School of Professional Advancement

Project Evaluation Form

CIRCULAR IN
Examiner Name: __________________________ Examiner: Internal External

Part-1: (15 points)

Criteria for Evaluation Muhammad Asif Muhammad

Umar Arshad

1- Problem Statement
(3 points)

2- Idea Proposed /
Contextualization
(3 points)

3- Planning
 Realistic timings
given
 Realising the
resources required
(2 points)

4- Methodology
 Monitoring tools
 Methods for
evaluating results
(3 points)

5- Coding Standards
 Comments
 Readable yet efficient
 Not much Hard-Code
 Use of API’s
 Use of IDE’s drop-
down menu
(4 points)

Part II: Presentation Evaluation (10 points)

6- Clarity of Explanation
(2 points)

7- Depth of Knowledge
(2 points)

8- Verbal and Body Language

(2 points)

University of Management & Technology

School of Professional Advancement

9- Use of supporting
documents / elements
(2 points)

10- Professionalism of
Presentation
(2 points)

Part III: Documentation (35 points)

SRS Report (10 points)

Validity of UML Diagrams (10

points)

ERD and Databases (5 points)

Accuracy of Test Cases (10

points)

Part IV: Project Viva (30 points)

Q1:

Q2:

Q3:

Part V: Showcase of FYP (10 points)

Demonstration

Flex/Poster summarizing their

FYP

Date and signature of the examiner ___________________________________________

University of Management & Technology