Professional Documents
Culture Documents
i i i iii i
620 0027 i i
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii (BC0190050)
INTRODUCTION
Custom iis idefined ias ian iaction ior ia iway iof ibehaving ithat iis iusual iand itraditional iamong ithe
i people iin ia iparticular igroup ior iplace ior isomething ithat iis idone iregularly iby ia iperson iof ithat
i particular igroup ior iplace. iIn ilaw, iit iis ithe ibuilt iup iexample iof iconduct ithat icould ibe iunbiasedly
i checked iinside ia ispecific isocial isetting. iA iclaim ican ibe icarried iout iin idefence iof i"what ihas
i always ibeen idone iand iaccepted iby ilaw” irelated iis ithe iidea iof iprescription; ia iright ienjoyed
i through ilong icustom irather ithan ipositive ilaw. iIn ia ihistorical icountry ilike iIndia, iCustoms iare
i always iin icorrelation iwith iour isociety iright ifrom ithe ivery ibeginning iperiod iof iour iancestors.
i With ithe ihelp iof ithe icustoms ithat iwere iin ipractice iamong ithe ipeople, imany ilaws ihave ibeen
i introduced iwith ireference ito iparticular iCustoms ithat iwere ifollowed. iThus, istudying ifurther iin
i this itopic, iwe ican ihave ia ibetter iunderstanding iof ithe icustoms ithat iwere ibelieved iand ifollowed
i from ialso iwhich ithe ilaws ihave ibeen ievolved.
The ilaw iis imade ifor ithe isociety. iIt iis, isimply iput, ia iset iof irules iand iregulations ito igovern ia
i society. iLaw iof ieach iand ievery istates iare idifferent ifrom iother idepending iupon iits ipersonal
i needs iand iexpectations. iThis iis ibecause iof ithe iculture iand icustoms iof ia iparticular iState. iSince
i law iis ifor ithe isociety, iit icannot ioverlook ithe ivarious iold iage itraditions ipervasive iin iits iway iof
i life iwhich ihave iappeared ias ilaw iamong ithe igeneral ipopulation ifollowing ithem, ihowever ithey
i might ibe iconflicting iwith ithe iexisting ilaws igo iby ithe imodern isociety. iLaw, iwhich ihas ibeen
i derived ifrom ithese itraditions iis ithe icustomary ilaw. iA iCustom iis ithe iarrangement iof iguidelines
i followed iby ia igathering iof ipeople ior ifamily ior igroup isince ilong, iapplicable ito ithem iin isuch ia
i way ias ito iform ithe ilaw iof ithe isociety.
Some iof ithe icustoms iare irecognized iby ithe ilaw iand iare iallowed ito ibe ifollowed iby ia iparticular
i community ifor iwhom iit iis iapplicable, ieven ithough iit iis inot iin iconsonance iwith ithe iStatute.
i Various iother icustoms iare iincorporated iin ithe iStatute iby iitself iand itakes ithe iform iof ia ivalid
i law. iSome iof ithe icustoms iwhich iare idetrimental ito ithe ineeds iand iexpectations iof ithe isociety
i are idisallowed. iCustomary ilaw iis ifound imajorly iin iareas iof imarriage, iproperty, iinheritance.
● The irelation ibetween iLaw iand iCustom, ian iarticle idone iby iNegi iMohita iwhich italks iabout
i the inature iof iCustom iand iLaw iand ialso igives ius ia iunderstanding ion ihow ithese itwo iare
i correlated.
● Rethinking iCustomary iLaw iin iTribal iCourt iJurisprudence, ian iarticle iMatthew iL.M.
i Fletcher iby iwhich igives ius ia ibroad iview ion ithe ihistory iand iimplementation iof icustomary
i law iand iits ipurposes ialso igiving ius iwith iclear iideas ion ithe ivarious iinterpretation iof
i customary ilaws iwith ireference ito ithe inecessity ifor iit.
● Sociology iof iLaw iin iIndia: iPostscripts iand iProspects, ia ijstor iarticle iby iVikash iN. iPandey
i and iAkhileshwar iPathak iwhich ihelps iin ielaborating ithe istages iof ievolvement iof ilaw
i adapting ito ithe icustomary ipractices ithat ihave ibeen ipracticed iin iIndia iwith ireference ito ithe
i changes ithat ihave itaken iplace iin ithe isociety iright ifrom ithe idays iwhen ipeople iused ito
i practice ithe icustoms ibefore iit iwas iaccepted iby ipeople iand icustoms iwere imade iinto ilaws ias
i such.
● Custom ias ia iSource iof iLaw, ian iarticle iwritten iby iSubodh iAsthana ia ifellow iNLU istudent
i from iChhattisgarh, iwhere ithe iauthor idiscusses iabout iCustom ibeing ia iprimary isource iof
i law. iThe iauthor ialso ibriefly iexplains ion ithe ivarious itypes iof iCustoms iand itheir iusage ias ia
i source iof ilaw ias iwell.
Significance iof ithis istudy iis ito iunderstand iourselves ion ithe ievolution iof iIndian ilaws iand ihow
i important ithe irole iof icustom iin ithe imaking iof ithese ilaws. iAs imany iof ius, imight inot iknow ithe
i root iof ithe iexisting ilaws iin iour icountry iand ihence ithis istudy iof icustoms iand itheir iessence iin
i the iIndian ilaws. i
RESEARCH iQUESTION
● What iare ithe ivarious itypes iof iCustoms iand iits iapplication iin ilaw?
OBJECTIVE
● To iunderstand ihow ithe idifferent itypes iof iCustoms iare iapplied iin iLaw.
This iresearch iis ibased ion ithe isecondary isources ilike ijournal iarticles ifor icollecting idata ito istudy
i and ianalyse icustoms. iIn iaddition iunpublished ithesis iand ibooks ialso icome iinto ihand ito ihelp
i understand ithe irelation ibetween iCustom iand ilaw iwhich igives ius ia iclear iview ion ihow ithose
i various itypes iof iCustoms iare iapplied iin ithe ilaw ias iwell. iMany ijournal iarticles, iText iBooks iand
i Information ifrom ieminent itext iand ivisual isources iare ireferred ito imake ithe iresearch. iMany
i scholars’ iopinion iregarding ithe imatter iis ialso ireferred ifor ithe iresearch.
METHODOLOGY
This iresearch iwork iwill ialso icompare iand icontrast ibetween iCustoms iand iLaws iat ithe isame
i time iexplaining irole iof iCustomary ipractices iin ithe ievolution iof ilaws ias iwell. iFor ithis iresearch,
i Secondary imethodology iwill ibe iutilised iwhich iincludes igathering iof idata ifrom ithe iwritings
i related ito ithis itopic iof ivarious iother idistinguished iauthors. iThis imethodology iallows ius ito
i collect, ianalyse iand icompare ithe iavailable iexisting iliterature.
CHAPTERISATION
● Introduction
● Relationship ibetween ilaw iand iCustom
● Customary iinheritance iand imarriage ilaws
● Varities iof icustom iand iits iapplications iin ilaws.
● Conclusion
CONCLUSION
This iproject iis italks iabout ithe ihistory iand ithe ievolution iof ilaws iwith iCustoms iplaying ian
i important irole imoulding iit. iCustoms iis ia ipart iof ithe iState iwhich iis ifurther idisintegrated iinto
i different iplaces ifrom iwhere ithe icustoms ioriginate. iIt iplays ian iimportant irole iin ithe ioverall
i development iof iState. iThere ihave ibeen icustoms iwhich ihas ibeen itransformed iinto ilaws iand
i some iof ithem ihave ibeen ineglected iin iorder ito ibring ijustice ito ithe isociety ias ia iwhole. iThis
i project istudies ibriefly iabout ihow ithe iIndian iCustoms ishaped iup ito ibe iand ihow ithe iIndian ilaws
i evolved iwith ithe ihelp iof iit.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
● http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/essay/relationship-between-law-and-
custom/24295/
● i https://polsci101.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/mill-burke-custom-vs-change/
● http://www.jstor.org/stable/4403076?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=
customs&searchText=and&searchText=its&searchText=application&searchText=of
&search
● https://blog.ipleaders.in/customs-source-law/\