Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
THEAR
Interactive
Learning with
Augmented Reality
Interactive
Learning with
Augmented Reality
FIRST EDITION
By:
Nur Shuhada binti Arbaan
Azeema Bt Marzuki
This book was published as an additional reference for teaching and learning process for students who
enrolled in curriculum Toxic & Hazardous Waste Management courses in the Malaysian Polytechnic.
©Hakcipta Terpelihara. Tidak dibenarkan mengeluar ulang mana-mana
bahagian artikel, ilustrasi dan isi kandungan buku ini dalam apa jua bentuk
dan cara apa jua sama ada dengan cara elektronik, fotokopi, mekanik atau
cara lain sebelum mendapat izin bertulis daripada POLITEKNIK
SULTAN IDRIS SHAH SG LANG, 45100 SG AIR TAWAR,
SELANGOR.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be produced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronics or mechanical
including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval
system, without permission in writing from POLITEKNIK SULTAN IDRIS
SHAH SG LANG, 45100 SG AIR TAWAR, SELANGOR.
ISBN: 978-967-2096-45-0
Diterbitkan Oleh:
Politeknik Sultan Idris Shah Sg Lang,
45100 Sg Air Tawar, Selangor.
Tel:03-32806200
Email: psis.edu.my
2
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 ............................................................................ 4
Chapter 2 ........................................................................... 51
Chapter 3 ........................................................................... 97
Chapter 4 ........................................................................ 150
Chapter 5 ........................................................................ 172
3
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION TO HAZARDOUS WASTE
Hazardous waste is the label assigned to a specific class of refuse. The key
characteristic that identifies this refuse is that, in some way, it is potentially
dangerous to living beings and/or the environment, particularly when
handled, transported or disposed of in an unsafe manner. Hazardous waste
can take different forms – solid, liquid or gaseous – and it can be emitted
to land, water or air. Further, hazardous substances, materials or goods can
potentially occur in the three major waste streams – MSW (Municipal), C
& I (Commercial and Industrial) and C & D (Construction and
Demolition). For example
5
6
1.1.2 Classify the hazardous waste according to engineering
classification system : inorganic and organic aqueous, organic
liquids, oils, inorganic sludge/ solids, organic sludge/ solids
7
Liquid waste - Spent halogenated
containing admixtures solvents from metal
Organic or concentrated degreasing and dry
liquids solutions of organic cleaning.
hazardous substances. - Distillation
residues from
production of
chemical
intermediates.
9
AR
Hazardous Waste Management
10
wastes that fit the above definition can be regarded as sources of
hazardous wastes.
Solid waste disposal sites: These are mainly disposal sites for
municipal solid waste, but hazardous wastes that have not
been properly separated from other wastes are also at these
sites. In developing countries, solid waste disposal sites are a
major source of pollutant-laden leachate to surrounding areas,
as well as recyclable materials for scavengers, who can
collect and resell waste materials that have been exposed
to or that contain hazardous substances.
12
Building materials: Roofs and pipes made of materials
incorporating asbestos, copper, or other materials may present
a source of hazardous waste.
In the 1950s and 1960s in the U.S., there was a dramatic decline in the
populations of several predatory birds due to dioxin exposure. DDT
exposure at low levels was found to interfere with calcium deposition in
the eggshells of birds of prey, causing them to be thin and fragile and often
to be crushed by the parents in the nest. One well-known species affected
in this way was the Bald Eagle (Figure 1)
13
Figure 1 : Bald Eagle
14
The health effects of the hazardous wastes are dependent on the amount
(doses), and routes and duration of exposure. Temporary health effects of
hazardous waste exposure can include dizziness, headaches and nausea,
while prolonged exposure can also result in cancers, disabilities or death.
Hazardous wastes from some household waste sources are prone to easily
cause health hazards due to their proximity to potential receptors. Wastes
from other sources are further from given receptors so their exposure
routes are longer. This may result in masking or delayed manifestation of
exposure effects.
16
17
1.2.2 TOXICOLOGY
“All things are poison and nothing is without poison, only the dose permits
something not to be poisonous.”
Paracelsus, 1538
Toxicological concepts
Acute or Chronic Effects
18
Reversible or Irreversible Effects
19
1.2.3 Special Waste: Waste Oil, Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)
Waste Oil
Waste oil is unused oil that has been in some way compromised
and can no longer be used for its intended purpose6. This happens
when an oil container is not properly sealed or handled. Waste oil
can be classified as a hazardous material and must be labelled and
dealt with as such. Waste oil cannot be reused; often, it is diluted
with water or some other chemical that makes it impure. In the
past, waste oil was disposed in landfills, but this practice was
discontinued when the negative effects on the environment
became apparent.
20
Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)
ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS
1. Regulation
2. Citation and commencement
3. Interpretation
4. Notification of the generation of scheduled wastes
5. Disposal of scheduled wastes
6. Treatment of scheduled wastes
7. Recovery of material or product from scheduled wastes
8. Application for special management of scheduled wastes
9. Responsibility of waste generator
10. Storage of scheduled wastes
11. Labelling of scheduled wastes
12. Waste generator shall keep an inventory of scheduled wastes
13. Information to be provided by waste generator, contractor and
occupier of prescribed premises
14. Scheduled wastes transported outside waste generator’s premises
to be accompanied by information
15. Spill or accidental discharge
16. Conduct of training
17. Compounding of offences
18. Revocation
19. SCHEDULES
22
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 1974
Interpretation
“scheduled wastes” means any waste falling within the categories of waste
listed in the First Schedule;
23
“contractor” means any person licensed by the Director General of
Environmental Quality under subsection 18(1A) of the Act;
3. (1) Every waste generator shall, within 30 days from the date of
generation of scheduled wastes, notify the Director General of the
new categories and quantities of scheduled wastes which are
generated.
24
Treatment of scheduled wastes
25
(3) If the Director General is satisfied with the application made
under subregulation (1), the Director General may grant a
written approval either with or without conditions.
(2) Every waste generator shall ensure that scheduled wastes that
are subjected to movement or transfer be packaged, labelled and
transported in accordance with the guidelines prescribed by the
Director General.
26
(4) Areas for the storage of the containers shall be designed,
constructed and maintained adequately in accordance with the
guidelines prescribed by the Director General to prevent
spillage or leakage of scheduled wastes into the environment.
(5) Any person may store scheduled wastes generated by him for
180 days or less after its generation provided that—
(b) the Director General may at any time, direct the waste
generator to send any scheduled wastes for treatment,
disposal or recovery of material or product from the
scheduled wastes up to such quantity as he deems
necessary.
27
Labelling of scheduled wastes
10. (1) The date when the scheduled wastes are first generated, name,
address and telephone number of the waste generator shall be
clearly labelled on the containers that are used to store the
scheduled wastes.
28
(2) A waste generator shall complete Part I of the Sixth Schedule
in six copies and hand over the six copies of the Schedule to the
contractor when the scheduled wastes are delivered to him.
(4) The contractor shall within 10 days from the date of receipt of
the scheduled wastes deliver the scheduled wastes to the
occupier of any prescribed premises and hand over the
remaining four copies of the Sixth Schedule to the occupier.
(6) If the waste generator fails to receive his copy of the Sixth
Schedule from the occupier of the prescribed premises
referred to in subregulation (5) within 30 days from the date
of delivery of the scheduled wastes to the contractor referred
to in subregulation (2), he shall notify the Director General
immediately and shall investigate and inform the Director
General of the result of his investigation.
29
(7) The waste generator, contractor or occupier of the prescribed
premises shall each keep a signed copy of the Sixth Schedule
which shall be retained as a record for at least three years from
the date the scheduled wastes are received by the occupier of
the prescribed premises.
(2) The waste generator shall inform the contractor of the purpose
and use of the Seventh Schedule.
(3) The contractor shall carry with him the Seventh Schedule for
each category of scheduled wastes being transported and shall
observe and comply with the instructions contained therein.
(5) The contractor shall ensure that all his employees that are
involved in the handling, transportation and storage of scheduled
wastes attend training programmes.
(6) The contractor shall ensure that during the training programme
each employee is well informed of the purpose and use of the
Seventh Schedule.
30
Spill or accidental discharge
Conduct of training
15. Every waste generator shall ensure that all his employees involved
in the identification, handling, labelling, transportation, storage
and spillage or discharge response of scheduled wastes attend
training programmes.
Compounding of offences
31
(2) The compounding of offences referred to in subregulation (1)
shall be in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the
Environmental Quality (Compounding of Offences) Rules 1978
[P.U. (A) 281/1978].
Revocation
32
FIRST SCHEDULE
(Regulation 2)
34
SW 303 Adhesive or glue waste containing organic solvents
excluding solid polymeric materials
35
SW 317 Spent organometallic compounds including tetraethyl
lead, tetramethyl lead and organotin compounds
36
SW 4 Wastes which may contain either inorganic or organic
constituents
37
SW 411 Spent activated carbon excluding carbon from the
treatment of potable water and processes of the food
industry and vitamin production
SW 5 Other wastes
39
THIRD SCHEDULE
(Regulation 10)
LABELLING REQUIREMENT FOR SCHEDULED WASTES
EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCES
(WASTE)
Symbol (exploding bomb): black; Background: light orange
INFLAMMABLE LIQUIDS
(WASTE)
Symbol (flame): black or white; Background: red
40
INFLAMMABLE SOLIDS
(WASTE)
Symbol (flame): black; Background: white with vertical red stripes
41
OXIDIZING SUBSTANCES
(WASTE)
Symbol (flame over circle): black; Background: yellow
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
(WASTE)
Poisonous (toxic) substances
Symbol (skull over crossbones): black; Background: white
INFECTIOUS SUBSTANCES
(WASTE)
Symbol (three crescents superimposed on a circle): black;
Background: white
42
CORROSIVE SUBSTANCES
(WASTE)
Symbol (liquids spilling from two glass vessels and attacking a hand and
a metal): black; Background: upper half white, lower half black
43
PARTICULARS OF LABELS
3. The labels shall be divided into halves, the upper half of the label
shall be reserved for the pictorial symbol and the lower half for
text printed in block capitals.
4. The text shall be printed in black on all labels except when the
background of the label is black, red or blue, the text shall be in
white.
(a) stick-on;
(b) metal plates; or
(c) stencilled or printed on the container or package.
45
FOURTH SCHEDULE
(Regulation 2)
The mixing of a waste in Group A with a waste in Group B may have the
following potential consequences:
46
Group 3-A Group 3-B
Aluminium Any waste in Group 1-A or 1-B
Beryllium
Calcium
Lithium
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
Zinc powder and other reactive
metals and metal hydrides
47
Group 5-A Group 5-B
Alcohols Concentrated Group 1-A or 1-B
wastes
Aldehydes
Halogenated hydrocarbons Group 3-A wastes
Nitrated hydrocarbons and other
reactive organic compounds and
solvents
Unsaturated hydrocarbons
48
Group 7-A Group 7-B
Chlorates and other strong Organic acids
oxidizers
Chlorites Group 2-B wastes
Chromic acid Group 3-B wastes
Hypochlorites Group 5-A wastes and other
flammable and combustible
wastes
Nitrates
Nitric acid
Perchlorates
Permanganates
Peroxides
49
FIFTH SCHEDULE
(Regulation 11)
Note:
I hereby declare that all information given in this form is to the best of my
knowledge and belief true and correct in all respect.
Designation: ...........................................................................................................
I.C. Number:.............................................................................................................
50
CHAPTER TWO
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECOVERY
51
Absorption is the incorporation of a substance in one state into
another of a different state (e.g., liquids being absorbed by a solid
or gases being absorbed by a liquid).
Adsorption is the physical adherence or bonding of ions and
molecules onto the surface of another phase (e.g., reagents
adsorbed to solid catalyst surface).
AR
Figure 2.1.1: Adsorption, Adsorbant and Adsorbate
53
AR
Figure 2.1.2: Mechanism for Activated Carbon
54
2.1.3.2 Properties of Activated Carbon
A broad range of pore sizes must be available, both for ease of movement
of adsorbates through the carbon pores and for the adsorption of particular
molecular sizes. Liquid phase carbons often contain a broader pore size
distribution to remove color bodies and larger organic materials, while
55
maintaining some microporosity for the removal of taste and odor
compounds.
56
2.1.3.3 Classification of Activated Carbon
Activated carbons are complex products that are difficult to classify on the
basis of their behavior, surface characteristics, and preparation methods.
However, some broad classification is made for general purpose based on
their physical characteristics.
57
Granular activated carbon (GAC)
58
Extruded activated carbon (EAC)
Impregnated carbon
Polymer-coated carbon
Porous carbon material can be coated with a biocompatible polymer to
give a smooth and permeable coat without blocking the pores. The
resulting carbon is useful for hemoperfusion. Hemoperfusion is a
treatment technique in which large volumes of the patient's blood are
passed over an adsorbent substance in order to remove toxic substances
from the blood.
Other
60
2.1.3.4 Types of Activated Carbon Reactors and Treatment Process
Batch Reactors
Applications:
It is non-continuous and perfectly mixed closed vessel where a reaction
takes place. A common use of batch reactors in laboratories is to
determine the reaction equation and rate constant for a chemical reaction.
The kinetic information determined in a batch reactor can be used to
design other types of reactors and full-scale treatment facilities.
61
Complete-Mix Flow Reactors
62
Packed Bed Reactors
Application:
Used to study the movement of water and contaminants in
groundwater systems. → Packed bed reactors in which the
packing medium is expanded by the
63
Fluidized-Bed Reactors
64
Environmental applications
Spill clean-up
Groundwater remediation
Drinking water filtration
Air purification
Volatile organic compounds capture from painting, dry cleaning,
gasoline dispensing operations, and other processes
Medical applications
65
Mechanisms of action:
66
Gas purification
Filters with activated carbon are usually used in compressed air and gas
purification to remove oil vapors, odors, and other hydrocarbons from the
air. The most common designs use a 1 stage or 2 stage filtration principle
where activated carbon is embedded inside the filter media. Activated
charcoal is also used in spacesuit Primary Life Support Systems.
AR
67
Scrubbing mercury from stack gas
2.2 DISTILLATION
68
of the next-lowest-boiling compound is approached. When the
temperature again stabilizes, another pure fraction of the distillate can be
collected. This fraction of distillate will be primarily the compound that
boils at the second lowest temperature. This process can be repeated until
all the fractions of the original mixture have been separated.
AR
Figure 2.2.1: Industrial continuous distillation columns
69
Figure 2.2.2: Schematic diagram of a continuous binary distillation
column
70
AR
71
Distillation is one of the fundamental unit operations of chemical
engineering. If the feed contains more than two components, it is
commonly referred to as multi-component distillation and, if it contains
only two components, it is referred to as binary distillation.
72
Table 2.2.1: A distillation column with bubble-cap trays.
* The pot is filled
with liquid mixture
and heated.
* Vapour flows
upwards through the
columns as reflux
and condenses at the
top.
* Nothing is added
or withdrawn from
the still until the run
is completed.
73
2.2.4 Column Shell Construction and Column Internal: Trays and
Packing
74
2.2.4.2 Sieve Trays
Sieve trays are simply metal plates with holes in them. Vapour passes
straight upward through the liquid on the plate. The arrangement, number
and size of the holes are design parameters.
75
2.2.4.3 Valve Trays
In valve trays, perforations are covered by liftable caps. Vapour flows lifts
the caps, thus self-creating a flow area for the passage of vapour. The
lifting cap directs the vapour to flow horizontally into the liquid, thus
providing better mixing than is possible in sieve trays. Valve tray is a steel
sheet on which liftable valves are mounted. They are much more efficient
than sieve trays.
76
2.2.4.4 Liquid and Vapour Flows In a Tray Column
The image below show the direction of vapour and liquid flow across a
tray, and across a column.
AR
Figure 2.2.4: Tray Column
A Weir on the tray ensures that there is always some liquid (Holdup) on
the tray and is designed such that the the holdup is at a suitable height, e.g.
such that the bubble caps are covered by liquid. Being lighter, vapour
flows up the column and is forced to pass through the liquid, via the
openings on each tray. The area allowed for the passage of vapour on each
tray is called the Active Tray Area.
77
2.2.4.5 Tray Designs
A tray essentially acts as a mini-column, each accomplishing a fraction of
the separation task. From this we can deduce that the more trays there are,
the better the degree of separation and that overall separation efficiency
will depend significantly on the design of the tray. Trays are designed to
maximise vapour-liquid contact by considering the
78
Structured packing is formed from corrugated sheets of perforated
embossed metal or wire gauze. The result is a very open honeycomb
structure with inclined flow channels giving a relatively high surface area
but with very low resistance to gas flow. The surface enhancements have
been chosen to maximize liquid spreading. These characteristics tend to
show significant performance benefits in low pressure and low irrigation
rate applications.
79
reaction is catalysed by enzymes in the yeast. The reaction continues until
the alcohol content reaches a point equal to about 13%. After that point,
the yeast enzymes can no longer survive, and this is where the production
of beer or wine usually ends. Fortified wine or malt liquor variations of
wine and beer, respectively that are more than 13% alcohol, or 26 proof
— are exceptions. These two products are the result of mixtures between
undistilled beer and wine and products of distillation having a higher
alcohol content.
80
deuterium by means of distillation. Few industries, however, employ
distillation to a greater degree than the petroleum industry.
81
2.2.5.5 Perfume
One of the earliest uses of distilling was to make perfume, which began
around 3500 B.C. The aroma from various plants and herbs is contained
in what are known as essential oils, which can be extracted through
distillation. However, many aromatic plants tend to decompose at high
temperatures so separation by normal distillation isn’t practical. In those
instances, steam is passed through the plant material to draw out the
essential oils without burning the mixture. The steam is then captured and
condensed just as in normal distillation.
2.2.5.6 Food Flavourings
Steam distillation is also used to create natural food flavourings. The most
common are citrus oils and liquid extracts of various herbs and spices.
2.2.6 Auxiliary Equipment: Condenser, Re-Boiler and Pumps
Distillation is a process of separating component substances (fractions)
from the whole (liquid mixtures) through vaporization and condensation.
As substances (fractions) of liquid to be distilled have different temperate
for vaporization, a system should be designed to facilitate vaporization,
condensation and removal of the various condensates. Process removes
fractions of whole and it is specifically known as fractional distillation.
A typical distillation system will have following equipment:
1. Feed Tank
2. Pre-Heater
3. Kettle Reboiler
4. Distillation column
5. Main condenser
6. Vent Condenser
7. Reflux Drum
8. Product cooler
9. Receivers
82
All equipment’s are also offered individually or as a system (on-Turnkey
Basis). It can be part of alcohol distillation system or solvent recovery
system or complete chemical process system for distillation or we can also
manufacture distillation system for your proprietary distillation process.
i. Feed Tank
Feed tank is used for Feed or Raw material Storage Purpose. From
this we can pump out the liquid to preheater or directly to column
depending on need of process.
ii. Pre Heater
Pre Heater is used to heat the Feed or Raw material before liquid
feeding to column. This equipment requirement in process
depends on Process Condition, Design Parameter & Raw material
condition.
iii. Kettle Reboiler
Distillation is the process of collecting vaporizing vapour by
condensation process. Kettle Reboiler will create the vapour of
liquid to be distilled. Kettle Reboiler will have U tube bundle
inserted into the kettle. Heating media will be circulated through
the tube bundle, which in turn will transfer the heat to the liquid
inside the kettle.
iv. Distillation Column/Tower
Distillation column is the heart of distillation system. Vapour
created in kettle reboiler will be condensed in the distillation
column. Fractional distillation column will separate the
components (fractions) by repeated vaporization-condensation
cycles within distillation column. We offer packed as well as non-
structured column.
v. Main Condenser
Liquid to be distilled will be partially condensed in the distillation
column and remaining uncondensed vapour will be condensed in
the condenser. It is shell and tube condenser with vapour in the
shell and water in the tubes. The system can also have accessories
83
and supporting equipment’s like Vent condenser, Reflux drum,
product cooler and a return line as per process requirement.
vi. Vent Condenser
From the condenser, partially condensed vapour will further
condensed in the vent condenser.
vii. Reflux Drum
Part of Condensate collected from the condenser will be collected
in the reflux drum. And will be returned to the upper part of the
distillation column. Inside the column, the down flowing reflux
liquid provides cooling and condensation of the up flowing vapors
thereby increasing the efficiency of the distillation tower.
viii. Product Cooler
If your product needs to be further cooled after receiving from the
condenser, we can be offer Product Cooler.
ix. Product Receiver
Condensed final products will be collected in the product
receivers. As per your requirements we can manufactured the
product receiver.
84
2.3 ION EXCHANGE
AR
Figure 2.3.1: Ion Exchange Mechanism
The exchanged ions have the same charge, that’s to say, positive ions are
exchanged for positive ions, for example:
85
Ion-exchange resins are widely used in different separation, purification,
and decontamination processes. The most common examples are water
softening and water purification. In many cases ion-exchange resins were
introduced in such processes as a more flexible alternative to the use of
natural or artificial zeolites. Also, ion-exchange resins are highly effective
in the biodiesel filtration process.
Cationic resins are materials that have reactive groups that can
give up positive ions in exchange of other positive ions from the
liquid phase.
Anionic resins are materials that have reactive groups that can
give up negative ions in exchange of other negative ions from
the liquid phase.
From the cation or the anion preference series, the ion in the
upstream of the series can replace or remove all the ions
downstream of the series, such as Ba+2. For example Ba+2 is
able to remove all the ions lower in the series such as Na+. And
SO4 -2 is able to remove all the ions lower in the series such as
OH- .
86
AR
Figure 2.3.2: Typical Ion Exchange Installation
Column operation
87
2.3.2 Types of Resin
Cation-exchange resin
Formula: R−H acidic.
Cation exchange method removes the hardness of water
but induces acidity in it, which is further removed in
next stage of treatment of water by passing this acidic
water through anion exchange process.
Removes hardness/alkalinity
Other cations
Reaction:
R−H + M+ = R-M+ + H+.
Anion-exchange resin
Formula: NR4+OH-
Often these are styrene–divinylbenzene copolymer resins
that have quaternary ammonium cations as an integral
part of the resin matrix.
Removes anions (NO3-, SO4-2, HCO3-)
Organics : Humic and Fulvic Acid
Reaction:
NR4+OH- + HCl = NR4+Cl- + H2O.
89
Figure 2.3.5: Idealised image of water-softening process,
involving replacement of calcium ions in water with sodium
ions donated by a cation-exchange resin
The resin can be recharged by washing it with a solution containing a high
concentration of sodium ions which called brine solution (e.g. it has large
amounts of common salt (NaCl) dissolved in it). The calcium and
magnesium ions migrate from the resin, being replaced by sodium ions
from the solution until a new equilibrium is reached. The salt is used to
recharge an ion-exchange resin, which itself is used to soften the water.
The exchange reaction can be written as:
2 RNa + Ca++R2Ca + 2 Na+
91
R’’OH + Cl- R’’Cl + OH-
2 R’’OH + SO4 R’’2SO4 + 2 OH-
where R’’ represents the anion exchange resin. All anions are replaced by
hydroxide (OH– ) ions. There is no picture for this anion exchange, as it is
very similar to the cation exchange picture in figure 2.3.7 above.
At the end of the exchange process, the resin beads have loaded all cations
and anions from the water and released H+ and OH– ions. The resin beads
are nearly exhausted (fig. 2.3.8 shows them completely exhausted).
92
2.3.3.3 Ion exchange in metal separation
Ion-exchange processes are used to separate and purify metals, including
separating uranium from plutonium and other actinides,
including thorium;
and lanthanum, neodymium, ytterbium, samarium, lutetium, from each
other and the other lanthanides. There are two series of rare-earth metals,
the lanthanides and the actinides. Members of each family have very
similar chemical and physical properties. Ion exchange was for many years
the only practical way to separate the rare earths in large quantities. This
application was developed in the 1940s by Frank Spedding.
Subsequently, solvent extraction has mostly supplanted use of ion-
exchange resins except for the highest-purity products.
A very important case is the PUREX process (plutonium-uranium
extraction process), which is used to separate the plutonium and
the uranium from the spent fuel products from a nuclear reactor, and to be
able to dispose of the waste products. Then, the plutonium and uranium
are available for making nuclear-energy materials, such as new reactor fuel
and nuclear weapons.
Ion-exchange beads are also an essential component in in-situ
leach uranium mining. In-situ recovery involves the extraction of
uranium-bearing water (grading as low as 0.05% U3O8) through boreholes.
The extracted uranium solution is then filtered through the resin beads.
Through an ion-exchange process, the resin beads attract uranium from the
solution. Uranium-loaded resins are then transported to a processing plant,
where U3O8 is separated from the resin beads, and yellowcake is
produced. The resin beads can then be returned to the ion-exchange
facility, where they are reused.
The ion-exchange process is also used to separate other sets of very similar
chemical elements, such as zirconium and hafnium, which incidentally is
also very important for the nuclear industry. Zirconium is practically
transparent to free neutrons, used in building reactors, but hafnium is a
very strong absorber of neutrons, used in reactor control rods.
93
2.3.3.4 Catalysis
Ion exchange resins are used in organic synthesis, e.g.
for esterification and hydrolysis. Being high surface area and insoluble,
they are suitable for vapor-phase and liquid-phase reactions. Examples can
be found where basic (OH--form) of ion exchange resins are used to
neutralize of ammonium salts and convert quaternary ammonium
halides to hydroxides. Acidic (H+-form) ion exchange resins have been
used as solid acid catalysts for scission of ether protecting groups and for
rearrangement reactions.
2.3.3.5 Juice purification
Ion-exchange resins are used in the manufacture of fruit juices such as
orange and cranberry juice, where they are used to remove bitter-tasting
components and so improve the flavor. This allows tart or poorer-tasting
fruit sources to be used for juice production.
2.3.3.6 Sugar manufacturing
Ion-exchange resins are used in the manufacturing of sugar from various
sources. They are used to help convert one type of sugar into another
type of sugar, and to decolorize and purify sugar syrups. The principal
applications of ion exchange in the purification and treatment of sugar
solutions, juices and syrups are:
1. Softening and demineralization of sugar juices to remove
scale-forming elements prior to evaporation;
2. Decolourization with anion exchange resins;
3. Catalytic inversion of sucrose to fructose and glucose;
4. Glucose/fructose separation.
94
2.3.3.7 Pharmaceuticals
Ion-exchange resins are used in the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals, not
only for catalyzing certain reactions, but also for isolating and purifying
pharmaceutical active ingredients. Three ion-exchange resins, sodium
polystyrene sulfonate, colestipol, and cholestyramine, are used as active
ingredients. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate is a strongly acidic ion-
exchange resin and is used to treat hyperkalemia. Colestipol is a weakly
basic ion-exchange resin and is used to
treat hypercholesterolemia. Cholestyramine is a strongly basic ion-
exchange resin and is also used to treat hypercholesterolemia. Colestipol
and cholestyramine are known as bile acid sequestrants.
Ion-exchange resins are also used as excipients in pharmaceutical
formulations such as tablets, capsules, gums, and suspensions. In these
uses the ion-exchange resin can have several different functions, including
taste-masking, extended release, tablet disintegration,
increased bioavailability, and improving the chemical stability of
the active ingredients.
95
2.3.3.9 Benefits and Limitations of Ion Exchange Process
Benefits
Limitations
Limited capacity: once all ion binding sites are occupied, ions
are no longer retained (except when operating in an
electodeionization process).
Does not effectively remove organics, particles, pyrogens or
bacteria.
Chemically regenerated DI beds can generate organics and
particles.
Single use, “virgin” resins require good pretreated water quality
to be economically efficient.
96
CHAPTER THREE
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT
97
Figure 3.1.1: Simple Filtration
The mixtures are of two main types: homogeneous and heterogeneous
mixtures. A homogeneous mixture is a mixture that is uniform throughout.
A heterogeneous mixture is a mixture that is not uniform throughout, i.e.,
ingredients of the mixture is distributed unequally. Air is a homogeneous
mixture of different gases, including oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide,
and water vapour.
Homogeneous mixtures are sometimes also called solutions; especially
when it is a mixture of a solid dissolved in a liquid. An example of a
heterogeneous mixture is the mixture of sand in water. On shaking, sand
will stay undissolved and are distributed unevenly. The sand particles
floating around which will eventually settle to the bottom of the bottle
makes it a heterogeneous mixture. Different types of filters are used to
purify and to separate these mixtures from the contaminants. Based on the
type of contaminant-large or small, filters of different pore sizes can be
used, even at home.
Filtration also plays a role in water treatment. The process of filtration can
become a costly process when it comes to water treatment and water
purification. Maintenance and lack of regulation can become major
disadvantages of filtration. Also, water treatment filters are not regulated
by any health commission or department, so the effectiveness of filtration
and purification can vary widely between manufacturers. But filters have
enough advantages to be used as a mechanism of water treatment or
purification.
98
3.1.2 Clarification and Dewatering Process
3.1.2.1 Dewatering (cake filtration) or thickening,
It is disposal of the residual solids, are significant costs of the waste
treatment operation. It is suitable for slurries (typically 1 to 30% solids by
weight). Its concentrate the slurries into paste or solid form (cake) for
disposal or further processing
These steps are especially important if the final disposal option is
incineration. The incinerator will be more efficient if more water is
removed prior to incineration. If the sludge has to be transported to a
landfill, volume reduction owing to dewatering will significantly improve
the overall economics.
3.1.2.2 Clarification/clearing up
Method for removing relatively small quantity of suspended solids from
a dilute suspension to produce a clarified liquid. The key is balancing the
upstream velocity of the liquid and the particle sedimentation velocity.
4. Pressure
The simplest method being to pump the slurry into the filter
under pressure.
5. Centrifugal force
Depth filtration
101
usually takes place with treated water in the opposite flow direction. The
pressure trend over time in a filter bed can be depicted by filter resistance
diagrams.
AR
Figure 3.1.4: Diagram of Belt Filter
102
Benefits of Belt Filtration
When compared to other compression filters, belt filters use relatively
lower pressures. Although centrifuges have lower moisture content, lower
costs and simpler operations in coal tails processing, belt filters tend to
make less noise and have much quicker startup and shutdown times.
Belt filters are considered simple and reliable, with good availability, low
staffing, easy maintenance and a long life. The belt filter is most
advantageous when installed such that it is open and viewable at floor level
for easier adjustment and monitoring. This is of course subject to what
lighting and ventilation will allow.
The belt filter press is often used in wastewater treatment, and thus the
odour of the feed sludge, volatile emissions and the chemicals used in
treatment, may become a problem. One control method is to use odour-
neutralizing chemicals such as potassium permanganate. However this
only neutralizes odours and doesn’t affect any gases or chemicals
involved.
103
damaged by sharp objects. The type of feed may also affect the washing
process. The belt filter needs to be washed frequently which consumes
large amount of water and time. Water and time wastage, as well as the
associated costs can be reduced by automating the washing system and
using effluents.
104
Advantages and limitation
The advantages and limitations of rotary vacuum drum filter compared to
other separation methods are:
Advantage
Disadvantages
105
3.1.4.3 Plate and Frame Filter Press
The plate and frame filter press is the most fundamental design and the
oldest type of filter press, it has carbon steel rack that holds and clamps
the filter plates together to form a pressure chamber, the plates are made
of cast iron or plastics, with the most common being PP.
The plate and frame design is to have a solid plate covered by a filter cloth
and a hollow frame in between each plate, the slurry is pumped into one
or more of the corner holes and it travels into each frame before filtering
through the cloth.
The filtrate travels across the drainage service of the solid plate and into
one or more of the corner holes that are not being used for the slurry feed.
Once these hollow frames are full of solids, no more slurry feed can come
into the filter press and it is time to open the press and discharge the solids.
106
Features of Plate and Frame Filter Press:
1. Compact design, small size and simple structure, easy to operate and
maintain.
2. Manual operation, no need power consumption and zero running cost.
3. The rack of plate and frame filter press is made of carbon steel Q235,
strong and durable, long use life.
4. The filter plate & frame is made of PP, do not contain other filler, not
recycled material, high strength, light weight, corrosion resistance, acid
and alkali, non-toxic and tasteless.
5. Open type outlet, PP faucet, quick opening type, strong acid and
alkaline.
Advantage:
Structure is relatively simple, easy to operate, stable operation, easy
maintenance; the choice of filter area flexible; small footprint;
good adaptability to all kinds of filter media; suitable for small and
medium sized sludge dewatering.
Disadvantages:
107
3.2 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION
108
3.2.1.1 Application
Precipitation is the most well known and most commonly used technique
for the removal of metals and some anions from wastewater. Precipitation
applications can be found in every sector where metals are found in the
wastewater. However, it is noticeable that alternative solutions are
currently being selected. The reasons for this include the relatively high
effluent concentrations, the disruptive influence of surface-active
substances and complex formers, and the rising cost of silt removal.
Here are a few typical applications.
109
3.2.2 Chemical Precipitation Process Unit Operation
AR
Figure 3.2.2: Chemical Precipitation Unit
110
3.2.3 Types of Chemical Precipitation Process
3.2.3.1 Neutralization of strong acids with lime or limestone
Limestone is an alkaline agent with the ability to neutralize, or partially
neutralize strong acids. The neutralization process occurs when strong
acids, in intimate contact with limestone chips, react with Calcium
Carbonate (CaCO3, the primary constituent of limestone) to form water,
carbon dioxide, and calcium salts. The following depicts the neutralization
of hydrochloric acid by limestone.
CaCO3 + 2HCl → CaCl2 + CO2 + H2O
Due to the presence of other calcium products in the limestone chips
typically used it is quite possible for limestone to exert alkaline influences
on the wastewater stream up to an beyond a pH of 11.0, meaning that an
upper pH limit of 9.0 cannot be guaranteed and can easily be violated.
The pH neutralization process occurs as strong acids react with the calcium
carbonate in the limestone through intimate contact with small limestone
chips. A high surface area is important as is sufficiently long contact time.
The reaction is not instantaneous and requires sufficient time. Additionally
the acidic solutions must be in intimate contact with the limestone. This
leads to one of the biggest problems with the use of limestone as an
effective treatment process, the coating of the available limestone surface
area with precipitated debris.
One of the by-products of the neutralization process is calcium salts.
Calcium salts tend to be very insoluble in water. This results in the
precipitation of salts that deposit on the limestone chips forming very
effective coatings. Once coated with precipitated products, the limestone
is rendered useless and must be replaced. Other solids and organic
materials that are suspended in the waste stream will often come out as a
result of mechanical filtration thereby contributing to the coating of the
limestone chips.
111
3.2.3.2 Hydroxide Precipitation
The precipitation of metal hydroxides such as for example Al(OH) 3,
Fe(OH)3 and Zn(OH)2 is the most widely used chemical precipitation
process in hydrometallurgy. The precipitation is achieved by increasing
pH in the solution by the addition of alkaline reagents such as limestone
(CaCO3), slaked lime (Ca (OH)2), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or ammonia
(NH3).
Examples of reactions
Zn SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq) → Zn (OH)2 (s) + Na2SO4 (aq)
112
Figure 3.2.3: Solubilities of metal hydroxides as a function of
pH
113
Advantages & disadvantages of Lime and Caustic precipitation.
Precipitant
Advantages Lime- CaOH Caustic- NaOH
Low chemical cost More reactive
114
3.2.3.2 Sulfide Precipitation
When it comes to sludge volume, reusability of the sludge and effluent
quality, precipitation of metals with sulfide is superior to precipitation as
hydroxides. It has many advantages over lime precipitation:
High reactivity of sulfides with heavy metal ions and very low
solubility of metal sulfides over a broad pH range resulting in
lower effluent concentrations (See Figure 3.2.4).
Sulfide precipitation, unlike hydroxide precipitation, is relatively
insensitive to the presence of complexes and most chelating
agents.
Sulfide removes chromates and dichromates without preliminary
reduction of the chromium to the trivalent state.
A high degree of selective metal precipitation is possible with
sulfide, as opposed to hydroxide precipitation.
Metal sulfide sludges generally are more dense and stable than
metal hydroxide sludges, exhibiting better thickening and
dewatering characteristics than corresponding metal hydroxide
sludge which facilitates further processing.
Previous objections against the use of sulfide, example that it is toxic and
corrosive, do not hold anymore because adequate safety measures and the
use of modern corrosion-resistant construction materials (plastics)
eliminate these disadvantages. Sulfide precipitation would be the method
of choice, if the high cost of transporting, storing or producing sulfide on
site (as NaSH or H2S) would not have hampered its widespread application
in the metal and mining industry.
115
Figure 3.2.4: Solubility of Metal Sulfides over a Broad pH
116
3.2.3 Control Of Heat Generation During Precipitation Process
Dilution of concentrated wastes, perhaps by bleeding into dilute
metal containing wastes
Control of neutralization rate, example, and reagent feed rate – to
avoid excessive temperature rise in the reaction tank.
Addition of lime slurry (dilution water if necessary) to the
reaction tank prior to adding acid waste. This coat the tank and
protects it from strong acid, and allow dissipation of the heat of
reaction throughout the mass of slurry and dilution water in the
tank.
Cooling of the reaction tank externally or by aeration
Adequate ventilation of emissions
Use of a surface impoundment with large surface area for
neutralization
117
3.3 SOLIDIFICATION AND STABILIZATION PROCESS
3.3.1 S/S Techniques
Solidification/stabilization (S/S) techniques are akin to locking
the contaminants in the soil. It is a process that physically encapsulates
the contaminant. This technique can be used alone or combined with other
treatment and disposal methods.
The most common form of S/S is a cement process. It simply involves the
addition of cement or a cement-based mixture, which thereby limits the
solubility or mobility of the waste constituents. These techniques are
accomplished either in situ, by injecting a cement based agent into the
contaminated materials or ex situ, by excavating the materials, machine-
mixing them with a cement-based agent, and depositing the solidified mass
in a designated area. The goal of the S/S process is to limit the spread, via
leaching, of contaminated material. The end product resulting from the
solidification process is a monolithic block of waste with high structural
integrity. Types of solidifying/stabilizing agents include the following:
Portland; gypsum; modified sulfur cement, consisting of elemental sulfur
and hydrocarbon polymers; and grout, consisting of cement and other dry
materials, such as acceptable fly ash or blast furnace slag. Processes
utilizing modified sulfur cement are typically performed ex situ.
Immobilisation is a collective term for a range of treatment processes that
primarily aim to make hazardous waste safe for disposal by reducing the
potential for waste component leaching.
Stabilisation: techniques by which hazardous wastes are converted into a
more stable form.
Solidification: techniques that create a solid mass of either the original
waste, or waste that has been stabilised S/S often used in combination S/S
feedstock is often the residue from other treatment processes
118
AR
Figure 3.3.1: Solidification/stabilization
3.3.2 S/S technology has the following advantages:
Low cost because the reagents are widely available and
inexpensive
Can be used on a large variety of contaminants
Can be applied to different types of soils
Equipment is widely available and simple
High throughput rates
However, it still has the following disadvantages:
119
3.3.3 Stabilisation Process
3.3.4 Stabilisation Technologies
Stabilization is a process employing additives (reagents) to reduce the
hazardous nature of a waste by converting the waste and its hazardous
constituents into a form that minimizes the rate of contaminants migration
into the environment, or reduces the level of toxicity.
The three major areas of application for stabilization technologies
are:
Land Disposal
The land disposal of liquid waste increases the likelihood of contaminants
migration. Liquid waste, along with wet sludges, must be stabilized prior
to landfilling. To affectively stabilize liquids, the stabilization agents
cannot be absorbents (such as sawdust). The liquids absorbed by agents
could be easily released (desorbed) in the landfill when compressed under
additional loads. That is, as more material is landfilled, the weight of the
overlying material would squeeze the liquids out of the underlying
material. Therefore, the liquids must be chemically and physically bound
by the stabilization reagents so that they are not expelled by the
consolidation stresses or leached out by the downward percolation of
precipitation.
120
Site Remediation
The remediation of contaminated sites having organic wastes, inorganic
wastes, and contaminated soils may be accomplished by employing
stabilization technology. For site remediation, stabilization is used to:
121
3.3.5 Mechanisms of stabilisation processes such as encapsulation,
absorption and absorbents
3.3.5.1 Microencapsulation
S/S additives, such as encapsulators, are available that will not increase
the weight and volume of the wastes so dramatically, but these additives
tend to be more expensive and difficult to use.
In microencapsulation, hazardous waste constituents are entrapped
within the crystalline structure of the solidified matrix at a microscopic
level. As a result, even if the stabilized material degrade into relatively
small particle sizes, most of the stabilized hazardous wastes remains
entrapped. However, as with macroencapsulation, because the waste is
not chemically altered or bound, the rates of contaminant release from the
stabilized mass may increase as the particle size decreases and more
surface area is exposed.
For example, the oily waste that is encapsulated within the small pores of
the light gray matrix of fly ash, lime, and cement binder. The waste in
these very small pores is bound only by physical entrapment in the
stabilized mass, as in macroencapsulation. If the stabilized materials
degrade to very small particles over the long term, the stabilized oily waste
would be released from the matrix.
122
3.3.6 Stabilisation reagent (binder) such as cement, pozzolans, lime
soluble silicates, clay and polymers.
Examples of inorganic binders which are often used in various
combinations include cements, lime, pozzolans, which react with lime and
moisture to form a cement such as fly ash, and silicates. Among the
organic types generally used are epoxies, polyesters, asphalt, and
polyolefins (e.g. polyethylene). Organic binders have also been mixed
with inorganic types, e.g., polyurethane and cement. The performance of
a binder system for a given waste is evaluated on a case-by-case basis;
however, much has been learned in recent years about the compatibility
and performance of binders with certain wastes, which allows for some
intelligent initial decisions related to binder selection and processing
requirements.
Cements
Stabilization of hazardous waste frequently employs cement as the
principal reagent.the most common cement is Portland cement, which is
made by firing a mixture of limestone and clay or other silicate in a kiln at
high temperature. The kiln produces a clinker, which is ground to a powder
that is a mixture of Calcium, Silicate, Aluminium and Iron Oxides. For
cement based stabilization, waste materials are mixed with cement
followed by the addition of water for hydration, if necessary because the
waste does not have enough water. The hydration of the cement forms a
crystalline structure, consisting of Calcium Aluminosilicate. This result in
a rock-like, hardened mass. Concrete by definition is a particulate
composite consisting of hydrated cement and aggregate.
Pozzolanic
It include fly ash, ground blast furnace slag, and cement kiln dust. The
resulting pozzolanic structures are termed amorphous aluminosilicates.
Fly ash, the most commonly employed pozzolan, is typically about 45%
SiO2, 25% Al2O3, 15% Fe2O3, 10% CaO. In addition the amount of
unburned carbon may vary from sources to source. Like cement based
stabilization, most stabilization application involving the untreated sludge
from an Imhoff digester tank was treated with fly ash and lime reagents to
stabilized elevated levels of Cadmium, Chromium, Copper,Iron, Lead,
Magnesium,Manganese,Selenium Silver andZinc. Although the stabilized
material had a soil-like consistency, the leaching test indicated that the
123
stabilization process significantly slowed leaching of several of these
components. Unburned carbon in fly ash may adsorb organics from the
waste. As a result, a pozzolan such as fly ash may have beneficial effects
in the stabilization of both organic and inorganic species. It should be
noted that when fly ash is used, quicklime (CaO) is needed to achieve
satisfactory stabilization.
Lime
Stabilization of sludges is frequently accomplished through the addition
of Calcium Hydroxide (CaOH) or lime. The resulting reaction with
materials included in the waste result in hydrates of calcium silicate,
Calcium alumina, or calcium aluminosilicate. These materials are formed
from the reaction of calcium in the lime and aluminosilicates in the waste.
As with all additives, additional stabilization can be accomplished through
the use of other ingredients in smaller quantities. Note that lime may also
be added to raise the Ph of acidic sludges with other reagents that provide
the main stabilization reactions, such as fly ash. Lime-based stabilization
is typically best suited for inorganic contaminants and has been widely
employed for metal sludges.
Soluble silicates
Numerous metals can be treated using silicates. Soluble silicates especially
effective at precipitating the following metals: copper, zinc, manganese,
cadmium, lead, nickel, silver, magnesium and calcium. Metal silicates
exhibit low solubility over a wide pH range of 2 to 11 or greater. In
addition, soluble silicates are also effective at reducing the permeability of
the stabilized sealant. By forming precipitates in the matrix that block
pores, the movement of any mobile species through the matrix into the
environment is slowed. If the metals be pretreated by reducing the pH to
resolubilize the metal hydroxide or silicate must be slowly released or
produced over a period of time to react with metal hydroxide that is slowly
dissolving and being re-speciated.
Clay
Has proven to be an effective additive in cementious waste forms for
retarding the release of the soluble radioisotope. Illite clay was shown to
be an effective selective sorbent for Cs in the early 1960s. Illite has a
relatively low equivalent exchange capacity among clays. Gel clays have
been used for decades in geotechnical applications, example construction
124
and drilling to resist segregation (suspended aid). Prevent bleed water, and
act as an engineered hydraulic barrier to water penetration (into a
construction zone, waste disposal site and etc. the most commonly used
clay for these purposes is bentonite, sodium montmorillonite.
Sulphur Polymer
Sulfur polymer cement (SPC) was developed employing readily available
and relatively
Inexpensive chemical modifiers which significantly improve product
durability. Elemental sulfur is reacted with 5-wt% dicyclopentadiene,
which suppresses a solid phase transition responsible for the instability.
SPC is a thermoplastic material, not a hydraulic cement. It has a relatively
low melting point (120°C) and melt viscosity (about 25 centipoise), and
thus can be processed easily by a simple heated stirred mixer. Compared
with hydraulic Portland cements, sulfur cement has a number of
advantages. Sulfur concrete compressive and tensile strengths twice those
of comparable Portland cement concretes have been attained. Full strength
is reached in a matter of hours rather than several weeks. Concretes
prepared using sulfur cements are extremely resistant to most acids and
salts. Sulfates, for example, which are known to attack hydraulic cements
have little or no effect on the integrity of sulfur cement. Because of these
properties, modified sulfur cement has been proposed for use as a paving
material, and for the production of tanks, pipes, and other structures where
durable concretes are required.
125
3.3.7 Implementation of S/S Technologies Such As In-Drum Mixing,
In-Situ Mixing And Plant Mixing Alternatives
When radioactive contamination is present, other types of hazardous waste
(e.g., organic chemicals) may interfere with solidification. Treatability
studies are needed to demonstrate that the S/S process works.
Given the long period of time that radioactive waste will be a hazard, the
S/S facility must be particularly careful about the degradation of
construction materials.
For radioactive waste, there is concern about the likelihood of liner
deterioration, liner penetration, and leaching over the long-term, as well
as risks associated with the possible excavation, handling, and
transportation of radioactive waste.
In situ S/S may not be suitable for some sites because gamma radiation
might not be reduced sufficiently. With in situ S/S, consideration must be
given to any debris such as barrels, metal scrap, and wood pieces that may
interfere with the solidification process. Soil characteristics influence
whether the technology will contain the waste effectively. These
characteristics include void volume, which determines how much grout
can be injected into the site; soil pore size, which determines the size of
the cement particles that can be injected; and permeability of the
surrounding area, which determines whether water will flow preferentially
around the solidified mass. Some cement processes result in significant
increases in volume— up to double the original quantity.
126
Ex-situ S/S system are assemblies of mixers, chemical storage and feeding
devices, pumps, conveyors, and ancillary equipment. The actual treatment
and disposal scenario determines which combination to use. Mixer-based
methods use the most complex equipment, while pit mixing and spray-on
methods are the simplest. All three tehcniques are used at fixed treatment
sites such as TSDFs and waste generator facilities.
127
Figure 3.3.3: Ex-Situ treatment in a roll-off box
Furthermore, the application of ex-situ S/S involves more commonly
available equipment, and there are more ‘vendors’ available that can apply
this method of S/S. In addition, it is possible to identify more quickly any
inadequate treatment and to re-route this material back into the ‘system’
to ensure the maintenance of treatment goals, or disposal by another
method.
Ex-situ treatment also has the advantage of being suitable for shallow
soils, located above the water table, and this facilitates selective materials
removal, and a lower-cost treatment option.
The major technical disadvantages for ex-situ S/S include primarily space
requirements and ease of materials handling. However, there must be
space available to stockpile materials to be treated and to apply S/S and to
hold the treated product until verification of performance criteria is
received. It should be noted that ex-situ S/S involves significant logistical
issues, related to the transport of the contaminated media to the site of S/S
treatment and then onto the location of final disposition (which may be
off- or on-site.
In drum mixing may be preferred for treatment of small volumes of waste
or for toxic wastes. It is common practice to dispose of drums (typically,
55 gallon drums) containing hazardous liquids and sludges in open storage
areas and landfills. If the drum integrity is good, the
stabilization/solidification reagent is added directly to the drum, thus
eliminating drum crushing and drum diposal problems. However,
generally poor condition of the drums or lack of necessary headspace in
128
the drum for reagent addition and resulting volume expansion may
preclude in-drum mixing.
Experience shows that in-drum mixing has the highest per-unit cost
because of high labor content and equipment, such as on-site chemical
storage system. Chemical-batching system, mixing system and drum
handling system costs. However, if properly handled, in-drum mixing can
provide the safest and most controlled work environment.
129
3.3 THERMAL METHODS
Incineration plant means any stationary or mobile technical unit and
equipment dedicated to the thermal treatment of wastes with or without
recovery of the combustion heat generated. This includes the incineration
by oxidation of waste as well as other thermal treatment processes such as
pyrolysis, gasification or plasma processes in so far as the substances
resulting from the treatment are subsequently incinerated.
This definition covers the site and the entire incineration plant including
all incineration lines, waste reception, storage, on site pre-treatment
facilities, waste-fuel and air supply systems, boiler, facilities for the
treatment of exhaust gases, on-site facilities for treatment or storage of
residues and waste water, stack, devices and systems for controlling
incineration operations, recording and monitoring incineration conditions.
Myths Reality
Incinerators cause It is true that emissions from waste incinerators need
pollution and raise risk to be monitored continuously. But all waste
to health and incineration processes are now designed and operated
contamination of so that residual emissions of pollutants comply with
surrounding land. the emission limits set out in the Waste Incineration
Directive (2000/76/EC).
All emissions are measured continuously and online
reported to the authority. Additionally the input and
the environment are checked by bioindication
(sampling of soil, water, plants, animals- showing
measurable damages to flora, soil and water fauna)
130
Incinerators are the In the 80´s incineration was considered to be a great
largest producers of producer of dioxins. Technology meantime has
dioxins. It is the dioxins improved so emissions are negligible.
contained in the gases
from the chimneys that
Dioxins are unwanted by products of a wide range of
attract most concern
manufacturing processes including smelting, chlorine
because they are
bleaching of paper pulp and the manufacturing of
suspected of causing
some herbicides and pesticides. Some of these
cancer.
processes produce much more dioxins than
incineration.
The ash from the Bottom ash from incinerators can be used in the
incineration process road building industry.
cannot be used for any
purpose. It is
contaminated and must be
disposed only.
131
The operation of Incineration plants can be located close to residential
incineration causes more areas, which are the centers of production of waste,
pollution to the air and and this helps to reduce the volume of traffic,
annoyance due to noise pollution, noise and of course the costs for the waste
by the traffic (transport transportation. Many incinerators have their own rail
of waste to incinerator) connection (siding). In the .A.S.A. Incinerator in
Zistersdorf 70% of input material is transported
by railway transport resulting in less impact to the
environment.
132
3.4.2 Regulation specific for incineration process
Incinerators and other combustors (e.g., light-weight aggregate kilns and
cement kilns) that use hazardous wastes as fuels are regulated principally
under RCRA and CAA. A hazardous waste is one that either exhibits
specific characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, and toxicity
or is specifically listed in 40 CFR §§ 261.31 through 261.33. Facilities that
treat, store, and dispose of hazardous wastes are comprehensively
regulated under RCRA. Operators of hazardous-waste incinerators must
obtain an operating permit from either federal or state regulators under
standards promulgated by EPA. The permitting process for a new
hazardous-waste incinerator generally takes at least 3 years and entails the
investment of $5-10 million.
Incinerators burning waste contaminated with PCBs, which fall under the
Toxic Substances Control Act, must obtain a federal permit. Under
Section 112 (d) of the CAA, EPA is required to develop national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for major source
categories. EPA has determined that industrial/commercial/institutional
boilers may be a major source of emissions of one or more HAPs. To the
extent that an incinerator discharges pollutants into navigable waters, the
operator must also obtain a permit under the Clean Water Act.
133
emissions of 188 air toxics (also known as hazardous air pollutants
(HAPs).
Prior to 1990, EPA's efforts to regulate HAPs on the basis of health risk
were slowed by conflicts and litigation by interested or affected parties.
As a result, EPA had developed standards for only seven of the original
189 HAPs. In response to the lack of progress, the 1990 amendments to
the CAA shifted the regulatory tool from a risk-based emissions standard
to a technology-based standard for the sources of air toxic emissions. The
so called “MACT” (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) standards
establish control requirements which assure that all major sources of toxic
emissions (including waste incineration facilities) have the same level of
control already attained by an average of the best performing (top 12%)
sources in each pollutant category. The “residual risk” (i.e., the risk
remaining) is to be determined in order to assess the risk remaining after
the technology-based standard has been met. Section 122(f) stipulates that
if an “ample margin of safety” is not reached, then taking into
consideration “costs, energy, safety, and other relevant factors,” a standard
more stringent than the MACT standards alone may be implemented. It is
important to clarify that several of the requirements will not be in effect
until several years later. In the meantime, for existing municipal solid-
waste incinerators, there is a variety of permits of widely varied stringency
governing emissions (for example, ranging from uncontrolled for some
pollutants to state-of-the-art controls for others).
EPA is charged with measuring the risks that remain after MACT
standards are implemented and reporting its measurements to Congress
along with data on the methods used to calculate such risks, their health
implications, commercially available methods for reducing them, and
recommendations as to legislation regarding them (Steverson 1994). EPA
has completed a residual risk report to Congress on the methods to be used
to assess the residual risk after MACT standards have been promulgated
and applied (EPA 1999). As discussed later in this chapter, EPA has
developed NSPS and emission guidelines for large municipal-waste
incinerators (units with great than 250 tons per day capacity) of medical-
waste incinerators as well as hazardous-waste incinerators, lightweight
aggregate kilns, and cement kilns that burn hazardous waste.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are in place for the six
criteria pollutants mentioned above. The NAAQS set nationwide limits on
134
the atmospheric (ambient) concentrations. If it is determined that an area
is not in attainment of any of the NAAQS, that state is expected to develop
a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for achieving attainment of the NAAQS
through state-selected and enforced controls on emissions. The state must
satisfy the EPA that its SIP is adequate. Depending on location, it is
possible that some incineration facilities may face additional, more-
stringent controls as part of SIP requirements.
135
time the guidelines were issued. Plants were divided into 3 categories:
small (units burning up to 250 tons or Mg/day), large (units burning up to
2,200 Mg/day), and very large (units burning more than 2,200 Mg/day).
The regulations included maximum levels that varied with the size of the
unit for the following emissions: hydrochloric acid (HCl), oxides of
nitrogen (NOx), opacity for particles, carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur
dioxide (SO 2), and dioxins and furans. They also include process
parameters, such as load, and flue-gas temperature at the particulate-matter
control-device inlet. The regulations also require provisional certification
of the chief facility operator and shift supervisors by the American Society
of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) or through a state certification program.
A site-specific training manual to be used for training other incinerator
personnel was required. Reporting is not required for emissions during
process upsets, including startup and shutdown. Also, such data are not
used to evaluate compliance with standards.
On November 15, 1990, as EPA was preparing final versions of the
standards for new and existing municipal solid-waste incinerators,
Congress passed the 1990 CAA Amendments; a new provision, section
129 (a), required that emission standards for new incinerators and
guidelines for existing ones reflect the maximal achievable degree of
emission reduction, taking into consideration the cost and any non-air-
quality health and environmental effects and energy requirements of the
technology. The level of control was to be based on MACT. Section 129
also effectively added mercury, cadmium, lead, and fly-ash or bottom-ash
fugitive emissions to the list of regulated pollutants, expanded the
applicability of the standards to some of the smaller plants, and required
recalculation of previously promulgated limits for the other pollutants
according to a new method.
Municipal solid-waste incinerator “Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources,”
implementing sections 111 and 129 of the CAA, were promulgated on
December 19, 1995, Fed. Regist. 60(243):65387-65436.
With regard to new sources, MACT emission standards (the so-called
MACT floor) may not be less stringent than the emission control achieved
in practice by the best-controlled similar units. As applied to existing
incinerators, MACT emission standards may not be less stringent than the
average emission limitation achieved in practice by the best-performing
136
12% of units. EPA has interpreted the former definition to mean the
average performance level achieved at the uppermost 12th percentile of
existing municipal solid-waste incinerators in the United States for which
data were available, and the latter to mean the level corresponding to the
average permit level for the uppermost 12th percentile of existing
incinerators for each pollutant.
The data with which MACT floors were to be determined were the subject
of some dispute. The MACT floor could have been based on permitted
emission levels, levels achieved in practice by currently used technologies,
or levels achievable with available technology. Some environmental
groups interpreted MACT to mean, in the case of new plants, emission
levels equivalent to the best performing plant's emission levels, and for
existing plants, the average performance level achieved at the uppermost
12th percentile of existing municipal solid-waste incinerators both from a
worldwide database of facilities. The difference between this
interpretation and the permitted-emission-level interpretation is
considerable, particularly in the case of existing incinerators, in that permit
levels are usually considerably less stringent than the current state-of-the-
art performance levels.
Section 129 also requires the setting of numerical emission limits based
on MACT. That has been done for all required pollutants except mercury,
HCl, and SO2, for which a dual standard—the less stringent of a numerical
limit and a percentage reduction —is proposed. In practice, the percentage
reduction usually applies.
Besides the MACT emission limitations, the December 1995 standards
and guidelines required that all municipal solid-waste incinerators
handling waste at over 35 Mg/day adhere to good combustion practices,
which include the following requirements:
138
A siting analysis is required for new plants, as is a material-separation
plan. The siting analysis is performed to consider “the impact of the
affected facility on ambient air quality, visibility, soils and vegetation” and
“air pollution control alternatives that minimize, on a site-specific basis,
to the maximum extent practicable, potential risks to the public health or
the environment” (40 CFR § 60.57b (b)(1), (2)). No other substantive
requirements are stated. The requirements for the material-separation
plans are largely procedural; EPA has not specified any particular
minimum performance levels, separation-system design, or materials to be
separated. To ensure proper siting of a landfill or incinerator, it is
important to consider current and projected prevention, recycling, and
composting levels and the effect of diversion on the character of the
resulting waste stream that serves as the incinerator feedstock.
On April 8, 1997, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit vacated the emission guidelines and new source performance
standards as they apply to municipal solid-waste incinerator units with the
capacity to combust less than or equal to 250 tons per day of municipal
solid waste, and all cement kilns combusting municipal solid waste. As a
result the requirements described above apply only to municipal-waste
combustor units with the capacity to burn more than 250 tons per day.
On August 25, 1997, EPA amended the emission guidelines and standards
that were promulgated on December 19, 1995 (Fed. Regist.
62(164):4511645127) to make them consistent with the court decision.
That amendment document also added supplemental emission guideline
limits for four pollutants: hydrogen chloride, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen
oxides, and lead. The amendments did not add any additional emission
limits to the standards for new facilities.
139
3.4.3 The combustion principles such as excess air, fuels, wastes
containing sulphur, halogens, nitrogen and inorganic; metals.
Use of heat
The heat produced by an incinerator can be used to generate steam which
may then be used to drive a turbine in order to produce electricity. The
typical amount of net energy that can be produced per tonne municipal
waste is about 2/3 MWh of electricity and 2 MWh of district heating. Thus,
incinerating about 600 metric tons (660 short tons) per day of waste will
produce about 400 MWh of electrical energy per day (17 MW of electrical
power continuously for 24 hours) and 1200 MWh of district heating
energy each day.
Pollution
Incineration has a number of outputs such as the ash and the emission to
the atmosphere of flue gas. Before the flue gas cleaning system, if
installed, the flue gases may contain particulate matter, heavy metals,
dioxins, furans, sulfur dioxide, and hydrochloric acid. If plants have
inadequate flue gas cleaning, these outputs may add a significant pollution
component to stack emissions.
In a study from 1997, Delaware Solid Waste Authority found that, for
same amount of produced energy, incineration plants emitted fewer
particles, hydrocarbons and less SO2, HCl, CO and NOx than coal-fired
power plants, but more than natural gas–fired power plants. According to
Germany's Ministry of the Environment, waste incinerators reduce the
amount of some atmospheric pollutants by substituting power produced
by coal-fired plants with power from waste-fired plants.
140
Gaseous emissions
Dioxin and furans
The most publicized concerns from environmentalists about the
incineration of municipal solid wastes (MSW) involve the fear that it
produces significant amounts of dioxin and furan emissions. Dioxins and
furans are considered by many to be serious health hazards. The EPA
announced in 2012 that the safe limit for human oral consumption is 0.7
picograms Toxic Equivalence (TEQ) per kilogram bodyweight per day,
which works out to 17 billionths of a gram for a 150 lb person per year.
According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the
combustion percentages of the total dioxin and furan inventory from all
known and estimated sources in the U.S. (not only incineration) for each
type of incineration are as follows: 35.1% backyard barrels; 26.6%
medical waste; 6.3% municipal wastewater treatment sludge; 5.9%
municipal waste combustion; 2.9% industrial wood combustion. Thus, the
controlled combustion of waste accounted for 41.7% of the total dioxin
inventory.
Backyard barrel burning of household and garden wastes, still allowed in
some rural areas, generates 580 grams (20 oz) of dioxins annually. Studies
conducted by the US-EPA demonstrated that the emissions from just one
family using a burn barrel produced more emissions than an incineration
plant disposing of 200 metric tons (220 short tons) of waste per day by
1997 and five times that by 2007 due to increased chemicals in household
trash and decreased emissions by municipal incinerators using better
technology.
However, the same researchers found that their original estimates for the
burn barrel were high, and that the incineration plant used for comparison
represented a theoretical 'clean' plant rather than any existing facility.
Their later studies found that burn barrels produced a median of 24.95
nanograms TEQ per lb garbage burned, so that a family burning 5 lbs of
trash per day, or 1825 lbs per year, produces a total of 0.0455 mg TEQ per
year, and that the equivalent number of burn barrels for the 83.8 grams
(2.96 oz) of the 251 municipal waste combustors inventoried by the EPA
in the U.S. in 2000, is 1,841,700, or on average, 7337 family burn barrels
per municipal waste incinerator.
141
Most of the improvement in U.S. dioxin emissions has been for large-scale
municipal waste incinerators. As of the year 2000, although small-scale
incinerators (those with a daily capacity of less than 250 tons) processed
only 9% of the total waste combusted, these produced 83% of the dioxins
and furans emitted by municipal waste combustion.
CO2
As for other complete combustion processes, nearly all of the carbon
content in the waste is emitted as CO2 to the atmosphere. MSW contains
approximately the same mass fraction of carbon as CO2 itself (27%), so
incineration of 1 ton of MSW produces approximately 1 ton of CO2.
If the waste was landfilled, 1 ton of MSW would produce approximately
62 cubic metres (2,200 cu ft) methane via the anaerobic decomposition of
the biodegradable part of the waste. Since the global warming potential of
methane is 34 and the weight of 62 cubic meters of methane at 25 degrees
Celsius is 40.7 kg, this is equivalent to 1.38 ton of CO2, which is more than
the 1 ton of CO2 which would have been produced by incineration. In some
countries, large amounts of landfill gas are collected. Still the global
warming potential of the landfill gas emitted to atmosphere is significant.
In the US it was estimated that the global warming potential of the emitted
landfill gas in 1999 was approximately 32% higher than the amount of
CO2 that would have been emitted by incineration. Since this study, the
global warming potential estimate for methane has been increased from 21
to 35, which alone would increase this estimate to almost the triple GWP
effect compared to incineration of the same waste.
In addition, nearly all biodegradable waste has biological origin. This
material has been formed by plants using atmospheric CO2 typically
within the last growing season. If these plants are regrown the CO2 emitted
from their combustion will be taken out from the atmosphere once more.
Such considerations are the main reason why several countries
administrate incineration of biodegradable waste as renewable energy. The
rest, mainly plastics and other oil and gas derived products – is generally
treated as non-renewables.
Different results for the CO2 footprint of incineration can be reached with
different assumptions. Local conditions (such as limited local district
heating demand, no fossil fuel generated electricity to replace or high
levels of aluminium in the waste stream) can decrease the CO2 benefits of
142
incineration. The methodology and other assumptions may also influence
the results significantly. For example, the methane emissions from
landfills occurring at a later date may be neglected or given less weight, or
biodegradable waste may not be considered CO2 neutral. A study by
Eunomia Research and Consulting in 2008 on potential waste treatment
technologies in London demonstrated that by applying several of these
(according to the authors) unusual assumptions the average existing
incineration plants performed poorly for CO2 balance compared to the
theoretical potential of other emerging waste treatment technologies.
Other emissions
Other gaseous emissions in the flue gas from incinerator furnaces include
nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, hydrochloric acid, heavy metals, and fine
particles. Of the heavy metals, mercury is a major concern due to its
toxicity and high volatility, as essentially all mercury in the municipal
waste stream may exit in emissions if not removed by emission controls.
The steam content in the flue may produce visible fume from the stack,
which can be perceived as a visual pollution. It may be avoided by
decreasing the steam content by flue-gas condensation and reheating, or
by increasing the flue gas exit temperature well above its dew point. Flue-
gas condensation allows the latent heat of vaporization of the water to be
recovered, subsequently increasing the thermal efficiency of the plant.
Flue-gas cleaning
The quantity of pollutants in the flue gas from incineration plants may or
may not be reduced by several processes, depending on the plant.
Particulate is collected by particle filtration, most often electrostatic
precipitators (ESP) and/or baghouse filters. The latter are generally very
efficient for collecting fine particles. In an investigation by the Ministry of
the Environment of Denmark in 2006, the average particulate emissions
per energy content of incinerated waste from 16 Danish incinerators were
below 2.02 g/GJ (grams per energy content of the incinerated waste).
Detailed measurements of fine particles with sizes below 2.5 micrometres
(PM2.5) were performed on three of the incinerators: One incinerator
equipped with an ESP for particle filtration emitted 5.3 g/GJ fine particles,
while two incinerators equipped with baghouse filters emitted 0.002 and
0.013 g/GJ PM2.5. For ultra-fine particles (PM1.0), the numbers were
4.889 g/GJ PM1.0 from the ESP plant, while emissions of 0.000 and
143
0.008 g/GJ PM1.0 were measured from the plants equipped with baghouse
filters.
Acid gas scrubbers are used to remove hydrochloric acid, nitric acid,
hydrofluoric acid, mercury, lead and other heavy metals. The efficiency of
removal will depend on the specific equipment, the chemical composition
of the waste, the design of the plant, the chemistry of reagents, and the
ability of engineers to optimize these conditions, which may conflict for
different pollutants. For example, mercury removal by wet scrubbers is
considered coincidental and may be less than 50%. Basic scrubbers
remove sulfur dioxide, forming gypsum by reaction with lime.
Waste water from scrubbers must subsequently pass through a waste water
treatment plant.
Sulfur dioxide may also be removed by dry desulfurization by injection
limestone slurry into the flue gas before the particle filtration.
NOx is either reduced by catalytic reduction with ammonia in a catalytic
converter (selective catalytic reduction, SCR) or by a high-temperature
reaction with ammonia in the furnace (selective non-catalytic reduction,
SNCR). Urea may be substituted for ammonia as the reducing reagent but
must be supplied earlier in the process so that it can hydrolyze into
ammonia. Substitution of urea can reduce costs and potential hazards
associated with storage of anhydrous ammonia.
Heavy metals are often adsorbed on injected active carbon powder, which
is collected by particle filtration.
Solid outputs
Incineration produces fly ash and bottom ash just as is the case when coal
is combusted. The total amount of ash produced by municipal solid waste
incineration ranges from 4 to 10% by volume and 15–20% by weight of
the original quantity of waste, and the fly ash amounts to about 10–20%
of the total ash. The fly ash, by far, constitutes more of a potential health
hazard than does the bottom ash because the fly ash often contain high
concentrations of heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, copper and zinc
as well as small amounts of dioxins and furans. The bottom ash seldom
contain significant levels of heavy metals. At present although some
historic samples tested by the incinerator operators' group would meet the
being ecotoxic criteria at present the EA say "we have agreed" to regard
144
incinerator bottom ash as "non-hazardous" until the testing programme is
complete.
Other pollution issues
Odor pollution can be a problem with old-style incinerators, but odors and
dust are extremely well controlled in newer incineration plants. They
receive and store the waste in an enclosed area with a negative pressure
with the airflow being routed through the boiler which prevents unpleasant
odors from escaping into the atmosphere. However, not all plants are
implemented this way, resulting in inconveniences in the locality.
An issue that affects community relationships is the increased road traffic
of waste collection vehicles to transport municipal waste to the incinerator.
Due to this reason, most incinerators are located in industrial areas. This
problem can be avoided to an extent through the transport of waste by rail
from transfer stations.
3.4.4 Gases, vapours and flares
3.4.7 Incinerator for Solid Waste Hearth-Type Such As Rotary Kiln
& Fluidized Bed
Rotary-kiln
The rotary-kiln incinerator is used by municipalities and by large industrial
plants. This design of incinerator has two chambers: a primary chamber
and secondary chamber. The primary chamber in a rotary kiln incinerator
consists of an inclined refractory lined cylindrical tube. The inner
refractory lining serves as sacrificial layer to protect the kiln structure.
This refractory layer needs to be replaced from time to time. Movement of
the cylinder on its axis facilitates movement of waste. In the primary
chamber, there is conversion of solid fraction to gases, through
volatilization, destructive distillation and partial combustion reactions.
The secondary chamber is necessary to complete gas phase combustion
reactions.
The clinkers spill out at the end of the cylinder. A tall flue-gas stack, fan,
or steam jet supplies the needed draft. Ash drops through the grate, but
many particles are carried along with the hot gases. The particles and any
combustible gases may be combusted in an "afterburner".
145
AR
Figure 3.4.2: Rotary Kiln Incinerator
147
Figure 3.4.3: Liquid Injection Incinerator
148
Table 3.4.1: Comparison between Fluidized Bed Reactor with
Rotary Kiln
149
CHAPTER FOUR
HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL
151
5.2 Essential Components of a Landfill
AR
Components of a Landfill
152
e) A surface water drainage system which collects and removes all
surface runoff from the landfill site.
f) An environmental monitoring system which periodically collects
and analyses air, surface water, soil-gas and ground water
samples around the landfill site.
g) A closure and post-closure plan which lists the steps that must be
taken to close and secure a landfill site once the filling operation
has been completed and the activities for long-term monitoring,
operation and maintenance of the completed landfill.
153
waste. In addition, the amount of settlement a waste will undergo due to
overburden stress and due to biodegradation should also be taken into
account.
Liner System
Three types of liner systems are usually adopted and these are described
hereafter:
154
a flexible geomembrane is placed over a clay or amended soil barrier. A
leachate collection system is placed over the composite barrier. Single
composite liner system are often the minimum specified liner system for
non-hazardous wastes such as MSW.
(c) Double Liner System: In a double liner system a single liner system
is placed twice, one beneath the other. The top barrier (called the primary
barrier) is overlaid by a leachate collection system. Beneath the primary
barrier, another leachate collection system (often called the leak detection
layer) is placed followed by a second barrier (the secondary barrier). This
type of system offers double safety and is often used beneath industrial
waste landfills. It allows the monitoring of any seepage which may escape
the primary barrier layer.
155
5.3 Leachate Collection Systems
Liner Components
Clay: To protect the ground water from landfill contaminants, clay liners
are constructed as a simple liner that is two- to five-feet thick. In composite
and double liners, the compacted clay layers are usually between two- and
five-feet thick, depending on the characteristics of the underlying geology
and the type of liner to be installed. Regulations specify that the clay used
can only allow water to penetrate at a rate of less than 1.2 inches per year.
The effectiveness of clay liners can be reduced by fractures induced by
freeze-thaw cycles, drying out, and the presence of some chemicals.
156
In theory, one foot of clay is enough to contain the leachate. The reason
for the additional clay is to safeguard the environment in the event of some
loss of effectiveness in part of the clay layer. The efficiency of clay liners
can be maximized by laying the clay down in four- to six-inch layers and
then compacting each layer with a heavy roller.
The efficiency of clay liners is impaired if they are allowed to dry out
during placement. Desiccation of the clay during construction results in
cracks that reduce the liner efficiency. In addition, clays compacted at low
moisture contents are less effective barriers to contaminants than clays
compacted at higher moisture contents. Liners that are made of a single
type of clay perform better than liners constructed using several different
types.
157
Geotextiles: In landfill liners, geotextiles are used to prevent the
movement of small soil and refuse particles into the leachate collection
layers and to protect geomembranes from punctures. These materials
allow the movement of water but trap particles to reduce clogging in the
leachate collection system.
158
5.4 Environmental Protection Features
Leachate - the landfill must provide a system to collect, contain
and possibly treat the leachate. Double-liner is used to control
the emissions.
Landfill gas control - gases are expected as a byproduct of a
landfill such as methane. Landfill gas typically is either vented or
collected and flared or incinerator.
Surface water control - Surface water from offsite upstream
location is often directed around or away from the landfill. On-
site run-off is diverted directly off-site.
Hazardous landfill must provided with the system to Collect, Contain and
Possibly Treat Leachate. A minimum of double-liner system is placed at
the bottom and side slopes of the facility prior to initial placement of
hazardous waste. This liner system will contain leachate that later may be
generated in the deposited waste and then flow downward by gravity.
Leachate that accumulates above the liner is directed to one or more
central collection sumps through a series or perforated plastic collection
pipes. From these sumps leachate is pumped out for treatment on-site or
ttreatment Off-site and ultimate disposal.
According to EPA regulations, the bottom liner was,
Layer Of Recompacted Clay or
other Natural Material with a minimum thickness of 0.91m (3ft)
and a permeability of no more than 1x10ˉ7 cm/s or
Flexible-membrane Liner (FML)
159
The upper layer must be an FML to avoid migration of leachate into the
top liner. To facilitate removal of leachate from the liner, the landfill
bottom is sloped and sufficient number of drainage pipes are provided so
that the leachate depth over the liner does not exceed 0.3m (1ft).
Leachate generation is also reduced through the placement of a low-
permeability cap over completed portions of the landfillThis cap must
have a permeability less than or equal to the permeability of the bottom
liner system. The hydrogeologic setting would preclude leachate
migration to ground or sufrace water. Hydrogeologic factors at the site
could provide a degree protection, these include:
on-site soils with significant attenuative capacity
(e.g:certain clays) and/or
a substantial thickness of soil situated between the
landfill and ground and surface water
160
limited amounts of oxygen are present in a landfill when methane
concentrations reach this critical level, there is little danger that the landfill
will explode. However, methane mixtures in the explosive range can form
if landfill gas migrates off-site and mixes with air.
161
non-methane organic compounds (NMOC). The landfill is required to
have an active LFG control and collection system.
162
5.4.3 Surface Water Control ( RUN-OFF)
163
5.4.4 Other Protection Features
Basic Soil Cover installed for municipal solid waste landfills (MSWL) to
be closed using engineered covers and are designed with intent to meet the
following performance objectives:
cover permeability less than or equal to the permeability of the
bottom liner/subsoil or no greater than 10-5 cm/sec;
minimize infiltration using no less than 45 cm of soil; and
minimize erosion using no less than 15 cm of topsoil for plant
growth.
The installed test cover is 60 cm thick. It is constructed of two
principal layers. The top vegetation layer is 15 cm of loosely laid
topsoil. The bottom layer is a 45 cm thick compacted soil barrier
layer.
164
Functions of cover soil is to impede rainfall infiltration and control the
odor and airborne emissions from deposited waste.
165
5.4.4.2 Geo-membrane
When a hazardous waste management unit stops receiving waste at the end
of its active life, it must be cleaned up, closed, monitored, and maintained
in accordance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
closure and post-closure care requirements. All hazardous waste
management units, and the treatment, storage and disposal facilities
(TSDFs) where they are located, are subject to closure and post-closure
care requirements.
166
“interim status facilities”. The various types of hazardous waste
management units (e.g., containers, tanks, drip pads, containment
buildings, waste piles and surface impoundments) are also subject to unit
specific closure requirements.
5.5.1 Closure
In clean closure, owners remove all wastes from the unit and
decontaminate or remove all equipment, structures, and
surrounding soils. Regulations require this approach for
containers, tanks, waste piles, incinerators, drip pads, and
containment buildings.
Closing with the waste in place, sometimes referred to as “closure
as a landfill,” is the required closure method for landfills, land
treatment units, and any other hazardous waste management unit
that cannot meet the clean closure requirements. This also
includes when owners cannot remove all waste and contamination
from tanks, waste piles, drip pads, and containment buildings.
167
5.5.2 Closure Plan
All TSDFs are required to prepare and submit written closure plans. A
permitted facility submits this plan as part of its permit application. Once
the plan is approved by the permitting agency, it becomes part of the
facility’s operating permit. Interim status facilities must have written
closure plans within six months of becoming subject to the closure
regulations.
168
5.5.3 Closure Timetables
After a unit receives its last shipment of hazardous waste, it has 30 days to
commence closure operations. Within 90 days of receipt of the last
shipment, all waste must be removed (if clean closing) or disposed on site
(if closing with waste in place). All closure operations must be completed
within 180 days of receiving the final waste shipment. In some cases, it
may be possible for the facility to receive extensions on the 90- and 180-
day deadlines from the EPA Regional Administrator.
After closure operations are complete, the facility has 60 days to certify
closure completion by submitting a written certification via registered mail
to the EPA Regional Administrator. This certification must be signed by
an independent, registered, professional engineer. At the same time (i.e.,
within 60 days of completing closure), a survey plat indicating the location
and dimensions of the closed hazardous waste management unit(s) or
facility must be submitted to the EPA Regional Administrator or local
zoning authority.
169
5.5.4 Post Closure Care
Post-closure care is required for land disposal units that leave waste in
place upon closure (i.e., landfills, land treatment units, surface
impoundments, or any other hazardous waste management unit that cannot
achieve the clean closure standards). These sites must monitor and
maintain liners, final covers, leachate collection and removal systems, leak
detection systems, and gas collection systems to protect the surrounding
environment and population from releases of hazardous constituents.
The standard post-closure care period is 30 years, but this can be shortened
or extended on a case-by-case basis by the permitting authority (i.e., the
EPA Region or the authorized state regulatory agency).
Each unit is also subject to unit specific post-closure care requirements
found in 40 CFR part 264 or 265 subparts:
K (Surface Impoundments)
L (Waste Piles)
M (Land Treatment)
N (Landfills)
X (Miscellaneous Units)
All facilities required to provide post-closure care need to obtain a post-
closure care permit. In applying for a permit, the facility must complete
and submit a post-closure care plan. This plan includes:
A description of the planned groundwater monitoring program.
A description of planned maintenance activities for the waste
containment systems (e.g., liners, final covers, leachate
management systems).
Contact information during the required post-closure care period.
Once the post-closure care period ends, the facility owner/operator must
provide (via registered mail) a certification of post-closure care
170
completion to the EPA Regional Administrator. This certification is due
within 60 days of completing post-closure care and must be signed by the
facility owner/operator and an independent, registered professional
engineer.
EPA has issued the Guidelines for Evaluating and Adjusting the Post-
Closure Care Period for Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities under
Subtitle C of RCRA. This guidance assists regulators in evaluating
conditions at hazardous waste disposal facilities subject to Subtitle C of
the RCRA that are approaching the end of the original 30-year post-closure
care period, and in determining whether the post-closure care period
should be adjusted or allowed to end. It also provides information to assist
facility owners and operators in preparing documentation to inform the
regulators’ evaluations. This guidance increases transparency and
efficiency to the decision making process.
171
CHAPTER FIVE
CLINICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT
Clinical waste is the term used to describe waste produced from healthcare
and similar activities that may pose a risk of infection, for example, swabs,
bandages, dressings etc. or may prove hazardous, for example
medicines. Other than that, it is also infectious / medical or Clinical Waste
not only that from hospitals, but also waste from biological research
facilities and water analysis laboratories. Medical waste includes human
tissues.
172
Clinical wastes are wastes containing:-
Human or animal tissue;
Blood or body fluids;
Excretions;
Drugs;
Pharmaceutical products;
Soiled swabs or dressings;
Syringes, needles, sharps;
Any waste that has come into contact or been mixed with any of
the above types of wastes;
Waste unless rendered safe may prove hazardous to any person
coming into contact with it.
173
Waste containing one or more hazardous substances
or products that are explosive, oxidising, flammable,
toxic, harmful, corrosive, irritant, carcinogenic,
teratogenic or mutagenic.
To further define clinical wastes, the Ministry of Health has included these
definitions in its guidelines:-
Any waste which consists wholly or partly of human or animal
tissue, blood or other body fluids, excretions, drugs or other
pharmaceutical products, swabs or dressings, syringes, needles or
other sharp instruments, being waste which unless rendered safe
may prove hazardous to any person coming into contact with it;
and
Any other waste arising from medical, nursing, dental, veterinary,
pharmaceutical or similar practices, investigation, treatment, care,
teaching or research, or the collection of blood for transfusion,
being waste which may cause infection to any person coming into
contact with it.
LARGE SOURCE
University hospitals and clinics
Maternity hospitals and clinics
General hospitals
MEDIUM SOURCE
Medical centres
Out-patient clinics
Mortuary/autopsy facilities
Farm and equine centers
Hospitals
Medical laboratories
174
Medical research facilities
Animal hospitals
Blood banks and transfusion centres
Emergency services
SMALL SOURCE
General medical practitioners
Convalescent homes
Nursing and remedial homes
Medical consulting rooms
Dental practitioners
Animal boarding and hunt kennels
Tattooists
Acupuncturist
Veterinary Practitioners
Pharmacies
Cosmetic piercers
GROUP CLASSIFICATION
A Human tissues/animal carcasses/infections waste materials
identifiable human tissue,
blood,
animal carcasses and tissue from veterinary
centres, hospitals or laboratories.
Soiled surgical dressings,
swabs and other similar soiled waste.
Other waste materials, for example from
infectious disease cases,
excluding any in Groups B-E.
175
B Sharp
Discarded syringe needles,
cartridges,
broken glass and
any other contaminated disposable sharp
instruments or items.
C Microbial Cultures
Microbiological cultures and potentially infected
waste from pathology departments and other
clinical or research laboratories
AR
176
5.4 The Methods Of Disposing Clinical Waste.
177
Labelling can be done in a number of ways: -
- writing the information on the bag or container;
- using pre-printed tape;
- using pre-printed self-adhesive address labels supplied on
a peel-off roll;
- Tie-on tag label, with information written on them;
- Self-locking plastic tags, pre-printed with all the required
information.
179
5.4.4 Transportation of Clinical Waste
The transportation of clinical waste from a central storage area to
an approved facility requires the use of dedicated vehicles.
The vehicle shall be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected
immediately following any internal spillage. The cleaning should
be carried out on a proper surfaced area with the drainage running
to the foul sewer.
There are several methods that have been successful in the treatment of
infectious waste. The following slides will discuss treatment that may be
available at your facility. The methods discussed are:
1. Autoclaving (steam sterilization)
2. Incineration
3. Thermal inactivation
4. Gas/Vapor Sterilization
5. Chemical Disinfection
6. Sterilization by irradiation (radiofrequency and microwave)
5.5. Autoclaving
Autoclaving (heating under high pressure) is widely accepted as
an effective medical waste treatment technology.
Steam sterilization, autoclaving, involves the use of saturated
steam within a pressure vessel at temperatures high enough to kill
infectious agents in the waste. Sterilization is accomplished
primarily by steam penetration.
Steam sterilization is most effective with low-density material
such as plastics, metal pans, bottles, and flasks. High-density
polyethylene and polypropylene plastic should not be used in this
process because they do not facilitate steam penetration to the
waste load.
Plastic bags should be placed in a rigid container before steam
treatment to prevent spillage and drain clogging.
Bags should be opened and caps and stoppers should be loosened
immediately before they are place in the steam sterilizer.
180
Care should be taken to separate infectious wastes from other
hazardous wastes.
Infectious waste that contains non infectious hazards should not
be steam-sterilized.
Waste that contains antineoplastic drugs, toxic chemicals, or
chemicals that would be volatilized by steam should not be steam-
sterilized.
Persons involved in steam sterilizing should be trained in handling
techniques to minimize exposure to hazards from these wastes.
These should include:
Use of protective equipment
Minimization of aerosol formation
Prevention of spillage during autoclave loading/unloading
Prevention of burns from handling hot containers
Management of spills
Check autoclave temperature to ensure that the proper temperature
is being maintained for a long enough period during the cycle.
Steam sterilizers should be routinely inspected.
5.5.2 Incineration
Medical waste incineration involves the burning of wastes
produced by hospitals, veterinary facilities, and medical research
facilities. These wastes include both infectious ("red bag")
medical wastes as well as non-infectious, general housekeeping
wastes. The emission factors presented here represent emissions
when both types of these wastes are combusted rather than just
infectious wastes.
In the world of generated medical waste, two of the most
common disposal methods are incineration and autoclaving.
Whereas a medical waste autoclave runs at about 300 degrees
(Fahrenheit) and sterilizes items through heated steam, an
incinerator runs at 1,800 degrees.
When waste material emerges from an incinerator, all that is left
is a bit of residue—also sometimes referred to as “ash” or “dust.”
In medical waste autoclaves, however, the items are still
generally intact after the sterilization process.
181
5.5.3 Thermal Inactivation
Thermal inactivation involves the treatment of waste with high
temperatures to eliminate infectious agents.
This method is usually used for large volumes.
Liquid waste is collected in a vessel and heated by heat
exchangers or a steam jacket surround the vessel.
The types of pathogens in the waste determine the temperature
and duration of treatment.
After treatment, the contents can be discharged into the sanitary
sewer in a manner that complies with State, Federal, and local
requirements.
This method requires higher temperatures and longer treatment
cycles than steam treatment.
182
5.5.6 Sterilization by Irradiation
Advantages of irradiation:
- Electricity requirements are nominal.
- Steam is not required.
- No heat or chemicals remain the treated waste.
- The principal disadvantages are as follows:
- Capital costs are high.
- Highly trained personnel are required.
- Space requirements are great.
- Worker exposure as a result of leaks in seals or poor work
practices.
- Disposal of the radiation source may pose problems.
183
The factors which affect microwave treatment of medical waste
include the frequency and wavelength of the irradiation, the
duration of the exposure, destruction and moisture content of the
waste material, process temperature, and the mixing of waste
during treatment.
184