Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In this post, let us consider the retaining wall sized and loaded as shown
in Figure 2. This structure has been modelled on Staad Pro in order to
determine the action effects due to the applied load.
Fig 2: Cantilever retaining wall
The retaining wall is subjected to a 3m thick earthfill, and a variable
surcharge pressure of 10 kPa. Given that the retained earth has an angle
of internal friction of 30°, we can obtain the Rankine active earth
pressure as follows;
Vertical actions
(1) Self weight (to be calculated automatically by Staad)
(2) Weight of earthfill (19 kN/m3 × 3m) = 57 kN/m2
(3) Surcharge load = 10 kN/m2
Horizontal Actions
(4) Triangular earth pressure = (0.333 × 19 × 3) = 18.98 kN/m 2
(5) Uniform surcharge pressure = (0.333 × 10) = 3.333 kN/m2
The wall has been modelled per metre run on Staad, and plate mat
foundation was utilised with coefficient of subgrade modulus of 100000
kN/m2/m.
Steps to adopt
(1) Model the retaining wall utilising plate element meshing, assign
thickness of 0.4m to the base, and 0.3m to the wall. Also assign plate
mat foundation of subgrade modulus 100000 kN/m2/m to the base in the
y-direction.
Fig 3: Modelling and meshing of the retaining wall
(2) Assign the following loads to the structure
A little consideration will show that the load cases 1 and 2 are treated as
permanent actions, while load case 3 is treated as a variable action.
To carry out manual analysis, we will have to follow the steps given
below to obtain the maximum moment at the base of the wall. The
actions causing bending on the wall are the horizontal earth pressure
and the horizontal surcharge pressure.
A little consideration will show that Staad Pro and Manual calculations
gave almost the same value for wall bending moment. However, I
expect the value of base moment from Staad Pro to be lower than the
one from manual analysis. Kindly verify this at your private time.
Thank you for visiting Structville today and God bless you.