Professional Documents
Culture Documents
continuous development both for myself and the education community. Though without the
depth of experience as other educators, throughout this course, the idea pertained would be to
become part of this community of practice immediately. For this matter, self evaluation of my
own professional development is required, as Short, Hennessy & Campbell (1996) pertain
retrospect to this, I find that throughout my coursework and employment I have had the
responsibility to lead and guide students to learning goals and outcomes, but have not had the
forth a role to become a leader, one that I have shown in different lines of work leading up to
rather than a blocker. Being open minded to change, encouraging change will become the
tool creation is an element that a community of practice can develop on the flow to
communicate immediate issues faced. This element will be important as at times, other
members of staff can ask for advice and answers for issues they will be having, or for
creating balance and communication in a dynamic workplace. Chamizo (2011) uses heuristic
tools in an education context to surmise that at times, rather than utilise the same conclusions
and methods, there will be times as a community of practice to assist in reasoning and
at times one needs to stand up, collaborate and dictate what needs to be changed or aligned
with. This has been more prevalent within the Assessment 2 Presentation. At times, through
the undertaking of the video presentation, we found ourselves with a large mix of ideas, plans
Excerpt Contemporary Teacher Leadership Assessment 2: Reflection
and objectives which at times wasn’t working due to the lack of in person transparent
communication. Rooney (2013) advocates the engagement of employee cultural assets and
what they bring to the workplace. The engagement sought within this presentation informally
assessed our way of personal agency, roles and personal attributes to finalise and ultimately
present the task. This comes from a belief of enabling change as a teacher from below rather
than above. Underpinning this engagement is the sense attributed by Lytle (2012) to pursue a
positive working and learning environment with the end goal of creating formal and informal
development opportunities for staff. This shifts back to the assessment and my own
professional identity as we have had to step up, assist and collaborate with each other in ways
that have caused discourse and changes to the task. The strength we upheld throughout this
presentation and unit of work has been down to the openness and transparency of our
thoughts on our submission of works to the group. This inherent feedback to our group
members wasn’t a critique of work, but the allowance for our group as an individual to grow
in a welcoming environment.