University of San Carlos

School of Arts and Sciences

Bachelor of Science in Psychology

COMPLIANCE FORM

Name of Proponent/s:
Arias, Annaver Z.
Bacatan, Anne Therese J.
Jones, Luzenne S.
Rabosa, Dominique Kristelle
Moises, Hyacinth Britneyripples M.
Date of proposal: Dec 5, 2019
Thesis Topic: Exploring the Social World of Sexually Victimized Filipino Males Perpetrated by Homosexual Males
Date Submitted: Dec 9,2019

COMPLIED WITH Remarks

Sections of Thesis Proposal Panelists’ YES (Page NO (Reason/s)
Suggestions No.)
1. Title -psychological YES (title We have retained the title but
impact is already page) will focus on how to connect
established in the existing psychological
previous literature impact to the social impact
2. Introduction -shorter way to YES (pg. 1) -We have removed the short
2.1 Rationale of the Study introduce paper (pg. 12) narrative story at the
-the gap was not beginning of the rrl and
highlighted replaced it with a more
-some parts appropriate way to begin a
should be research paper.
discussed earlier -We rearranged parts of our
(a matter of intro and rrl in order to have
rearrangement) flow in our research paper
-We highlighted our gap in
the intro and rrl

3. Review of Related Literature -highlight the gap YES (pg.13) - We highlighted our gap in
-why are female (pg. 7,8, 10) our rrl and we have compared
victim studies not female victims to male
 enough? victims and stated are reasons
quantitative why female studies are not
studies do not entirely applicable to male
suffice? victims because of gender and
-highlight the gap cultural differences
-the rrl should -our rrl satisfies the
satisfy the psychosocial framework
philosophical - we have rationalized and
assumptions of integrated the previous studies
IPA in our rrl
-relate everything
in rrl to research
problem

4. Theoretical/Conceptual Framework -when you say YES (pg.13) -We now know that IPA is not
IPA you are the most appropriate method
assuming that for determining the
their idiographics psychosocial impact of sexual
(what makes their victimization
situation unique
and special)
changes their
hermeneutics (the
way they
understand things)
and this
idiography comes
from their
phenomenology
(comes from their
subjective
experiences)

5. Problem -change the way YES (pg.14) -we changed the way we
5.1 Main Problem you state your stated our problem by listing
5.2 Sub-Problems problem that we want to determine the
5.3 Assumptions social impact of the sexual
 5.4 Hypotheses victimization experience on
the victim and how they
perceive their social world
and
determine the unique sexual
victimization experience of
heterosexual Filipino male
victims perpetrated by
Filipino homosexual makes

6. Significance of the Study -theoretical YES (pg.14) -We switched their placement
application comes
first before
practical
application
7. Methodology -the incentive YES (pg.16) -We have emphasized that the
7.1 Research Design should equal the participants will be provided
7.2 Research Participants time and effort of with food, drink, and
7.3 Research Instrument(s) participant monetary incentives which
7.4 Data Gathering Procedure -separate the would equal to the amount of
7.5 Treatment of Data inclusion and time and effort they put in
exclusion criteria participating for the duration
of participants of the whole interview. We
will give a monetary
compensation for the back
and forth travelling fare.
-We separated the inclusion
and exclusion criteria

8. Scope and Limitations of the Study

9. Definition of Terms -sexual YES (pg.5) -In order to be more specific
victimization is with the information we want
broad and may to draw out from the
yield different participants, we have chose to
results focus on the sexual assault
component of sexual
victimization
10. Organization of the Study -pay attention to YES (all -We have corrected the way
flow and pages) our paper was written in a
transitioning way that is it more
understandable with a better
flow
11. Mechanics -observe YES (all -We have corrected the parts
11.1 References alphabetical order pages) where correct APA format
11.2 Headings -observe correct was not followed
11.3 Tables spelling and -We have corrected typos
11.4 Graphs grammar
11.5 Others ___________________
___________________

12. Results
13. General Discussion
14. Limitations and Recommendations
15. Conclusion
Submitted by:

Name of Thesis Proponents:

Arias, Annaver Z.

Bacatan, Anne Therese J

Jones, Luzenne S

Rabosa, Dominique Kristelle

Moises, Hyacinth Britneyripples M.

Noted and checked by:

_________________________ Date: _________________

Name and Signature of Panelist 1

__________________________ Date: _________________

Name and Signature of Panelist 2

_ Date: _________________
Name and Signature of Thesis Consultant

_______________________________ Date: _________________

Name and Signature of Thesis Adviser