Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Composite Design Manual PDF
Composite Design Manual PDF
February 2001
OneSteel Market Mills
Composite Structures Design Manual
Published by
Produced by the
Contributors
Reviewed by
Dr. Brian Uy
The University of New South Wales
Disclaimer
While every effort has been made and all reasonable care taken to
ensure the accuracy of the material contained herein, the
contributors, editors and publishers of this booklet shall not be held
liable or responsible in any way whatsoever, and expressly disclaim
any liability or responsibility for any loss or damage, cost or
expenses, howsoever incurred by any person whether the user of
the booklet or otherwise including without limitation, loss or damage,
costs or expenses incurred as a result of or in connection with the
reliance, whether whole or partial by any person as a foresaid upon
any part of the contents of this booklet. Should expert assistance be
required, the services of a competent person should be sought.
Foreword
OneSteel is a leading manufacturer of steel long products in Australia after its spin-off from BHP Pty
Ltd on the 1st November 2000. It manufactures a wide range of steel products, including structural,
rail, rod, bar, wire, pipe and tube products and markets welded beams.
OneSteel is committed to providing to design engineers, technical information and design tools to
assist with the use, design and specification of its products. This design booklet “Design of Simply-
Supported Beams with Large Web Penetrations” was the third design booklet of the Composite
Structures Design Manual, which is now being completed and maintained by OneSteel.
The initial development work required to produce the design booklets was carried out at BHP
Melbourne Research Laboratories before its closure in May 1998. OneSteel Market Mills is funding
the University of Western Sydney’s Centre for Construction Technology and Research in continuing
the research and development work to publish this and future booklets.
The Composite Structures Design Manual refers specifically to the range of long products
that are manufactured by OneSteel and plate products that continue to be manufactured by
BHP. It is strongly recommended that OneSteel sections and reinforcement and BHP plate
products are specified for construction when any of the design models in the design booklets
are used, as the models and design formulae including product tolerances, mechanical
properties and chemical composition have been validated by detailed structural testing using
only OneSteel and BHP products.
To ensure that the Designer’s intent is met, it is recommended that a note to this effect be
included in the design documentation.
Contents
Preface ............................................................................................................. iv
1. SCOPE AND GENERAL
1.1 Scope ..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 General................................................................................................... 1
2. TERMINOLOGY..........................................................................................................................3
3. DESIGN CONCEPTS
3.1 Strength Design...................................................................................... 4
3.2 Deflection Calculation............................................................................. 7
4. DESIGN MODELS
4.1 General................................................................................................... 9
4.2 Strength Design Model ........................................................................... 9
4.3 Deflection Design Model........................................................................ 12
5. DESIGN APPROACH
5.1 General................................................................................................... 13
5.2 Overall Design Approach........................................................................ 13
5.3 Strength Design...................................................................................... 13
5.4 Deflection Calculation............................................................................. 15
6. DESIGN RULES
6.1 General................................................................................................... 16
6.2 Application .............................................................................................. 16
6.3 Strength Design...................................................................................... 18
6.4 Design Moment and Shear Capacities - Composite Beams .................. 18
6.5 Design Moment and Shear Capacities - Bare Steel Beams................... 20
6.6 Stability Considerations .......................................................................... 21
6.7 Detailing.................................................................................................. 21
6.8 Deflection Calculation............................................................................. 23
7. AIDS FOR STRENGTH DESIGN
7.1 General................................................................................................... 26
TM
7.2 WEBPEN Spreadsheet Program ........................................................ 26
7.3 Design Capacity Tables.......................................................................... 27
8. WORKED EXAMPLES
8.1 General................................................................................................... 28
8.2 Beam and Penetration Data ................................................................... 28
8.3 Example 1 .............................................................................................. 29
8.4 Example 2 .............................................................................................. 32
9. REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 39
APPENDICES
A. Nominal Moment Capacity - Composite Beam ...................................... 40
B. Nominal Moment Capacity - Bare Steel beam ....................................... 44
C. Design Capacity Tables.......................................................................... 46
D. Notation .................................................................................................. 85
Preface
This design booklet forms part of a suite of booklets covering the design of simply-supported and
continuous composite beams, composite slabs, composite columns, steel and composite
connections and related topics. The booklets are part of the OneSteel Market Mills’ Composite
Structures Design Manual which has been produced to foster composite steel-frame building
construction in Australia to ensure cost-competitive building solutions for specifiers, builders and
developers.
The additional design information necessary to allow large web penetrations to be incorporated into
simply-supported bare steel and composite beams is presented in this booklet. Design issues with
respect to strength and deflection control are addressed. The non-composite bare steel state arises
during construction prior to the concrete hardening.
Large rectangular and circular penetrations are often made in the steel web of composite beams for
the passage of horizontal building services. This allows the plenum height to be reduced when using
economical, standard UB and WB steel sections. However, large penetrations weaken a composite
beam locally and reduce its overall flexural stiffness, and therefore their effect must be considered in
design.
Neither the Steel Structures Standard AS 4100 nor the Composite Beam Standard AS 2327.1
contains design provisions for large web penetrations. The rules provided in the booklet for designing
bare steel beams with large penetrations are compatible with AS 4100. For the composite state, the
rules are compatible with AS 2327.1, and have been proposed as an acceptable method of design to
be referred to in Amendment No. 1 of this Standard expected to be published this year.
Information is also given to assist design engineers to understand the engineering principles on
which the design methods are based. This includes:
(a) explanatory information on important concepts and models;
(b) the limits of application of the methods; and
(c) worked examples.
Design capacity tables are given in Appendix C to simplify the strength design process. The
information provided can be used to design for either the bare steel or composite states. The tables
®
cover a range of situations involving 300PLUS UB and WB steel sections supporting a composite
TM
slab and incorporating large web penetrations. A spreadsheet program named WEBPEN is
available to assist with the strength design calculations.
Although these design aids are intended to make the design process more efficient, it is essential
that the user obtain a clear understanding of the basis of the design rules and the design approach
by working through this document and the relevant parts of associated design Standards such as AS
4100 and AS 2327.1.
1.2 General
The strength design method presented herein is based on a method recommended by an ASCE
Task Committee [4]. The method has been verified with some experimentally-based investigations
conducted in Australia, and modified to suit Australian design practice and conform to relevant
Australian Standards. Further details about the development of the strength design method can be
found elsewhere [5,6].
The deflection design method has been developed from work originally presented by Tse and
Dayawansa [7]. Further information about this method can be found in [5].
Large rectangular and circular penetrations are often made in the steel web of composite beams for
the passage of horizontal building services. This allows the plenum height to be reduced when using
economical, standard UB and WB steel sections. However, large web penetrations weaken a
composite beam locally and reduce its overall flexural stiffness. Neither the Steel Structures
Standard AS 4100 nor the Composite Beam Standard AS 2327.1 contains design provisions for
large web penetrations.
The strength design method was adopted after a detailed review of four proposed methods, viz.
ASCE Task Committee [4], Redwood and Cho [8], Lawson [9] and Oehlers and Bradford [10]. The
method adopted for Australian design practice, proposed by ASCE Task Committee [4], has been
modified to conform to the relevant Australian Standards. The suitability of the modified method has
been verified on the basis of an Australian experimental program. A reliability analysis has been
conducted using the results of the experimental program and other experimental data available from
overseas literature, to determine an appropriate value for the strength factor, φ [11]. In this regard,
consideration has also been given to the improved performance of a composite beam that can be
™
derived by placing DECKMESH [12] in the region of a penetration [13]. Accordingly, it is
recommended herein that this reinforcing product is used in the region of each web penetration when
the profiled steel sheeting is deemed perpendicular to the steel beam. (Note: this product is not
suitable to be used in situations when the sheeting is parallel to the steel beam – refer to design
booklet DB1.2 for further guidance.)
The cost implications of choosing between reinforced or unreinforced web penetrations is an
important consideration during the design stage, noting that the intention of using penetrations is not
only to obtain an acceptable floor-to-floor height, but also a more cost-effective structure. For this
purpose, it is recommended that a rational method of costing steelwork is used which takes into
account the specific labour and material costs involved in fabricating the penetrations including any
steel plate reinforcement [14].
2. TERMINOLOGY
Some important terminology used in this booklet is summarised in this section. Reference should
also be made to Section 2 of DB1.1 and Clause 1.4.3 of AS 2327.1 for additional terminology.
Bottom T-Section
The portion of the steel beam cross-section lying below the penetration.
Rigid Arm
A part of a beam assumed to be rigid in the model used for deflection calculations.
Steel T-Section
The bottom T-section or the top T-section, excluding the concrete flange in the case of a composite
beam.
Top T-Section
The portion of the steel beam cross-section lying above the penetration, inclusive of the concrete
flange in the case of a composite beam.
Vierendeel Action
The development of secondary bending moments in the top and bottom T-sections due to the
presence of vertical shear force across the penetration.
3. DESIGN CONCEPTS
3.1 Strength Design
Top T-Section
Concrete Diagonal
cracking cracking
Concrete
crushing
Primary
Shear bending
force moments
LME
HME
Support
Steel yielding Bottom T-Section
When the sheeting ribs are orientated perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the steel beam, the
diagonal crack initiates at the top of the ribs and rapidly propagates through the cover slab causing
failure. Tests show that the behaviour of a composite beam with the sheeting laid perpendicular to
the steel beam can be significantly improved if the width of this crack is controlled using special steel
reinforcement in the concrete slab [13]. This steel reinforcement was originally developed to prevent
rib shearing failure in composite edge beams [16,17,19], and is now commercially available as
DECKMESH [12].
Top T-Section
M*L M*H
Primary bending
moments
LME HME
Bottom T-Section
Bottom T-Section
HME
Figure 3.2 Primary and Secondary Bending Moments in the Region of a Web Penetration
(b) any horizontal reinforcement at the top and bottom edges of the penetration; and
(c) the degree of shear connection ( β ) at the HME of the penetration.
The effect of vertical shear force is ignored, and therefore, so are secondary bending moments
arising from Vierendeel action.
nH shear connectors
Maximum moment
cross-section
Force in concrete
flange Fcc
Beam with no
web penetration
F = (nH)afds
Fcc
Beam with
web penetration
Case (a) Force in concrete flange is not affected by web penetration (i.e. F = nHfds ≤=Fcc)
Beam with no
Force in concrete
web penetration
flange
Fcc
F = (nH)bfds
Beam with
Fcc
web penetration
x
Case (b) Force in concrete flange is affected by web penetration (i.e. F = nHfds >=Fcc)
Assumptions:
(a) fds corresponds to (nH)a in Case (a) and (nH)b in Case (b)
(b) Shear connectors are uniformily distributed
Figure 3.3 Influence of Web Penetration on Maximum Compressive Force in Concrete Flange
Moment-Shear Interaction
In accordance with the strength design method given in AS 2327.1, the nominal moment capacity of
a cross-section of a composite beam without a web penetration is assumed to be affected by shear
when the shear ratio, γ , is greater than 0.5 (see Clause 6.4 of AS 2327.1). In this case, the nominal
moment capacity is assumed to reduce linearly with the shear ratio until the entire steel web is fully
utilised resisting shear, and hence makes no contribution to moment capacity. When γ = 10 . , the
only contribution to the moment capacity from the steel section is due to the steel flanges. The
resulting tri-linear moment-shear interaction curve is shown in Fig. D3.2 of AS 2327.1.
It should be noted that a different moment-shear interaction relationship, defined by a continuous
cubic equation, as shown in Fig. 4.1, is adopted in the web penetration design method. This same
moment-shear interaction equation is used by ASCE Task Committee [4], Redwood and Cho [8] and
Oehlers and Bradford [10].
Penetration Reinforcement
There are numerous ways of reinforcing web penetrations to minimise the loss of strength and
stiffness that can arise due to their presence. Some of these reinforcing arrangements are shown in
Fig. 3.4. However, the strength design formulae given in Section 6 have been derived assuming the
steel plate or flat bar reinforcement is continuously welded to the web, as close as practicable to the
top and bottom horizontal edges of the penetration. Therefore, only the reinforcement arrangements
shown in Fig. 3.4(a) are valid for use with this document.
4. DESIGN MODELS
4.1 General
The design models used in the strength and deflection design methods and their limits of application
are briefly explained in this section. The limits of application arise mainly from the parameter ranges
covered in experimental and theoretical studies undertaken to verify the models. This may explain
somewhat arbitrary nature of some of the limits of application. Nevertheless, the limits encompass a
range sufficiently wide for most practical applications. These limits are described in detail in
Section 6.
M*
φMb
3 3
A M* V* ≤ 1.0
1.0 Region where +
φMb φVu
Q
P
B V*
0
0 1.0 φVu
P - Corresponding to a satisfactory design
Q - Corresponding to an unsatisfactory design
When the design bending moment, M * , and design shear force, V * , at the mid-length of the
penetration have been calculated, the next step of the strength design calculation is to determine the
values of φM b and φVu at the penetration.
Reinforcement
Reinforcement
Web penetrations may be either unreinforced or reinforced, and possibly eccentric to the centroid of
the steel beam section. It is assumed that any web penetration reinforcement is continuously welded
as close as practicable to the top and bottom horizontal edges of the penetration. In addition, the
reinforcement shall be rectangular in cross-section and shall not exceed the dimensions specified in
Section 6.7. Acceptable reinforcement arrangements are shown in Fig. 4.2 for a rectangular
penetration.
Top T-Section P
θL
θL θH P θH
δ's
a L0 b
L
θ'L
θ'L θ'H P θ'H
The steel section shall be compact or non-compact in accordance with the requirements of
AS 2327.1. Slenderness limitations have been imposed in the region of the web penetration to avoid
buckling of the webs of the T-sections and overall buckling of the top T-section in compression.
These limitations are given in Section 6.6. As the resistance of bare steel and composite beams to
lateral and flexural-torsional buckling may be lowered with the introduction of a web penetration, the
effect of reduced lateral and flexural-torsional buckling loads also needs to be considered in design.
The strength design method is not applicable to beams subjected to significant load fluctuations,
which may lead to fatigue.
5. DESIGN APPROACH
5.1 General
The purpose of this section is to explain the design approach adopted in this booklet. Rules for the
strength and deflection design of simply-supported bare steel and composite beams incorporating
large web penetrations are covered in Section 6. The restrictions applicable to the strength design
method are given in Section 6.2.
The overall design approach covering strength and deflection design is illustrated in Fig. 5.1 as a
flowchart.
The design action effects, M * and V * , are calculated at the mid-length of the web penetration.
Start
Strength design of
beam without web penetration
Design of beam
without web penetration Calculation of deflection
of beam without web penetration
Calculate M* & V*
Geometric No
constraints
satisfied
?
Yes
Strength design
calculation
Add
Stability & No penetration Yes Add
detailing criteria reinforcement reinforcement
satisfied ?
?
Yes No
Deflection No
design criteria
satisfied
?
Yes
Design complete
Stop
In the calculation of φMb , it is necessary to know the compressive force in the concrete flange at the
HME, FcH , which depends on the distribution of shear connectors along the beam, previously
determined for the strength design of the beam without any web penetrations.
The shear force, V * , at the cross-section is assumed to be zero for this calculation. Hence the value
of φMb represents the point “A” on the moment-shear interaction curve shown in Fig. 4.1.
Design Shear Capacity
The design shear capacity, φVu , is determined as the summation of the nominal shear capacities of
the top and bottom T-sections, Vt and Vb , respectively, times the capacity factor, φ . Although the
overall bending moment at the penetration is assumed to be zero for this calculation, Vierendeel
action due to vertical shear force acting across the penetration is accounted for which gives rise to
secondary bending moments. The value of φVu represents the point “B” on the moment-shear
interaction curve shown in Fig. 4.1.
5.4 Deflection Calculation
The total deflection is calculated as the sum of three components (as shown in Fig. 5.2), viz:
(a) deflection of beam without a web penetration, calculated in accordance with the requirements
of AS 2327.1 (Fig. 5.2(a));
(b) deflection due to secondary bending within the length of the penetration (Fig. 5.2(b)); and
(c) deflection due to shear deformation within the length of the web penetration (Fig. 5.2(c)).
The design method has been formulated assuming only one web penetration in the beam. However,
deflections from multiple penetrations may be superimposed as linear elastic behaviour is assumed.
P
a L0 b
x
L
δg(x)
δH(x)
θ' L
(b) Additional bending deflection (from rigid-arm model)
θ' H
δv(x)
δt(x)
6. DESIGN RULES
6.1 General
The design rules for the strength and deflection design of simply-supported bare steel and composite
beams incorporating large web penetrations are presented in this section. The web penetrations may
be circular or rectangular in shape, unreinforced or reinforced, and located either concentrically or
eccentrically to the centroid of the steel section.
The restrictions applicable to the strength design rules are given in Section 6.2.
The strength design objectives and criteria are given in Section 6.3.
The design rules for calculating the design moment and shear capacities, φMb and φVu , for
composite beams are given in Section 6.4.
The design rules for calculating φMb and φVu for bare steel beams, a special case of the more
general method applicable to composite beams, are given in Section 6.5.
The stability considerations applicable to the strength design are given in Section 6.6, and the
detailing requirements are given in Section 6.7.
Design rules for calculating the additional vertical deflection due to a web penetration are given in
Section 6.8.
6.2 Application
The proposed size and location of the web penetration must be checked prior to performing the
design calculations to ensure compliance with the requirements of the strength design method given
in this section. In addition, the size and location of penetrations may also be governed by the stability
considerations given in Section 6.6.
Circular Penetrations
The design formulae presented are for rectangular penetrations. However, circular penetrations can
be designed using the same formulae by assuming that a circular penetration of diameter D is
equivalent to a rectangular penetration of the following dimensions.
(a) L0 = 0.45D .
(b) For unreinforced circular penetrations:
h 0 = D for the calculation of Mb ; and
Steel Section
The steel section shall be a doubly symmetric I-section. The design methods are only applicable if
the steel beam plate elements are compact or non-compact in accordance with the requirements of
AS 2327.1. Only the effective portion of any non-compact plate elements shall be used in the
strength and deflection calculations. The steel section shall also conform to the stability
considerations given in Section 6.6.
between the beam and the sheeting ribs is less than or equal to 15 degrees. Otherwise it shall be
considered perpendicular (i.e. λ = 0.0 ).
(b) h 0 ≤ 0.7 Ds
(c) s t ≥ 0.15D s
(d) For bare steel beams, sb ≥ 0.15Ds ; and
for composite beams, sb ≥ 0.12Ds
(e) (L0 / s t ) ≤ 12 and (L0 / s b ) ≤ 12
(f) For bare steel beams, (L0 / h 0 + 6 h 0 / Ds ) ≤ 5.6; and
for composite beams, (L0 / h 0 + 6 h 0 / Ds ) ≤ 6.0
P
Mid-height of
L0/st ≤ 12 st ≥=0.15Ds
penetration
+ve e
Ds L0/h0 ≤ 3 h0 ≤=0.7Ds
Centroidal axis
of steel beam
L0/sb ≤ 12 sb ≥=0.15Ds (bare steel)
sb ≥=0.12Ds (composite)
a ≥=Ds L0
d1 f yw bf − t w f yf
ç ÷ ≤ 70 and ç ÷ ≤9 (6.1)
tw 250 2t f 250
- closer than D s from the nearer edge of the penetration unless,
æ d1 ö f yw æ bf − t w ö f yf
ç ÷ ≤ 87 and ç ÷ ≤ 11 (6.2)
è tw 250 è 2t f 250
The design of bearing stiffeners shall be in accordance with the requirements of Clause 5.14 of
AS 4100.
Design Objectives
The objective of the strength design method is to ensure that the strength design criterion is not
violated in the region of the web penetration. It is also necessary to check that the beam is
sufficiently strong to resist any local instability of the steel beam plate elements around the
penetration, which can cause lateral buckling of the top T-section or flexural-torsional buckling of the
beam. The latter two modes of buckling apply only to bare steel beams.
(b) Determine the depth of the compressive zone in the concrete flange, d c , and the force
components in the cross-section using Para. A3.2.
(c) Determine the design moment capacity, φMb , using the appropriate case given in Para. A3,
depending on the depth of the compressive zone in the cross-section, dh .
The formulae given in Appendix A are based on the following assumptions:
(a) the composite beam cross-section is comprised of a concrete flange and a doubly-symmetric
steel I-section;
(b) penetrations may be either reinforced or unreinforced;
(c) the reinforcement, if any, above and below the penetration are of the same dimensions and
are located horizontally as close as practicable to the edges of the penetration; and
(d) sheeting ribs are deemed to be either perpendicular or parallel to the steel beam.
6 + µb
Vb = Vpb ≤ Vpb (6.5)
νb + 3
2Fr d r
where, µb = (6.6)
Vpb sb
sb = (D s − h 0 ) 2 + e0 (6.7)
L0
νb = (6.8)
sb
sb = s b , or (6.9)
= s b − Ar (2bf ) [when the penetration is reinforced and
6 + µb
≤ 1]
νb + 3
Vpb = 0.6f yw s b t w (6.10)
The nominal shear capacity of the top T-section, Vt , is calculated as follows:
6 + µt
Vt = Vpt ≤ Vpt + 0.29 f c' Avc (6.11)
νt + 3
2Fr d r + FctHd ctH − FctL d ctL
where, µt = (6.12)
Vpt s t
st = (D s − h 0 ) 2 − e0 (6.13)
L0
νt = (6.14)
st
st = s t , or (6.15)
= s t − Ar (2bf ) [when the penetration is reinforced and
6 + µt
≤ 1]
νt + 3
Vpt = 0.6f yw s t t w (6.16)
Fr = f yr Ar (6.17)
FctH = min.(Fc , n H f ds , (Ftf + Ftw + Fr )) (6.18)
The distance d ctH from the top of the steel cross-section to the line of action of FctH is determined
as:
FctH
d ctH = Dc − (6.19)
1.7 f c' bcf
FctL
d ctL = (1 − λ )hr + (6.21)
1.7f c' b cf
6 + µt
If > 1.0 in Eq. 6.11, then the nominal shear capacity of the top T-section, Vt , shall be
νt + 3
limited by the following condition:
FctH ≤ f yf t f (bf − t w ) + Ar f yr (6.22)
In this case, d ctH , FctL , and d ctL are all to be recalculated based on the value of FctH in Eq. 6.22,
and µ t shall be recalculated from Eq. 6.12. The nominal shear capacity of the top T-section is then
determined as:
µt
Vt = Vpt (6.23)
νt
but limited by,
6 + µb
Vb = Vpb ≤ Vpb (6.27)
νb + 3
2Fr d r
where, µb = ; (6.28)
Vpb sb
sb = (D s − h 0 ) 2 + e 0 (6.29)
Vpb = 0.6f yw sbt w (6.30)
Fr = f yr Ar (6.31)
L0
and νb = ; (6.32)
sb
sb = s b , or (6.33)
= s b − Ar (2bf ) [when the penetration is reinforced and
6 + µb
≤ 1]
νb + 3
The nominal shear capacity of the top T-section, Vt , can be calculated using Eqs 6.27 to 6.33 with
Vt , µ t , ν t , Vpt and s t substituted for Vb , µ b , ν b , Vpb and sb , respectively.
Web Buckling
The strength design method is generally applicable to the design of web penetrations in beams for
which,
d1 f yw
ç ÷ ≤ 87 (6.34)
tw 250
More specifically,
(a) for beams where,
æ d1 ö f yw
ç ÷ ≤ 70 (6.35)
è tw 250
L0
then ≤ 3.0 (6.36)
h0
and Vu ≤ 0.4f yw t w D s + Vc (6.37)
æ d ö f yw
70 < ç 1 ÷ ≤ 87 (6.39)
è tw 250
L0
then ≤ 2.2 (6.40)
h0
and Vu ≤ 0.27f yw t w D s (6.41)
For rectangular penetrations where M * / (V * D s ) > 20 and ν t > 4 , the top T-section of a bare steel
beam shall be designed as a compression member with an effective length equal to L0 , in
accordance with the requirements of AS 4100. Buckling is unlikely to occur in the top T-section of a
composite beam or in reinforced T-sections.
Flexural-Torsional Buckling
In the case of bare steel beams, the effect of the penetration on flexural-torsional buckling of the
member shall be considered. No specific guidelines are provided in this document.
Note: Some guidance on buckling of beams with web penetrations can be found in [18].
6.7 Detailing
é æ V* öù
ê ç ÷
ê ç φVu ÷
S ≥ max . h0 , L0 ç ÷ (6.42)
ê *
ê ç 1- V ÷
ç φV ÷
ëê è u ø
For circular penetrations:
é æ V* öù
ê ç ÷
ç φVu ÷
S ≥ max .ê1.5D , Dç ÷ (6.43)
ê *
ê ç 1- V ÷
ç φV ÷
êë è u ø
where, Vu is the nominal shear capacity of the steel beam without a penetration and D is the
diameter of the penetration.
The spacing between multiple penetrations in composite beams shall also satisfy,
S [
≥ max. L0 , 2D s ] (6.44)
When these criteria are not satisfied, the possible reduction in the strength of the member due to
interaction between penetrations shall be considered. However, no guidelines are provided in this
document for this assessment.
Penetration Reinforcement
Typical reinforcement details are shown in Fig. 4.2. The reinforcement shall be provided in
accordance with the following requirements.
(a) The outstand of the reinforcement shall be compact in accordance with the requirements of
AS 4100.
(b) The reinforcement shall be continuously welded parallel and as close as practicable to the
horizontal edges of the penetration.
(c) The area of reinforcement along each edge of the penetration shall satisfy the condition:
fyw
Ar ≤ 0.3t w L0 çç ÷ (6.45)
fyr ÷
(d) The reinforcement shall be extended beyond each end of the penetration by a distance not
less than L0 / 4 or (0.87Ar ) / t w , whichever is greater.
(e) The design capacity of the weld within the length of the penetration shall not be less than twice
the nominal tensile capacity of the reinforcement.
(i.e. design capacity of weld ≥ 2 × f yr × cross-sectional area of one reinforcement plate or flat
bar.)
(f) The design capacity of the weld beyond each end of the penetration shall not be less than the
nominal tensile capacity of the reinforcement.
(i.e. design capacity of weld ≥ f yr × cross-section area of reinforcement.)
(g) Reinforcement shall be provided equally along the top and bottom horizontal edges of the web
penetration.
A single-side reinforcement arrangement shall not be used unless all of the following conditions are
satisfied:
Af
Ar ≤ (6.46)
3
L0
≤ 2.5 (6.47)
h0
st f yw
≤ 23 (6.48)
tw 250
sb f yw
≤ 23 (6.49)
tw 250
M*
and ≤ 20 at the mid-length of the penetration. (6.50)
V * Ds
Slab Reinforcement
TM
It is recommended that DECKMESH be provided in region of the web penetration when the
sheeting ribs are deemed perpendicular to the steel beam (see Fig. 6.2), to control the diagonal
cracking shown in Fig. 3.1. Only one panel width (450 mm) is required.
DECKMESH
BHP DECKMESH
LME HME
Notes:
Notes:
(a)
(a) DECKMESH is available
BHP DECKMESH in modules
is available of length
in modules 600 mm
of length 600and
mmwidth 450 mm.
(b)
(b) DECKMESH is required
BHP DECKMESH only when
is required sheeting
only when ribs are
sheeting ribsdeemed perpendicular
are deemed to steel
perpendicular to beam
beam
TM
Figure 6.2. DECKMESH Recommended in the Region of a Web Penetration.
Corner Radii
The corner radii of a rectangular penetration shall be not less than 2t w or 16 mm, whichever is
greater.
6.8 Deflection Calculation
General
The total deflection δ t ( x ) at a point x (see Fig. 5.2) on the beam is expressed as:
δ t (x) = δ g (x ) + δb (x ) + δ v (x ) (6.51)
where,
δ g(x) = deflection at point x of the beam without the penetration;
δb (x ) = deflection at point x due to bending from Vierendeel action within the length of
the penetration; and
δ v (x ) = deflection at point x due to shear deformation within the length of the penetration.
The design shear force, V * , is assumed to be shared between the top and bottom T-sections as
Vt* and Vb* , respectively. For bare steel and composite beams, Vt* shall be determined as follows:
Vt * L 0
*
M se = − (6.57)
2
where Vt* is the shear force carried by the top T-section, and is calculated using Eqns 6.52, 6.53 or
6.55, as appropriate.
Hence, the rotations at the low and high moment ends of the web penetration are given as:
θL
ç
= ç
*
M se ( )
I 0 L20 − 2L0 (3b + 2L 0 ) − M d* I t L0 (3b + 2L 0 )
÷
6EI 0 I t L ÷ (6.58)
θH
ç
−ç
(M I*
d t + 2M se
*
I 0 L0 ) ÷
=
2EI 0 I t ÷ − θL (6.59)
where I0 is the second moment of area of the gross cross-section including the web penetration, I t
is the second moment of area of the top T-section, and b and L are the dimensions shown in
Fig. 4.3(a).
The additional bending deflection, δ b , of the beam due to the web penetration is given as:
For x ≤ a ;
δb (x) = xθ L (6.60)
For x ≥ a + L0 ;
δb (x) = (L − x )θ H (6.61)
2L0 δ 's
θL' = (6.62)
3 bL
δ'
θH' = çç s ÷÷ − θ L' (6.63)
b
where the additional shear deflection ignoring geometric continuity (see Fig. 4.3(c)) is given by:
kVt* L0
δ 's = (6.64)
Gs t t w
The additional deflection, δ v , of the beam due to the web penetration is given as:
For x ≤ a ;
δ v (x ) = xθ L' (6.65)
For x ≥ a + L0 ;
δ v (x ) = (L − x )θ H' (6.66)
WEBPENTM RESULTS
900
800
700
MOMENT (kNm)
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 200 400 600 800
SHEAR FORCE (kN)
TM
Figure 7.1 Typical Output of WEBPEN
8. WORKED EXAMPLES
8.1 General
Two worked examples are presented to demonstrate the strength and deflection design methods
given in Section 6. They involve the design of a web penetration in an unpropped simply-supported
composite beam for Construction Stage 3 (i.e. bare steel beam), and the in-service condition, as
defined in AS 2327.1:
Example 1
Strength design of a bare steel beam with a rectangular web penetration for Construction Stage 3,
using hand calculations and the design capacity tables given in Appendix C.
Example 2
Strength and deflection design of a composite beam with a rectangular web penetration for the in-
service condition, using hand calculations and the design capacity tables given in Appendix C.
It is assumed that the composite beam without the penetration has been designed in accordance
with AS 2327.1.
f'c= 25 MPa
Dc=120
410UB53.7, BHP-300PLUS
h0=225
x
3088 L0=425 6987
3300
L=10500
8.3 Example 1
This worked example demonstrates the strength design procedure for a web penetration in a bare
steel beam for Construction Stage 3, using hand calculations and design capacity tables given in
Appendix C.
• ( )
h 0 = 225 mm = 0.56D s ≤ 0.7Ds Satisfactory
• for bare steel beams: (L0 h 0 + 6 h 0 Ds ) = 5.2 ≤ 5.6 Satisfactory in Construction Stage 3
• (
s t = 89 mm ≥ 0.15Ds = 60.5 mm ) Satisfactory
• no concentrated loads are applied to the beam, thus loading does not restrict the position of the
web penetration Satisfactory
• the slenderness of the web will also influence the maximum allowable length-to-height ratio of a
penetration and the maximum nominal shear capacity of the member (see Section 6.6).
d1 f yw
For 410UB53.7, ç ÷ = 56.7 < 70
tw 250
L0
Therefore, ≤ 3.0; and
h0
for bare steel beams, Vu ≤ 0.4f yw t w D s
Mb ( ) (
) 2 + (s t − d h ) 2 ú 2
= Ftf d h − t f / 2 + t w f yw ê d h − t f
+ Fr (D s + s t − s b − 2d h ) + Fbw (D s − d h − (s b + t f ) 2)
+ Fbf (D s − d h − t f / 2)
= [
621E 3 × (89 − 10.9 / 2) + 7.6 × 320 (89 − 10.9) + 0 2
2
]2
(
+ 0 + 190E 3 403 − 89 − (89 + 10.9) 2 )
+ 621E 3(403 − 89 − 10.9 / 2)
= 303 kNm
Therefore, the design moment capacity of the cross-section at the penetration is;
φM b = 273 kNm
6 + µb
Vb = Vpb ≤ Vpb
νb + 3
2Fr d r
where, µb = = 0 (since unreinforced)
Vpb sb
L0 425
νb = = = 4.78
sb 89
and Vpb = 0.6f yw s b t w = 0.6 × 320 × 89 × 7.6 = 130 kN
6 +0
Therefore, Vb = × 130 ≤ 130 kN
4.78 + 3
= 48.9 kN
Moment-Shear Interaction
Applying the moment-shear interaction relationship given in Eq. 6.3,
3 3
173 æ 28.4 ö
ç ÷ +ç ÷ = 0.29 ≤ 10
. strength criterion satisfied
273 è 88.0
Since L0 h 0 = 19
. for the penetration, first interpolate between the columns corresponding to
L 0 h 0 = 15
. and L0 h 0 = 2.0 in each table, and then interpolate between those values to determine
φVu.0 corresponding to h 0 D s = 0.56 .
. − 15
19 .
Value of φVu.0 from Table C26 = 137 − ç ÷ × (137 − 113) = 118 kN
2.0 − 15
.
. − 15
19 .
Value of φVu.0 from Table C27 = 45 − ç ÷ × (45 − 35) = 37.0 kN
2.0 − 15
.
0.7 − 0.56
φVu = 118 + ç ÷ × (118 − 37 ) = 93.6 kN
0.7 − 0.5
Moment-Shear Interaction
Applying the moment-shear interaction relationship given in Eq. 6.3,
3 3
æ 173 ö æ 28.4 ö
ç ÷ +ç ÷ = 0.31 ≤ 10
. strength criterion satisfied
è 265 è 93.6
8.4 Example 2
This worked example demonstrates the strength design procedure for a web penetration in a
composite beam (described in Section 8.2) for the in-service condition, using hand calculations and
design capacity tables given in Appendix C.
It is assumed that the composite beam without the penetration has already been designed in
accordance with AS 2327.1. The resulting shear connector distribution given in Fig. 8.2 shows that
the number of 19 mm shear connectors from HME to the nearer end of the beam is 9 (i.e. n H = 9 ).
14
12
Recommended shear connector
No. of Connectors
10
distribution (from COMPBEAMTM)
8
6 nL= 8 nH= 9
4
2 LME HME
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 10500
Total dead load of beam (G) = 8.8 + 0.3 × 2.6 = 9.6 kN/m
350
From Section 4 of AS 1170.1, the permissible live load reduction equals, 75 − = 8%
27.3
∴ Reducible live load (Q) = 4 x 0.92 x 2.6 = 9.6 kN/m
Design load (W) = 1.25 x 9.6 + 1.5 x 9.6 = 26.4 kN/m
8 2 (
bcf = 2 × min. 10500 , 2600 , 178 + 8 × 120
2 )
= 2098 mm
Web Buckling
Check for web buckling conditions given in Section 6.6:
d1 f yw
For 410UB53.7, ç ÷ = 56.7 < 70
tw 250
L0
Therefore, ≤ 3.0; and
h0
Fc = Fc1 + Fc2
Fc1 = 0.85f c' bcf (D c − hr )
= 0.85 × 25 × 2098 × (120 − 55) = 2898 kN
Fc2 = 0.85 f c' bcf λhr
= 0.85 × 25 × 2098 × 0.0 × 55 = 0 kN
Therefore, Fc = 2898 kN
Since nH = 9,
fds = φk n f vs
æ ö
= 0.85 × ç 118
. − ç 0.18 ÷ ÷ × 89 = 84.7 kN
è 9
Therefore, nHf ds = 9 × 84.7 = 762 kN
From Eq. A7,
ne
Fs = Afi yi
i =1
= 2 × 178 × 10.9 × 320 + 2 × (89 − 10.9) × 7.6 × 320 = 1622 kN
From Eq. A8,
FcH = min.( Fc , nHf ds , Fs )
= min.( 2898, 762, 1622 ) = 762 kN
From Eqs A10 and A9,
Fcc = min.(Fc , Fs )
= min.(2898,1622) = 1622 kN
β = n H f ds Fcc ≤ 1
= 762 / 1622 = 0.47
Since FcH ≤ Fc ,
dc = FcH (0.85b f ) cf c
'
[Eq. A11]
= 762E 3 (0.85 × 2098 × 25 ) = 17.1 mm
Since top flange is compact,
Ftf = beff t f f yf = 178 × 10.9 × 320 = 621 kN [Eq. A12]
( )
Since Fs − 2Ftf < FcH ≤ Fs , Case 2 in Para. A3.2 is applicable.
From Eq. A20,
dh = 128 mm
From Eq. A21,
M b = 408 kNm
Therefore, the design moment capacity of the composite cross-section at the penetration is:
φM b = 367 kNm
6 + µt
Vt = Vpt ≤ Vpt + 0.29 f c' Avc [Eq. 6.11]
νt + 3
where, Vpt = 0.6f yw s t t w [Eq. 6.16]
= 0.6 × 320 × 89 × 7.6 = 130 kN
L0 425
νt = = = 4.78 [Eq. 6.14]
st 89
2Fr d r + FctHd ctH − FctL d ctL
and µt = [Eq. 6.12]
Vpt s t
FctH = min.(Fc , n H f ds , (Ftf + Ftw + Fr )) [Eq. 6.18]
= min.(2898, 762, (621 + 190 + 0)) = 762 kN
FctH 762 × 10 3
where, d ctH = Dc − = 120 − [Eq. 6.19]
1.7 f c' bcf 1.7 × 25 × 2098
= 111.5 mm
FctL 677.3 × 10 3
d ctL = (1 − λ )hr + = 55 + [Eq. 6.21]
1.7f c' b cf 1.7 × 25 × 2098
= 62.6 mm
0 + 762 × 10 3 × 1115
. − 677.3 × 10 3 × 62.6
Therefore, µt = = 3.68
130 × 89
6 + µt 6 + 3.68
and Vt = Vpt = × 130 = 122 kN
νt + 3 4.78 + 3
Therefore, Vt = 122 kN
Substituting the values of Vb and Vt in Eq. 6.4,
Moment-Shear Interaction
Substituting the calculated values of M * , V * , φM b and φVu in Eq. 6.3,
3 3
314 æ 514
. ö
ç ÷ +ç ÷ = 0.66 ≤ 10
. strength criterion satisfied
367 è 154
0.56 − 0.5
β = 0.79 − ç ÷ × (0.79 − 0.70 ) = 0.76
0.7 − 0.5
0.56 − 0.5
Fcc = 1710 − ç ÷ × (1716 − 1527) = 1653 kN
0.7 − 0.5
0.56 − 0.5
n max = 19 − ç ÷ × (19 − 17 ) = 18
0.7 − 0.5
The number of studs to HME, nH = 9 OK since n H < n max (see Fig. 3.3)
0.56 − 0.5
φM b.0 = 269 − ç ÷ × (269 − 255 ) = 265 kNm
0.7 − 0.5
0.56 − 0.5
φM b.5 = 385 − ç ÷ × (385 − 341) = 372 kNm
0.7 − 0.5
Now, interpolate between the values of φM b.0 and φM b.5 to determine φM b corresponding to
β = 0.46 ,
æ 0.46 − 0.0 ö
φM b = 265 + ç ÷ × (372 − 265) = 363 kNm
è 0.5 − 0.0
. − 15
19 .
Value of φVu.0 from Table C26 = 137 − ç ÷ × (137 − 113) = 118 kN
2.0 − 15
.
. − 15
19 .
Value of φVu.5 from Table C26 = 201 − ç ÷ × (201 − 182) = 185 kN
2.0 − 15
.
. − 15
19 .
Value of φVu.0 from Table C27 = 45 − ç ÷ × (45 − 35) = 37.0 kN
2.0 − 15
.
. − 15
19 .
Value of φVu.5 from Table C27 = 102 − ç ÷ × (102 − 90 ) = 96 kN
2.0 − 15
.
Secondly, interpolate between these values to determine the moment capacities φVu.0 and φVu.5
corresponding to h 0 / D s = 0.56 ,
0.56 − 0.5
φVu.0 = 118 − ç ÷ × (118 − 37) = 94 kN
0.7 − 0.5
æ 0.56 − 0.5 ö
φVu.5 = 185 − ç ÷ × (185 − 96) = 158 kN
è 0.7 − 0.5
Finally, interpolate between the values of φVu.0 and φVu.5 to determine the value of φVu
corresponding to β = 0.46 ,
æ 0.5 − 0.46 ö
φVu = 158 − ç ÷ × (158 − 94) = 153 kN
è 0.5 − 0.0
Moment-Shear Interaction
Substituting the calculated values of M * , V * , φM b and φVu in Eq. 6.3,
3 3
314 æ 514
. ö
ç ÷ +ç ÷ = 0.68 ≤ 10
. strength criterion satisfied
363 è 153
Deflection Calculations
In this example, the additional deflection component calculated corresponds to short-term loading
during the in-service condition. The design load, W , for short-term loading is given as:
W = G sup + ψ s Q = 0.78 + 0.7 × 9.6 = 7.5 kN/m
The design action effects at the web penetration resulting from the in-service loading are:
Similarly, the second moment of area of the top T-section can be calculated as,
I t = 30.90 × 10 6 mm
4
The modular ratio used in these calculations was based on the short-term properties of the concrete
in accordance with AS 2327.1.
θL
( ( ))
ç M se I 0 L0 − 2L0 3b + 2L 0 − M d I t L0 3b + 2L 0 ÷
= ç
* 2 *
( )
6EI 0 I t L ÷
ê (
− 3.1E 6 × 510E 6 × 425 2 − 2 × 425(3 × 6987 + 2 × 425 )
ú )
ê− 6E 6 × 30.9E 6 × 425 × (3 × 6987 + 2 × 425) ú
=
6 × 2E 5 × 510E 6 × 30.9E 6 × 10500
−6
= 137 × 10 rad
θH = − çç
(M I*
d t + 2M se
*
I 0 L0 ) ÷ −θ
2EI 0 I t ÷ L
= −
(6E 6 × 30.9E 6 + 2 × ( −3.1E 6) × 510E 6) × 425 − 137E − 6
2 × 2E 5 × 510E 6 × 30.9E 6
−6
= 63.7 × 10 rad
Therefore, the additional bending deflections at the HME and at midspan are:
δ b at the HME = 6987 × 63.7 × 10 −6 = 0.4 mm
δ b at midspan = 5250 × 63.7 × 10 −6 = 0.3 mm
. × 14.6 × 10 3 × 425
12
= = 0.1 mm
80 × 10 3 × (89 × 7.6 )
2L0 δ 's
From Eq. 6.62, θ L' =
3 bL
2 × 425 × 0.14
= = 541 × 10 −9 rad
3 × 6987 × 10500
δ'
From Eq. 6.63, θ H' = ç s ÷ − θ L'
ç b÷
0.14 −9
= ç ÷ − 541 × 10 = 19.5 × 10 −6 rad
6987
Thus, the additional shear deflections at the HME and at mid-span are:
δ v at the HME = 6987 × 19.5 × 10 −6 = 0.1 mm
δ v at midspan = 5250 × 19.5 × 10 −6 = 0.1 mm
9. REFERENCES
1. Standards Australia, Steel Structures, AS 4100-1990.
2. Standards Australia, Composite Structures, Part 1: Simply-Supported Beams, AS 2327.1-1996.
3. OneSteel Market Mills, Design of Simply Supported Composite Beams for Strength (To Australian
nd
Standard AS 2327.1-1996), Composite Structures Design Manual DB1.1, 2 Ed., February, 2001.
4. American Society of Civil Engineers, Task Committee on Design Criteria for Composite
Structures in Steel and Concrete, Proposed Specification for Structural Steel Beams with Web
Openings, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 118(12), 1992, pp. 3315-3349.
5. Chick, C.G., Dayawansa, P.H. and Patrick, M., Design of Composite Beams with Large Steel
th
Web Penetrations, 15 Aust. Conf. on the Mech. of Struct. and Mat., Melb., Australia, 1997,
pp. 159-164.
6. Chick, C.G., Dayawansa, P.H. and Patrick, M., Strength Design of Simply-Supported Composite
Beams with Large Steel Web Penetrations, Aust. Struct. Engg. Conf., Auck., New Zealand, 1998,
pp. 159-166.
7. Tse, D. and Dayawansa, P.H., Elastic Deflection of Steel and Composite Beams with Web
Penetrations, The Structural Engineer, J. of the Inst. of Struct. Eng., 70(21), 1992, pp. 372-376.
8. Redwood, R.G. and Cho, S.H., Design of Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings,
J. Construct. Steel Research, 25, 1993, pp. 23-41.
9. Lawson. R.M., Design for Openings in the Webs of Composite Beams, CIRIA Special Publication
51, CIRIA/SCI, London, 1987.
10. Oehlers, D.J. and Bradford, M.A., Composite Steel and Concrete Structural Members:
Fundamental Behaviour, Pergamon, 1995.
11. Chick, C.G., Dayawansa, P.H. and Goh, C.C., Reliability Analysis to Determine φ-factor for
Strength Design of Web Penetrations, BHP Melbourne Research Laboratories Report.
TM
12. OneSteel Reinforcing, DECKMESH , September, 2000.
13. Patrick, M., The Application of Structural Steel Decking in Commercial and Residential Buildings,
Malaysian Structural Steel Association Convention, (Paper 6), December, 1998.
14. Watson, K.B., Dallas, S., van der Kreek, N. and Main, T., Costing of Steelwork from Feasibility
through to Completion, Steel Construction Journal, AISC, 30(2), 1996.
15. Patrick, M., Tse, D. and Wilkie, R., Combined Shear-Tension Testing of the Hilti HVB Shear
Connector, Structural Steel PSSC ’95 4th Pacific Structural Steel Conference, Vol. 3, Steel-
Concrete Composite Structures, Pergamon, 1995, pp. 203-210.
16. Patrick, M., Dayawansa, P.H. and Watson, K.B., A New Reinforcing Component for Preventing
Longitudinal Shear Failure of Composite Edge Beams, Structural Steel PSSC ’95 4th Pacific
Structural Steel Conference, Vol. 3, Steel-Concrete Composite Structures, Pergamon, 1995,
pp. 101-108.
17. Patrick, M., Dayawansa, P.H., Eadie, I., Watson, K.B. and van der Kreek, N., Australian
Composite Structures Standard AS 2327, Part 1: Simply-Supported Beams, Steel Construction
Journal, AISC, 29(4), December, 1995, pp. 2-40.
18. Redwood, R.G. and Shrivastava, S.C., Design Recommendations for Steel Beams with Web
Holes, Can. J. Civ. Engg., 7(4), 1980, pp. 642-650.
19. OneSteel Market Mills, Design of the Shear Connection of Simply Supported Composite Beams
st
(To Australian Standard AS 2327.1-1996), Composite Structures Design Manual DB1.2, 1 Ed.,
February, 2001.
APPENDIX A
NOMINAL MOMENT CAPACITY - COMPOSITE BEAM
A1 General
The equations required to determine the nominal moment capacity, M b , of a composite beam cross-
section with a web penetration are presented in this appendix. It is assumed that at the penetration
the steel beam is a doubly-symmetric I-section. The equations are derived using the cross-section at
the HME of the penetration and are based on rectangular stress block theory.
Fc = Fc1 + Fc 2 (A1)
where, Fc1 = 0.85f c' bcf ( D c − hr ) (A2)
Fc2 = 0.85 f c' bcf λhr (A3)
Fc1 and Fc2 are the design compressive capacities of the concrete flange above and within the depth
of the steel sheeting ribs, respectively. Parameter λ in Eq. A3 is dependent on the orientation of the
sheeting ribs with respect to the longitudinal axis of the steel beam, expressed as a function of the
acute angle θ between the sheeting ribs and the longitudinal axis of the steel beam.
λ = 10
. for 0 < θ ≤ 15 (A4)
λ = 0.0 for θ > 15 (A5)
Design Shear Capacity of Shear Connectors
The design shear capacity, fds , of a shear connector acting in a group of n connectors is given as:
fds = φk n f vs (A6)
where, φ is the capacity factor for shear connectors, taken as 0.85 (see Table 3.1 of AS 2327), and
the load sharing factor, kn , is given by Eq. 8.3.4.(2) of AS 2327.1 as:
kn . − 0.18 / n
= 118
The values of f vs are given in Section 8 of AS 2327.1.
β = min.( n H f ds / F cc , 1) (A9)
where, F cc = min.( Fc , Fs ) (A10)
dc = (
FcH 0.85bcf f c' ) (A11)
Depending on the magnitude of the compressive force FcH in the concrete flange, the nominal
moment capacity of the composite beam cross-section with a penetration, M b , can be determined
using the formula below.
The following force terms will be used:
Ftf = Atf.eff f yf (A12)
Ftw = Atw f yw (A13)
Fr = Ar f yr (A14)
Fbw = Abw f yw (A15)
Fbf = Af f yf (A16)
where, Atf.eff = beff t f (A17)
and b eff is the effective width of the top flange of the steel beam, noting that b eff equals b f when
the top flange is compact.
Case 1:
If FcH ≤ (Fc1 + Fc2 ) and FcH ≥ Fs , the plastic neutral axis of the composite cross-section is located in
the cover slab of the concrete flange. The depth of compressive zone, d h , and the nominal moment
capacity of the composite cross-section, M b , are given by:
Mb = FcH (d h 2) + Ftf (D c + t f / 2 − d h )
( )
+ Ftw D c − d h + (s t + t f ) 2 + Fr (2D c − 2d h + s t − s b )
+ Fbw (D c − d h + D s − (s b + t f ) 2)
(
+ Fbf D c − d h + D s − t f / 2 ) (A19)
Case 2:
( )
If Fs − 2Ftf < FcH ≤ Fs , the plastic neutral axis of the composite cross-section is located within the
top flange of the steel beam. The depth of compressive zone, d h , and the nominal moment capacity
of the composite cross-section, M b , are given by:
Mb = ( )
FcH d h − d c 2 + beff f yf d h − D c ( )2 / 2
(
+ b eff f yf D c + t f − d h ) 2 / 2 + Ftw (Dc − d h + (s t + t f ) 2)
+ Fr (2Dc − 2d h + s t − s b + D s )
(
+ Fbw D c − d h + D s − (s b + t f ) 2 )
+ Fbf (D c − d h + D s − t f 2) (A21)
Case 3:
If (F s ) ( )
− 2(Ftf + Ftw ) < FcH ≤ Fs − 2Ftf , the plastic neutral axis of the composite cross-section is
located within the top web of the steel beam. The depth of compressive zone, d h , and the nominal
moment capacity of the composite cross-section, M b , are given by:
Case 4:
( ) ( )
If Fs − 2(Ftf + Ftw + Ftr ) < FcH ≤ Fs − 2( Ftf + Ftw ) , the plastic neutral axis of the composite cross-
section is located within the top stiffener of the steel beam. The depth of compressive zone, d h , and
the nominal moment capacity of the composite cross-section, M b , are given by:
( )
f yr br 2D c + 2s t − t r + Fr + Fbw + Fbf − FcH − Ftw − Ftf
dh =
2f yr br
….(A24)
Mb = FcH (d h − d c 2) + Ftf (d h − D c − t f / 2)
(
+ Ftw d h − D c − (s t + t f ) 2 )
[
+ br f yr 2 (d h − D c − s t + t r ) + ( D c + s t − d h )
2 2
]
+Fr (Dc + Ds − dh − sb + t f 2)
(
+ Fbw D c − d h + D s − (s b + t f ) 2 )
+ Fbf ( Dc + Ds − dh − t f / 2) (A25)
Case 5:
( (
If Fs − 2 Ftf + Ftw + Ftr + Fbr )) < FcH ≤ (Fs − 2(Ftf + Ftw + Ftr )) , the plastic neutral axis of the composite
cross-section is located within the bottom stiffener of the steel beam. The depth of compressive
zone, d h , and the nominal moment capacity of the composite cross-section, M b , are given by:
dh =
[ ]
f yr br 2(D c + D s − s b ) + t r + Fbw + Fbf − FcH − Ftw − Fr − Ftf
2f yr br
….(A26)
Mb = FcH (d h − d c 2) + Ftf (d h − D c − t f / 2)
( )
+ Ftw dh − Dc − (st + t f ) 2 + Fr (dh − Dc − st + tr 2)
[
+ br fyr (dh − Dc − Ds + sb ) + ( Dc + Ds − sb + tr − dh )
2 2
]/2
(
+ Fbw D c − d h + D s − (s b + t f ) 2 )
+ Fbf ( Dc + Ds − dh − t f / 2) (A27)
Case 6:
( (
If Fs − 2 Ftf + Ftw + Ftr + Fbr + Fbw )) < FcH ≤ (Fs − 2(Ftf − Ftw − Ftr − Fbr )) , the plastic neutral axis of the
composite cross-section is located within the bottom web of the steel beam. The depth of
compressive zone, d h , and the nominal moment capacity of the composite cross-section, M b , are
given by:
f yw t w (2D c + 2D S − s b − t f ) + Fbf − 2Fr − Ftw − Ftf − FcH
dh =
2f yw t w
….(A28)
Mb = FcH (d h − d c 2) + Ftf (d h − D c − t f / 2)
( )
+Ftw dh − Dc − ( st + t f ) 2 + Fr ( 2dh − 2Dc − Ds − st + sb )
[
+ t w fyw (dh − Dc − Ds + sb ) + ( Dc + Ds − t f − dh )
2 2
]/2
+ Fbf ( Dc + Ds − dh − t f / 2) (A29)
APPENDIX B
NOMINAL MOMENT CAPACITY - BARE STEEL BEAM
B1 General
The simplified equations required to determine the nominal moment capacity of a bare steel beam
with a web penetration are presented in this appendix. The equations are derived based on the
following assumptions:
(a) the steel beam is a doubly-symmetrical I-section;
(b) the penetration may be either reinforced or unreinforced;
(c) the reinforcement above and below the penetration have the same dimensions; and
(d) the penetration reinforcement is located as close as practicable to the penetration edges.
In all cases, the nominal moment capacity of the bare steel section with web a penetration, M b , shall
not exceed that of the bare steel section without the penetration, M s .
Mb = ( ) ( ) 2 + (s t − d h ) 2 ú 2
Ftf d h − t f / 2 + t w f yw ê d h − t f
+ Fr (D s + s t − s b − 2d h ) + Fbw (D s − d h − (s b + t f ) 2)
+ Fbf (D s − d h − t f / 2) (B2)
Case 2:
If Ftw > Fbw and Ftw < 2Fr + Fbw , the plastic neutral axis of the steel section is located within the top
reinforcement of the steel beam. The depth of compressive zone, d h , and the nominal moment
capacity of the steel section, M b , are given by:
Mb = (
Ftf (d h − t f / 2) + Ftw d h − (s t + t f ) 2 )
+ br f yr ê(d h − s t + t r ) + (s t − d h ) ú / 2
2 2
+ Fr (D s − d h − s b + t r 2) + Fbw (D s − d h − (s b + t f ) 2)
+ Fbf (D s − d h − t f / 2) (B4)
Case 3:
If Ftw < Fbw and Ftw + 2Fr > Fbw , the plastic neutral axis of the steel section, d h , is located within the
bottom reinforcement of the steel beam. The depth of compressive zone, d h , and the nominal
moment capacity of the steel section, M b , are given by:
Mb = (
Ftf (d h − t f / 2) + Ftw d h − (s t + t f ) 2 )
+ Fr (d h − s t + t r 2)
( ) 2 + (D s − s b + t r − d h ) 2 ú / 2
+ br f yr ê d h − D s + s b
Case 4:
If Ftw + 2Fr < Fbw , the plastic neutral axis of the steel section is located within the bottom web of the
steel beam. The depth of compressive zone, d h , and the nominal moment capacity of the steel
section, M b , are given by:
Mb = (
Ftf (d h − t f / 2) + Ftw d h − (s t + t f ) 2 )
+ Fr (2d h − D s − s t + s b )
(
+ t w f yw ê d h − D s + s b ) 2 + (D s − t f − d h ) 2 ú / 2
(
+ Fbf D s − d h − t f / 2 ) (B8)
APPENDIX C
DESIGN CAPACITY TABLES
C1 General
The design capacity tables given in this appendix can be used to calculate φM b and φVu at a
penetration for a range of bare steel and composite beams with unreinforced web penetrations,
placed concentric to the centroid of the steel beam cross-section. The values of φM b and φVu can
then be used in the moment-shear interaction equation (Eq. 6.3) to check that the strength design
criterion is satisfied.
The design shear capacities in the tables have been calculated assuming that the number of shear
connectors over the web penetration is equal to one. The parametric range covered in the tables is
given in Table 7.1.
C2 Tables
Parameters in Tables
The parameters given in the design capacity tables are described below.
Column Parameter Description
No.
2 β max The maximum degree of shear connection that can be achieved at a
cross-section with the web penetration, calculated with respect to the
cross-section without the web penetration, i.e. β max = Fcc / Fcc . If the
value of β at the proposed location of the penetration is greater than
β max , then the force in the concrete flange will be affected (see Fig. 3.3).
3 Fcc The force corresponding to β max , i.e. Fcc = β max Fcc . This is the
maximum force that can be developed in the concrete flange at a cross-
section with the web penetration.
4 n max The number of 19 mm studs required to develop Fcc .
5-7 Design The values of φM b.0 , φM b.5 and φM bc given are the design moment
Moment
capacities of the composite beam cross-section at the web penetration,
Capacities
calculated ignoring the effect of shear force, corresponding to β = 0.0,
0.5 and 1.0, respectively. The design moment capacity of a bare steel
beam with the web penetration can be read directly from Column 5.
8 - 10 Design The values of φVu.0 , φVu.5 and φVuc given are the design shear
Shear
capacities of a composite beam cross-section at the circular penetration,
Capacities
for Circular calculated ignoring the effects of primary bending, corresponding to β =
Penetrations 0.0, 0.5 and 1.0, respectively. These values have been calculated
assuming an equivalent rectangular penetration with L0 = 0.45D and
h 0 = 0.9 D . The design shear capacity of a bare steel beam with the web
penetration can be read directly from Column 8.
11 - 19 Design The values of φVu.0 , φVu.5 and φVuc given are the design shear
Shear
capacities of a composite beam cross-section at the rectangular
Capacities
penetration, calculated ignoring the effects of primary bending,
for
Rectangular corresponding to β = 0.0, 0.5 and 1.0, respectively. Three sets of values
Penetrations are given for L0 / h 0 equal to 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. The design shear capacity
of a bare steel beam with the web penetration can be read directly from
Columns 11, 14 and 17, as appropriate.
(c) Number of shear connectors, n H , from the end of the beam to HME, and the force n H f ds .
The value of fds corresponding to n H can be calculated in accordance with Cl. 8.3.4 of
AS 2327.1.
(d) Shape of penetration: circular or rectangular.
(e) Size of the penetration: the ratios ( h 0 / D s ) and ( L0 / h 0 ) for rectangular penetrations or
( D / D s ) for circular penetrations.
Rectangular Penetrations
The calculation steps for a composite beam with a rectangular penetration are as follows:
(a) Select the appropriate design table based on bcf , f c' , λ and h 0 / D s or D / D s .
(c) If β max = 10
. , it indicates that Fcc = Fcc and therefore the force in the concrete flange is not
affected by the web penetration.
(d) Read Fcc from the table.
(e) If n H f ds > Fcc , then the force n H f ds is limited to Fcc (see Fig. 3.3(b)). The condition
nHf ds ≤ Fcc can also be satisfied by ensuring nH used in the calculations does not exceed
the value of nmax given in Column 4.
(h) Select the columns of shear capacity data corresponding to the value of ( L0 / h 0 ) for the
penetration. Interpolate between the columns for intermediate values of ( L0 / h 0 ).
(i) Calculate φVu corresponding to β by linear interpolation using φVu.0 , φVu.5 and φVuc , as
appropriate, which correspond to β = 0.0, 0.5 and 1.0, respectively.
(j) Use the moment-shear interaction equation given in Eq. 6.3 and check whether or not the
strength criterion is satisfied. Reference should be made to Fig. 5.1 to consider the options
available in the event that the design is unsatisfactory.
For bare steel beams, the value of β is taken as zero and the design moment and shear capacities
are directly read from the φM b.0 column, and the φVu.0 column corresponding to the values of
( L0 / h 0 ) for the penetration.
Circular Penetrations
For circular penetrations, the same procedure described above is used except that the shear
capacity is calculated using the values of φVu.0 , φVu.5 and φVuc given in Columns 8-10 in the tables.
bcf f c' h0 or D
Table No. λ
(mm) Ds Ds
(MPa)
C1 1200 25 0.0 0.3
C2 1200 25 0.0 0.5
C3 1200 25 0.0 0.7
C4 1200 25 1.0 0.3
C5 1200 25 1.0 0.5
C6 1200 25 1.0 0.7
C7 1200 32 0.0 0.3
C8 1200 32 0.0 0.5
C9 1200 32 0.0 0.7
C10 1200 32 1.0 0.3
C11 1200 32 1.0 0.5
C12 1200 32 1.0 0.7
C13 1600 25 0.0 0.3
C14 1600 25 0.0 0.5
C15 1600 25 0.0 0.7
C16 1600 25 1.0 0.3
C17 1600 25 1.0 0.5
C18 1600 25 1.0 0.7
C19 1600 32 0.0 0.3
C20 1600 32 0.0 0.5
C21 1600 32 0.0 0.7
C22 1600 32 1.0 0.3
C23 1600 32 1.0 0.5
C24 1600 32 1.0 0.7
C25 2100 25 0.0 0.3
C26 2100 25 0.0 0.5
C27 2100 25 0.0 0.7
C28 2100 25 1.0 0.3
C29 2100 25 1.0 0.5
C30 2100 25 1.0 0.7
C31 2100 32 0.0 0.3
C32 2100 32 0.0 0.5
C33 2100 32 0.0 0.7
C34 2100 32 1.0 0.3
C35 2100 32 1.0 0.5
C36 2100 32 1.0 0.7
TABLE C1: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C2: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C3: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C4: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C5: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C6: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C7: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C8: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C9: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C10: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C11: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C12: bcf = 1200 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C13: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C14: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C15: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C16: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C17: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C18: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C19: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C20: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C21: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C22: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C23: bcf = 1600 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C24: b c f
= 1600 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C25: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C26: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C27: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C28: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C29: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C30: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 25 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C31: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C32: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C33: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 0.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs perpendicular to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C34: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.3,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C35: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.5,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
TABLE C36: bcf = 2100 mm, fc' = 32 MPa, λ = 1.0 ( i.e. sheeting ribs parallel to beam), h0 Ds or D D s = 0.7,
®
Dc = 120 mm, hr = 55 mm, Steel Grade = 300PLUS
Appendix D
NOTATION
The notation used in the booklet is the same as that used in AS 2327.1 where possible.
Abw = cross-sectional area of steel web of the bottom T-section
Af = cross-sectional area of steel flange
Ar = cross-sectional area of steel plate reinforcement along top or bottom edge of penetration
Atf.eff = cross-sectional area of steel top flange, based on beff or bf as appropriate
Atw = cross-sectional area of steel web of the top T-section
Avc = effective area of concrete slab for shear = 3D c (D c − (1 − λ )h r )
a = distance from LME to support, away from web penetration (see Fig. 5.2(a))
b = distance from HME to support, away from web penetration (see Fig. 5.2(a))
bcf = effective width of concrete slab compression flange, calculated in accordance with
AS 2327.1
beff = effective width of steel beam top flange
bf = width of steel beam top flange
br = width of penetration reinforcement
D = diameter of circular penetration
Dc = overall depth of concrete slab
Ds = overall depth of steel beam
d1 = clear depth between steel beam flanges ignoring fillets or welds
dc = depth of the rectangular stress block in concrete slab
d ctH = distance from top of steel flange to line of action of FctH
d ctL = distance from top of steel flange to line of action of FctL
dh = depth of compression zone in the cross-section measured from the top of the cross-section
dr = distance from outside edge of steel flange to centroid of steel plate reinforcement
E = Young’s modulus of steel
e = the vertical eccentricity of the web penetration with respect to the mid-height of the steel
cross-section (+ve when toward the concrete compression flange, see Fig. 6.1).
Fbf = capacity of steel beam bottom flange
Fbw = capacity of steel web of bottom T-section
Fc = compressive capacity of concrete flange (= Fc1 + Fc2 )
Fcc = compressive force in concrete flange corresponding to complete shear connection for the
cross-section without web penetration at strength limit state
Fc1 = compressive capacity of concrete cover slab within slab effective width
Fc2 = compressive capacity of concrete between steel sheeting ribs within slab effective width
Fcc = compressive force in concrete flange corresponding to complete shear connection for the
cross-section with web penetration at the strength limit state
FcH = force in concrete flange at HME
FctH = calculated value of compressive force in concrete slab at the HME of the penetration at
strength limit state, considering the area of top steel T-section only (see Eq. 6.18)
FctL = calculated value of compressive force in concrete slab at low moment end of the
penetration corresponding to FctH (see Eq. 6.20)
Fr = capacity of steel plate reinforcement along one edge of penetration = fyr A r ≤ (f yw t w L ) / 2 3
Ftf = axial capacity of top steel flange (= beff t f f yf )
Ftw = axial capacity of top steel web
st = effective depth of top steel T-section, accounting for the movement in plastic neutral axis
when the penetration is reinforced (see Eq. 6.15)
tf = thickness of steel flange
tr = thickness of steel plate reinforcement
tw = thickness of steel web
*
V = design vertical shear force at mid-length of web penetration
Vu = nominal shear capacity of the beam cross-section at the strength limit state
Vt* = design vertical shear force carried by the top T-section
Vpb = nominal shear capacity of steel web of the bottom T-section ignoring the effects of bending
Vpt = nominal shear capacity of steel web of top T-section ignoring the effects of bending
Vb = nominal shear capacity of bottom T-section including the effects of secondary moments
Vc = contribution of concrete flange to shear capacity
Vt = nominal shear capacity of top T-section including the effects of secondary moments
Vu = nominal vertical shear capacity of a beam cross-section without a penetration
Vu = nominal shear capacity of a beam cross-section with a penetration
Vu.0 , Vu.5 and Vuc = nominal shear capacity of composite beam cross-section at the penetration,
calculated ignoring the effects of primary bending moments, corresponding to β = 0.0, 0.5
and 1.0, respectively
W = design load
x = distance to a beam cross-section from support
β max = maximum degree of shear connection that can be achieved at cross-sections within the
Fcc
length of a penetration, i.e. =
Fcc
β = degree of shear connection calculated using Fcc , e.g. β = FcH / Fcc at HME
δb = additional deflection in the beam due to bending deformation at the web penetration
δ b ( x ) = value of δ b at a point on the beam distance x from support
δg = deflection of the beam calculated ignoring the effects of the penetration
δ g ( x ) = value of δ g at a point on the beam distance x from support
δ 's = additional shear deflection ignoring geometric continuity (see Eq. 6.64)
δt = total deflection (see Eq. 6.51)
δ t ( x ) = total deflection at a point on the beam distance x from support (see Eq. 6.51)
δv = additional shear deflection due to a web penetration
δ v (x ) = value of δ v at a point on the beam distance x from support
φ = capacity factor relevant to a strength limit state
λ = factor accounting for angle between sheeting ribs and steel beam - see Fig. 5.2.2.2(b)
µb , µ t = dimensionless ratio relating secondary bending moment contributions of concrete and
web penetration reinforcement to the product of the plastic shear capacity and depth of the
steel T-section (see Eqs 6.6 and 6.12, respectively)
θ = acute angle between the steel ribs of a composite slab and longitudinal axis of steel beam
θ H , θ L = rotations due to bending deformation at the HME and LME of penetration, respectively
θ H' , θ L' = rotations due to shear deformation at the HME and LME of penetration, respectively