Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NUM Survival
Guide Your Guide to McGill’s Neuroscience Courses
Disclaimer: These course reviews have been written by students in the program. Though we ask our writers to
provide a balanced review of the class, these entries are inherently subjective. If you strongly disagree with
anything written here or would like to suggest an edit, fill out this form: goo.gl/hnyYkQ
Introduction
A Guide to this Guide
Introduction
Every year we must make tough decisions on what courses we want to devote our time and attention to, and deciding which
ones to take can be tricky. While the official course descriptions can provide you with an idea of what is taught in the class,
it tells you little of what the actual course experience is like. To help fill this gap we have created the NUM Survival Guide.
We have recruited actual students of McGill’s Neuroscience Program to share their experiences with the courses and to give
you some tips for success. Not every course is reviewed here, but we have tried to cover the most important and enjoyable
courses within the program.
About Textbooks
In this guide we have tried to indicate how important the textbook is for each course. Often textbooks are useful for
contextual information but aren’t needed for the actual midterms and final, so we have tried to indicate when that is the
case. Still, when in doubt, buy the textbook. Buying used textbooks can also save you money, so be sure to check out
McGill Classifieds or the various used bookstores around McGill. You may not get the latest edition, but you may save
hundreds of dollars for a very similar text.
About Prerequisites
If you really want to take a course but you don’t have the prerequisites, don’t give up! Often professors will let you register
for classes if you express enough interest. Many profs know that neuroscience students are willing to put in extra effort to
make up for their lack of background knowledge. Just know that you may be disadvantaged relative to other students in the
class.
ANAT 321 Instructor:
Prof. David Ragsdale
Semesters:
Circuitry of the Human Brain Fall
The Experience
While the course is not conceptually difficult, it is rather memorization heavy.
There is a huge number of enzymes and tons different pathways that you need
to memorize. If memorizing is very challenging for you, this course is not
necessarily recommended, but if you work hard at it you can do well. However,
memorization also means that this course does not require a huge time
commitment outside of studying for midterms and exam.
The Experience
Biol 201 is a very interesting course that is quite a bit different from the
experience in Biol 200. Dr. Brouhard emphasizes application of concepts and
doesn’t focus heavily on the proteins and complex names that the processes
he discusses rely on. He is an amazing lecturer that goes over concepts at a
reasonable rate, has obvious passion for the subject that he teaches, and is
interested in the success of his students. All slides and lectures are posted
online if you can’t make it to class. The final section of the class overlaps
quite a bit with NSCI 200/201, which can prove helpful.
The Experience
This course is much more demanding than PSYC 305, but students do learn a
lot. Dr. Leung has fairly straight-forward slides, and he does an adequate job
explaining complex concepts. He is very willing to take questions in class
and to speak to students after class if they have problems. The class does
move quickly, but assignments following each lecture ensure students stay on
top of concepts.
The Experience
This class is great opportunity to work with three different animal models.
Students work in pairs but the reports are done individually. The techniques
can be challenging; however, the professors are very nice and will help you
master them. Keep in mind that these weekly lab sessions go through the
entire afternoon and end in the evening for scheduling purposes.
The Experience
The evaluation is based on two one-hour presentations, each on one of the
assigned papers. The presentations are very thorough, but the marking is very
fair and helps to improve your presentation and analytic skills. Overall, this is
an excellent course, and it helps to improve your thinking from just
memorizing material to understanding and critiquing it. It is also a great
opportunity to interact with professors and graduate students in a small class.
If you want to get a feel for what graduate school is like, take this course!
The Experience
This course is extremely useful if you want to do further graduate and/or
industry work with biomedical signals and systems and/or data science. The
concepts learned and applied will enable you to work with large data sets of
biomedical data (neuroimaging, electrophysiology, etc.) and develop
complex algorithms to analyse them.
The lecture itself is very theoretical and heavy on math so it’s very useful to
have a decently strong math background (i.e. at least MATH 315). It is your
job to understand that theory and apply it in order to complete the assignment
for the week. Keep up with all of the assignments and start early in the week.
Some of them can take as long as 30 hours per week so give yourself enough
time to complete it. Make sure you’re able to balance it with the rest of your
course work and extracurricular courses so you don’t fall behind.
The midterm and final are both take-home exams which you can take
anytime you’d like within the assigned exam period (usually a 1-week
period) but you only have 72 hours once the code has been accessed. Make
sure that you are completely free for the 72 hours that you choose to write it
because they are very long and do require significant time and thinking.
CHEM 212 Instructor:
Laura Pavelka and Hanadi Sleiman
Semesters:
Organic Chemistry 1 Fall/Winter/Summer
Course Overview Prerequisites:
The main focus of the course is understanding how chemicals behave in order CHEM 110 and 120
to predict reactivity as well as how chemicals transform Properties, Reactivity
and application of hydrocarbon and hydrocarbon derivatives (i.e alkyl halides) Class Size: >650 students
are studied as well as nomenclature, stereochemistry and modern concepts of
bonding. Multiple different mechanism pathways are learnt including radical
Textbook:
halogenation, substitution, elimination and aromatic reactions. Organic Chemistry (Solomon and Fryhe)
11e or 12e: Any organic textbook is
Method of Evaluation suitable as the problems are
40% Midterms (2x 20%); 35% or 40% Final; 20% Laboratory, 5% or 0% supplementary but useful for practice.
Sapling Online Learning. Sapling is an online resource of practice questions
with the option of them counting for 5% of your grade. If you choose not to do Lecture Recordings:
the questions, the 5% will be weighted to your final. Lectures are recorded and slides are
posted
The Experience
Both Professor Pavelka and Professor Sleiman are extremely dedicated to the
success of their students. They thoroughly explain concepts in class, provide
useful flowcharts and tools for problem solving, and allow time for practice in
class. They both are very clear and passionate about chemistry. They go above
and beyond in proving resources which will help students excel such as Fresca
tutorials, an online discussion board, a facebook group, suggested textbook
problems, sapling, organic bytes (pre-lecture learning modules), and in class
“clicker” questions.
The Experience
Professor Langer is an extremely organized lecturer. Slides and notes for the
entire term are available online. He generally approaches topics in a linear
and structured fashion. He is also very available for extra help within and out
of office hours. The assignments align well with course material. Most of the
coding done in class is in pseudo-code as lectures focus more on algorithms
and theory.
The Experience
Probably the most important math course you can take at McGill (in terms of
the tools and techniques that you learn). The class is very interesting as you
learn multiple mathematical tools that you can use to solve different types of
differential equations – it’s almost like an algorithm class. There is some
memorization as for the exams you will have to memorize all different types
of differential equations and methods to solve them, but the amount you need
to memorize isn’t bad at all. Try to really remember these tools because they
will become increasingly important for other math classes (especially for us
neuroscientists!)
The Experience
This is deceptively a very difficult class. Class material scales in difficultly Lecture Recordings:
quite rapidly as you go towards the end of the semester – the midterm will Typically none, but some professors
seem reasonable, but the final catches a lot of students off-guard. It is will post lecture notes.
incredibly helpful to review the textbook and work out all the examples that
are being offered, as well as reviewing assignment questions for the exams.
The class requires you to have an in-depth understanding of all the material
from beginning to the end. If you fall behind or if you are lost near the
beginning of the semester, work hard because the material builds on top of
each other really quickly.
.
MATH 324 Instructor: Christian Genest
OR
The Experience
First of all, only take this course if you like math or care about statistics.
Otherwise you should be able to take MATH 204 and be able to make good
statistics decisions just fine. The main draw of this course is understanding the
relationships between distributions and to get a bit of insight into why
statistical tests are set up the way they are. Lectures are straightforward and
easy to understand. Homeworks follow the lectures quite closely, and are not
tricky. The exams are similar to the practice questions provided.
The Experience
The class is fairly interactive and offers many opportunities for critical
thinking and problem solving. As mentioned above, you end up having to
read one reading per lecture. Articles might seem challenging at first, but it
gets better once the material has been covered in the class. Details from the
readings are not tested on the exam, and are there to improve your
understanding of class material.
The exam assessment is quite similar to the short answer questions in NSCI
200, where you are required to either describe what is known about a topic, or
come up with experiments to test certain hypotheses. Pay close attention to the
experiments covered in class, as you will likely have to discuss them on the
exams. For the term paper, make sure to start early as there can be an
overwhelming amount of literature to read and organize into a term paper.
NEUR 602 Instructor:
Dr. Mallar Chakravarty
Semesters:
Special Topics in Neuroscience: Computational Neuroanatomy and Neuroimaging
Fall and Winter
Course Overview Prerequisites:
Graduate level course which can be approved as a 400/500 level course for the None.
program. There are several different sections; this will be completely in
reference to Dr. Chakravarty’s section of the course, which focuses on Restriction:
Computational Neuroanatomy and Neuroimaging - specifically, various types Requires approval to count as a 400/500
of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The entire course consists of reading level course.
several pretty dense (but wickedly interesting) papers each week, covering
topics from the basics of image processing/segmentation to graph theory to Class Size: ~8 Students
cortical thickness to diffusion MRI.
Textbook:
Method of Evaluation No Textbook, Assigned Papers
20% of the grade is made up of 8 summaries of articles read for the class, up to
Lecture Recordings:
2 pages long. These actually take quite a while to write, since you have to read
No. It’s a seminar course, so you pretty
a fairly complex paper, understand it, summarize it, and then describe the
much have to attend every class.
strengths and weaknesses of the paper. 20% of the grade is from in-class
presentations of a paper; these are supposed to be 20 minutes long but ended
up being at least 40 minutes for each one. Each student did 3 presentations
during the semester. 10% is participation. 50% of the grade comes from the
final project -- a written proposal and oral presentation of a grant that you
write based on one of the novel techniques presented in the readings.
The Experience
This class is definitely not for everyone -- however, if you are interested in the
topic of neuroimaging and willing to put in the work, you honestly can learn a
LOT, both in terms of general knowledge and in critical thinking as well as
presentation skills. I took the course with essentially no knowledge of
neuroimaging, and had to work really hard at the beginning to learn the
foundations of the topic, but it’s genuinely fulfilling once you learn enough to
understand the papers. Most of the students in the class also don’t have
background in neuroimaging, so it’s more of a collaborative rather than
competitive class environment. :)
The Experience
Neuroethics presents a variety of interesting topics in neuroscience that can
lead to very meaningful class discussions. The quality of the class is very
dependent on who is presenting, with certain presenters being better than
others. There is next to no memorization in this course, as most of the
evaluation is based on critical thinking and effective communication of ideas.
There are 2-3 readings for each lecturer that are necessary to do if you want to
do a lecture commentary on that lecture, so readings can pile up if not done
on time.
The Experience
The course involves more work than 0.5 credits, but completing the reports is
not overly hard. A common sentiment from students in the course is that the
grading for each report can seem inconsistent, as there is not a rubric provided
for what graders are specifically looking for. Seminars are usually pretty fast
paced and a lot of information is thrown at you, but the goal is to understand
the gist of the talk. The three-page assignment is actually a little bit easier
because it is difficult to fit it all in material into one page.
The Experience
The experience can vary wildly depending on the supervisor, lab
environment, and project. Although the minimum laboratory requirements are
16 hours/week, this may vary depending on the project. Don’t expect regular
hours - sometimes projects must be carried out during the night or early
mornings (e.g. due to animal sleep cycles, culture incubation periods) or
squeezed in between your classes. This course tends to be a fantastic learning
experience and very important for students considering graduate school.
Textbook:
Method of Evaluation
Human Pharmacology: Molecular
35% Midterm (~50 questions) + 65% Final (~100 questions), both multiple
to Clinical. Brody et al., 5th ed.,
choice
Mosby, 2010
The Experience Required according to the course
This course provides a solid background in two important aspects of drug instructors but it was not very useful
action: drug distribution (pharmacokinetics) and drug mechanism outside of clarifying concepts
(pharmacodynamics). The course is broken down into lecture segments that
discuss drugs that act on the different physiological systems of the body, Lecture Recordings:
including the brain. Overall, the course was helpful in preparation for more
Yes, but only if you are connected
advanced courses (such as PHAR 562) that assume you understand how
to MyCourses (unable to download)
drugs work and/or how different organ systems work. Overall, this was a
challenging experience but nothing drastically harder than the level of
difficulty seen in courses such as BIOL 200 and NSCI 201.
The Experience
This course is divided into different modules, each of which is taught by a
different professor. All assignments involve coding in MATLAB to analyze a
dataset and generate graphs, and are fairly straightforward. There is also a
term project that is done either in pairs or solo, which involves analyzing a
dataset from a professor’s lab in order to examine a hypothesis. The project is
a great experience, as you get to apply the programming skills learned in the
course, collaborate with a professor to design the project, get creative about
answering an open scientific question, and get experience in preparing a
research paper and giving a presentation on your findings. The class
atmosphere is collaborative and there is ample opportunity for working with
your peers and getting to know the professors.
Method of Evaluation
Midterm (20%), term paper (20%), group seminar presentation (20%),
participation (5%), short writing assignment after article discussions (5x1%),
short assignment after seminar presentations (4x1.25%), final exam (25%)
The Experience
PHGY 524 is an introduction to a field that most neuroscience students will
not have seen before. Almost all of the material covered in class is novel, and
so the class can be quite interesting. The course focus covers rhythms from
the molecular level all the way to the human behavioural level. The
professors do an excellent job of explaining concepts, and the tests are not
memorization heavy, instead focusing on understanding the key experiments,
figures, and results discussed in class. The small assignments do add up
however, and so the class can become quite time-consuming.
Computational Psychology
Semesters: Fall
The first month of the course focuses on teaching students how to code in
LISP. Make sure to do the practice modules that Schultz assigns to get
familiar with LISP syntax. The quiz and final exam are multiple choice, and
you are allowed cheat sheets for both. The bulk of the work in this course
comes from the reports. To do well, give yourself ample time to come up
with an interesting question, and if you can, talk to the TA or Prof Schultz
about your idea before beginning to actually alter any code. They will be able
to help you gauge if your idea is complex enough, yet within the realms of
feasibility in terms of implementation. Overall, the assignments can be a fun
way of applying your LISP coding knowledge to phenomena in psychology
and anthropology, and can be excellent practice for writing formal papers and
for presenting data in a meaningful way.
PSYC 317 Instructor:
Jeffrey Mogil
Semesters:
Genes and Behaviour Fall
The Experience
The one weekly seminar usually entails 1.5 to 2 hours of lecture, a small
break, and then an hour of discussion and/or debate about a certain topic.
Each lecture topic is presented and analyzed from the perspectives of
different groups of researchers, focusing on two or three theories and their
strengths/weaknesses. It can get quite confusing as many theories are very
similar, so it is important to find distinguishing features and focus on them
to help keep track of all the different ideas. The discussion/debate period
(where the class is split into different groups, and each group argues for a
certain theory) is also very helpful, although not mandatory. Videos are also
often shown during class, which provides a simplified explanation of
concepts and gives you a nice break from the content of lectures.
Note Prerequisites:
This is the first time this course has been offered with this professor. One of PSYC 211, NSCI 201, PHGY
209
Course Overview One of PSYC 311, PSYC 317, PSYC
This course covers basic neurobiological mechanisms, possible functions, and 342
physiological and behavioural aspects of sleep. The course is divided into six Or permission of instructor
main themes: sleep psychophysiology, circadian regulation of sleep and
wakefulness, functions of sleep, sleep-wake regulation disorders, the variety of Class Size: ~200 students
conscious experiences in sleep, and parasomnias. There are guest lecturers
throughout the semester that present content related to the professor’s lectures.
Textbook:
No required textbook, all reading
Method of Evaluation material will be provided
2 midterm exams (25% each; multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank and short- Lecture Recordings:
answer questions), final exam (50%; same format as midterms), and optional Lectures are recorded.
research paper to replace 1 midterm (25%).
Note: For the final exam, multiple choice questions are non-cumulative, but
other questions are cumulative. Also, you will be given 6 questions on the last
day of class. You must answer 2 of them for the short-answer questions (you
choose 1 and the professor choses the 2nd one)
Note: You can miss 1 midterm without any reason and have the research paper
replace 25% of your grade. It is also possible to use the paper to replace both
midterms and count for 50% of your grade IF you have documented or valid
reasons for missing the second midterm.
The Experience
This was the first semester this course was offered by Professor Solomonova,
and she did not make this class or the midterms difficult. The material
presented was not conceptually difficult, but this class requires memorizing
course content. All relevant information was on the slides or clearly explained
in class. The content of the required readings overlaps nicely with the content
that was presented during lectures, so reading them was not too challenging.
Since the lectures are recorded and most of the information is on Dr.
Solomonova’s slides, many students decide to not attend the lectures. Lastly,
content from guest lecturers complements class material nicely.
Method of Evaluation
Class Size: 30
Participation (10%), Weekly submitted questions (15%), Oral ‘journal club’ Register as soon as possible!
presentation (30%), Research proposal abstract (5%), Written research
proposal (40%) Textbook:
None
The Experience
This course was offered for the first time in several years under the guidance Lecture Recordings:
of a new professor, Prof Bagot. This course primarily used original research None
articles to explore major topics relating hormones to behavior and cognition,
in both preclinical models and in humans. While the topics themselves were
advanced, the course itself was not stressful or challenging in terms of
workload or grading. Prof Bagot gives you a lot of individual control over
your mark and the amount you get out of the course is relatively dependent
on the amount of work you put in. She also brings in a few guest lecturers
that talk about their research which provides great insight into the work
currently being done at McGill.
The Experience
Classes typically begin with a group presentation on the readings assigned for
the week, followed by a lecture by Dr. Ristic. Lectures can get quite dry.
Readings are listed in the syllabus and can be found through the McGill
library website or PubMed. The course may be more difficult for some on a
conceptual level, as there is not a clear definition for attention, which Ristic
stresses from the get-go. While this makes some material confusing, it can
serve to your advantage come finals, as any answer can be correct with the
right empirical support. Final exam consists of definition and essay
questions.
PSYC 526 is a very interesting course, covering the visual systems from all Lecture Recordings:
angles and perspectives. Most of Dr. Kingdom’s classes begin with either a No
demo or a number of slides exposing common and uncommon visual
illusions. The remainder of the lecture is spent explaining why these illusions
occur. Dr. Mullen’s section meanwhile is quite interactive, as students are
broken into groups to discuss important papers on the visual system. At the
cellular level, the material does not expand much beyond what students will
have already seen in NSCI 201 and ANAT 321. The class is very enjoyable,
the illusions you see are super cool, and the material tends to be presented
quite well.
Midterm (30%), 5-page term paper (20%), and cumulative final exam (50%). Textbook:
Exams have a mix of multiple choice (1/3), and short and long answer. Assigned Readings
There are no mandatory textbooks for
The Experience
this course, however assigned article
It is an interdisciplinary course that intersects the concepts that you have readings are mandatory. References
learned from previous biochemistry, neuroscience and pharmacology posted on the slides can be used to gain
courses. The professors were able to convey their information rather clearly. a deeper understanding of topics.
Course instructors have their own topics, and they speak about their own
research, which helps you get a rich experience of the material because you Lecture Recordings:
are getting it first-hand from experts in the field. Slides are posted. There are no
recordings for this course. Do your best
Tips for Success to attend every lecture because there is
This is a graduate level course, therefore have to memorize the content and ample information presented during
make sure to be able to apply it to experiments. Exams will test your class by the professor that is not on the
problem-solving capabilities and ability to apply the material and to use lecture slides.
experimental evidences to support your answers. Remember that although
BIOC 311, 312 are prerequisites, you can get by with having taken BIOC 212
or BIOL 201. This course is very interesting, and it is worth taking it if you
are able to! It is basically the sister of PSYT 500.
PSYT 500 Instructor:
Lalit K Srivastava, Tak Pan Wong
Semesters:
Advances: Neurobiology of Mental Disorders Winter
To do well in the course, pay attention in class and memorize! Memorize the
slides and be sure to take lots of detailed notes during the lectures since many
of the professors have very bare slides that require your own notes for
explanations. All of the questions on the midterm and final are long answer so
make sure you know the material well enough to answer questions using free-
recall only. Tiny details, especially in the neurochemistry section, will be
tested (e.g. listing differences between serotonin receptor subtypes) and be
sure to understand all the supporting evidence for theories presented in class.
The final paper is only 5 pages double-spaced and is more based on your own
thoughts than research. Spots for this class fill up fast; students have been
known to email the course coordinators (Wong and Srivastava) months before
course registration opens to ensure a spot!