This document discusses three logical fallacies: 1) A hasty generalization that assumes a person who failed one subject failed all subjects. 2) A false cause fallacy that claims not voting for a certain party means insincerity to one's country. 3) Circular reasoning that repeats the same premise by stating "no men are allowed" after establishing the premise is "restricted for women".
This document discusses three logical fallacies: 1) A hasty generalization that assumes a person who failed one subject failed all subjects. 2) A false cause fallacy that claims not voting for a certain party means insincerity to one's country. 3) Circular reasoning that repeats the same premise by stating "no men are allowed" after establishing the premise is "restricted for women".
This document discusses three logical fallacies: 1) A hasty generalization that assumes a person who failed one subject failed all subjects. 2) A false cause fallacy that claims not voting for a certain party means insincerity to one's country. 3) Circular reasoning that repeats the same premise by stating "no men are allowed" after establishing the premise is "restricted for women".
1) I heard that he was unsuccessful to clear his Math’s examination; therefore, I
believe that he must be unsuccessful in all his subjects. Answer: This fallacy falls into the “fallacy of presumption” hasty generalization because it is generalized that he would be failed in every subject because he failed in his math’s exam. 2) If you do not vote my party, you are insincere to this country. This fallacy falls into the “Fallacy of defective induction” False cause because this is not the valid cause to say someone that he is insincere to his country. 3) This premise is restricted for women, no men are allowed here This fallacy falls into the “fallacy of presumption” circular reasoning because same thing has been said again in second phrase.