in public schools provided that the corrections /
revisions included in this report are made. (For commercial resources (non-DepED owned resources) the
Publisher must implement all recommended corrections / revisions in their next printing or provide errata.)
I / We do not recommend the approval of this material for possible use in public schools for the reasons stated
below and/or cited in this evaluation report. (Please use separate sheet if necessary.)
I/We certify that this evaluation report and recommendation are my/our own and have been made without any undue
influence from others.
Signature(s): ______________________________________
Evaluator(s): _________________________________________
_________________________________________ ______________________________________
Date: _______________________________________________
DepEd Evaluation Rating Sheet for Supplementary Reading Materials
Title: ___________________________________________________________________ ISBN: _________________________________________________

Author(s): _______________________________________________________________ Illustrator(s): __________________________________________
Publisher/Distributor(s): ________________________________________________
Copyright Year: __________ Number of Pages: _________ Subject: ______________________________________
Intended for : _____ 4-6 Read Aloud _____ 4-6 Independent Reading
Instructions: Examine the material very carefully and rate it along each evaluation criteria by indicating the appropriate rating (with 4 – Very Satisfactory (VS); 3 – Satisfactory (S); 2 – Fair;
and 1 – Poor). For a rating below 4, write your comments / justifications on each evaluation criterion. If an evaluation criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material is rated 3 on said
criterion. Attach extra sheets if necessary.
No.
Factor 1: Content
1. Content is suitable to the student’s level of
development
2. Material contributes to the achievement of

specific objectives of the subject area and
grade/year level for which it is intended.
Page 19 of 30
No.
3. Material provides for the development of
higher cognitive skills such as critical thinking,
creativity, learning by doing, inquiry, problem
solving, etc.
4. Material handles social content (i.e., gender,

ideological, cultural, religious, racial content)
sensitively.
5. Material enhances the development of

DepEd core values: (please check)
__ Maka-Diyos
__ Makatao
__ Makakalikasan
__ Makabansa
Page 20 of 30
No.
7. Adequate warning/cautionary notes are
provided in topics and activities where safety and
health are of concern
Total points
Note: SRM must score at least 21 points out of a maximum 28 points to pass this criterion.
No.
Factor 2: Format
1. Prints
1.1 Size of letters is appropriate to the
intended user.
1.2 Spaces between letters and words

facilitate reading.
Page 21 of 30
Page 22 of 30
No.
1.4 Printing is of good quality (i.e., no
broken letters, even density, correct
alignment, properly placed screen
registration).
1.5 There are no typographical and

other print errors (e.g., inappropriate or
unclear illustrations, missing labels,
wrong captions, etc.)
2. Illustrations
2.1 Simple and easily recognizable.
2.2 Clarify and supplement the text.
2.3 Properly labeled or captioned (if

applicable)
2.4 Realistic / appropriate colors
Page 23 of 30
2.4 Realistic / appropriate colors
Page 24 of 30
No.
2.5 Attractive and appealing
3. Design and Layout

3.1 Attractive and pleasing to look at
3.2 Simple (i.e., does not distract the

attention of the reader)
3.3 Adequate illustration in relation to

text

Page 25 of 30
Page 26 of 30
No.
4. Paper and Binding
4.1 Paper used contributes to easy
reading
4.2 Durable binding to withstand

frequent use
5. Size and Weight of SRM

5.1 Easy to handle
5.2 Relatively light
Total points
Page 27 of 30
No.
Factor 3: Language
1. Language is engaging, interesting and
understandable.
2. Flow of ideas is suitable to the level of the

reader.
3. Vocabulary level is adapted to target

reader’s experience and understanding.
4. Length of sentences is suited to the

comprehension level of the target reader.
5. Sentences and paragraph structures are

varied and interesting to the target reader.
6. There are no grammatical errors.
Total points
Page 28 of 30
No.
Factor 4: Up-to-dateness
1. Conceptual errors
2. Factual errors
3. Computational errors
4. Obsolete information
Total points
Page 29 of 30
Other Comments
(Please write your comments and

recommendations on the material not captured
in Factors 1 to 4. Use additional sheets if
necessary.)
Recommendation
Note: A material which Failed in at least one of the four factors in this rating sheet should not be recommended for possible use in public schools.
(Please put a check mark in the appropriate box.)
o included
I/We recommend the approval of this supplementary material for possible use in public schools provided that the corrections/revisions
in this report are made. (Publisher must implement all recommended corrections/revisions in their next printing or provide an
errata.)
I/We do not recommend the approval of this supplementary material for possible use in public schools for the reasons stated below,
o and/or cited in this evaluation report. (Please use separate sheet if necessary.)
Evaluator(s): Signature(s): __________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
Date:
Page 30 of 30

Evaluation Tool For Video Audio Recording

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Evaluation Tool For Video Audio Recording

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DepEd Evaluation Rating Sheet for Supplementary Reading Materials

Title: ___________________________________________________________________ ISBN: _________________________________________________

2. Material contributes to the achievement of

4. Material handles social content (i.e., gender,

5. Material enhances the development of

6. Material arouses interest of target reader.

Total points #REF!

1.2 Spaces between letters and words

1.3 Font is easy to read.

1.4 Printing is of good quality (i.e., no

1.5 There are no typographical and

2.2 Clarify and supplement the text.

2.3 Properly labeled or captioned (if

2.4 Realistic / appropriate colors #REF!

2.6 Culturally relevant

3.2 Simple (i.e., does not distract the

3.4 Harmonious blending of elements

5. Size and Weight of SRM

Total points #REF!

2. Flow of ideas is suitable to the level of the #REF!

3. Vocabulary level is adapted to target #REF!

4. Length of sentences is suited to the #REF!

5. Sentences and paragraph structures are #REF!

6. There are no grammatical errors. #REF!

Total points #REF!

2. Factual errors #REF!

3. Computational errors #REF!

4. Obsolete information #REF!

Total points #REF!

(Please write your comments and

(Please put a check mark in the appropriate box.)

(Please sign below and at the back of each page.)

Evaluator(s): Signature(s): __________________________________________

Very Poor Not

1. Content is suitable to the learners'level of development.

Note: Resource must score at least 21 points out of a Passed

Very Poor Not

1. Volume and quality sound is appropriate.

Note: Resource must score at least 9 points out of a maximum Passed

Very Poor Not

1. Presentation is engaging, interesting, and

Note: Resource must score at least 12 points out of a Passed

Very Poor Not

Note: Resource must score at least 20 points out of a Passed

(Please put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate box.)

(Please sign below and at the back of each page.)

Title: ___________________________________________________________________ ISBN: _________________________________________________

2. Material contributes to the achievement of

4. Material handles social content (i.e., gender,

5. Material enhances the development of

6. Material arouses interest of target reader.

1.2 Spaces between letters and words

1.3 Font is easy to read.

1.5 There are no typographical and

2.2 Clarify and supplement the text.

2.3 Properly labeled or captioned (if

2.4 Realistic / appropriate colors

2.6 Culturally relevant

3. Design and Layout

3.2 Simple (i.e., does not distract the

3.3 Adequate illustration in relation to

3.4 Harmonious blending of elements

4.2 Durable binding to withstand

Title: ___________________ ISBN: _

Title: ___________________ ISBN: _