Pontificia Universidad Católica

Facultad de Letras
LET1313 English Language III

Group: Javier Leiva, Cristobal Castillo.

Score:3.81
Grade: 6.5
Hypermedia Project Rubric

Exemplary (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2) Poor (1)

Engagement 5% Your podcast is extremely
engaging as well as
informative/clear. You took
care to make your podcast
really interesting and kept
the audience’s attention
throughout.
Your podcast is engaging
as well as clear. Your
podcast has some
elements that make it
interesting. You managed
to keep the audience’s
attention most of the time.
Your podcast is sometimes
engaging. It has few
elements that make it
interesting, but it is a really
dry podcast overall.
You took very little effort to
make your podcast
engaging.

3.5 Podcast is engaging and clear. There are some elements that make it interesting. Audience’s attention was captured
most of the time.

Content 30% The podcast content is
really clear, concise and
informative. Contents are
relatable and very easy to
understand.
Your script showed
evidence of thought and
revision. You stuck closely
to your script in your
production (though some
improvisation is OK)
The podcast content is
clear, concise and
informative. Contents are
very easy to understand.
You improvised some but it
is clear you were following
a well thought-out plan.
The content is adequate,
but perhaps your
descriptions/points contain
an error or are difficult to
understand.
You didn't stick to your
script and your podcast
seemed very improvised.
The content is incorrect or
very difficult to
understand.
You didn't write a script or
stick to it. Your podcast
seemed almost totally
improvised.

4 Podcast content is really clear and informative, presented in a way that is very easy to understand and relate to.
Script employed in the episode production shows evidence of thought and revision.

Organization 10% Your podcast was very well Your podcast was Your podcast needed to be Your podcast was not
organized and was easy to organized. Your podcast more organized. Your organized. Your podcast
follow. Your podcast was was submitted on time. podcast was submitted was late. Every member
 submitted on time. It was Every member of your late. It might not have was not included.
clear every member of group had a role. been clear that every
your group had an member had a role.
important role to play.

3.6 Podcast was submitted on time. Episode is well organized and easy to follow. Every group member had a role,
though dialogue distribution was uneven between members.

Delivery and Well rehearsed and smooth
Language 50% delivery. Highly effective
enunciation, expression,
and rhythm keep the
audience listening.
Pronunciation is intelligible
throughout and there are
many successful attempts
to use complex language
forms and lexical items
from the chosen unit.
Speech is fluent and
effortless.
Rehearsed and smooth
delivery.
Enunciation, expression
and pacing are effective.
Pronunciation is intelligible
most of the times and
there are some successful
attempts to use complex
language forms and lexical
items from the chosen unit.
Speech is fluent.
Appears unrehearsed with Delivery is hesitant and
uneven delivery. choppy, and sounds like
Enunciation, expression the presenter is reading.
and rhythm are sometimes Rhythm is distracting
distracting. throughout the podcast.
Pronunciation is sometimes Pronunciation is
intelligible and speakers unintelligible overall and
have control of basic speakers don’t have control
language forms. Your of basic language forms.
production included only a No lexical items from the
few lexical items from the chosen unit were included.
chosen unit. Speech does Speech is choppy.
flow freely at times.

3.8 There’s a well-rehearsed and smooth delivery of content by group members. Highly effective enunciation and
expression by group members keep the audience engaged and listening.
Pronunciation is intelligible through almost the whole episode, and there are many successful attempts in the use of
complex language forms and lexical items from the selected group by different group participants. Speech is fluent
and almost effortless by group members.

Technical Production Transitions are smooth and
5% spaced correctly without
noisy or dead space.
Volume of voice, music,
and effects enhance the
presentation.
Podcast length keeps the
audience interested and
engaged.
Transitions are smooth
with a minimal amount of
ambient noise.
Volume is acceptable.
Podcast length keeps
audience listening.
Transitions are uneven Transitions are abrupt and
with inconsistent spacing; background noise needs to
ambient noise is present. be filtered.
Volume is occasionally Volume changes are highly
inconsistent. distracting.
Podcast length is Podcast is either too long
somewhat long or or too short to keep the
somewhat short to keep audience engaged.
audience engaged.

3.5 Correct format, yet the file was submitted twice.

Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly. Volume of voice and music enhance the presentation.
Podcast length keep the audience engaged and interested in the episode.
Observations: You did a very job guys! It was nice to listen to; you took a very interesting and informative approach toward the topic. I
would have liked for the both of you to have equal participation in the episode, as the dialogue distribution was unequal. What brought
down your score in technical production was the fact it was submitted twice, so a word of advice would be to follow well the instructions of
future projects.

Grammar and vocabulary

“In your scory (?) opinion”

Pronunciation
Welfare
Rather
Humility