Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.0 GENERAL
1.1 Date of Inspection: 22-12-2018
1.2 Name of Quality Monitor: J.N. Joshi
1.3 Name of Road: Vadali to lapasari road Ch. 4/600 to 6/000 km.
1.4 Package No: MMGSY/BUJ/16-17/P.04
1.5 Length: 1.380 Km.,Flexible Pavement, 0.020 Km.,C.C. / Other Pavement = Total 1.40 km
1.6 Technical Sanctioned Cost: Rs 4823900
1.7 Name of Agency: Madhuram construction - Junagadh
1.8 Date of Start of the Work: 11-06-2018
1.9 Stipulated Date of Completion: 15-06-2019
1.10 Actual Date of Completion ( If Work Completed ): Work in progress
1.11 Name of Officer Present: M.R. Parmar
Observations:
Engineer Present or NOT Whether
Whether Field Whether Necessary
Sr. Equipments
Laboratory Equipments
No. At Plant Site At Paver Site have been
Establishment (Y/N) Available ( Y/N )
used (Y/N)
1 N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A
*If Engineer of Agency is Not present on site than Proposed Dissection as per Tender Clause. (i.e. Rs 16500/-
Month)
Grading: Grade: S SRI U
If this item is graded U, write clear reason and suggestion for Improvement.
Observation - Item 2b: Verification of test Results ( P - Conforms, F - Does Not Conform ):
Test result as per QC
Results of the test
Register at the same Whether the test result
conducted by QM
Sr. No. Name of tests location. (Mention the recorded in QC register
at a defined
page No. of QC Register found correct? (Y/N)
location. (P/F)
also ) (P/F)
1 WBM Gradation test P/ P/110 Y
Grading: Grade: S SRI U
If this item is Graded U, Write clear reasons and Suggestions for Improvement.
3.0 GEOMETRICS: The QM should take at least two measurements in 1km length and if found that the
Roadway and Carraigeway is inadequate QM may take more observation:
4.0 EARTHWORK:
Observations: Item - 4 a : Quality of Material for Embankment / Sub Grade:
On Visual Classification Identify
Location the group symbol & write (Type Quality of material is acceptable. (Y/N)
of Soil )
If this item is Graded, Write clear reasons and Suggestions for Improvement.
Observation - Item no. 4 b: Workmanship for Embankment and Sub Grade Construction:
LAB TEST
Degree of Compaction
(As Per Record) Field
Location
Moisture
(Km) Compaction
MDD OMC Content Field Density Dry Density
CBR Adequate.
gm/cc % gm/cc gm/cc
(Y/N)
N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A
N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A N.A
NA
7.0 C Bitumen Extraction Tests Performed at Plant site at the time of Inspection:
Wt. of mix
% Asphalt % Asphalt
with Wt. of mix without Wt. of % Asphalt Remarks
w.r.t reqd as per
Asphalt Asphalt (gm) Asphalt w.r.t Mix Pass/Fail
Aggregate Specification
(gm)
NA
Grading : Grade: S SRI U
If this item is Graded U, Write clear reasons and Suggestions for Improvement.
NA
9.0 Observations - Item No.8, Quality of Shoulders (In case of completed works)
Whether Quality of
Sr. Whether Camber is
Location Shoulder Material Material is as per
No. maintained. (Y/N)
Specification
NA
10.0 Cross Drainage Works:
Whether General Whether general
Sr. Quality of the quality of
Location Type of CD
No. material is workmanship is
acceptable. (Y/N) acceptable. (Y/N)
N.A
NA
PIU staff and contractor's engineers were present at road site and they
were checked all measurements.
Observations about deficiency in project preparation (Give detailed observations about deficiencies
in general and items which have been left but are required as per site conditions ):
No deficiencies found.
Whether the work has been complete or is in progress as per work program or delay has occurred. If
15.2
delay has occurred, whether the liquidated damages have been withhold or recovered.
Work is in progress.
Whether the work has been completed within the sanctioned cost, if not, what is the action taken by
15.3
the PIU (In case of Complete works).
NA
Comments about difference in observations made by NQMs/SQMs in earlier inspection (the NQM
15.5 shall study earlier inspection reports of NQMs/SQMs, if any and offer his clear comments about the
differences in observations, if any).
NA
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS