This document discusses the spectrum of right and wrong and how morality is not always black and white. It notes that as children we are taught right from wrong is clear, but as we mature we understand there is a spectrum and what is considered wrong can depend on factors like intent and severity of the action. The document questions where the line is between right and wrong, and whether an action that is technically wrong but intended to be right should still be considered wrong, or more in the gray area of the spectrum.
This document discusses the spectrum of right and wrong and how morality is not always black and white. It notes that as children we are taught right from wrong is clear, but as we mature we understand there is a spectrum and what is considered wrong can depend on factors like intent and severity of the action. The document questions where the line is between right and wrong, and whether an action that is technically wrong but intended to be right should still be considered wrong, or more in the gray area of the spectrum.
This document discusses the spectrum of right and wrong and how morality is not always black and white. It notes that as children we are taught right from wrong is clear, but as we mature we understand there is a spectrum and what is considered wrong can depend on factors like intent and severity of the action. The document questions where the line is between right and wrong, and whether an action that is technically wrong but intended to be right should still be considered wrong, or more in the gray area of the spectrum.
From childhood, we are taught that there is right and wrong.
That it is black and white. We are told to treat others as we would like to be treated. It isn’t until later that we understand the spectrum of right and wrong. Telling a white lie by no means holds the same weight as killing another human being. Nor does helping a friend bring the same reward as saving a life. Yet the line isn’t cut and dry. What is truly right or perfectly wrong? Or better, where does one become the other? Is doing something wrong with a right inten- tion still considered wrong? For example, someone does something wrong, but they have the right intention. Technically the action itself is wrong, but the reasoning behind it isn’t. If there is a spectrum, in which black is wrong and white is right, was the wrong action gray? Would it be closer to white or black? The same goes with doing the right thing for the wrong reasons. How much does the reasoning and intent of the person determine the extent of the sin?