This debate discussed the Reproductive Health (RH) Law in the Philippines. The government argued that the RH Law allows people freedom over their own bodies and prevents unwanted pregnancies. However, the opposition argued that the RH Law violates religious beliefs and can have health risks. Both sides debated issues around population control, teenage pregnancy, and whether contraceptives constitute taking a life. Overall, the debate revolved around balancing individual choice versus religious doctrine in matters of family planning and reproductive health.
This debate discussed the Reproductive Health (RH) Law in the Philippines. The government argued that the RH Law allows people freedom over their own bodies and prevents unwanted pregnancies. However, the opposition argued that the RH Law violates religious beliefs and can have health risks. Both sides debated issues around population control, teenage pregnancy, and whether contraceptives constitute taking a life. Overall, the debate revolved around balancing individual choice versus religious doctrine in matters of family planning and reproductive health.
This debate discussed the Reproductive Health (RH) Law in the Philippines. The government argued that the RH Law allows people freedom over their own bodies and prevents unwanted pregnancies. However, the opposition argued that the RH Law violates religious beliefs and can have health risks. Both sides debated issues around population control, teenage pregnancy, and whether contraceptives constitute taking a life. Overall, the debate revolved around balancing individual choice versus religious doctrine in matters of family planning and reproductive health.
Prime Minister: Leader of the Opposition: Castro Villaflor Parameters Challenge Religious beliefs RH Law – conscious updates to RH law is defined those who want to control birth Arguments Arguments Right to live Prevents unwanted pregnancy Everyone should have the freedom For those couple who don’t want a to live and not being controlled by child. Because of the rh law, someone unwanted pregnancy is minimized. 57 seconds The couple does not want a family The parameter is not even a or a child. parameter Minimizes early pregnancies. There After he gave the parameter, he was are teenagers who commit to pms. about to take his seat and end his We need to learn from these turn. Later on, he remained mistakes. standing and did a long pause, We can minimize this early eventually, he gave an argument pregnancy because of the rh law Minimizes the increase of population. If the population increases, it might lead to poverty. It will lead to babies being thrown away. It helps teenagers to control birth 2:03 Did not accept points from the PM and W of the Gov Deputy Prime Minister: Deputy Leader of the Opposition: Mansueto Doria Children should be given the It prevents unwanted pregnancy. chance to experience the struggles All of us make mistakes. Usually and benefits of life teenagers, usually couples tend to No one is allowed to take do something rather risky. If they someone’s life want to do something unique to Contraceptives can have bad effects spice up their life, it helps them to the body of the person prevent stupid things like teenage It can add diseases from the pills pregnancy and the chances of that are being taken making mistakes. New argument Montemayor: if they are not ready Thou shall not kill – is used to pregnant yet, they should not 1:15 commit that intimate act especially Not all arguments were thoroughly that it is outside of marriage—they explained know it is wrong, but they still do it. Montemayor: People nowadays are not that religious and they are not committing a sin, what can you say about that failure of them to follow God’s order—it depends on the person and his moral codes It helps minimize the chances of STD It helps in keeping young curious individuals from making grave mistakes that will have adverse effects on them in the long run It could minimize the risk of the said task Rebuttals DPM: how can contraceptives add diseases when in the first place it helps prevent diseases 4:26 Closing Government Closing Opposition Member: Member: Adanza Flores Argument Rh law provides condoms, pills, 5th commandment has been used and other forms of contraceptives in (not a new argument, but she said order to prevent unwanted that it is) pregnancies. The life we have today is not ours This is exceptionally helpful to We should not stop giving life to a overpopulated countries, boosting person. their environment for the people. We should multiply and continue Teenage pregnancy, as one issue in producing life the country, will be stopped. Long pause When one becomes a teenager, Longer pause there is an excessive production of She ended her speech at around 34 hormones in the body. seconds This leads to them being intimate Rebuttal was then shared after the and doing quite touchy things first bell Rebuttals Rh law is for those who don’t have 5th commandment—how can we kill a child—if they did not want to someone that isn’t even born yet? have a child, they should have not DPM: contraceptives add to done an intimate act which gives diseases—how can this be when birth to a child. They should be contraceptives rather prevent responsible as a couple diseases 1:59 3:01 Did not accept points from the DLO and M of the Opp Whip: Whip: Montemayor Crisostomo Summary Summary Arguments came out but the Arguments are explained explanations are missing By part summary, he did it per role Rebuttals of a person How can you kill someone who is Castro: it is not rh law that not yet born—what is inside the minimizes population. It is the woman is already alive choice of the people to control Flores—we are talking about population—we are talking about contraceptives, when someone is the rh law using condoms, the semen cannot Rebuttals push through the vaginal opening Rh law gives freedom, yet it avoids —I am focusing on the rebuttal teenage and unwanted pregnancies against the 5th commandment 5th commandment—rh law does not 2:20 kill, Rh law is designed to help individuals “I would like to give my rebut” 4:00