- The document discusses reminders for an online class, including being on time, being respectful, avoiding distractions, wearing a proper uniform, and not eating during class.
- It then covers a lesson about environmental ethics and how humans value the environment, including the concepts of ecocentrism, anthropocentrism, and technocentrism.
- Ecocentrism believes nature has inherent value, while anthropocentrism sees nature as existing for human benefit. Technocentrism believes technology can solve environmental problems.
- The document discusses reminders for an online class, including being on time, being respectful, avoiding distractions, wearing a proper uniform, and not eating during class.
- It then covers a lesson about environmental ethics and how humans value the environment, including the concepts of ecocentrism, anthropocentrism, and technocentrism.
- Ecocentrism believes nature has inherent value, while anthropocentrism sees nature as existing for human benefit. Technocentrism believes technology can solve environmental problems.
- The document discusses reminders for an online class, including being on time, being respectful, avoiding distractions, wearing a proper uniform, and not eating during class.
- It then covers a lesson about environmental ethics and how humans value the environment, including the concepts of ecocentrism, anthropocentrism, and technocentrism.
- Ecocentrism believes nature has inherent value, while anthropocentrism sees nature as existing for human benefit. Technocentrism believes technology can solve environmental problems.
• Be respectful and polite at all times. • Please pay attention to the whole class discussion. Be in a place where you can focus. Avoid distractions. • Wear your proper uniform. • Do not answer in chorus. Click the “like” button in the reaction box if you would like to share something in the class. • Please message me privately if you want to go to the comfort room. • Eating is not allowed while the class is going on. THE HUMAN PERSON AND THE ENVIRONMENT LEARNING TARGETS •Notice that things that are not in their proper place and organize them in an aesthetic way
• Show that care for the environment contributes to
health, well-being and sustainable development by doing actions like planting, etc.
• Demonstrate the virtues of prudence and frugality
towards environments • The belief that a person is a steward of God’s creation seems to be just a myth today. Because of human activities, the environment is facing destruction which, in turn, puts the whole of humankind to its greatest challenge to date— survival. Humans and their environment are expected to coexist. At this point, the challenge for people is to prevent their own kind from facing extinction. It is hoped that people will realize that if they are the cause of the problem, they too can provide the solution. ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS • also known as environmental philosophy, deals with the ethical relationship between a person and his/her environment. This discipline also takes into consideration the ethical responsibilities of a person in as far as his/her natural environment is concerned. • was developed out of the growing awareness of the effects on the environment of the factors such as technology, industry, population, and even economic expansion.
• has the primary task of outlining or defining of one’s moral
obligations in the face of the worsening environmental concerns. ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE SYSTEMS • refers to how a person sees and values environmental concerns and is classified into three major categories: ecocentrism, anthropocentrism, and technocentrism.
1. Ecocentrism – based on the principle that the natural world has
inherent value. Advocates of this view wish to lessen the impact of human influence to the environment by reducing and lessening the consumption of natural resources. ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE SYSTEMS 1. Ecocentrism – based on the principle that the natural world has inherent value. Advocates of this view wish to lessen the impact of human influence to the environment by reducing and lessening the consumption of natural resources. • Two Types • 1. Land Ethic – focus on human responsibility towards the natural world. They are said to be nature-centered and are putting so much premium on the rights of nature as compared to the rights of humanity. It was first advocated by Aldo Leopold in the late 1940s and implied the responsibility of human beings for natural communities. • 2. Deep Ecology – a newer concept in ecocentric philosophy. This value system intensively inquires about a person’s set of values and lifestyles that cause serious environmental problems. ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE SYSTEMS 2. Anthropocentrism – a philosophical perspective which puts human needs and interests to be of highest value and importance. This viewpoint is human- centered and believes that the natural world exists for him/her alone; hence, concern for nonhuman entities is limited to those having value to people. There are anthropocentrism philosophers who advocate the cornucopian point of view, which claims that environmental resources are unlimited and the rapid increase in human population does not lead to scarcity in natural resources. Cornucopian philosophers argue that the possibility of resource scarcity and population explosion is a mere exaggeration. They believe that future technology will be invented and developed to address such issues. ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE SYSTEMS 3. Technocentrism – with values centered on technology, this type of view believes that it can provide solutions to all environmental problems. It believes that the nature is present to benefit human beings. It stresses that environmental problems can be solved through science and technology, and holds that technology is a key ingredient in improving the standard of living. Advocates of this vies downplay the effects of environmental problems, such as global warming and illegal logging. They contend that scientific and technological expertise are the answers to the growing problems in the environment. • The popular belief that one is a steward of the environment has given humans the chance to interpret it in such a way that would benefit the humankind. Because of this, people believe that they live outside of the environment and in no way that they are a part of it. • People’s strong alliance with technology and glued partnership with science have fuelled their desires to alter the environment’s natural state. In turn, they created trees, made of cement, mountains of skyscrapers, and rivers of plastics and chemicals. Environmental philosophy is, therefore, tasked to align human perspectives with the efforts to preserve the natural environment. LEARNING ACTIVITY SHEET (OFFLINE ACTIVITY)