You are on page 1of 12

Triaxial Test

Objectives

• To conduct an unconsolidated undrained triaxial test on a soil sample


• To obtain the shear strength parameters of the soil

Introduction

Triaxial test is a popular laboratory test used to determine the shear strength parameters of a soil. These
parameters are important in geotechnical engineering. The soil sample to be used can be either disturbed
or undisturbed. Stress is applied to the soil in perpendicular directions. The test is classified according to
the drainage conditions during the consolidation and shearing stages.

• Consolidated-drained
• Consolidated-undrained
• Unconsolidated-undrained

The unconsolidated-undrained test does not allow drainage to occur. It is used for clayey or silty soils
which have cohesive forces acting in them.

Theory

𝑠 = 𝜎𝑛 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝜑 + 𝑐

• s – shear strength of a soil


• σn – normal stress on the shearing plane
• c – cohesion
• φ – angle of friction

The above equation represents the Mohr- Coulomb Failure criteria of a soil. It gives the equation for the
line of the failure envelope to the Mohr’s circle at shear failure of the soil. Cohesion and angle of friction
are the shear strength parameters of a soil.

Apparatus

• Soil
• Mould
• Rammer
• Rubber membrane
• O-rings
• Triaxial apparatus
• Air/water constant pressure apparatus
• Porous stone
• Filter paper
Procedure

• Sample preparation
o First the clay-silt soil to be tested was crushed.
o Then the mould was assembled, inside was covered with oil, and soil was compacted in
three layers using a rammer, with 25 blows for each layer.
o Next, the diameter of the mould was measured, and the mould was opened.
o After that the soil sample was pushed out of the mould until only a length that was
twice the diameter was left inside.
o Then the extra length was cut, and the soil sample was removed.
o Next the sample was encased in a rubber membrane.
• Testing procedure
o First the sample was placed on the bottom cap and sealed with O-rings and rubber
membrane.
o Then filter paper and top cap was placed on top and also sealed.
o After that the loading piston was lifted and the cell was mounted and fixed by screws.
o Next the loading piston was placed on the top cap carefully, without applying a high
deviator stress.
o Then the cell was completely filled with water using a funnel until water exited from the
top, after which the cell was sealed.
o Next cell pressure was applied using the air/water constant pressure machine.
o After that the deviator stress was increased until the gauge reading stopped changing,
which indicated failure.
o Readings were taken from the strain dial reading and the deviator load.
o Finally, after the test the water was drained from the cell and the moisture content of
the specimen was determined.
Observations

Initial diameter (mm) 50


Initial height(mm) 100
Initial area (mm2) 1963.495
Initial volume (mm3) 196349.5
Applied lateral pressure (KPa) 50

Wet weight of specimen (g) 40.2


Dry weight of specimen (g) 34.4
Moisture content of specimen (%) 16.86
Wet density of specimen (gcm-3) -
Dry density of specimen (gcm-3) -

Strain dial Deviator Strain (%) Corrected Deviator Minor Major


reading load (kN) area (mm2) stress (kPa) principal principal
(mm) effective effective
stress (kPa) stress (kPa)
0.0 0.00 0.0% 1963.50 0.00 50 50
0.5 0.07 0.5% 1973.36 35.47 50 85.47
1.0 0.08 1.0% 1983.33 40.34 50 90.34
1.5 0.08 1.5% 1993.40 40.13 50 90.13
2.0 0.09 2.0% 2003.57 44.92 50 94.92
2.5 0.10 2.5% 2013.84 49.66 50 99.66
3.0 0.11 3.0% 2024.22 54.34 50 104.34
3.5 0.12 3.5% 2034.71 58.98 50 108.98
4.0 0.12 4.0% 2045.31 58.67 50 108.67
4.5 0.13 4.5% 2056.02 63.23 50 113.23
5.0 0.15 5.0% 2066.84 72.57 50 122.57
5.5 0.15 5.5% 2077.77 72.19 50 122.19
6.0 0.16 6.0% 2088.82 76.60 50 126.60
6.5 0.16 6.5% 2100.00 76.19 50 126.19
7.0 0.17 7.0% 2111.29 80.52 50 130.52
7.5 0.17 7.5% 2122.70 80.09 50 130.09
8.0 0.18 8.0% 2134.23 84.34 50 134.34
8.5 0.18 8.5% 2145.90 83.88 50 133.88
9.0 0.19 9.0% 2157.69 88.06 50 138.06
9.5 0.20 9.5% 2169.61 92.18 50 142.18
10.0 0.20 10.0% 2181.66 91.67 50 141.67
10.5 0.20 10.5% 2193.85 91.16 50 141.16
Initial diameter (mm) 50
Initial height(mm) 100
Initial area (mm2) 1963.495
Initial volume (mm3) 196349.5
Applied lateral pressure (KPa) 100

Wet weight of specimen (g) -


Dry weight of specimen (g) -
Moisture content of specimen (%) -
Wet density of specimen (gcm-3) -
Dry density of specimen (gcm-3) -

Strain dial Deviator Strain (%) Corrected Deviator Minor Major


reading load (kN) area (mm2) stress (kPa) principal principal
(mm) effective effective
stress (kPa) stress (kPa)
0.0 0.00 0.00% 1963.50 0.00 100 100.00
0.5 0.04 0.50% 1973.36 20.27 100 120.27
1.0 0.05 1.00% 1983.33 25.21 100 125.21
1.5 0.05 1.50% 1993.40 25.08 100 125.08
2.0 0.05 2.00% 2003.57 24.96 100 124.96
2.5 0.05 2.50% 2013.84 24.83 100 124.83
3.0 0.07 3.00% 2024.22 34.58 100 134.58
3.5 0.07 3.50% 2034.71 34.40 100 134.40
4.0 0.08 4.00% 2045.31 39.11 100 139.11
4.5 0.09 4.50% 2056.02 43.77 100 143.77
5.0 0.10 5.00% 2066.84 48.38 100 148.38
5.5 0.11 5.50% 2077.77 52.94 100 152.94
6.0 0.11 6.00% 2088.82 52.66 100 152.66
6.5 0.11 6.50% 2100.00 52.38 100 152.38
7.0 0.11 7.00% 2111.29 52.10 100 152.10
7.5 0.11 7.50% 2122.70 51.82 100 151.82
8.0 0.11 8.00% 2134.23 51.54 100 151.54
8.5 0.11 8.50% 2145.90 51.26 100 151.26
9.0 0.11 9.00% 2157.69 50.98 100 150.98
9.5 0.11 9.50% 2169.61 50.70 100 150.70
10.0 0.11 10.00% 2181.66 50.42 100 150.42
Calculations

𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 2
• 𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 = 𝜋 ( )
2
50
• 𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 = 𝜋( )2
2
• 𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 = 1963.49𝑚𝑚2

• 𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 × 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡


• 𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 1963.49 × 100
• 𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 196349.5𝑚𝑚3

For third measurement,


𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔
• 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 = × 100%
𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
1
• 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 = 100 × 100%
• 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 = 1%

𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎
• 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 = (1−𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛)
1963.49
• 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 = (1−0.01)
• 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 = 1983.33𝑚𝑚3

𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑
• 𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎
0.08
• 𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 1983.33×10−6
• 𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 40.34𝑘𝑃𝑎

• 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒


• 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 50𝑘𝑃𝑎

• 𝑀𝑎𝑗𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 + 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠
• 𝑀𝑎𝑗𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 50 + 40.34
• 𝑀𝑎𝑗𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 90.34𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑤𝑒𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡−𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
• 𝑀𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 = ( ) × 100%
𝑑𝑟𝑦 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
40.2−34.4
• 𝑀𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 = ( ) × 100%
34.4
• 𝑀𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 = 16.86%
Results

• The sample was remoulded after extracting soil from the field.
• The test was strain controlled by increasing the force applied by the loading piston so that the
strain increase rate was constant.
• The soil specimen consisted of clayey sand.

Deviator stress at failure Minor principal stress Major principal stress


50kPa 91.68 50 141.68
100kPa 51.54 100 151.54

• Axial strain at maximum deviator stress,


o 50kPa – 9.5% (92.18kPa)
o 100kPa – 5.5% (52.94kPa)
50kPa 100kPa
Cu (kPa) 45.84 25.77
φu 0 0
Discussion


There are two main stages in a triaxial test: consolidation and drainage. Consolidation is the gradual
reduction of volume in a soil due to drainage of pore water before vertical loading. Drainage occurs due
to slow rate of loading. Depending on these conditions there are three types of triaxial tests,
• Consolidated-drained (CD)
• Consolidated-undrained (CU)
• Unconsolidated-undrained (UU)

The CD test is done to simulate long term loading of sandy soils. Drain valves are opened during both
consolidation and shearing stages. Loading rate quite is slow, in order to replicate long term loading
conditions. The test is very time consuming.

The CU test allows the sample to consolidate after applying lateral pressure. The test is used to simulate
long term loading of cohesive soils. Conversely the UU test simulates short term loading on cohesive soils.
Drain valves are shut and the loading is done quickly to prevent drainage. This test is quite fast.

There are several other tests that are used to determine the shear strength parameters of soil.
• Direct shear test – the equipment consists of box that can be split into two halves, horizontally.
After soil is filled in the box, shear force is applied by the relative movement of the two halves.
• Field vane shear test – the vane shear apparatus consists of a rod that is inserted in the soil. The
rod is then rotated at a measured rate until failure occurs.
• Consolidation test – the soil sample is placed in a metal ring with porous stones and loading is
applied for 24 hours.

There are several advantages in the triaxial test compared to the above methods.
• Drainage can be well controlled, which can be used to accurately simulate the field situation.
• Shearing can occur along any plane (weakest plane) unlike the direct shear test.
• Can be used for most types of soil.
• Uniform stress distribution on the failure plane
• Area and volume changes can be measured
• Stresses before failure is known

But it also has disadvantages such as expensive equipment and complex process. The direct shear test is
much faster than the triaxial test. The triaxial test cannot be used soft clays, unlike the vane shear test.
Also, it does not give as much information on consolidation compared to the consolidation test.
Conclusion

An unconsolidated-undrained triaxial test was successfully conducted on a clayey soil specimen. Through
the test deviator stress and corresponding strain was measured. Those values were used to construct a
Mohr’s circle to determine the shear strength parameters of the soil. The practical experience gave
essential knowledge on an important testing process in geotechnical engineering.
References

Civil Engineers Forum, 20118. Triaxial Test – Merits and Demerits of Triaxial Test. [Online]
Available at: http://civilengineersforum.com/triaxial-test-merits-demerits/
[Accessed 3 March 2018].

NPTEL, 2015. Triaxial Test. [Online]


Available at: http://nptel.ac.in/courses/105103097/46
[Accessed 1 March 2018].

S, R., 2017. PART ONE: INTRODUCTION TO TRIAXIAL TESTING. [Online]


Available at:
http://www.gdsinstruments.com/__assets__/pagepdf/000037/Part%201%20Introduction%20to%20tria
xial%20testing.pdf
[Accessed 2 March 2018].

University of Connecticut, 2017. Shear Strength of Soil. [Online]


Available at: http://www.engr.uconn.edu/~lanbo/CE240LectW112shearstrength2.pdf
[Accessed 2 March 2018].

You might also like