Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Civil Law
SUMMER REVIEWER
LAND TITLES
NATURE OF TORRENS SYSTEM
LAND TITLE is the evidence of the owner’s right or Judicial in character and not merely
extent of interest, by which he can maintain control administrative
and as a rule assert right to exclusive possession Proceeding is in rem (binding upon the whole
and enjoyment of property. world)
—Adviser: Dean Cynthia Roxas-Del Castillo; Heads: Joy Marie Ponsaran, Eleanor Mateo; Understudies: Joy Stephanie
Tajan, John Paul Lim; Subject Head: Shelly Lim; Ple dgees: Nicole Batingana, Timothy Joseph Lumauig—
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
Page 271 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
FUNCTIONS OF THE ROD: IPDI verified and acknowledges before a notary public or
1. Immediately register an instrument other public officer authorized by law to take
presented for registration dealing with real acknowledgement.
or personal property which complies with
the requisites for registration
NOTE: When the ROD is in doubt as to the proper
2. Shall see to it that said instrument bears
action to take on an instrument or deed presented to
the proper documentary and science
him for registration, he should submit the question to
stamps and that the same are properly
the Administrator of the LRA en consulta (Section
cancelled
117, PD 1529).
3. If the instrument is not registerable, he
shall deny the registration thereof and
NON-REGISTRABLE PROPERTIES
inform the presentor of such denial in
writing, stating the ground or reason Article 420 1. Those intended for public use,
therefore, and advising him of his right to NCC such as roads, rivers, torrents,
appeal by consulta in accordance with Sec. ports and bridges constructed
117 of PD 1529 by the State, banks, shores,
4. Prepare and keep an index system which roadsteads, and others of
contains the names of all registered similar character
owners and lands registered 2. Those which belong to the
State, without being for public
Baranda v, Gustilo, 165 SCRA 757 (1988) use, and are intended for some
The function of the ROD with reference to registration of deeds, encumbrances, instruments, public service
and the like isorministerial
for the in nature.
development of the national
wealth.
Arts. 5 & 6, 1. Rivers and their natural beds;
Water Code 2. Continuous or intermittent
(PD 1067 ) waters of springs and brooks
is registrable for him to register it. The act being an administrative act does not contemplate notice to and hearing
running inof interested
their natural parties.
beds
and the beds themselves;
3. Natural lakes and lagoons;
4. All other categories of surface
waters such as water flowing
G.R. No. L-22486, Mar. 20, 1968 over lands, water form rainfall
er a document is valid or not is a function that belongs to a court of competent jurisdiction, and not to the ROD. natural or artificial, and
whether
water from agriculture runoff,
seepage and drainage;
5. Atmospheric water;
6. Subterranean or ground water;
RA 12 (1969) 7. Seawater;
OD may validly deny registration of a voluntary instrument:
Found in private lands:
e than 1 copy of the owner’s duplicate certificate of title and not all such copies are presented to the ROD
8. Continuous or intermittent
instrument bears on its face an infirmity waters rising on such lands;
tQhueickTiinmes™traundma ent sought to be 9. Lakes and lagoons naturally
waters rising on such lands;
10. Rain water and falling on such
lands;
registeredue
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
is in aisspending
are needed tocourt suit
see this picture.
11. Subterranean or ground
Notice waters; and
a. of pending suit must be given to parties
12. Waters in swamps and
Registration may be suspended
marshes
b. Regalian Forest or timberland, public forest,
Doctrine under forest reserves lands, mineral
(1987)
the 1935, 1973, lands
gister a private document since Section 112 of PD 152 provides that deeds of conveyances
and 1987affecting lands should be
Constitution
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
TYPES OF REGISTRATION:
tive and retired military officers and their faQumickiTliimees™.anSd Ha AI , a non-stock
1. Original Registration
2. Subsequent Registration
Page 274 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
courts.
NOTE: Noncompliance with the requisites
will make the Certificate of Title (CT) WHO MAY APPLY IN ORDINARY REGISTRATION
issued invalid and cancellable by the PROCEEDINGS UNDER PD 1529: OPAL
1. Those who by themselves or through their land had been previously denied in a
predecessors-in-interest have been in open, reivindicatory action and the right of ownership
continuous, exclusive, notorious possession of thereto of another is upheld by the courts
alienable and disposable lands of the public
domain under a bona fide claim of ownership FORM OF THE APPLICATION
since June 12, 1945 or earlier (Sec. 15, PD 1529)
2. Those who acquired ownership of private land In writing
by prescription under the provisions of existing Signed by the applicant or person duly
laws authorized in his behalf
3. Those who acquired ownership of private lands Sworn to before an officer authorized to
or abandoned river beds by right of accession administer oath for the province or city where
or accretion under the existing laws the application was actually signed
4. Those who have acquired ownership of land in If there is more than 1 applicant, they shall be
any manner provided for by law signed and sworn to by and in behalf of each.
Page 276 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
Averia v. Caguioa, 146 SCRA 459 (1986) If the amendment consists in the inclusion in the
application
PD 1529 has eliminated the distinction between the general jurisdiction forin registration
vested an limited
the RTC and the area orjurisdiction
parcel of conferred
land upon it b
not previously included in the application for
registration of an area or parcel of land not previously
included in the original application, as published, a
new publication of the amended application must be
made. The purpose of the new publication is to give
notice to all persons concerned regarding the
amended application. Without a new publication, the
registration court cannot acquire jurisdiction over the
area or parcel of land that is added to the area
covered by the original application, and the decision
of the registration court would be a nullity insofar as
If there are several parcels of land situated in the decision concerns the newly included land. The
different provinces/cities but belong to one reason is because without a new publication, the law
owner, he must file in RTC of each is infringed with respect to the publicity that is
province/city where different parcels of land are required in registration proceedings, and third parties
located for registration purposes who have not had the opportunity to present their
EXCEPTION: Delegated jurisdiction of the claim might be prejudiced in their rights because of
MTC to hear and determine cadastral or land failure of notice.
registration cases covering lots where
− there is no controversy or opposition, or But if the amendment consists in the exclusion of a
− contested lots, the value of which does not portion of the area covered by the original application
exceed 100,000 and the original plan as previously published, a new
publication is not necessary. In the latter case, the
AMENDMENTS IN ORDINARY REGISTRATION jurisdiction of the court is not affected by the failure of a
PROCEEDINGS new application.
1. Striking out one or more The court may strike
of the parcels of land out at any time DOCTRINE OF NON-COLLATERAL ATTACK OF
applied for or by a DECREE OR TITLE
severance of the A decree of registration and registered title
application cannot be impugned, enlarged, altered,
2. Substantial change in New technical modified, or diminished either in collateral or
boundaries, increase in description and new direct proceeding after the lapse of the 1-year
area, inclusion of publication and notice period prescribed by the law.
additional land are necessary
Benin
3. v. Tuason,
Joinder, 57 SCRAor
substitution, 531 (1974)
File motion with court
kTime™ and a
discontinuance of aTnIFyF (oUnthe
Under Section 23 of Act 496, f sed)registration
decompressor court may allow, or order an amendment of the application
Quic to see this picture.
compres
are needed
the parties
4. Decrease in area File motion with court;
no need for new
publication or notice
Page 276 of
If transaction is BEFORE If transaction is AFTER
Issuance of Decree Issuance of Decree
Record instrument in Register directly with
ROD in same ROD for purpose of
manner as if no canceling such title
application was and issuing a TCT
made
Present instrument
to RTC, with a
motion praying that
the same be
Page 277 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
Page 277 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
ISSUE:
Whether or not Spanish Titles are still admissible as
evidence of ownership of lands
HELD:
No.
WHAT APPLICANT MUST PROVE: Although PD 892 reads: “Whereas, Spanish titles to
The land is alienable and disposable land of lands which have not yet been brought under the
the public domain, and operation of the Torrens system, being subject to
His possession was for the length of time and prescription, are now ineffective to prove ownership
in the manner and concept required by law unless accompanied by proof of actual
possession…,” petitioners cannot claim that they can
NOTE: Form, Contents, Notice, Mailing, Posting still present the Spanish title as proof of ownership
Requirements are the same as those required in since they were in actual possession.
original registration under PD 1529.
Actual proof of possession only becomes necessary
Director of Lands v. CA, 106 SCRA 426 (1981) because Spanish titles are subject to prescription.
The
A judicial declaration that a parcel of land is public, does not preclude holder
even of applicant
the same a Spanish fromtitle may stillseeking
subsequently lose ahis
judicial confirm
ownership of the real property to the occupant who
actually possesses the same for the required
prescriptive period. Because of this inherent
weakness, the applicant for registration of his
Spanish title under the Torrens system must also
submit proof that he is in actual possession of the
real property by virtue of prescription. Taking the
PROOF OF PRIVATE OWNERSHIP: STOP law as a whole, it has clearly set a deadline for
1. Spanish title (inadmissible and ineffective proof the filing of applications for registration of ALL
of ownership in land registration proceedings Spanish titles under the Torrens system (i.e., 6
filed after Aug. 16, 1976) months from its effectivity or on 14 August 1976),
2. Tax declarations and tax payments (not after which, the Spanish titles may no longer be
conclusive evidence of ownership, must be presented to prove ownership. Therefore, the
coupled with proof of actual possession for the fact that petitioners were in actual possession of
period required by law) the property when they filed the complaint
3. Other kinds of proof (ex. testimonial evidence with
QuickTime™ and a
to prove accretion, deeds
TIFF (Uncompressed) of sale)
decompressor the RTC on April 29, 1996 does not exclude them
are needed to see this picture.
from the application of PD 892, and their
Spanish
4. Presidential issuances and legislative acts Santiago v. SBMA, GR No. 156888, November 20, 2006
(constitutive of a fee simple title or absolute title
in favor of the grantee, a law ceding full
ownership to a government institution)
Page 278 of
title remain inadmissible as evidence of
their ownership of the property, whether in
a land registration proceeding or in an
action to remove a cloud on or to quiet
title. However, this does not bar holders of
Spanish titles from claiming ownership of
real property on some other basis, such as
those provided in PD 1529 or in the Public
Land Act. For sure, Spanish titles can no
Page 279 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
longer be countenanced as indubitable evidence such disability, and if a minor, his age
of land ownership. 4. Description of the land and shall set forth the
estate of the owner, and also show their
JUDGMENT is a decision of court constituting its relative easements, liens, attachments, and
opinion after taking into consideration the evidence other encumbrances
submitted. 5. Other matters to be determined in pursuance of
It becomes final upon the lapse of 15 days the law
counted from the receipt of notice of the
judgment. PROCESS OF ISSUING THE OCT:
However, notwithstanding the lapse of the 15- 1. Within 15 days from finality of order of
day period from receipt of judgment by the judgment directing registration of title – court
parties, the court continues to retain control orders the LRA to issue decree of registration
over the case until the expiration of 1 year after and certificate of title
the entry of decree of registration by the LRA 2. Clerk of court will send order of court and
(Republic v. Assosacion Benevola de Cebu, copies of judgment
178 SCRA 692 [1989]). 3. Writ of Demolition may be issued. The court
has authority to order, as a consequence of the
POST-JUDGMENT INCIDENTS writ of possession issued by it, the demolition
1. Writ of Possession: order to sheriff to deliver of improvements introduced by the defeated
the land to the successful party litigant; no oppositor or his successor-in-interest
prescription against: (1) the loser and (2) 4. Administrator will issue a decree of registration
anyone unlawfully and adversely occupying and original and duplicate of OCT that is
When writ may not issue: When a party signed by the Administrator, entered and file
entered into property after issuance of final decree of registration in LRA
decree, is not an oppositor in registration 5. Send to ROD the original and duplicate of title
proceeding, and is in possession of land for and certificate for entry in his registration book
at least 10 years 6. Enter in record book, dated, signed, numbered
2. Writ of Demolition: the complement of writ of and sealed to take effect upon date of entry
possession; to demolish improvements 7. ROD to send notice to registered owner ready
introduced by oppositor or his successor in for delivery after payment of fees
interest 8. ROD shall send duplicate and note on each
certificate of title to whom it is issued
MEANS TO RECOVER POSSESSION: 9. Original copy to be filed in ROD
1. Forcible entry 10. Bound in consecutive order
2. Unlawful detainer
3. Accion publiciana ATTRIBUTES AND LIMITATIONS ON
4. Accion reivindicatoria CERTIFICATES OF TITLE AND REGISTERED
LANDS:
DECREE OF REGISTRATION : 1. Free from liens and encumbrances
The decree issued by the LRA pursuant to the a. Claims and liens of whatever character
order of the court.
existing against the land prior to the
Binds the land, quiets title thereto, subject only issuance of the certificate of title are cut off
to such exceptions or liens as may be provided by such certificate and the certificate so
by law issued binds the whole world, including the
government.
Conclusive upon all persons including the b. EXCEPTIONS: CNT-PD
government QuickTime™ and a i. Those noted on the certificate
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture. ii. Liens, claims, or rights arising or
CONTENTS OF THE DECREE: DMD-DO existing under the laws and the
1. Date, hour and minute of its entry 3. If er is under disability, the nature of
2. Whether the owner is married or unmarried, th
and if married, the name of the spouse; e
provided that if the land is conjugal property, o
the decree shall be issued in the name of both w
spouses n
Page 279 of
C in the Register of Deeds in order to be
o valid Unpaid real estate taxes levied and
n assessed within 2 years immediately
iii. s preceding the acquisition of any right
t over the land by an innocent purchaser
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
,
w
h
i
c
h
a
r
e
n
o
t
b
y
l
a
w
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
a
p
p
e
a
r
o
n
r
e
c
o
r
d
Page 280 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
amin Valenzuela, to whom she entrusted the documents evidencing her rights over the 6. lots,
General incidents
the latter of registered
fraudulently transferredland
the rights over the lots to
Registered land or the owners thereof are
not relieved from the following:
a. From any rights incident to the relation
of husband and wife, landlord and
tenant
b. From liability to attachment or levy on
execution
c. From liability to any lien of any
description established by law on the
land and buildings thereon, or in the
interest of the owner in such land or
buildings
d. From any right or liability that may arise
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor due to change of the law on descent
titled toartehneeedpedrtoo steeecthtisiopincturoe.f the law with a better right over the lots than the Amorins.
e. From the rights of partition between co-
owners
f. From the right of the government to
SSUE: take the land by eminent domain
Whether or not the Bank is an innocent purchaser for value whose title must be upheld. g. From liability to be recovered by an
assignee in insolvency or trustee in
HELD: bankruptcy under the laws relative to
preferences
h. From any other rights or liabilities
Page 281 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
Page 282 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
in
cooperation of registered owner is not needed, to attach the property, rights, credits, or
or even against his will effects of the defendant to satisfy demands
1. ATTACHMENT
A writ issued at the institution or during
progress of an action commanding the sheriff
Page 284 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
a. TAX SALE
Sale of land for collection of delinquent
taxes and penalties due the government
Page 285 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
t o t h e r e g i stered owner;
t o se e th is p ic tu re .
2. Such right arose subsequent to date of Diaz-Duarte v. Ong, 298 SCRA 388 (1998)
original registration For this purpose, the interested party must file with
3. No other provision is made in the Decree the proper court a petition for cancellation of adverse
for the registration of such right or claim claim, and a hearing must also first be conducted.
(Sec. 70, PD 1529) The Register of Deeds cannot on its own
automatically cancel the adverse claim.
Sanchez v. CA, 69 SCRA 327 (1976)
Page 285 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
Ty Sin Tei v. Dy Piao, 103 Phil 858, G.R. No. 11271, May 28,party
1958 who caused such registration
5. Deemed cancelled
An adverse claim may exist concurrently with a subsequent annotation when
of a notice of liscertificate
pendens. issued by clerk of court stating manner o
Page 286 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
Page 287 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
Before: It was included in the definition of 1. Action for partition because it is not a
agriculture, therefore the conversion of conveyance
2. Alienations or encumbrances made in favor of
the government
agricultural land to fishponds did not change
character of land ERRING HOMESTEADER NOT BARRED BY PARI
Now: It has a restricted meaning; Fishponds DELICTO
have a distinct category and cannot be Pari delicto rule does not apply in void
alienated but may be leased from government contracts
Violation of prohibition results in void contract
WHEN GOVERNMENT GRANT DEEMED Action to recover does not prescribe
ACQUIRED BY OPERATION OF LAW:
1. Deed of conveyance issued by government KINDS TO WHOM REQUIREMENTS
patent/grant GRANTED
2. Registered with the ROD: mandatory, it is the HOMESTEAD To any • does not own
operative act to convey and transfer title PATENT Filipino more than 12
3. Actual physical possession, open and citizen over hectares of land in
continuous the age of 18 the Philippines or
Land ceased to be part of public domain & years or has not had the
now ownership vests to the grantee head of a benefit of any
Any further grant by Government on same family gratuitous
land is null and void allotment of more
Upon registration, title is indefeasible than 12 hectares
• must have
TITLE ISSUED PURSUANT TO REGISTRATION resided
OF PATENT: continuously for at
1. Indefeasible when registered, and deemed least 1 year in the
incorporated with Torrens system 1 year after municipality where
the issuance of patent the land is situated
2. May not be opened 1 year after entry by LRA • must have
(otherwise, confusion and uncertainty on the cultivated at least
government system of the distribution of 1/5 of the land
public lands may arise and this must be applied for
avoided) FREE PATENT To any • does not own
Except: if it is annullable on ground of fraud, natural born more than 12
then it may be reopened even after 1 year citizen of the hectares of land
because registration does not shield bad faith Philippines • has continuously
The court, in the exercise of its equity (filing ended occupied and
jurisdiction, may direct reconveyance Dec. 31, cultivated, either
even without ordering cancellation of title 2000) by himself or his
predecessors-in-
HOMESTEAD RESTRICTIONS: interest, tracts of
1. Cannot be alienated within 5 years after disposable
approval of application for patent agricultural public
2. Cannot be liable for satisfaction of debt within 5 land for at least 30
years after approval of patent application years prior to
3. Subject to repurcha s e decompressor
o f h e ir s within
Q u ickTi m e™ a nd a March 28,1990
TIFF (Uncompressed)
5 years after alienation • paid real property
a re ne ed ed to s ee th is pict ure .
w h e n a ll o w e d a lr eady taxes on the
4. No private corporation, partnership, association property while the
may lease land unless it is solely for same has not
commercial, industrial, educational, religious or been occupied by
charitable purpose, or right of way (subject to any person
consent of grantee and approval of Secretary • grant will be
of Environment & Natural Resources) limited to 12
hectares only
EXCEPTIONS:
Page 288 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
Page 289 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
t i
t
p l
e e
r s
f
e o
c b
t t
e a
d i
n
a e
n d
d
o
t n
h
e s
r a
e m
f e
o
r d
e a
t
n e
o ,
t
t
i h
n e
d
e o
f n
e e
a
s p
i r
b o
l c
e u
I r
n e
d
c
a t
s h
e r
o
o u
f g
h
2
a
t
Page 291 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
d
e d
c i
r r
e e
e c
t
o o
f r
r o
e f
g
i l
s a
t n
r d
a s
t 2
i
o t
n i
t
i l
s e
s
s
u p
p r
e o
r c
i u
o r
r e
d
t
h b
a y
n
o
p n
a e
t
e p
n e
t r
s
i o
s n
s :
u
e o
d n
e
b
y f
Page 292 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
r o
o l
m d
h t
o o
m
e 2
s
t d
e i
a f
d f
e
p r
a e
t n
e t
n
t p
, e
r
a s
n o
d n
s
o ,
n
e t
h
f e
r
o o
m n
e
j
u w
d h
i o
c
i b
a o
l u
g
d h
e t
c
r i
e t
e
f
a o
n r
d
v
s a
Page 293 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
l e
u
e p
r
a e
n f
d e
r
i e
n n
c
g e
o
o
d
f
a
i
t
h
a
n
d
w
h
o
r
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
f
i
r
s
t
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
Page 294 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
361 (2002)
e latter. However, this indefeasibility of a title does not attach to titles secured by fraud and misrepresentation. Well-settled is the doctrine that the regi
cel of land acquired under a free patent or homestead within five years from its grant. The prohibition against any alienation or encumbrance of the land
Page 295 of
year from the issuance of
the decree
e. The property has not been
passed on to an innocent
purchaser for value
ACTION FOR • available so long as property
RECONVEYANCE not yet passed to innocent
purchaser for value
• by aggrieved party, whose
land was registered wrongly to
another person
• before issuance of decree, or
within/after 1 year from entry
• action in personam
• if based on implied trust, it
must be instituted within 10
years, and imprescriptible if by
registered owner or his
children, co-heir, or plaintiff in
possession
• if based on expressed trust
and void contract,
imprescriptible
• if based on fraud, it must be
instituted within 4 years from
the discovery of the fraud
RECOVERY FOR REQUISITES:
DAMAGES a. Person is wrongfully
deprived of his land by
registration in name of
another (actual or
constructive fraud
b. No negligence on his part
c. Barred/ precluded from
bringing an action (after 1
year from decree)
d. Action for compensation
has not prescribed
ACTION FOR REQUISITES:
COMPENSATION a. The aggrieved party
FROM THE sustained loss or damage,
ASSURANCE FUND* or is deprived land or any
estate or interest therein
b. Such loss, damage or
deprivation was occasioned
by the bringing of the land
TIF
uQnuidckeTimr
et™haendoaperation of the
F (Uncompressed) decompressor
are neeTdeod trorseeentshis spiyctusret.em
or arose
after the original registration
of the land
c. The loss, damage or
deprivation was due to
fraud, or any error,
omission, mistake, or
misdescription in any
entry or memorandum in
the registration book
d. There was no negligence
on his part
e. He is barred or precluded
under the provisions of PD
1529 or under the
provisions of any law from
bringing an action for the
recovery of such land or the
estate or interest therein;
f. The action has not
prescribed: must be
instituted within a period of
6 years from the time the
right to bring such action
first occurred-which is the
date of issue of the
certificate of title
g. Execution first against
person responsible for
fraud; if insolvent, against
national treasury
CANCELLATION Where 2 certificates are
SUITS issued to different persons
covering the same land, the
title earlier in date must
prevail, unless procured by
fraud or is jurisdictionally
flawed
The later title should be
declared null and void and
ordered cancelled
It is the aggrieved party that
institutes the action
In case of non-registered
land, must be filed by the
OSG for cancellation of title
or reversion to State
Voiding or cancellation of
OCT does not affect
derivative TCTs if their
holders not given
opportunity to be heard and
defend their title
ANNULMENT OF May only be availed of
JUDGMENT when the ordinary remedies
of new trial, petition for
relief, or other appropriate
remedies are no longer
available through no fault of
the petitioner (Linzag v.
CA, 291 SCRA 304
[1998]).
REVERSION SUIT The objective is the
cancellation of the be brought within 10 years
certificate of title and the from loss of possession
consequential reversion of CRIMINAL ACTION The State may criminally
the land covered in the land prosecute for perjury the
grant to the State party who obtains
GROUNDS: registration through fraud,
a. Violation of Sections such as by stating false
118, 120, 121 and 122 assertions in the sworn
of the Public Land Act answer required of
(ex. alienation or sale applicants in cadastral
of homestead executed proceedings (People v.
within the 5 year Cainglet, 16 SCRA 749
prohibitory period) [1966] )
b. When land patented
ASSURANCE FUND and titled is not capable
of registration State creates a fund for the compensation of
c. Failure of the grantee to persons injured by divesting/cutting off of rights
comply with conditions due to the indefensibility of title; following that
imposed by law to act of registration is operative act by which
entitle him to a patent or State transfers title
grant It is created to relieve innocent persons from
d. When area is an harshness of doctrine that certificate of title is
expanded area conclusive evidence of an indefeasible title to
e. When the land is land.
acquired in violation of Upon entry of certificate in name of owner or
the Constitution (e.g. TCT, ¼ of 1% shall be paid to the ROD based
land acquired by an on assessed value of land as a contribution to
alien) the assurance fund
Indefeasibility of title, If there is yet no assessment, a sworn
prescription, laches, and declaration of 2 disinterested persons on the
estoppel do not bar value of the land, subject to determination by
reversion suits court, is required.
QUIETING OF TITLE Brought to remove clouds Money shall be in the custody of the National
on the title to real property Treasurer who shall invest it until principal plus
or any interest therein, by interest aggregates to 500,000. The excess
reason of any instrument, shall be paid to the Assurance Fund and be
record, claim, included in the annual report of Treasurer to
encumbrance, or Secretary of Budget
proceeding which is
apparently valid or effective WHO IS ENTITLED:
but is in truth and in fact 1. Claimant must be owner, purchaser or
invalid, effective, voidable encumbrancer in good faith who suffered
or unenforceable, and may actual damage by loss of land. In short, he is
be prejudicial to said title deprived of his land or interest therein
(Art. 476, Civil Code) 2. No negligence attributable to him
An ordinary civil remedy 3. Claimant is barred from filing action to
F(UncoA
Qu ic k Ti me ™
TIF
s i d e f roanmd a the recover said land
registered
mpressed) decompressor 4. Action to recover from assurance fund has
oewd tonseeert,hisapipctuerer. son
are need not prescribed
who has
an equitable right or LOSS/DAMAGES SHOULD NOT BE DUE TO
interest in the property may FOLLOWING REASONS:
likewise file such action 1. Breach of trust
(Mamadsul v. Moson, 2. Mistake in resurvey resulting in expansion of
190 SCRA 82 [1990]) area in certificate of title
Imprescriptible if plaintiff is
title
LOSS/DAMAGES SHOULD BE DUE TO THE After notice and hearing, the court is to
FOLLOWING REASONS: order issuance of new title with
1. Omission, mistake, misfeasance of memorandum that it is issued in place of
ROD or clerk of court lost certificate (duplicate)
2. Registration of 3rd persons as owner If false statement, he can be charged with
3. Mistake, omission, misdescription in the complex crime of estafa through
4. certificate of title, falsification of public document
duplicate or entry in books
5. Cancellation 2. ADVERSE CLAIM IN REGISTERED LAND
Different from lis pendens:
AGAINST WHOM ACTION IS FILED: Lis pendens has no expiration period but
1. Action due to deprivation of land due to adverse claim is only for 30 days:
mistake, negligence, omission of ROD, etc: Lis pendens is a notice that property is in
ROD and National Treasurer as defendants; litigation while adverse claim signifies that
Sol-Gen must appear somebody is claiming better right
2. Private persons involved should also be Recent ruling: adverse claim can only be
impleaded removed upon court order, therefore, it is
considered to be the more permanent and
LIABILITY: stable one as compared to lis pendens
1. Satisfy claims from private persons first
2. When unsatisfied: secondarily liable is the 3. PETITION SEEKING SURRENDER OF
National Treasurer who shall pay through the DUPLICATE TITLE
assurance fund; thereafter Government shall In voluntary and involuntary conveyances:
be subrogated to rights of plaintiff to go when the duplicate cannot be produced,
against other parties or securities the party must petition the court to compel
the surrender of duplicate certificate of title
to ROD
MEASURE OF DAMAGES:
After hearing, the court may order issuance
Based on amount not greater than fair of a new certificate and annul the old
market value of land certificate
Amount to be recovered not limited to The new certificate shall contain an
500,000 which is maintained as standing annotation regarding the annulment of the
fund old certificate
If fund is not sufficient, National Treasurer is
authorized to make up for deficiency from 4. AMENDMENT AND ALTERATION OF
other funds available to Treasury even if not CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
appropriated A certificate of title cannot be altered,
amended except in direct proceeding in
WHERE AND WHEN TO FILE ACTION AGAINST court; summary proceeding
ASSURANCE FUND:
1. Any court of competent jurisdiction: RTC in Entries in registration books are not
city where property lies or resident of plaintiff allowed to be altered except by order of
2. Action prescribes in 6 years from time court
plaintiff actually suffered loss Grounds:
3. If plaintiff is minor, insane or imprisoned, he Petition to court for the issuance of
has additional 2QuicykeTimaer™s andaafter
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
new
disability is removed toare nfeieldeed to saece
tthiios pnicture.notwithstanding expiration of
regular period
escription of thePUBLICATION,
lot does not overlap previously
MAILING AND plotted properties.
POSTING IN Without serving notices of the petition to adjoining owners, the RTC then granted th
PETITIONS FOR RECONSTITUTION OF TITLE:
Notice thereof shall be published twice in
successive issues of the OG
Must be posted on the main entrance of the
provincial building and of the municipal
building of the municipality or city where the
land is situated
To be sent by registered mail or otherwise, at
the expense of the petitioner, to every person
named in said notice
This should be done at least 30 days prior to
the date of hearing.
Page 295 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
No. The source of the petition for reconstitution in confirming the sale, and that TCT No. 8502 was
the case at bar was petitioner’s duplicate copies of never lost.
the TCTs. As a general rule, Sections 9 and 10 of
RA 26 will apply and not Sections 12 and 13. The Zaldivars, on the other hand, claimed that Aurelio
bought the property from Dalman who, in turn,
Section 9 and 10 or RA 26 require that 30 days bought the same from Gil in 1951. Gil allegedly
before the hearing, (1) a notice be published in 2 purchased the property from Remegia, the sale of
successive issues of the OG at the expense of which was evidenced by the joint affidavit of
the petitioner, and (2) such notice be posted at confirmation of sale that Remegia and her uncle
the main entrances of the provincial building and purportedly executed before the notary public in
of the municipal hall where the property is 1965. Aurelio then filed a petition for the issuance of
located. The notice shall state the following: (1) a new owner’s duplicate copy of TCT No. T-8502
the number of the certificate of title, (2) the name because when they asked Remegia about it, she
of the registered owner, (3) the names of the claimed it had been lost. A petition for partial
interested parties appearing in the reconstituted cancellation of the said TCT was granted and TCT
certificate of title, (4) the location of the property, No. 17993 was issued in Aurelio’s name. They also
and (5) the date on which all persons having an allege that they and their predecessors-in-interest
interest in the property must appear and file such have been occupying the said property since 1947,
claims as they may have. openly, publicly, adversely, and continuously or for 41
years already.
In petitions for reconstitution where the source is the
owner’s duplicate copy, notices to adjoining owners ISSUE:
and to actual occupants of the land are not required. Who is the real owner of the subject lot?
But Puzon is not applicable here. There is no report
from a pertinent government agency challenging the HELD:
authenticity of the duplicate certificates of title Remegia is the real owner.
presented in Puzon. The trial court correctly held that the CFI which
granted Aurelio’s petition for issuance of new
Sections 12 and 13 of RA 26 must apply because owner’s duplicate copy of TCT No. 8502 did not
the owner’s duplicate is claimed by the LRA to be acquire jurisdiction. It has been consistently held
spurious. The failure to meet any of the that when the owner’s duplicate certificate of title
necessary publication, notice of hearing and has not been lost, but is in fact in the possession
mailing requirements did not vest jurisdiction of of another person, then the reconstituted
the case to the court. Thus, the judgment certificate is void, because the court that
rendered by the RTC is void and will never rendered the decision had no jurisdiction.
become binding or final as it is a nullity right Consequently, the issuance of TCT No. 17993 is
from the very start. It may be challenged at any also void, emanating as it did from the void TCT
time. No. 8502 in Aurelio’s name. The indefeasibility of
Feliciano v. Spouses Zaldivar, GR No. 162593. a Torrens title does not apply where fraud
September 26, 2006 attended the issuance of the title, such as when it
was based on void documents.
FACTS: 6. REGISTRATION OF
Remigia Feliciano filed a complaint against the TRANSACTION EVIDENCED BY
spouses Zaldivar for the declaration of nullity of TCT LOST DOCUMENT
No. T-17993 and reconveyance of the property ROD is forbidden to effect registration of
covered therein. The said title is registered in the lost or destroyed documents
are needed to see this picture.
Steps by interested parties:
1. covered
Remigia alleged that she was the registered owner of a lot, part of which is that Procurebyan authenticated
the copy
above TCT, and withofTCT
lostNo. 8502. It was
or destroyed instrument
2. Secure an order from court
Page 296 of
4. Forgery
Page 297 of
Civil Law Summer Reviewer
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Page 297 of