Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Palanisamy Murthi, Paul Awoyera, Palanisamy Selvaraj, Devi Dharsana &
Ravindran Gobinath (2018): Using silica mineral waste as aggregate in a green high strength
concrete: workability, strength, failure mode, and morphology assessment, Australian Journal of
Civil Engineering, DOI: 10.1080/14488353.2018.1472539
Article views: 8
ARTICLE
CONTACT Paul Awoyera paul.awoyera@covenantuniversity.edu.ng Department of Civil Engineering, Covenant University, Ota 112233, Nigeria
© 2018 Engineers Australia
2 P. MURTHI ET AL.
mostly available in cement production plants where Table 2. Physical Properties of Coarse Aggregate.
silica is used as raw material. The ecosand was sourced Parameters River sand Eco sand Granite
from ACC Limited cement industry, located within Specific gravity 2.66 2.42 6.55
Fineness modulus 2.6 2.8 2.43
Madukkarai, Coimbatore South Sub-District, Tamil Water absorption (%) 6.5 2.1 2.5
Nadu, India. This company generates about 15,000 Aggregate impact value (%) - - 12.17
Aggregate crushing value (%) - - 31.20
tonnes of Eco Sand within a month, currently, it has
not been utilized for concreting. There is a large deposit
of eco sand at this cement production plant as shown in
Figure 1. Eco sand possesses high silica content, as can
be seen from its oxide composition presented in
Table 1. This phenomenon is an advantage for eco
sand to aid pozzolanic reactions in concrete.
Natural river sand and granite that were sourced
from a quarry in Tamil Nadu district, India, were
used as the primary aggregates. The portions of
river sand and eco sand aggregates used represent
that which passes the 4.75micron sieve aperture,
while the granite was of 20 mm maximum size. The
aggregates were air-dried in the laboratory for a per-
iod of 2 weeks in order to ensure natural moistures
were drained out of the aggregates. This procedure is
necessary so as to monitor concrete water content
and also to negate bleeding occurrence in the con-
crete. The physical properties of the aggregates were
determined following the recommendations of IS
2386 (Chinnaraju et al. 2013), the results are pre- Figure 2. Particle size distribution of river sand and eco sand.
sented in Table 2. In Figure 2, the particle size dis-
tribution of both river sand and eco sand are
properties of the cement as sourced from the manu-
presented. The eco sand particles are slightly finer
factural is presented in Table 3. Potable water was
than the river sand, this feature can ensure that eco
used for mixing the concrete constituents.
sand functions as a filler in the concrete matrix in
addition to being a substitute fine aggregate.
A grade 43 Ordinary Portland Cement (CEM1) 2.2. Mix design, samples preparation and testing
conforming to IS 12,269 (IS 2386, 2002) requirement
Table 4 shows the mix proportions of the mixtures
was used as binder, it was obtained from a retail
investigated in this study. The mix design approach
outlet within Tamil Nadu, India. The physical
follows the recommendation of IS 10,262 (IS 12,269,
1987). Although, Eco-sand does not only works as
fine aggregate replacement, but the superfine portion
of eco-sand can also be used as a secondary binder in
order to improve the strength characteristics of a
cementitious mixture.(IS 10,262, 2009)
The superfine portion of Eco sand (due to its fine-
ness) possess the ability to fill micropores, caused as a
result of slow hydration, and more over the pozzolanic
reaction can be triggered by its inclusion in a concrete
matrix. However, in this study Eco sand was used as
partial replacement of fine aggregate in the concrete
mixtures. It was mixed in various percentages as pre-
sented (Table 4). The workability characteristics of the
Figure 1. Eco sand deposit at Madukkarai, Coimbatore. Table 3. Physical Properties of Cement.
Parameters Values
Fineness 98%
Table 1. Oxide composition of eco sand. Initial Setting Time 18 min
Oxides SiO2 Al2O3 K2O CaO Fe2O3 Na2O MgO LOI Final Setting Time 7 hr: 45 min
Standard Consistency 33%
Amount % 68.1 10.7 4.3 2.2 1.7 0.6 0.5 11.5 Specific Gravity 3.15
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING 3
Table 4. Weight of Mix Ingredients. due to the low water-cement ratio used. These types of
Binder Fine aggregate Coarse aggregate concrete mixtures can be suitable for high strength con-
(kg/m3) (kg/m3) (kg/m3)
crete for road pavement construction.
Water/
Mix River Eco cement
ID Cement sand sand Granite ratio
Ref 444.44 614.4 - 992 0.47
EC5 444.44 583.68 30.72 992 0.47 3.1. Strength development in concrete mixtures
EC10 444.44 552.96 61.44 992 0.47
EC15 444.44 522.24 92.16 992 0.47 The compressive strength development with curing
EC20 444.44 491.52 122.88 992 0.47
EC25 444.44 460.8 153.6 992 0.47
age and eco sand content are shown in Figure 4(a,b)
EC30 444.44 430.08 184.32 992 0.47 respectively. Compressive strength increases with
increasing curing age for all the mixtures. In terms of
28 days strength, all the modified mixtures gained
concrete was determined using slump and compacting higher strength than the reference concrete. It is an
factor tests. Samples preparation includes 150 mm con- evidence that the strength developed in the other mix-
crete cubes, 150 × 300 mm concrete cylinders and tures was enhanced by the eco sand addition. This can
100 × 100 x 500 mm reinforced concrete prisms, they be possible in two different ways, it could be due to the
were used for determination of compressive strength, fact that eco sand also featured as a filler particle,
split-tensile strength, and flexural strength respectively which filled up micro pores in the concrete, or perhaps
(IS 516-1959, n.d.), after the samples have been cured in the hydration process was prolonged because of poz-
water for 28 days. Samples for compression and split zolanic effect by the eco sand (Awoyera et al. 2017).
tensile strength tests were made in triplicates, while two However, considering strength gained with eco sand
prisms were made per mixture. The averages of strength substitution into the concrete (Figure 4(b)), compres-
obtained were presented in this paper. sive strength initially increased with increasing eco sand
The prisms were reinforced using nominal high yield content up to 25%, before a sharp drop occurred in the
reinforcement of 12 mm diameter as main bars and 6 mm strength as the eco sand content was increased to 30%.
diameter as stirrups. Upon testing of the samples, the It was a similar attribute for both the concrete tested at 7
morphology of selected crumbs from the crushed con- and 28 days. SEM micrographs of 25% and 30% eco
crete was observed using a Scanning Electron Microscope sand concrete are presented in Figures 5 and 6, respec-
(SEM), which was operated in the secondary electron tively. The sharp reduction in strength may be because
mode. This mode is adapted for determination of mor- of addition of more content of eco sand, and its fine
phology of samples which are normally coated with fragments could reduce the calcium silicate hydrate (C-
carbon. S-H) gel developed during hydration of cement. When
this is the case, the interfacial transition (ITZ) density
will lessen and strength characteristic of concrete
3. Results and discussion
diminishes. This therefore suggests that the optimum
The workability result is presented in Figure 3. Although, eco sand content to be substituted for river sand is
higher slump and compacting factor were seen in the eco about 25% to develop a high strength concrete. A typical
sand concrete compare to the reference mixtures, but failure mode of eco sand concrete is shown in Figure 7.
generally the entire mixtures are categorized as having The pattern of failure is the concrete is similar to the
low slump. There was low slump in concrete mixtures conventional mix, when tested in compression.
Figure 4. Compressive strength developed with (a) curing age (b) eco sand conetnt.
Figure 5. SEM of 25% eco sand concrete. Figure 7. Failure mode in a 25% eco sand concrete cube.
Figure 10. Split-tensile versus compressive strength. Figure 12. Flexural strength developed with curing age.
6 P. MURTHI ET AL.
Figure 13. Concrete mophology (a) reference mix (b) 25% eco sand concrete.
International Journal Engineering Technological 7: 1049– IS 10262. 2009. “Guidelines for Concrete Mix Design
1056. Proportioning, Indian Stand”.
Awoyera, P. O., J. O. Akinmusuru, and J. M. Ndambuki. IS 12269. 1987. “Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary
2016. “Green Concrete Production with Ceramic Wastes Portland Cement, Indian Stand”.
and Laterite.” Constr Build Materials 117: 29–36. IS 2386. 2002. “Method of Test for Aggregate for Concrete,
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.108. Indian Stand”. ().
Awoyera, P. O., A. R. Dawson, N. H. Thom, and J. O. IS 516-1959. n.d.. “Methods of Test for Strength of
Akinmusuru. 2017. “Suitability of Mortars Produced Concrete, Indian Stand”.
Using Laterite and Ceramic Wastes: Mechanical and Karthik, S., P. R. M. Rao, and P. O. Awoyera. 2017.
Microscale Analysis.” Constr Build Materials 148: 195– “Strength Properties of Bamboo and Steel Reinforced
203. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.031. Concrete Containing Manufactured Sand and Mineral
Babalola, O. E., and P. O. Awoyera. 2016. “Suitability of Cordia Admixtures.” Journal King Saud University Engineering
Millenii Ash Blended Cement in Concrete Production.” Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.jksues.2016.12.003.
International Journal Engineering Researcher Africa 22: 59– Palankar, N., A. U. Ravi Shankar, and B. M. Mithun. 2015.
67. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.22.59. “Studies on Eco-Friendly Concrete Incorporating
Chinnaraju, K., V. Ramkumar, K. Lineesh, S. Nithya, and V. Industrial Waste as Aggregates.” International Journal
Sathish. 2013. “Study on Concrete Using Steel Slag as Coarse Sustain Built Environment 4: 378–390. doi:10.1016/j.
Aggregate Replacement and Ecosand as Fine Aggregate ijsbe.2015.05.002.
Replacement.” International Journal Researcher Engineering Sathanandam, T., P. O. Awoyera, V. Vijayan, and K.
Advancement Technological 1: 1–6. Sathishkumar. 2017. “Low Carbon Building:
Dash, M. K., S. K. Patro, and A. K. Rath. 2016. “Sustainable Experimental Insight on the Use of Fly Ash and Glass
Use of Industrial-Waste as Partial Replacement of Fine Fibre for Making Geopolymer Concrete.” Sustain
Aggregate for Preparation of Concrete – A Review.” Environment Researcher 27: 146–153. doi:10.1016/j.
International Journal Sustain Built Environment 5: 484– serj.2017.03.005.
516. doi:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.04.006. Wang, X. F., Z. J. Yang, J. R. Yates, A. P. Jivkov, and C.
Dharshna Devi, M., R. Venkatasubramani, and R. Elangovan. Zhang. 2015. “Monte Carlo Simulations of Mesoscale
2016. “Analytical Investigation of Flexural Behaviour of Fracture Modelling of Concrete with Random
SCC Beam Using Eco Sand.” International Researcher Aggregates and Pores.” Constr Build Materials 75: 35–
Journal Engineering Technological 3: 908–913. 45. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.069.
Iqbal, S., A. Ali, K. Holschemacher, Y. Ribakov, and T. A. Zeghad, M., J. Mitterpach, B. Safi, B. Amrane, and M.
Bier. 2017. “Effect of Fly Ash on Properties of Self- Saidi. 2017. “Reuse of Refractory Brick Wastes (RBW)
Compacting High Strength Lightweight Concrete.” as a Supplementary Cementitious Material in a
Period Polytech Civil Engineering 61: 81–87. Concrete.” Period Polytech Civil Engineering 61: 75–
doi:10.3311/PPci.8171. 80. doi:10.3311/PPci.8194.