RELATED FIELDS

FUNTIONAL GRAMMAR SOCIOLINGUISTICS ECOLINGUISTICS ETHNOSYNTAX

-There are theories of language
seek to explain the development,
use of linguistic phenomena in
terms of their social – cultural and
discursive function. (Nichols –
1984)
-Grammatical structure needs to
be influenced by extra – linguistic
context.
-The language is view as a tool,
which it realized through the
interaction of syntax, semantics
and pragmatics.
-Hallyday’s systematic functional
grammar, linguistic structure
arises from environmentally
imposed constraints on a speaker
by systematic relation between
semantic system networks and
the lexicogrammar.
-Functionalist theories focus on
interplay between semantic and
pragmatic function.
-Studies the interaction -Eco linguistic is defined the field
between language and society. as the study of interactions
-Hymes has classified three main
orientation:
1. Attitudinal studies,
investigating social attitudes
toward linguistic phenomena.
2 Variational studies,
investigating the influence of
social context on language
variation (dialects).
3 Functional studies, investigation
the social functions of linguistics
expressions (discourse analysis).
-The standarazitation is focuses
on socially conditioned variation
of grammar, instance phonology
and popular subject.
between language and its
environment.
-Ecolinguist isn’t a discipline and
hardly even subject despite the
bold claim.
-Ecoling. would be a highly
diversified field with a small
number of general.
-Hauger has an importance on
language variation in a context
multilingualism and
standardization.
-It researches into dialect
variation, writing systems, pidgins
and creoles in which influenced of
nonlinguistic environment on
language according to the term
ecology.
-Ethonsyntax is an approach to
grammatical analysis influenced
by linguistic anthropology.
-It defined the study of
connections between the cultural
knowledge, attitudes, practices of
speakers, morph syntactic..
-The focus on cultural praxis from
linguistics which have an interest
in language and social factors
outside.
-First pillar: cross linguistically
some of the components of so
called core grammar are subject
to cultural constraints.
-Second pillar: there is no
evidence from Piraha for
particular causal relation between
culture and grammatical
structure.
- function and grammatical
structure is abstracting away from
the interaction between linguistic
and non-linguistic information.
-The relationship between
language and the communicative
context is as subset of the
relationship between grammatical
structure and non- linguistic
environment.
-Functional linguistic emphasize
the interaction between
grammatical structure and the
outside world rather than intra
linguistic between syntax and
pragmatic.
-The influence of geo social and
societal factors on grammatical
variation (dialectal or socielectal)
-All sociolinguistic is fundamental
separation between competence
and performance.
-Sociolinguistic can be
quantitative or qualitative these
results are verifiable and
falsifiable which are focused more
on introspection.
-Others fields have followed a
different path , reinterpreted
environment and ecology more
literal fashion.
-Eco linguistics should have a
focus on the relationship between
linguistic, cultural and biological
diversity.
-Ecolinguistic focuses on
grammatical structure of
language and are inspired by
observation of language use.
-Ethonsyntax is in how our
description of grammatical
structure might be influenced by
our academic training and cultural
background.
-The extralinguistc factor beyond
the real culture is influenced on
grammatical structure.
-Ethonsyntax doesn’t take and
interaction between grammar and
the extra linguistic environment.