Capex Vs Opex compariosn for Chiller

Sr No Description Unit Vendor data

1 Chilled water generation capacity TR 100
2 Running Hours Hr 24
3 no of days per year Nos 365
4 No of years Nos 10
5 Electrical power unit cost-Rs/KWH Rs 8.15
6 No of machine Nos 1
7 Type of Air compressor Air Cooled
8 Type of control Without VFD
9 Chilled water generation capacity TR 105
10 Cooling water flow required M3/Hr NA
11 Weight Kgs 3342
12 Foot print dimensions mmXmmXmm 4856X2242X2393
13 Model number YLAA0442HE
14 Capacity as per model offered TR 105
15 Specific power consumption IKW/TR 1.6762
Cooling tower fan consumption
16 considering cooling water flowrate kw NA

Cooling water pump power consumption

17 considering cooling water flow rate kw NA

Chiller power consumption@Full Load&

18 kw 164.2
45 degree temperature
19 Total Chiller plant efficiency IKW/TR 1.6762

20 Cooling fan Power consumption @Full kw 11.76

Load& 45 degree temperature
21 Driver power rating for Chiller kw 164.2
22 Driver power rating for cooling fan kw 11.76
Total input power for entire unit
23 considering @Full Load& 45 degree kw 175.96
temperature
Power cost for 10 years running @Full
24 INR 125654153.94
Load& 45 degree temperature
 Cost considering Consumable /
25 replacement required for 10 years INR
operation
1550000
Cost considering overhauling for rotating
26 INR
parts considering 10 years operation

Toal Operation Cost (Energy +

27 INR 127204153.94
Consumnbles + Maintenance) @ 10 years

28 Capital Cost INR 3200000

29 Difference between Operation Cost INR 67220079.74
30 DIfference between capital cost INR 123611

Capex and Opex both are higher for Air cooled

31 Payback period Years and hence no pay back feasible

32 Location Indoor
33 Available foot print mmXmmXmm 8500Width X 4400Length X 5000Height

Feasibility for offered model considering Not feasible for Indoor

34
free space requirement around the unit location
Vendor data
100
24
365
10
8.15
1
Water Cooled
With VFD
100.5
74.95
2717
2596X2717X2527
YVWE100
100.5
0.7383

4.7

3.5

74.23

0.8202

NA

NA
NA

82.43

58850074.2
 1134000

59984074.2

3076389
67220079.74
123611

d Opex both are higher for Air cooled

d hence no pay back feasible

Indoor
Width X 4400Length X 5000Height
 Capex Vs Opex compariosn for Chiller
Sr No Description Unit Vendor data
1 Chilled water generation capacity TR 100
2 Running Hours Hr 24
3 no of days per year Nos 365
4 No of years Nos 10
5 Electrical power unit cost-Rs/KWH Rs 8.15
6 No of machine Nos 1
7 Type of Air compressor Air Cooled
8 Type of control Without VFD
9 Chilled water generation capacity TR 105
10 Cooling water flow required M3/Hr NA
11 Weight Kgs 3342
12 Foot print dimensions mmXmmXmm 4856X2242X2393
13 Model number YLAA0442HE
14 Capacity as per model offered TR 105
15 Specific power consumption IKW/TR 1.6762
Cooling tower fan consumption
16 considering cooling water flowrate kw NA

Cooling water pump power consumption

17 considering cooling water flow rate kw NA

Chiller power consumption@Full Load&

18 kw 164.2
45 degree temperature
19 Total Chiller plant efficiency IKW/TR 1.6762

20 Cooling fan Power consumption @Full kw 11.76

Load& 45 degree temperature
21 Driver power rating for Chiller kw 164.2
22 Driver power rating for cooling fan kw 11.76
Total input power for entire unit
23 considering @Full Load& 45 degree kw 175.96
temperature
Power cost for 10 years running @Full
24 INR 125654153.94
Load& 45 degree temperature
 Cost considering Consumable /
25 replacement required for 10 years INR
operation
1550000
Cost considering overhauling for rotating
26 INR
parts considering 10 years operation

Toal Operation Cost (Energy +

27 INR 127204153.94
Consumnbles + Maintenance) @ 10 years

28 Capital Cost INR 3200000

29 Difference between Operation Cost INR 73074387.74
30 DIfference between capital cost INR 123611

Capex and Opex both are higher for Air cooled

31 Payback period Years and hence no pay back feasible

32 Location Indoor
33 Available foot print mmXmmXmm 8500Width X 4400Length X 5000Height

Feasibility for offered model considering Not feasible for Indoor

34
free space requirement around the unit location
Vendor data
100
24
365
10
8.15
1
Water Cooled
With VFD
100.5
74.95
2717
2596X2717X2527
YVWE100
100.5
0.7383

74.23

0.7386

NA

NA
NA

74.23

52995766.2
 1134000

54129766.2

3076389
73074387.74
123611

d Opex both are higher for Air cooled

d hence no pay back feasible

Indoor
Width X 4400Length X 5000Height
 Capex Vs Opex compariosn for Chiller
Sr No Description Unit Vendor data
1 Chilled water generation capacity TR 100
2 Running Hours Hr 24
3 no of days per year Nos 360
4 No of years Nos 10
5 Electrical power unit cost-Rs/KWH Rs 8.15
6 No of machine Nos 1
7 Type of Air compressor Air Cooled
8 Type of control Without VFD
9 Chilled water generation capacity TR 105
10 Cooling water flow required M3/Hr NA
11 Weight Kgs 3342
12 Foot print dimensions mmXmmXmm 4856X2242X2393
13 Model number YLAA0442HE
14 Capacity as per model offered TR 105
15 Specific power consumption IKW/TR 1.6762
Cooling tower fan consumption
16 considering cooling water flowrate kw NA

Cooling water pump power consumption

17 considering cooling water flow rate kw NA

Chiller power consumption@Full Load&

18 kw 164.2
45 degree temperature
19 Total Chiller plant efficiency IKW/TR 1.6762

20 Cooling fan Power consumption @Full kw 11.76

Load& 45 degree temperature
21 Driver power rating for Chiller kw 164.2
22 Driver power rating for cooling fan kw 11.76
Makeup water qty considering
23 M3/Hr
Evaporation+drift+Blowdown losses

24 Makeup rate kw
 Total input power for entire unit
25 considering @Full Load& 45 degree kw 175.96
temperature

26 Power cost for 10 years running @Full INR 123932864.16

Load& 45 degree temperature
Cost considering Consumable /
27 replacement required for 10 years INR
operation
1550000
Cost considering overhauling for rotating
28 INR
parts considering 10 years operation

Toal Operation Cost (Energy +

29 INR 125482864.16
Consumnbles + Maintenance) @ 10 years

30 Capital Cost INR 3200000

31 Difference between Operation Cost INR 68065355.36
32 DIfference between capital cost INR 123611

Capex and Opex both are higher for Air cooled

33 Payback period Years
and hence no pay back feasible

34 Location Indoor
35 Available foot print mmXmmXmm 8500Width X 4400Length X 5000Height

Feasibility for offered model considering Not feasible for Indoor

36
free space requirement around the unit location

Capex Vs Opex compariosn for Chiller

Sr No Description Unit Vendor data
1 Chilled water generation capacity TR 100
2 Running Hours Hr 24
3 no of days per year Nos 360
4 No of years Nos 10
5 Electrical power unit cost-Rs/KWH Rs 8.15
6 No of machine Nos 1
7 Type of Air compressor Air Cooled
Vendor data
100
24
360
10
8.15
1
Water Cooled
With VFD
100.5
74.95
2717
2596X2717X2527
YVWE100
100.5
0.7383

2.2 2.2kw conveyed by M/S Bluechip

3.5

74.23

0.7953

NA

NA
NA

2.365

3.7
 83.63

56283508.8

1134000

57417508.8

3076389
68065355.36
123611

d Opex both are higher for Air cooled

d hence no pay back feasible

Indoor
Width X 4400Length X 5000Height

Vendor data
100
24
360
10
8.15
1
Water Cooled
ct
capacity TR 2000 2000 100
flow M3/hr 1200 1200 80
Fan BKW KW 15 to 18 18 0.9
Evaporation loss M3/Hr 0.612
Blowdown M3/Hr 0.153

Drift loss m3/hr 0.02 1.6

Makeup water m3/hr 12 to 15 15 2.365

COC 5 5 5
E = 0.00085 x R x 1.8 x C

E = Evaporation Loss (m3 /hr)

R= Range(Delta T)
C = Circulating Cooling Water (m3 /hr)
Drift loss=0.02Xcirculation flow
Blow Down = Evaporation Loss / (C.O.C. – 1)

M=E+D+B

M = Make up water Requirement in m3 /hr

B = Blow Down in m3 /hr
E = Evaporation Loss in m3 /hr
D = Drift Loss in m3 /hr