Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. The primary function of natural gas pipeline is to transport gas from
the supply source (e.g. offshore processing facilities) to the end users such as
gas-fired power plant or fertilizer plant. For a long-distance pipeline, there is
also a secondary function, a short-term gas storage, called linepack, storing a
certain amount of extra gas into the pipeline (packing the pipeline). This extra
gas volume will be extracted (unpacking) during high demand or shortfall in
supply source. This property is due to the compressibility of the gas. Linepack
gives an operational flexibility for both gas supply and demand. The gas supply
will have a time windows to overcome minor unwanted operational incidents
without affecting the demand. In the other hand, the demand also has a flexibility
for fluctuating between peak and off-peak periods.
A case study will be used to develop a linepack flexibility chart which will be
used as pipeline operating maps to monitor the linepack flexibility of the
pipeline. This case study can be used as a template for specific cases. The longer
the pipeline, the more linepack flexibility. The natural gas supply source can
estimate the time window to deal with minor operating incidents without
affecting the gas demand and the gas demand can be fluctuated between peak
and off-peak periods.
The novelty of this paper is to provide a quick method to work out the
linepack flexibility from which the upstream facility operator can be aware the
available time window to recover their facilities without affecting the gas supply
at pipeline downstream.
1 Introduction
Natural gas after processing from offshore facility will normally be exported to shore
by a pipeline. The sales gas contract has a very strict term of Gas Sales Purchase
Agreement (GSPA) on gas delivery in which the gas flowrate must be met average
Daily Contract Quantity (DCQ) at an agreed flowrate otherwise a contract penalty will
be applied. The upstream operators try many ways to avoid downtime that affects to the
gas delivery such as increasing the equipment reliability and redundancy. However,
there are still risks of minor downtime due to many unknown reasons: process upset,
fault failures/alarms and especially human errors. The minor downtime also affects to
the gas supply at pipeline downstream.
Taking the advantage of gas compressibility, the gas pipeline can be used as a
buffer to store extra gas volume, called linepack. This extra gas volume can buy time
for upstream operators to recover their facility. Linepack can be efficiently applied for a
long-distance pipeline (hundreds kilometer long) and the upstream facility must have
extra capacity to pack the line.
This paper focuses on applying linepack to increase the reliability of upstream
facility (gas supply) by using the extra gas volume storing in the pipeline to com-
pensate for short gas supply shortfall during downtime.
The average gas compressibility factor can be calculated by CNGA Eq. [1]:
1
z¼ ð2Þ
Pavg 344400ð10Þ1:785G
1þ Tf3:825
where:
Pavg = Average gas pressure, psig
Tf = Average gas temperature, 0R = °F + 460
G = Gas specific gravity.
The gas volume in standard condition can be calculated as:
zst Tst P p zst Tst P
Vst ¼ V ¼ D2 L ð3Þ
z T Pst 4 z T Pst
480 Q. K. Do et al.
At standard condition, Tst = 460 + 60 = 520 0R, Pst = 14.7 psia and zst = 1
From Eq. (3) the linepack volume in scf will be calculated as:
p 1 Tst Pavg
Vlinepack ¼ 22:784 D2 L ; scf ð4Þ
4 zavg Tavg Pst
where:
Vlinepack: Volume of gas in the pipeline, scf
D: Pipeline internal diameter, inch
L: Pipeline length, km
Zavg: Average gas compressibility factor
Tavg: Average gas temperature, 0R
Pavg: Average pipeline pressure, psia
Pst: Pressure at standard condition, 14.7 psia.
3 Linepack Flexibility
state, the upstream pressure will be at P01partialload at partial load and from P01min to P01max
at full load. The gas flowrate Q is the same for pressure P1 in between P01min and P01max .
In the ideal case, the upstream discharge pressure should be P01min then the pipeline
downstream pressure P2 = P3. There is no differential pressure across the control valve
(no energy loss) therefore less energy is consumed at upstream facility. However, there
is no linepack flexibility to compensate for the upstream operation fluctuation. If P1
drops below P01min , P2 will drop below P3 and the downstream facility will be shut
down.
If the upstream facility discharge pressure increases up to maximum pressure P01max ,
the downstream pressure will be P02 . At this state, the pipeline stores gas at its maxi-
mum capacity, the linepack flexibility is highest. The downside is that the energy loss
will be highest due to pressure differential between control valve (P02 P3 ), that means
the upstream facility must need more power to raise the upstream pressure and this
power will be consumed across pipeline downstream control valve.
The Fig. 4 describes how the pipeline
pressures changing during operation. When
the upstream facility operates at pressure P1,
flowrate Q1 and compressors running at speed
RPM1, the system works at point A where the
compressor curve intersects the pipeline
curve. To increase the linepack flexibility,
upstream pressure increases to P01 . This is not
instantly increasing. First, the compressor
increases speed to RPM2 and causes the
flowrate increase to Q01 (point A [ A0 ).
Because the flowrate at downstream is kept
Fig. 4. The relationship between
constantly at Q1, there is more gas packed to upstream facility and pipeline.
the pipeline and then the pipeline pressures
(both upstream and downstream) will gradu-
ally increase. The flowrate Q01 will decrease
back to Q1 when upstream pipeline reaches P01 (point A0 [ B. The pipeline curve also
moves up from A to B. This is the new equilibrium state, there is no more gas packed to
the pipeline.
The linepack flexibility volume Vflexibility is defined as the difference of linepack
volume between considered upstream operating condition P1 with the minimum
upstream discharge pressure P01min . The linepack flexibility will be converted to hours
by divided it to the downstream gas flowrate. This amount of time will let the upstream
operator know how much time available for them to fix the problem before it can affect
the downstream gas delivery which leads to sales gas contract penalty.
482 Q. K. Do et al.
4 Case Study
There is a capacity constraint in the sales gas delivery contract in which the gas
receiving from the power plant must be at least 375 MMSCFD.
For the sales gas contract, there is normally an agreement on number of days/year
for maintenance shutdown. However, there are still risks of short unplanned shutdown,
a few hours, due to minor equipment failure on CPP. The short downtime can be
compensated by storing the surplus gas volume in the pipeline which is called packing
the pipeline and this volume will be used during downtime (unpack the pipeline).
To estimate the time availability during unpacking the pipeline the following steps
will be carried out:
Step 1: Establish a pipeline simulation model (e.g. pipesim simulation) based on the
diagram as shown on Fig. 2 to calculate the downstream pipeline pressure P2 with
required delivery flowrate Q = 375 MMSCFD and P1 is incremental of 100 psi from
P01min to 2000 psig.
Step 2: Establish the excel spreadsheet with all the pipeline parameters to calculate the
linepack flexibility in hours as shown in Table 1.
Offshore Gas Pipeline Linepack to Improve the Flexibility 483
5 Conclusion
This paper provides a quick method to calculate the linepack flexibility in hours to
build the linepack chart to estimate the time availability to fix the minor incidents at
upstream facility. The linepack flexibility can be used only if the maximum capacity of
the upstream facility is higher than the demand otherwise there will have no extra gas to
be packed to the pipeline.
The downside of using linepack is that it requires power (through upstream com-
pressors) to keep extra gas volume stored in the pipeline. The linepack flexibility
should be optimized to reduce the unnecessary power loss by using the margin of
design capacity.
484 Q. K. Do et al.
References
1. Shashi Menon, E.: Gas Pipeline Hydraulics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)
2. Keyaerts, N., Hallack, M., Glachant, J.-M., D’haeseleer, W.: The trade-offs between line-pack
flexibility and transport capacity in a liberalized gas market. TME Working Paper-Energy and
Environment (2010)
3. Chebouba, A.: Multi objective optimization of linepack management of gas pipeline system.
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 574, 012114 (2015)