Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity 15
2. Identify other subjects or disciplines that are examples of the different types of
integrated curriculum design.
Interdisciplinary
History and world religion
Mathematics and statistics
Earth & Life Science and Biology
Oral communication and English
Multi-disciplinary
CORE
Civic responsibilities
informed consumerism
development of aesthetic appreciations
proficiency in spoken and written language
economic systems
3. Write the benefits and possible pitfalls of subject design and integrated design.
Activity 16
It gives power to the learners: they are identified as the experts in the
knowing what they need to know.
The constructivist element of this approach honors the social and cultural
context of the learner.
It also creates a direct link between in-class work and learners’ need for
literacy outside the classroom.
Improves participation, Improves retention of knowledge, Boosts performance
at work, Develops problem-solving skills, Fosters collaborative learning,
Makes learning more fun.Facilitates personalized learning.
Activity 17
1. Analyze a school curriculum that uses problem- centered designs. Discuss the
benefits and issues related to its implementation.
- PBL’s principal goal-meeting students where they are and putting them to work
solving real-world problems-marks a significant shift from old educational models.
Putting it into action unearths a host of practical challenges, from finding “real”
real-world questions to ensuring accurate and adequate assessments.
Finding authentic problem- It can be difficult to know the kinds of problems that
work best with PBL, but one thing’s for sure: Instructors must avoid
manufacturing false challenges just to make them fit a predesigned pedagogy.
Confronting your own lack of knowledge- Whether we intend to or not,
instructors grow accustomed to “sage” status. PBL can move us off the stage
and make us uncomfortable because we might not know or understand the
problems or technologies our students are dealing with. That’s a unique
challenge to our preparations, because we can walk with our students into areas
that expose our ignorance.
Getting up to speed on PBL- It is also important to be educated on PBL. While
it is becoming increasingly popular, not every district has a wealth of professional
development resources to ensure that teachers are deeply educated in PBL. This
should not stop you. In addition to collecting your own resources, consider
alternative methods of professional development like Twitter chats, message
boards, or online communities dedicated to PBL.
Embracing effective failure- The potential for failure is not a downside of PBL.
Indeed, failure presents an excellent opportunity to show students their actions
have real-world consequences and that success is far from guaranteed.
Activity 18
1. Examine the K-12 Curriculum and identify the core standards and competencies
that are required for all students to know and do.
Content Standards define what students should know and be able to do. These
are benchmarks which identify the expected understandings and skills for a
content standard at different grade levels.
Performance Standards (or indicators) describe how well students need to
achieve in order to meet content standards. They are the levels of proficiency
which the students are expected to demonstrate what they know and what they
are able to do.
Competencies are more specific versions of the standards. They are specific
tasks performed with mastery. They also refer to the ability to perform activities
within an occupation or function to the standards expected by drawing from one’s
knowledge, skills, and attitudes.Curriculum Guide of the K to 12 Curriculum
contains content and performance standards and competencies, not objectives. It
makes use of standards-based instruction.
Activity 19
Review the linear curriculum development models. Identify the possible strengths and
weaknesses of each model when applied to the Philippine context.
STRENGTH:
WEAKNESSES:
It does not have a feedback mechanism to tell people how to correct it.
It seems lack procedure between
Evaluation and organisation, and this procedure is execution. For example they
do not apply to all subjects or the design of a subjects’ content.
It limits what students can learn
It treats ends and means separately.
It doesn’t indicate who decides what is ‘worthwhile’ learning
STRENGTHS:
WEAKNESSES:
STRENGTHS:
Help all students learn more by demanding higher student proficiency and
providing effective methods to help students achieve high standards;
Provide parents, schools, and communities with an unprecedented opportunity
to debate and reach agreement on what students should know and be able to do;
Focus the education system on understandable, objective, measurable, and
well-defined goals to enable schools to work smarter and more productively;
Reinforce the best teaching and educational practices already found in
classrooms and make them the norm;
Provide real accountability by focusing squarely on results and helping the public
and local and state educators evaluate which programs work best.
WEAKNESSES:
STRENGTHS:
WEAKNESSES:
STRENGTHS:
WEAKNESSES:
Very linear
Constraining, limits creativity
Time-consuming to implement
Specific to higher education
Classroom oriented
Directed at total curricula in addition to individual classes
Requires significant input from university personnel (as well as other academic
departments)
Activity 20
Review the cyclical curriculum development models. Identify the possible strengths and
weaknesses of each model when applied to the Philippine context.
STRENGTHS:
WEAKNESSES:
STRENGTHS:
WEAKNESSES:
STRENGTHS:
The faculty members has enough knowledge thorugh their experience in order to
produce their lesson and want to teach
Very much applicable for designiing higher education courses because it is the
reality how college faculty members design their courses
Given the influence of academic freedom, faculty members may plan the
curriculum based on their own convinience
Weaknesses:
Activity 21
Review the dynamic curriculum development models. Identify the possible strengths
and weaknesses of each model when applied to the Philippine context.
STRENGTHS:
Describes what happens in the process of the curriculum but does not describe
what actually happens in the classrrom that will results into chaos
The process of deliberation can be time consuming and resource intensive, and
can result curriculum products that may niot be aligned and consistent internally.
STRENGTHS:
Curriculum developer can begin with any of the elements the model; allows the
curriculum
Developer to change the order of planning. The mode; offers flexibility
More reaslistic, feasible ways of handling curriculum development
Developers are free o be more creative
WEAKNESSES: