Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review
highlights
articleinfo
abstract
Article history:
Received 26 November 2017 Around the world flexible pavement is the most favored pavement structure to build road and
Received in revised form 6 April 2018 highways. A massive amount of non-renewable materials and industrial products like aggregates,
Accepted 9 April 2018 bitumen, cement, lime, and other additives are consumed during construction and maintenance of this
pavement system. Extraction and production of these virgin materials is an unsustainable practice.
Wastage of materials, environmental deterioration, depletion of resources, and the spike in material cost
Keywords: led researchers to search for alternative materials that can be used in flexible pavement. This paper
Sustainable development provides an overview of such recycled materials that have been successfully used in different layers of
Construction, and demolition flexible pavements. Studies have established that the use of secondary material not only provide an
Recycled asphalt concrete efficient waste disposal technique but also reduce demand for conventional material and reduce overall
Quarry waste construction cost. Through this paper, an attempt has also been made to identify the reason because of
Flexible pavement which, despite having essential studies, their field implementation has been limited and suggest
possible remedies by which use of recycled material in the flexible pavement can be promoted.
© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Contents
1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 240
2. Criteria required for waste to be used in flexible pavement....................................................................................................................................................240
3. Flexible pavement layer and possible use of waste....................................................................................................................................................................241
3.1. In Subgrade, Sub-base and base (non-bituminous) layer..............................................................................................................................................241
3.2. In base and surface course (Bituminous)..........................................................................................................................................................................247
3.3. Binder 250
4. Practical Challenges in implementing waste material...............................................................................................................................................................251
5. Conclusion.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 251
Conflict of interest.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 252
References.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 252
⇑ Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: 2015rce9037@mnit.ac.in (P.K. Gautam), pkalla.ce@mnit.ac.in (P. Kalla), 2015pct5148@mnit.ac.in (R. Agrawal), 2015rce9518@mnit.ac.in (H. Singh).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.067
0950-0618/© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
24 P.K. Gautam et al. / Construction and Building Materials 180 (2018) 239–253
1. Introduction
2. Criteria required for waste to be used in flexible pavement
Sustainability is defined as meeting the needs of present age
Every country has standards and specifications for a material to
without compromising the well-being of future generation [1].
be used in pavement construction. Any recycled material to be
Sustainable development takes into consideration simultaneous
used for construction purpose should be subjected to property test
economic, environmental and social growth [2]. This practice
similar to that of conventional material. The product obtained
has become very important in today’s reference as rapid growth
using the waste material (used either as partial or full replacement
has sidelined conservation and protection of the natural
of virgin material) should also comply with the minimum strength,
resources. Road and Highways sector is a significant part of con-
stability, durability and other necessary specifications.
struction industry where the exhaustive use of the natural
The basic material requirement is that it must be free from any
resource has emerged as a severe threat to the environment [3].
contaminating element, organic impurities, and hazardous compo-
The reason for this is that the material procurement for construc-
nent. Tables 1–3 summarize the necessary parameters upon which
tion, their extraction, and laying, generates a lot of pollution and
materials to be used in the flexible pavement are evaluated for
waste.
their suitability.
About 95% of world’s roads are made of flexible pavements
Around the globe, recycling of waste as pavement material has
[4]. It is composed of four layers namely subgrade, subbase, base
been in practice with varying degree of success. Few countries have
and surface course [5] as shown in Fig. 1. Sub-grade is natural
formulated rules, regulation, suggestion, and restrictions which
soil over which other layers are laid. Many times it’s found that
permit the respective transportation departments to utilize the
existing subgrade is weak, or is of expansive nature, i.e., little
locally available waste, while many are still in drafting phase to
change in moisture condition leads to substantial volume change
allow recycling of waste material in pavement construction.
within a short period [6]. In such cases, subgrade is modified
In the USA, an average range of 15–20% of Recycled Asphalt
using certain additives. This modified sub-grade is called sub-
Pavement (RAP) is allowed in wearing course. The Virginia center
base. Above sub-base lies base course which is a load-bearing
for transportation allows 30% RAP in blend phase as road base
layer composed majorly of high-quality aggregates of different
and sub-base material. Use of blended material is permitted if it
sizes. Above it lies surface course, which is a mixture of aggre-
satisfies the grading and particle size distribution of the mix
gates, fines, filler, and binder. This layer is directly in contact
design. The blending can be from multiple sources but once the
with traffic load, hence using a superior quality material is an
batch is tested, verified and deemed suitable to use as pavement
absolute necessity.
material, the addition of material to the stockpile is restricted.
A significant part of flexible pavement is composed of aggre-
State of Nebraska permits using up to 50% RAP as pavement con-
gates which are procured from selected quarry sites. Their extrac-
struction material, which makes it one the highest RAP using coun-
tion process includes blasting, drilling, excavating and crushing.
try in the world. The reason for this permissible specification is the
These methods are highly unsustainable as a massive quantity of
provision that the contractor has to take the full ownership of the
waste produced during the process is either filled back at quarry
quality of material supplied. Florida Department of transportation
site or disposed of abruptly, affecting ecological cycle in many haz-
permit use of RAP, recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) and
ardous ways [7]. Similarly, bitumen, which is used as binding agent
construc- tion and demolition waste (C&D) from existing concrete
in the surface course, also has an unfavorable impact on environ-
ment and health. It’s mixed with aggregates at a temperature of pavement to be used as subgrade and base material in highway
construction. States’s permissive specification allow the contractor
165–200 °C, releasing vapors and fumes into the atmosphere.
to use a pro- portion of recycled material based on his or her
These fumes contain greenhouse gas and aerosol components,
judgment [9]. Sim- ilarly, Texas Department of transportation
which during occupational exposure cause irritation and carcino-
permit 20% percentage use of RAP and RCA in subgrade and base
genicity of skin and respiratory tract [8].
construction. This state department recommends that for a project,
Despite all these impacts, construction of highways can’t be
the material must be from the same stockpile, and along with
restricted as they play a significant role in the development of a
gradation, the stock must not have maximum percentage loss from
nation. Therefore, it’s vital to search for resources which may pro-
decantation higher than 5% and should also comply with state’s
vide a sustainable aspect by reducing consumption of natural
non-hazardous recyclable material guidelines. The Department
resources, easing landfill pressure while maintaining structural
also permits the use of com- post produced via aerobic
integrity. Use of locally generated waste materials is a significant
decomposition as backfill ingredient. Only that compost is allowed
step forward in this direction. This review paper compiles the var-
for construction which is derived from agriculture residue, forest
ious wastes that are commonly produced around the world and
residue, bark, and paper. The waste must also satisfy particle size
their possible use in the flexible pavement.
distribution where 95% of content is passing through 16 mm (5/8
in.) sieve, and at least 70% material is
SURFACE COURSE
PAVEMENT (BOUND LAYER)
BASE COURSE PAVEMENT SYSTEM
SUB-BASE
UNBOUND LAYERS
SUBGRADE
Ductility (in cm at 25 °C) Adhesive and Ductility ASTM D113 3. Flexible pavement layer and possible use of waste
Penetration, (0.1 mm, 100 g, 5 s) Hardness and ASTM D5
Consistency 3.1. In Subgrade, Sub-base and base (non-bituminous) layer
Softening Point (°C) Elevated temperature ASTM D36
Flash Point (°C) Temperature study ASTM
D92 Viscosity (at 135 °C and/or 165 °C) Flow and performance ASTM Strength and performance of flexible pavement are dependent
D92 Specific Gravity (g/cm at 25 °C)
3
Density of bitumen ASTM D70 not only on good mix design but also on the load-bearing capacity
of the subgrade. A quality subgrade reduces pavement’s thickness
and contributes toward an economical construction. Convention-
ally, lime and cement are used as additives to improve soil proper-
passing 9.5 mm (3/8 in.) sieve. Use of compost having the wood ties. Their addition leads to the formation of gelatinous and
chip containing visible refuse, material treated with chemical amorphous material which helps in interparticle bonding. The
preservatives or other harmful contaminating material is strictly reaction taking place by addition of these compounds are shown
prohibited [10]. below:
Similarly, The state transportation department of Korea restricts With lime:
the use of toxic elements present in recycled construction prod-
ucts. The regulations prohibit the use of materials containing lead CaO þ H2 O ! CaðOHÞ2
and cadmium compounds and have recommended the maximum
permissible limit of copper, arsenic, and mercury not to be higher CaðOHÞ2 ! CAþ2 þ 2½OH]
—
Calcium Silica (SiO2) Alumina Iron Oxide Magnesia Potash LOI Refs.
Oxide (Al2O3) (Fe2O3) (MgO) (K2O)
(CaO)
Cement 64.86 20.44 5.50 – – 1.59 1.52 [19]
Lime 53.4 8.56 4.4 1.12 – – – [23]
RHA .41–1.24 22.12– .21–1.23 .21–1.28 0.21–22.31 0–0.45 2.36 [19,42]
93.51
Pumice aggregate 1.75 65.5 17.5 4.5 2.25 4.25 [21]
Iron ore tilling .607 45.64 3.36 47.7 .393 .607 3 [23]
Fly ash 3.6–12.0 44.5–55 20.3–22.4 6.3–7.5 1.5–3.5 0–2.5 0.2–4.5 [27,30]
Ground Granulated blast furnace 41.5 34.8 11.3 0.6 7.2 0.3 – [27]
slag
Cement Kiln Dust 41–67.72 9.64–17.62 1.90–4.90 1.50–4.06 0.64–1.93 0–2.18 4.94– [38,39]
31.30
Marble waste 30.56–55.86 0.09–1.06 0.03–0.05 .01–0.24 0.18–21.21 0–0.01 16.44 [40,45,66]
Palm oil fuel Ash 8.4 43.6 11.4 4.7 4.8 4.5 18 [86]
Lime stone Waste 38–42 15–18 1.02–1.53 1.02–1.53 13.74–15.32 0.35–0.62 32–34 [98]
Granite Stone Waste 1–3.94 67.04–76 13.06–21.12 7.66–21.12 0.04–0.46 3.74–7.15 0.5 [40,98]
Burned olive waste – Soil stabilization of Workability, Strength, 2.5% to improve strength, durability of soil. [16]
black cotton soil Durability, Swelling 7.5% reduced swelling properties
properties
Limestone ash waste – Stabilization of laterite Workability, Bearing 6% by weight replacement improved engineering [17]
soil capacity, Durability, properties of soil
Shear strength
Rice husk ash Cement Stabilization of Workability, Strength, 6–8% cement and 10–15% RHA give optimum result [19]
residual soil Durability, Swelling
Fly ash and stone dust – Stabilization of Workability, Strength, Blend of 25% fly ash with 30% stone dust gave [22]
expansive soil Durability, Swelling optimum result
Iron ore tilling Lime Soil stabilization of Workability, Strength, 8% iron ore tilling and 8% lime [23]
black cotton soil Durability, Swelling,
Leaching potential
Phosphate gypsum’s two variant: Lime and Stabilization of Physical properties, Use of hemi-hydrate with lime or cement gave [24]
dehydrate and hemi hydrate cement tropical soil Strength, Durability, better performance than dehydrate. However,
Swelling, Resilient result may vary depending upon soil type, its
modulus composition, type of photo gypsum used and
quality of secondary additive used (lime or
cement)
Fly ash – Stabilization of black Workability, 25% by weight of soil [26]
cotton soil mechanical property of
soil
Two variants of Low lime fly ash (fine Lime Enhancing properties Strength, Durability - Fine fly ash gave better results than coarse fly [27]
particles with low LOI and coarse of two type of natural and water ash
particles with high LOI) granulated (sulfate-bearing) clay permeability - Addition of GGBS further improved the engi-
blast furnace slag neering and durability properties of soil.
- Results are dependent on material
characteristics.
Limestone dust and coal fly ash – Lean clay soil Workability, Strength, 15% coal fly ash +3% limestone dust gave [28]
Durability, Swelling optimum engineering properties and durability
properties results
Fly ash, bottom ash and oil palm – Verities of local clayey Workability, Strength, Use of 8% fly ash and bottom ash gave optimum [31]
empty fruit branches ash soil. Durability, Swelling results.
properties
Cement kiln dust – Black cotton soil and Workability, Strength, 8% replacement ratio gave best result [37]
Cadmium Durability, Swelling
contaminated black properties
cotton soil.
Cement Kiln dust sandy sabkha, less 50% replacement in all soil sample was considered [38]
plastic white marl, as optimum dose
cohesionless marl and
plastic marl
Cement Kiln dust – Black cotton soil Workability, Strength, 8–16% CKD mix soil gave durable results [39]
modified with quarry Durability, Swelling
fines
Three varieties of Stone waste:Calcite – Three varieties of Workability, Strength, Improved engineering properties of each soil [40]
marble, Dolomite marble, and artificially made clay Durability, sample with each waste type.
Granite powder samples of different - best result obtained with dolomite waste,
plasticity. optimum replacement percentage 30%.
Marble dust – Clayey soil subgrade Workability, Strength, 10% by weight replacement gave optimum results. [44]
Durability
Marble dust sand Clayey soil Strength and Swelling 10% marble dust reduced swelling potential. [45]
properties
Crushed bricks and recycled concrete Aggregates in Engineering properties Satisfied code specification [52]
aggregates unbound layer and strength
C&D mixture Sub-base course Engineering properties, Use of C&D waste recommended in sub-base [53]
material Strength, and long layer.
term performance - Strict quality control is required.
Waste glass powder – Stabilization of Engineering properties, 12% by weight of soil sample [54]
Clayey soil strength, and
durability
Low density polyethylene – Subgrade and sub- Engineering properties, Test result compared with strength and stability of [55]
base layer strength and durability layers containing RAP and CB.
Use of polyethylene waste gave lower values than
control mix, however were within permissible
limits.
RCA – Unbound layer as Physical, Use of RCA is possible, mechanical properties are [58]
aggregates mechanical and influenced by number of variables.
durability and long-
term performance
properties.
RAP (with and without additive) cement Sub-base and Base Strength and Blend of 25% RAP, 75% stone with 6% cement gave [61]
course durability properties highest bearing ratio.
Other proportion performed satisfactorily
C&D Lime Sub-base and base Engineering properties, C&D waste as aggregate performed satisfactorily [62]
course Strength and stability with 3–5% lime as additive
proportion by weight. To each of this replacement proportion, lime
lime stabilized soil sample. The overall conclusion from this study
was added in 2, 4, 6 and 8% replacement by dry weight of soil.
was that addition of fly ash to lime stabilized sulphates bearing soil
Each mix was tested for change in index properties, compaction
improves the durability of soil, but the extent of this change is
charac- teristics strength and durability properties. Proctor test
dependent on waste material‘s property characteristics.
result showed an increase in MDD and decrease in OMC with the
Use of fly ash along with other locally generated waste can also
rise in replacement proportions, which was attributed to the
lead to improved subgrade, sub-base, and base course properties
formation of flocculated particles and increase in specific gravity
and result in better waste management practice. This behavior
obtained after addition of waste. A maximum CBR value of 50% in
was demonstrated by Ramdas et al. [28] in a laboratory investiga-
unsoaked and 40% in wet condition was obtained by addition of
tion, where fly ash and stone dust was added to expansive soil and
8% iron ore tilling waste and 8% lime. Similar behavior was
results were assessed from workability, MDD, CBR and UCS test
observed in dura- bility studies, where samples tested after 7, 14
values. Study result showed that 25% fly ash and 30% stone gave
and 28 days curing, gave better UCS results than control samples.
most optimum results. Study on the similar ground was conducted
Surface morphology study conducted using scanning electron
by Ali & Koranne [29] where, stone dust and fly ash, two of the
microscopy instrument and fiber matrices confirmed the formation
most commonly generated pollutant in the area were used for con-
of crystalline hydration product in the lime-IOT treated soil.
trolling swelling properties of soil subgrade. In this study, waste
Minimum leaching was observed with 8% addition of IOT in soil
was combined in equal proportion by weight, and the mixture
samples. Hence 8% iron ore tilling with 8% lime was suggested as
was used at 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% replacement of
an optimum percentage, and its use in field study was suggested.
expansive soil. The study found that the addition of 20–30% of
Similar findings were by Rezende et al. [24] in which effect of
the mixture eliminated swelling properties of soil subgrade. Also,
phosphate gypsum (PG), a byproduct of phosphate fertilizer
improvement in maximum dry density, soil index properties, and
industry, on tropical soil was investigated. Results showed
CBR value were observed. The study also concluded that addition
improved physical and mechanical properties and reduction in
of stone dust improves the mechanical properties of soil and
swelling behavior was reported with the blend of 11% PG and 9%
when used with fly ash in equal proportion give better results.
lime.
Similar finding were reported by Brooks et al. [30] where limestone
Many studies are available where fly ash, a waste by-product
dust and coal fly ash was used to stabilize two varieties of locally
obtained during coal combustion process, has been used efficiently
available soil at south- eastern Pennsylvania. Samples were
to improve mechanical properties of soil, reduce shrinkage charac-
evaluated by change in atter- berg’s limit, CBR, UCS value and
teristics and form strong sub-base. This improvement is because
swelling potential. This laboratory investigation proceeded in
the addition of fly ash and lime leads to rapid hydration process
three sets in which set one used 15% and 25% by weight
which stimulates cation exchange that flocculates the soil into
replacement of fly ash, set two replaced soil with limestone dust
large lump causing improved mechanical property and decreasing
at 3, 6 and 9% by weight of soil sample and, set three assessed
its shrinkage characteristics [25]. Use of fly ash to improve sub-
change in properties when both fly ash and limestone dust is
grade property was evaluated by Bhuvaneshwari et al. [26] in
added at 15% and 3% by weight respectively. Study results
which fly ash waste, generated from the thermal power plant
showed improved mechanical, and durability charac- teristics and
was added to soil at 10% replacement interval up to 50%. Results
it was concluded that soil sub-base and base course subjected to
showed that adding fly ash gave an improved workable mixture.
light traffic loads could be stabilized with limestone dust and fly
Durability test result was best obtained by addition of 20% fly
ash. Similarly, Fauzi et al. [31] successfully improved subgrade
ash by weight of soil. Based on laboratory investigation it was
properties using the recycled waste materials. The waste material
advised that 25% fly ash in the soil helps to improve mechanical
used were fly ash, bottom ash, oil palm empty fruit bunches ash
property and workability of soil. This laboratory research was fol-
at 4, 8, 12% replacement of different clayey soils found in the area
lowed by a field study where an embankment of dimension 3 m
of Kuantan city. OMC, MDD and CBR values were eval- uated for
wide, 30 m long and 600 mm in height was constructed. Fly ash
all mixes. Fly ash and bottom ash gave encouraging results, and
was sandwiched between two layers of soil and then mixed via
use of these waste up to 8% in sub-base was suggested. Around the
disc harrow after which a required quantity of water was sprayed
world, variants of fly ash are available. Fuel oil fly ash (FFA) is
manually to attain optimum moisture content. Uniform mixing of
one such type, generated in bulk quantity, especially in the
fly ash and soil was able to achieve after eight passes. The layer
region of Saudi Arabia. Al-Malack [32] in his research work,
was compacted via sheep foot roller and cone penetration appara-
utilized this waste as partial replacement of cement for stabiliza-
tus was used for taking the samples. Field results were found to be
tion of sand and marl soil. The result of this study was compared
in correlation with laboratory investigation; however, difficulty in
with cement stabilized soil and the virgin soil sample. FFA was
mixing of fly ash with soil in the field was reported by the author,
added at the percentage of 5%, 10%, and 15%. The proportion of
this was attributed to lumps in natural soil, hindering uniform
cement in this study was kept fix at 5%. Each soil sample was eval-
blending process. Mccarthy et al. [27] used two variant of low lime-
uated by atterburg’s limit, CBR, and UCS. The study suggested that
fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) to
use of 5% FFA along with 5% Portland cement improves
improve soil properties of lime stabilized soil containing sulphates.
mechanical properties of marl soil while significant effect was not
Two varieties of soil samples, obtained from two different location
observed in sandy soil. Similarly, Lynn et al. [33] used municipal
was used in this study. Each soil sample had sulphates content
incinerated bottom fly ash in unbound pavement layer. Waste
higher than 10%. Bearing Index, UCS, Indirect tensile strength
was assessed on the basis of physical, chemical and engineering
(ITS), and water permeability were used as evaluating parameters
properties fol- lowed by mechanical and durability performance.
to study the effect of fly ash and GGBFS on test samples. The quan-
Laboratory investigation revealed improved compaction compared
tity of lime, in this study, was fixed to 3% and fly ash proportion
to sandy gravel soil sample; comparable results were obtained for
was increased from 0% to 24% at an interval of 6%, and the
permeability, elastic modulus, and shear strength test. Abrasion
addition of GGBFS to soil sample was kept at 3, 6 and 9%. Results
strength was similar to lightweight aggregates, and bearing
showed that addition of fly ash and GGBFS improved compaction
capacity was found sufficient enough to permit its use in lower
property, bearing index and UCS values of both soil variants. Water
strength structures like embankments and sub-base materials.
perme- ability was found to be increasing with the addition of lime,
The overall conclusion based on this study was that this waste
which further increased upon the addition of coarse fly ash. Sample
could be implemented in sub-base material with no significant
con- taining fine fly ash and GGBFS showed similar behavior to
drawbacks.
that of
Role of coal waste in sub-base was studied by Modarres et al.
Laboratory investigation by Gandhi et al. [42] compared RHA
[34]. Here, coal waste powder, coal waste ash and their combina-
and marble dust (MD) for stabilizing black cotton soil of Gujarat
tion with hydraulic lime were used in different proportions for sta-
region. The research was carried out with two sets of samples,
bilization of medium plastic clay. Test results were compared with
one prepared using marble dust and other using rice husk ask,
that of neat soil sample and soil sample stabilized with hydraulic
where waste was added between 10% and 30%. The evaluation
lime. Effect of coal waste as an independent additive had a notice-
was done on the basis of atterberg’s limit, CBR, and swelling index.
able impact on soil properties with reduced swelling behavior and
Addition of 20% MD by dry weight of soil sample, decreased liquid
improved CBR. However, when used in combination with lime,
limit by 30%, whereas with RHA at similar replacement, liquid
bet- ter results were observed with decrease in the liquid limit,
limit reduced up to 26%. Similarly, swell index reduced to 80% and
plastic- ity index, swelling properties and enhanced soaked CBR
38% when MD and RHA were added up to 30%. Correlation and
value and compressive strength of soil samples. Another study by
regres- sion analysis also demonstrated that MD gave better results
Gullu et al.
com- pared to RHA. Though both materials were found to have a
[35] used waste sludge, having the mineral composition similar to
positive impact on soil properties, this comparative study
fly ash in mix proportion of 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80% by
established that the overall performance of MD is better than RHA
weight to improve properties of fine-grained soil. Each sample was
to stabilize black cotton soil. Gupta et al. [43] in their study
evaluated by results from direct shear, CBR value, and UCS test.
advocated the use of marble dust in a combination of fly ash and
OMC and MDD were found using standard Proctor test. The Study
sand to improve black cotton soil properties. Findings by Gurbuz
suggested dosage up to 40–50% can improve mechanical and dura-
[44] also recommended the use of MD. In this study, MD was used
bility properties of soil.
as an additive to modify an inferior quality clayey subgrade.
Cement kiln dust (CKD), a waste generated as a by-product of
Laboratory investigation was carried out, by first physical
cement manufacturing industry have the chemical composition
properties analysis of soil and addi- tives, then adding waste in
similar to Portland cement [36]. Research works are available
replacement ratio of 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and then
which shows that it is suitable for improving sub-base and base
subjecting to durability studies. Peak UCS value was obtained with
course of flexible pavement. Gupta et al. [37] used cement kiln dust
the addition of 10% MD in the soil; work- ability was also observed
at replacement ratio of 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10% in the black cotton soil sam-
to be improving at 10% MD replacement. Durability was also
ple and same soil sample contaminated with Cadmium. The study
evaluated by assessing the mass loss of sample after introduced to
reported at 8% replacement ratio minimum swelling behavior and
twelve freeze-thaw cycles. The test result showed a reduction in
maximum UCS value was obtained. Similar findings were reported
percentage mass loss from 6% of a neat soil sample to 4.25%
by Rahman et al. [38] on four soils namely sandy sabkha, less plas-
obtained from a sample containing 15% MD, indi- cating
tic white marl, cohesionless marl and plastic marl, aimed to inves-
improvement in durability conditions. Overall, the study
tigate the change in soil characteristic on the inclusion of CKD as
concluded that addition of 10% MD by weight of soil gave
an additive. All soils showed maximum UCS value at 50% addition
sufficient stiffness and modify soil properties, and hence can be
of CKD by dry weight of soil; same results were observed when
used to improve sub-base and base course properties containing
sam- ples were subjected 14 days of curing period. Combination of
clayey soil. Another study by Oncus & Bilsel [45] used sand as a
CKD with quarry waste was evaluated by Amadi et al. [39] to
primary additive and marble dust as a secondary additive to study
improve properties of black cotton soil. The quantity of quarry fine
the effect on swelling behavior of soil. Addition of marble waste
was fixed to 10% by weight, and CKD was varied from 0% to 16%
was done by partially replacing sand in samples. Five different
by weight at an interval of 4%. No improvement was found in
mixes were prepared, categorized into five groups. Samples of the
mechan- ical properties of soil until 8% inclusion of CKD, after
second group contained 50% black cotton soil and 50% silt; the
which an increase in CBR and UCS value was observed. Between 8
third group was made 47.5% silt and 5% MD. Group fourth and
and 16% CKD inclusion, moisture susceptibility was also found to
group fifth com- prised of 10% and 20% marble dust with an
reduce.
equally divided propor- tion of clay and silt. Results were analyzed
A comprehensive study on evaluating the role of stone waste in
from the one- dimensional swell test, volumetric shrinkage, and
subgrade was carried by Sivrikaya et al. [40] in which five variants
flexure strength. Finding suggests that 10% MD improved soil
of stone waste were selected, and their effect on black cotton soil
properties by reducing swelling percentage by 3%, enhanced
was examined. Bentonite, Kaolinite, Granite powder, Calcite mar-
flexure strength by 3N. Based on test result it was recommended
ble powder, Dolomitic marble powder were used in three variants
that marble dust should be used as an additive in low volume
of artificially prepared clayey soil from high plastic bentonite and
roads. Another study by Minhas & Devi [46] investigated the effect
low plastic kaolinite. Waste was added in a proportion of 5, 10,
of marble dust on alluvial soil. Here, replacement ratio was kept at
20, 30, and 50% by weight. All sample showed increased unit
5, 10 and 15% respectively. The result was in align with previous
weight, reduced liquid limit and improved plastic limit. Among
studies where improvement in mechanical properties was
used waste, dolomite gave the best performance up to 30% replace-
observed.
ment by weight. Marble slurry, another globally produced waste,
In recent times, rapid industrialization and competitive market
generated during cutting and polishing of marble stone can be uti-
have led to an exponential increase in Construction and Demolition
lized in improving mechanical property of sub-base and base
waste (C&D) [47]. These are the waste material derived from con-
course. Amit et al. [41] in a laboratory investigation established
struction, renovation, demolition of roads, houses and buildings.
that marble slurry has a positive impact on soil property. In this
Developing country like Vietnam produced 1 million tons of C&D
study, marble waste was added to soil at rate of 40%, 50%, 60%,
waste in 2001 which increased to 1.9 MT in 2011; recent estimate
and 70%. The virgin sample was used as a control sample, and
suggests that with current waste generation rate of 9.8kilotons/day
results were evaluated based on the change in mechanical proper-
it is expected to double by 2018 and might reach an alarming
ties. A consistent increase in MDD value, decrease in OMC and
quantity of 91MT by 2025 [48]. A similar situation is in India where
improved workability was observed with increase in marble waste
C&D waste generation increased from 10 to 15 MT in the year 2000
in soil, indicating improved compaction property. At 50% replace-
to about 23 MT in the year 2013 [43]. Similarly, about 1 billion tons
ment, maximum CBR of 5.16% was obtained, which was almost
of C&D waste was generated by China in 2013 [49]. Europe in 2006
four times the CBR value of neat soil sample, after which further
produced approximately 970 million tons C&D waste, and in Aus-
increase in proportion gave decrement results. Overall the study
tralia, it was 19 million tons in the year 2009. Many countries have
suggested that marble dust can be used up to 50% to improve
acknowledged the seriousness of the situation and implemented
mechanical properties of black cotton soil.
various restrictions and policies to control the situation. Ireland
has aimed to utilize at least 85% of C&D waste generated in any
result of both replacement mix was within code limitations,
new construction, England has introduced various site created
indi- cating their suitability as partial replacement of RCA. Leite
C&D waste management drives that include a mandatory waste
et al.
management plan for C&D wastes in projects greater than 30,000
[53] carried out laboratory investigation on the use of locally gen-
euros [50]. Similarly, restrictions on waste generation and provi-
erated C&D waste at Sao Paulo, Brazil as aggregate in sub-base
sions have been incorporated by other countries like USA, Ger-
course. The waste was a mixture of ceramic, concrete block, mor-
many, and Japan [51]. As road construction is one of the highest
tar, steel, plastic, asbestos, cement and wood. The materials were
material consuming industry, many researchers have attempted
first separated using visual inspection, sorting and magnetic sepa-
to analyze potential use of C&D waste in pavements. Waste like
ration technique, then sieved via 4.75 mm sieve size and retained
debris, bricks, blocks, ceramic derived from different stages of con-
material was used for the study. Aggregates were divided into four
struction activities are reformed and recycled into desired aggre-
groups, cementitious material, highly porous ceramic material
gate sizes and then used in flexible pavement. The flowchart in
(bricks and roof), less porous material (ceramic tile) and crushed
Fig. 2 summarizes a general methodology achieved by various
rocks. The mixes were evaluated on the basis of grain size, CBR
authors.
value, and resilient modulus. Physical property analysis revealed
Use of crushed clay bricks (CB) and Recycled Concrete
that reformed aggregates exhibit higher water absorption, lower
aggregate (RCA) in the unbound layer of flexible pavement was
specific gravity, and rough surface texture compared to virgin
evaluated by Poon & Chan [52]. Here, the study was carried out on
aggregates. Use of standard and modified compaction method
two mixes, one containing 75% RCA and 25% CB and other 50%
was adopted in this study and change in grain size was reported
RCA and 50% CB. Mix prepared from natural aggregates was taken
during compaction due to aggregate breakage. Modified Proctor
as control mix. The result of this study was evaluated by maximum
test result showed higher OMC, lower MDD for all mixes contain-
dry den- sity, physical properties of materials and CBR value. It
ing C&D waste. Results of CBR showed comparable results with
was found that crushed clay bricks caused an increase in water
the high quality well-graded crushed stone material. Not much dif-
absorption, leading to a higher OMC value and a decreased MDD.
ference was observed in resilient modulus test, though it was
CBR test
noted that use of higher compaction reduced the resilient displace-
Marble quarry waste Aggregate in base course Physical properties, Strength and Recycled marble aggregates had sufficient strength and [66]
stability stability
Marble waste Aggregate in base course Physical parameters, Strength, 60% RMA can be used efficiently as a partial replacement to [67]
Stability, long term performance virgin aggregates in low volume roads
Marble dust Filler Strength, stability and durability Marble dust performed similar to limestone dust and can be [68]
used as filler
Marble dust Fines Strength, durability and stability Improved stability value, can be used as 100% replacement of [69]
conventional fines
Ballast quarry waste Coarse and fine aggregates in Strength, Stability, Best performance was obtained from mix containing 100% [76]
HMA in individual and Durability, moisture basalt coarse aggregates and conventional fine aggregates
combined form susceptibility, long- term
Ballast quarry waste Aggregate in stone matrix performance Mix containing recycled waste gave better stability values [77]
Strength and Stability
asphalt
RCA Coarse aggregates Physical properties, Strength, RCA can be used as coarse aggregates [78]
stability, long-term study
RAP Surface course of airport Strength, stability and durability, 40% replacement of RAP deemed suitable for low volume [80]
pavement followed by field study roads and 40% replacement of RAP can be used as surface
course in airport pavement
RCA Coarse aggregate in base Strength, Stability, durability RCA can be used in low volume roads efficiently [81]
course
Verities of C&D mixture, Coarse aggregate Physical properties, Strength, Higher proportion of C&D waste as partial replacement can be [82]
using cement and stability, long term study used with cement as filler
lime as filler
Steel slag Coarse aggregate Physical properties, strength, Use of steel slag is feasible, Binder plays important role in [84]
stability and durability strength, stability and flow value
Clay bricks filler Physical properties, strength, Can be used as filler [85]
stability and durability
Palm oil fuel ash Filler in HMA Strength, stability, long term Use of palm oil fuel ash gave better results [86]
performance
Asphaltite Filler Strength, stability, long term Better durability results and improvement in resistance to [87]
performance fatigue
Rice husk ash Filler Strength and stability Replacement up to 50% is possible [88]
parameters.
Table 7
Summary of prominent reviewed research for use of locally generated waste to modify binder properties.
Low density polyethylene Used in 50/60 grade asphalt; in SMA Rheological test, performance parameters of Improvement in binder properties. [90]
mixes Up to 6% addition improved SMA
properties
Waste plastic bottles 80/100 penetration grade bitumen; Volumetric and mechanical properties of Up to 6% addition of PET gave [91]
Polyethylene Terephthalate in SMA SMA improved strength and stability
(PET) value
Waste plastic Coated plastic on aggregate and then Physical properties of aggregates, Strength Optimum dose for best performance [92]
mixed with 80/100 grade binder parameters, field study, cost analysis was 10% of bitumen used
Poly vinyl chloride pipe (PVC), 80/100 grade bitumen; in Visco-elastic properties of PVC-bitumen - PVC pipe waste can be used as [93]
treated with chemical Bituminous Mixes blend, performance characteristics of mixes modifying agent.
modifier - Mix prepared showed increase
in strength and stability.
Rubber tires PG 58–22 binder, in OGFC Performance and durability characteristics 10% rubber gave better [94]
of mixes. performance than SBS binder
scenario is very rare especially in areas where large landfills are [18] T. Sen, U. Mishra, Usage of industrial waste products in village road
created after decades of accumulation over the prolonged period. construction, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 1 (2010) 122–126, https://doi.org/
In such conditions, the samples for quality check should be 10.7763/IJESD.2010.V1.25.
[19] E.A. Basha, R. Hashim, H.B. Mahmud, A.S. Muntohar, Stabilization of residual
increased and use of such materials in small projects like in low
soil with rice husk ash and cement, Constr. Build. Mater. 19 (2005) 448–453,
traffic volume road, maintenance work should be incorporated. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.08.001.
Physical properties of recycled waste depend on both recycled [20] A.A. Al-Rawas, A.W. Hago, H. Al-Sarmi, Effect of lime, cement and Sarooj
(artificial pozzolan) on the swelling potential of an expansive soil from Oman,
material and its manufacturing process. Research work shows that
Build. Environ. 40 (2005) 681–687, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
many recycled materials especially like RAC, ceramic waste exhibit buildenv.2004.08.028.
change in shape, size and other physical properties during the test- [21] M. Saltan, F. Selcan, Findik, Stabilization of subbase layer materials with
ing procedure, for example, change in gradation has been observed waste pumice in flexible pavement, Build. Environ. 43 (2008) 415–421,
https://doi. org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.007.
when subjected to compaction effort. For such materials proper [22] L.C. Dang, B. Fatahi, H. Khabbaz, Behaviour of expansive soils stabilized
mixing, suggesting any additional requirements like additives, with hydrated lime and bagasse fibres, Procedia Eng. 143 (2016) 658–665,
technical restriction and quality control can help to address such https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.093.
[23] R.K. Etim, A.O. Eberemu, K.J. Osinubi, Stabilization of black cotton soil with
situations. However, still, research is needed to address such mate- lime and iron ore tailings admixture, Transp. Geotech. 10 (2017) 85–95,
rial behavior and any conflicting statement precisely. Above all, the https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.01.002.
government must also make efforts to promote the use of sec- [24] L.R. De Rezende, S. Curado, M.V. Silva, M. Maria, D. Arthur, N. Metogo, M.
Porfirio, C. Neto, L. Legi, B. Bernucci, Laboratory study of phosphogypsum,
ondary materials in the field via introducing incentives and legisla- stabilizers, and tropical soil mixtures Lilian, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (2017) 1–16.
tion [97]. Establishing a National body responsible for organizing, [25] Z. Nalbantoǧlu, Effectiveness of class C fly ash as an expansive soil
compiling, storing and promoting information, including National stabilizer, Constr. Build. Mater. 18 (2004) 377–381, https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.conbuildmat.2004.03.011.
Standards for the production and use of recycled products, would [26] S. Bhuvaneshwari, R.G. Robinson, S.R. Gandhi, Stabilization of expansive soils
help increase stakeholder confidence in the suitability of recycled using flyash, in: Fly Ash India, 2005, pp. 1–10.
C&D materials. [27] M.J. Mccarthy, L.J. Csetenyi, A. Sachdeva, R.K. Dhir, Engineering and durability
properties of fly ash treated lime-stabilised sulphate-bearing soils, Eng. Geol.
174 (2014) 139–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.001.
Conflict of interest [28] T.L. Ramadas, N.D. Kumar, G. Aparna, Swelling and strength characteristics of
expansive soil treated with stone dust and fly ash, in: Indian Geotech. Conf.,
Iinternational Societ of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Mumbai,
We have no conflict of interest to declare. 2010,pp. 557–560.
<https://gndec.ac.in/~igs/ldh/conf/2010/articles/t019.pdf>.
[29] M.S. Ali, S.S. Koranne, Performance analysis of expansive soil treated with stone
References dust and fly ash, Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 16 (I) (2011) 913–982.
[30] R. Brooks, F.F. Udoeyo, K.V. Takkalapelli, Geotechnical properties of problem
[1] ] G.H. Brundtland, Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission soils stabilized with fly ash and limestone dust in Philadelphia, J. Mater. Civ.
on Environment and Development, 1987. <https://doi.org/10.1080/ Eng. 23 (2011) 711–716, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-
07488008808408783>. 5533.0000214.
[2] Di.-N. Dima, R. Ansrei, V. Boboc, I. Scabteianu, Evaluation of the [31] A. Fauzi, U.J. Fauzi, W.M. Nazmi, Engineering quality improvement of Kuantan
sustainability of farms, Bul. INSTITUTULUI Politeh. DIN IAS,I. vol. 63, 2008, clay subgrade using recycling and reused materials as stabilizer, Procedia Eng.
293–296. 54 (2013) 675–689, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.062.
[3] E.T.B.T.B. Edil, Characterization of recycled materials for sustainable [32] M.H. Al-Malack, G.M. Abdullah, O.S.B. Al-Amoudi, A.A. Bukhari, Stabilization
construction Caractérisation des matériaux recyclés pour la Construction of indigenous Saudi Arabian soils using fuel oil flyash, J. King Saud Univ. - Eng.
durable, Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Geotech. Eng., 2013, pp. 3195–3198. Sci. 28 (2014) 165–173, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2014.04.005.
[4] Y. Huang, R.N. Bird, O. Heidrich, A review of the use of recycled solid waste [33] C.J. Lynn, G.S. Ghataora, R.K. Dhir, Municipal incinerated bottom ash (MIBA)
materials in asphalt pavements, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52 (2007) 58–73, characteristics and potential for use in road pavements, Int. J. Pavement Res.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.02.002. Technol. (2016) 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.12.003.
[5] R.M. Mulungye, P.M.O. Owende, K. Mellon, Finite element modelling of [34] A. Modarres, Y.M. Nosoudy, Clay stabilization using coal waste and lime –
flexible pavements on soft soil subgrades, Mater. Des. 28 (2007) 739–756, Technical and environmental impacts, Appl. Clay Sci. 116–117 (2015) 281–
https://doi. org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.12.006. 288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.026.
[6] V. Dakshanamurthy, V. Raman, A simple method of identifying an expansive [35] H. Güllü, S. Girisken, Performance of fine-grained soil treated with industrial
soil, Soils Found. 13 (1973) 97–104, https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.13.97. wastewater sludge, Environ. Earth Sci. 70 (2013) 777–788, https://doi.org/
[7] P.K. Gautam, P. Kalla, A.S. Jethoo, S.C. Harshwardhan, Dimensional stone 10.1007/s12665-012-2167-0.
waste characterization in Rajasthan and suggesting their possible remedies, Int. J. [36] R. Siddique, Cement Kiln Dust, in: Waste Mater. By-Products Concr., 2008,
Emerg. Technol. 8 (2017) 40–42. pp. 351–380. <http://dx,doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74294-4_11>.
[8] R. Fuhst, O. Creutzenberg, H. Ernst, T. Hansen, G. Pohlmann, A. Preiss, S. [37] S. Gupta, M.K. Pandey, R.K. Srivastava, Evaluation of cement kiln dust
Rittinghausen, 24 Months inhalation carcinogenicity study of bitumen fumes stabilized heavy metals contaminated expansive soil – a laboratory study, Eur. J.
in Wistar (WU) rats, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 4 (2007) 20–43, https://doi.org/ Adv. Engineeing Technol. 2 (2015) 37–42.
10.1080/15459620701326257. [38] M.K. Rahman, S. Rehman, O.S.B. Al-Amoudi, literature review on cement kiln
[9] R. Ellis, D. Agdas, K. Frost, Developing improved opportunities for the dust usage in soil and waste stabilization and experimental investigation, Int. J.
recycling and reuse of materials in road, bridge, and construction projects, Res. Rev. Appl. Sci. 7 (2011) 77–87.
Florida, 2014. [39] A.A. Amadi, Enhancing durability of quarry fines modified black cotton soil
[10] Texas Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications for Construction subgrade with cement kiln dust stabilization, Transp. Geotech. 1 (2014) 55–61,
and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges, Texas, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.02.002.
[11] Harwell, Green Public Procurement – Road Construction and Traffic Signs [40] O. Sivrikaya, K.R. Kiyildi, Z. Karaca, Recycling waste from natural stone
Background Report, Brussels, 2010. processing plants to stabilise clayey soil, Environ. Earth Sci. 71 (2014) 4397–
[12] V.E. Schimmoller, H. Katherine, T.T. Eighmy, C. Wiles, M. Smith, G. 4407, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2833-x.
Malasheskie, G.J. Rohrbach, S. Schaftlein, G. Helms, R.D. Campbell, C.H. Van [41] V. Amit, R.R. Singh, Utilization of marble slurry to enhance soil properties and
Deusen, B. Ford, J.A. Almborg, Recycled materials in European highway protect environment, J. Environ. Res. Dev. 7 (2013) 1479–1483.
environments uses, technologies, and policies, 2000. <https://international. [42] K.S. Gandhi, Stabilization of expansive soil of Surat region using rice husk
fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/recycolor.pdf>. ash & marble dust, Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol. 3 (2013) 1516–1521.
[13] J. Christory, D. Miet, E. Barre, D. Sicard, B. Mahut, J. Piau, M. Luminari, A. [43] C. Gupta, R.K. Sharma, Influence of marble dust, fly ash and beas sand on
Beeldens, B. Kalman, NR2C. New Road Construction Concepts. Towards sub grade characteristics of expansive soil, J. Mech. Civ. Eng. 2014 (2014)
reliable, green, safe & smart and human infrastructure in Europe., 2008. 13–18.
<http://www.fehrl.org/nr2c>. [44] A. Gurbuz, Marble powder to stabilise clayey soils in sub- bases for road
[14] Indian Road Congress, MoRT&H: Specifications for Roads and bridges.pdf, construction, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 0629 (2015) 481–492, https://doi.
New Delhi, 2013. org/10.1080/14680629.2015.1020845.
[15] M.R. Hall, K.B. Najim, P. Keikhaei Dehdezi, Soil stabilization and earth [45] S. Oncu, H. Bilsel, Ageing effect on swell, shrinkage and flexural strength of
construction: materials, properties, and techniques, in: Mod. Earth Build., sand and waste marble powder stabilized expansive soil, in: 3rd Eur. Conf.
2012, pp. 222–255. <https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096166.2.222>. Unsaturated Soil, EDP Sciences, Paris, 2016, pp. 1–6. <https://doi.org/10.1051/
[16] M.F. Attom, M.M. Al-Sharif, Soil stabilization with burned olive waste, Appl. e3sconf/20160913003>.
Clay Sci. 13 (1998) 219–230, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-1317(98)00007-6. [46] A. Minhas, V.U. Devi, Soil stabilization of alluvial soil by using marble
[17] C.O. Okagbue, J.A. Yakubu, Limestone ash waste as a substitute for lime in powder, Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 7 (2016) 87–92.
soil improvement for engineering construction, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 58 [47] N. Kisku, H. Joshi, M. Ansari, S.K. Panda, S. Nayak, S.C. Dutta, A critical review
(2000) 107–113, https://doi.org/10.1007/s100640050004. and assessment for usage of recycled aggregate as sustainable construction
material, Constr. Build. Mater. 131 (2017) 721–740, https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.conbuildmat.2016.11.029. [72] M. Lokeshwari, K.S. Jagadish, Eco-friendly use of granite fines waste in
[48] S. Lockrey, H. Nguyen, E. Crossin, K. Verghese, Recycling the construction building blocks, Procedia Environ. Sci. 35 (2016) 618–623,
and demolition waste in Vietnam: opportunities and challenges in practice, J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. proenv.2016.07.049.
Clean. Prod. 133 (2016) 757–766, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. [73] O. Šernas, M. Strumskys, D. Skrodenis, Possibility of use of granite fines in
jclepro.2016.05.175. asphalt pavements, in: 9th Int. Conf. ‘‘Environmental Eng., VGTU Press,
[49] L. Zheng, H. Wu, H. Zhang, H. Duan, J. Wang, W. Jiang, B. Dong, G. Liu, J. Zuo, Lithuania, 2014, pp. 7–13. <http://enviro.vgtu.lt>.
Q. Song, Characterizing the generation and flows of construction and [74] B.V. Kiran Kumar, S. Manjunatha, S. Prasad, N. Porous, Asphalt pavement a tentative mix
demolition waste in China, Constr. Build. Mater. 136 (2017) 405–413, design guidelines – by new generation open graded friction, Int.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.055. J. Eng. Sci. Invent. Res. Dev. I (2014) 105–112.
[50] E.C.& S.R.S. Hyder Consulting, Construction and demolition waste status [75] S. Uzun, S. Terzi, Evaluation of andesite waste as mineral filler in asphaltic
report, 2011. concrete mixture, Constr. Build. Mater. 31 (2012) 284–288, https://doi.org/
[51] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Construction and Demolition Debris 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.093.
Generation in the United States, 2014, 2016. [76] A. Ibrahim, S. Faisal, N. Jamil, Use of basalt in asphalt concrete mixes,
[52] C.S. Poon, D. Chan, Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (2009) 498–506, https://doi.org/10.1016/
clay brick as unbound road sub-base, Constr. Build. Mater. 20 (2006) 578–585, j.conbuildmat.2007.10.026.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.045. [77] A. Karakus, Investigating on possible use of Diyarbakir basalt waste in Stone
[53] F.D.C. Leite, R.D.S. Motta, K.L. Vasconcelos, L. Bernucci, Laboratory evaluation Mastic Asphalt, Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (2011) 3502–3507, https://doi.org/
of recycled construction and demolition waste for pavements, Constr. Build. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.043.
Mater. 25 (2011) 2972–2979, https://doi.org/10.1016/ [78] S. Paranavithana, A. Mohajerani, Effects of recycled concrete aggregates on
j.conbuildmat.2010.11.105. properties of asphalt concrete, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 48 (2006) 1–12,
[54] H. Canakci, A. Al-Kaki, F. Celik, Stabilization of clay with waste soda lime glass https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.12.009.
powder, Procedia Eng. 161 (2016) 600–605, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. [79] Y.D. Wong, D.D. Sun, D. Lai, Value-added utilisation of recycled concrete in
proeng.2016.08.705. hot-mix asphalt, Waste Manage. 27 (2007) 294–301,
[55] A. Arulrajah, E. Yaghoubi, Y.C. Wong, S. Horpibulsuk, Recycled plastic https://doi.org/10.1016/j. wasman.2006.02.001.
granules and demolition wastes as construction materials: resilient moduli [80] K. Su, Y. Hachiya, R. Maekawaa, Study on recycled asphalt concrete for use in
and strength characteristics, Constr. Build. Mater. 147 (2017) 639–647, surface course in airport pavement, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54 (2009) 37–44,
https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.06.003.
[56] A. Arulrajah, M.M.Y. Ali, J. Piratheepan, M.W. Bo, M. Asce, Geotechnical [81] J. Mills-Beale, Z. You, The mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures with
Properties of Waste Excavation Rock in Pavement Subbase Applications, 2012. Recycled Concrete Aggregates, Constr. Build. Mater. 24 (2010) 230–235,
<https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000419>. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.046.
[57] A. Arulrajah, J. Piratheepan, M.M. Disfani, M.W. Bo, M. Asce, Geotechnical and [82] I. Pérez, A.R. Pasandín, L. Medina, Hot mix asphalt using C&D waste as coarse
geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition aggregates, Mater. Des. 36 (2012) 840–846, https://doi.org/10.1016/
materials in pavement subbase applications, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (2013) 1077– j.matdes.2010.12.058.
1088, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000652. [83] A. Zulkati, Y.D. Wong, D.D. Sun, Mechanistic performance of asphalt-concrete
[58] A. Ebrahim, A.E. Behiry, Fatigue and rutting lives in flexible pavement, Ain mixture incorporating coarse recycled concrete aggregate, J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
Shams Eng. J. 3 (2012) 367–374, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2012.04.008. 25 (2013) 1299–1305, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000668.
[59] P. Pérez, F. Agrela, R. Herrador, J. Ordoñez, Application of cement-treated [84] P. Ahmedzade, B. Sengoz, Evaluation of steel slag coarse aggregate in hot
recycled materials in the construction of a section of road in Malaga, Spain, mix asphalt concrete, J. Hazard. Mater. 165 (2009) 300–305, https://doi.org/
Constr. Build. Mater. 44 (2013) 593–599, https://doi.org/10.1016/ 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.105.
j.conbuildmat.2013.02.034. [85] M.Z. Chen, J.T. Lin, S.P. Wu, C.H. Liu, Utilization of recycled brick powder as
[60] M. Zaumanis, R.B. Mallick, R. Frank, 100% hot mix asphalt recycling : alternative filler in asphalt mixture, Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (2011) 1532–
challenges and benefits, in: Transp. Res. Procedia, Elsevier B.V., 2016, pp. 1536, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.08.005.
3493–3502, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.315. [86] M.N. Borhan, A. Ismail, R.A. Rahmat, Evaluation of palm oil fuel ash (POFA) on
[61] D. Chandra, J.N. Mandal, Laboratory investigations on Reclaimed Asphalt asphalt mixtures, Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 1–8 (2010).
Pavement (RAP) for using it as base course of flexible pavement, in: Procedia [87] M. Yilmaz, B.V. Kök, N. Kulog, Effects of using asphaltite as filler on mechanical
Eng., The Author(s), 2017, pp. 434–439. <https://doi.org/:10.1016/j.proeng. properties of hot mix asphalt, Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (2011) 4279–4286,
2017.05.069>. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.072.
[62] A. Mohammadinia, A. Arulrajah, H. Haghighi, S. Horpibulsuk, Effect of lime [88] S. Sargin, M. Saltan, N. Morova, S. Serin, S. Terzi, Evaluation of rice husk ash as
stabilization on the mechanical and micro-scale properties of recycled filler in hot mix asphalt concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 48 (2013) 390–397,
demolition materials, Sustainable Cities Soc. 30 (2017) 58–65, https://doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.029.
org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.004. [89] O.A. Ehinola, O.A. Felode, G. Jonathan, Softening point and Penetration Index of
[63] S. Jain, Y.P. Joshi, S.S. Goliya, Design of rigid and flexible pavements by bitumen from parts of Southwestern Nigeria, Nafta. 63 (2012) 319–323.
various methods & their cost analysis of each method, Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 3 [90] A.I. Al-Hadidy, T. Yi-qiu, Effect of polyethylene on life of flexible pavements,
(2013) 119–123. Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (2009) 1456–1464, https://doi.org/10.1016/
[64] H.M. Algin, P. Turgut, Cotton and limestone powder wastes as brick j.conbuildmat.2008.07.004.
material, Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (2008) 1074–1080, [91] E. Ahmadinia, M. Zargar, M.R. Karim, M. Abdelaziz, P. Shafigh, Using waste
https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.conbuildmat.2007.03.006. plastic bottles as additive for stone mastic asphalt, Mater. Des. 32 (2011) 4844–
[65] A. Rana, P. Kalla, L.J. Csetenyi, Recycling of dimension limestone industry 4849, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.016.
waste in concrete, Int. J. Mining, Reclam. Environ. 930 (2016) 1–20, https://doi. [92] R. Vasudevan, A. Ramalinga, B. Chandra Sekar, R. Sundarakannan, A.
org/10.1080/17480930.2016.1138571. Velkennedy, Technique to dispose waste plastics in an ecofriendly way -
[66] H. Akbulut, C. Gürer, Use of aggregates produced from marble quarry waste in Application in construction of flexible pavements, Constr. Build. Mater. 28
asphalt pavements, Build. Environ. 42 (2007) 1921–1930, https://doi.org/ (2012) 311–320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.031.
10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.012. [93] A. Behl, G. Sharma, G. Kumar, A sustainable approach: utilization of waste PVC
[67] F.M. Nejad, A.R. Azarhoosh, G.H. Hamedi, Laboratory evaluation of using in asphalting of roads, Constr. Build. Mater. 54 (2014) 113–117, https://doi.
recycled marble aggregates on the mechanical properties of hot mix asphalt, org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.050.
Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 25 (2013) 741–746, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) [94] B. Shirini, R. Imaninasab, Performance evaluation of rubberized and SBS
MT.1943-5533.0000539. modified porous asphalt mixtures, Constr. Build. Mater. 107 (2016) 165–171,
[68] M. Karas,ahin, S. Terzi, Evaluation of marble waste dust in the mixture https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.006.
of asphaltic concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (2007) 616–620, [95] D. Lo Presti, Recycled Tyre Rubber Modified Bitumens for road asphalt
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.001. mixtures: a literature review, Constr. Build. Mater. 49 (2013) 863–881,
[69] A.N. Abed, S.O. Eyada, The use of sulaimania marble waste to improve the https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.007.
properties of Anbar, J. Eng. Sci. 1 (2012) 139–151. [96] H. Qasrawi, I. Asi, Effect of bitumen grade on hot asphalt mixes properties
[70] SevilKofteci, Niyaziugurkockal, Using marble wastes as fine aggregate in hot prepared using recycled coarse concrete aggregate, Constr. Build. Mater. 121
mix asphalt production, in: Proc. Intl. Conf. Adv. Civil, Struct. Constr. Eng. - (2016) 18–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.101.
CSCE 2014., Institute of Research Engineers and Doctors, 2014, pp. 117–121. [97] A.A.A. Molenaar, Durable and sustainable road constructions for developing
<http://seekdl.org/nm.php?id=3648>. countries, Procedia Eng. 54 (2013) 69–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
[71] R.A. Hamza, S. El-Haggar, S. Khedr, Marble and granite waste: characterization proeng.2013.03.007.
and utilization in concrete bricks, Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinf. 21 (2011) 115– [98] R. Lakhani, R. Kumar, P. Tomar, Utilization of stone waste in the
119, https://doi.org/10.7763/IJBBB.2011.V1.54. development of value added products: a state of the art review, J. Eng. Sci.
Technol. Rev. 7 (2014) 180–187.