Lean6™ Leanmap.

com
Six Sigma for Excel Hypothesis Testing Navigating to Results

Process: Purpose: Reference: Responsible: Date:

Waiting time at machining center Accept or reject a hypothesis (assumption) WaitHypothesis091116 Enter Name 1/1/2020

1. Start

2. Select Hypothesis Test

Discrete Data Continuous Data

Z-Test for the Proportion Z-Test for Mean, Sigma known t Test: Differences in 2 Means F Test: Differences in 2 Variances
Hypothesized Proportion 0.743 Hypothesized Mean 10.2 Hypothesized Difference 10 Level of Significance 0.05
Level of Significance 0.05 Level of Significance 0.05 Level of Significance 0.05 Population 1 Sample
Number of Successes 4 Population Std Deviation) 0.5 Population 1 Sample Sample Size (n) 100
Sample Size 50 Sample Size (n) 25 Sample Mean (xbar) 70 Sample Std Deviation (s) 3
Sample Proportion 0.08 Sample Mean (xbar) 10 Sample Size (n) 10 Population 2 Sample
Standard Error 0.0617982 Standard Error of the Mean 0.1 Sample Std Deviation (s) 3 Sample Size (n) 100
Z Test Statistic -10.728464 Z Test Statistic -2 Population 2 Sample Sample Sd Deviation (s) 5
Two-Tailed Test Two-Tailed Test Sample Mean (xbar) 57 F-Test Statistic 0.36
Lower Critical Value (-Z) -1.959964 Lower Critical Value (-Z) -1.959964 Sample Size (n) 10 Sample-1 Degree Freedom 99
Upper Critical value (+Z) 1.959964 Upper Critical Value (+Z) 1.959964 Sample Std Deviation (s) 3 Sample-2 Degree Freedom 99
p-Value 0 p-Value 0.0455003 Sample-1 Degree Freedom 9 Two-Tailed Test
Null Hypothesis: reject Null Hypothesis: reject Sample-2 Degree Freedom 9 FDIST value 0.9999997
Upper-Tail Test Upper-Tail Test Total Degrees of Freedom 18 1-FDIST value 3.419E-07
Upper Critical value (+Z) 1.6448536 Upper Critical Value (+Z) 1.6448536 Pooled Variance 9 Lower Critical Value (-Z) 0.6728417
p-Value 1 p-Value 0.9772499 Difference Sample Means 13 Upper Critical Value (+Z) 1.4862338
Null Hypothesis: accept Null Hypothesis: accept t-Test Statistic 2.236068 p-Value 6.839E-07
Lower-Tail Test Lower-Tail Test Two-Tailed Test Null Hypothesis: reject
Lower Critical Value (-Z) -1.6448536 Lower Critical Value (-Z) -1.6448536 Lower Critical Value (-Z) -2.100922 Upper-Tail Test
p-Value 3.741E-27 p-Value 0.0227501 Upper Critical Value (+Z) 2.100922 FDIST value 0.9999997
Null Hypothesis: reject Null Hypothesis: reject p-Value 0.0382496 1-FDIST value 3.419E-07
t-Test for Mean, Sigma unknown Null Hypothesis: reject Upper Critical Value (+Z) 1.3940613
Chi-Square Test for Proportion Hypothesized Mean 16.2 Upper-Tail Test p-Value 0.9999997
Ho: there is no difference between… Inspectors Level of Significance 0.1 TDIST value 0.0191248 Null Hypothesis: accept
Level of Significance 0.025 Sample Size (n) 15 1-TDIST value 0.9808752 Lower-Tail Test
Observed: Inspectors Sample Mean (xbar) 16.3 Upper Critical Value (+Z) 1.7340636 FDIST value 0.9999997
Result Insp-1 Insp-2 Insp-3 Total Sample Std Deviation (s) 0.1 p-Value 0.0191248 1-FDIST value 3.419E-07
Pass 25 25 20 70 Standard Error of the Mean 0.0258199 Null Hypothesis: reject Lower Critical Value (-Z) 0.7173286
Fail 5 5 10 20 Degrees of Freedom 14 Lower-Tail Test p-Value 3.419E-07
Total 30 30 30 90 t Test Statistic 3.8729833 TDIST value 0.0191248 Null Hypothesis: reject
Expected: Inspectors TDIST value 0.0008446 1-TDIST value 0.9808752
Result Insp-1 Insp-2 Insp-3 Total 1-TDIST value 0.9991554 Lower Critical Value (-Z) -1.7340636
Pass 23.333333 23.333333 23.333333 70 Lower Critical Value (-Z) -1.7613101 p-Value 0.9808752
Fail 6.6666667 6.6666667 6.6666667 20 Upper Critical Value (+Z) 1.7613101 Null Hypothesis: accept
Total 30 30 30 90 Two-Tailed Test
Number of Rows 2 p-Value 0.0016893
Number of Columns 3 Null Hypothesis: reject
Degrees of Freedom 2 Upper-Tail Test
Critical Value 7.3777589 p-Value 0.0008446
Chi-Square Test Statistic 0.1663308 Null Hypothesis: reject
p-Value 0.920199 Lower-Tail Test
Null-Hypothesis: accept p-Value 0.9991554
Null Hypothesis: accept
3. Results