You are on page 1of 3

Name : Aldira Jasmine Rizky Arifin

NIM : 12010119190284
Class : X. IUP

PATH ANALYSIS

P3
KK Persamaan Matematis:
RK
e2
 KO = a1+P1KK+e1
P1  RK = a2+P2KO+P3KK+e2
KO P2
e1
Dependent variable: KO Model Summaryb

Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the Durbin-Watson


Square Estimate

1 .286a .082 .049 .59287 1.978

a. Predictors: (Constant), KepKer


b. Dependent Variable: KomOrg

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.


Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta

(Constant) 2.626 .870 3.019 .005


1
KepKer .352 .223 .286 1.579 .126

a. Dependent Variable: KomOrg


Dependent variable: RK Model Summaryb

Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the Durbin-Watson


Square Estimate
a
1 .476 .227 .169 .59354 1.646

a. Predictors: (Constant), KomOrg, KepKer


b. Dependent Variable: RetKar

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.


Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta

(Constant) 2.934 1.003 2.927 .007

1 KepKer -.262 .233 -.199 -1.125 .270

KomOrg .528 .189 .493 2.792 .010

a. Dependent Variable: RetKar

Analysis Results:
e2

0,879 Pei = √ 1−R2i


0,199
KK RK Pe1 = √ 1−R21 = √ 1−0,082 = 0,958

0,493 Pe2 = √ 1−R22 = √ 1−0,227 = 0,879


0,286 P1
KO

0,958

e1
Total determinant coefficient:

R2m = 1 - P2e 1 P2e 2 … P2ep

R2m = 1 – (0,958)2 (0,876)2

= 1 – 0,062
= 0,295
The information contained in the data 29.5% can be explained by the model, while the rest is explained by other variables and
errors

e2
Theory Trimming
0,199
0,879
a
0,270
Coefficients

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.


RK
KK
Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta

(Constant) 2.934 1.003 2.927 .007


1 0,493
KO
KomOrg .528 .189 .493 2.792 .010 0,286
0,010
0,126
a. Dependent Variable: RetKar
0,958
So after trimming, it turns out that the only significant model is KO
e1

You might also like