Professional Documents
Culture Documents
June 1, 2010 21
Current Issues
the water stress in the area at issue, the more urgently the
pipeline losses should be reduced.
The economic attractiveness of the given technologies to adapt to
climate change or water stress depends on the respective
framework conditions. Particularly sophisticated methods are only
likely to be applied if the local water prices are high enough or if
water stress does not allow any other alternative. It is precisely the
low water prices to date that have prevented the technologies from
finding greater application so far.
Climate funds are a financing option
The issue of funding arises also in relation to the technologies
Case study: Windhoek
described above. Companies from industrial countries must
The capital of Namibia, Windhoek, lies in an
arid region. The nearest rivers carrying water themselves ensure that the necessary adjustments are made. In the
the entire year are 700 km and 900 km away case of developing countries and emerging markets, all the forms of
from the city. Because the city is situated at funding already outlined at the end of section 3.3 may be taken into
1,650 metres above sealevel and at a consideration. Since these measures are meant to pursue the
distance of about 250 km from the Atlantic
objective of adjusting to the negative consequences of climate
Ocean, seawater desalination does not make
business sense. Therefore, the city secures its change, so-called climate funds may serve as an additional source
water requirements not only via drilled wells of financing. These may be fed, for example, from the proceeds of
and dams projects but also by using auctions of emission allowances. To illustrate, the share of
wastewater. Two treatment plants turn allowances to be auctioned off in EU emissions trading will increase
wastewater into non-potable and potable
steadily from 2012; a portion of the receipts is likely to be earmarked
water. The cost of doing so comes to less than
one euro per cubic metre of water, which is for climate protection and adaptation measures in the developing
affordable for the local population. countries and emerging markets.
5. Investments in the water market
There is a huge need for investment in the global water sector,
though the focus varies from region to region. Going forward, the
industrial countries will have to boost investment in the maintenance
and modernisation of their existing water infrastructure. Extensive
expansion and newbuild projects are not considered to have top
priority there simply because the demographic development is
moderate in comparison with that of developing countries and
Climate funds emerging markets. Nonetheless, such expansion is necessary, for in
During the Copenhagen climate conference in countries such as the United States and France the population will
late 2009 it was set out in the Copenhagen continue to grow. In the emerging markets, the big challenge is to
Accord that a total of USD 30 bn was to flow ensure that the development of the infrastructure keeps pace with
from the rich countries to the poor countries the population growth, the rising degree of industrialisation and the
between 2010 and 2012 so the latter could increasing demands of agriculture. Neither challenge was met in the
lower their own greenhouse gas emissions
and adapt for the negative consequences of past: in many industrial countries the water infrastructure was not
climate change. From 2020, some USD 100 maintained adequately. And in the poorer countries the development
bn is to be made available annually. Although of the infrastructure has lagged behind the increase in demand for
the Copenhagen Accord is not legally binding, water.
the prospective financial transfers are one of
the few concrete results of the climate Investment requirements go into the triple-digit billions
conference.
As a consequence there is enormous pent-up demand for
investment in the water sector. Estimates differ on the actual
investment needs. For example, the World Business Council for
Sustainable Development (WBCSD) estimates that the investment
Enormous pent-up demand in
required for exchanging the outdated infrastructure in the OECD
developing countries and emerging
countries alone will total about USD 200 bn per year. 18 Since much
markets
18
The OCED itself estimates that the annual operating and investment expenditures
for water supply and wastewater disposal in the OECD countries run to about USD
600 bn. In Germany, the actual investment figures for public water supply and
wastewater disposal alone add up to around EUR 7 bn per year. This does not
include corporate investments and spending by households, which could reach a
similar scale. The condition of the water infrastructure is better in Germany than in
most of the other industrial countries, though, which is why the investment
22 June 1, 2010
World water markets
June 1, 2010 23
Current Issues
24 June 1, 2010
World water markets
21
We do not have a uniform source for government debt, which limits the
comparability of the data. We recorded high government debt as a negative
criterion in our study, for the bulk of investment will probably have to continue to be
shouldered by the government. It could of course also be argued that with a high
government debt there is greater pressure to integrate private companies into the
water market. In our opinion, however, the first argument carries more weight.
June 1, 2010 25
Current Issues
high GDP per capita there is a relatively large demand for the
renovation and modernisation of the water infrastructure since in
the rich countries this was created decades earlier (data on the
condition of existing infrastructure is not available).
The renewable water resources per capita and the ratio of water
withdrawals to renewable water resources as indicators of water
stress in a country.
Points based on DBR scoring model* The percentage of the population connected to the public
drinking water supply and wastewater disposal as indicators of
QA the investment requirements.
AE The Corruption Perception Index (CPI) of Transparency
BH International as well as the Index on the Protection of Intellectual
SG Property and the Index on the Level of Financial Market
SA Sophistication of the World Economic Forum as indicators of
KW
political stability and of the maturity of local financial markets.
DK
IN We applied a scoring algorithm to these criteria, subdividing the
IL readings into five equally large intervals. The country with the
LY poorest value for the respective factor is assigned a score of 1. And
22
CN the country with the best value is given a 5, the highest score. We
JO formed five equally large intervals between the two extremes. The
DE scores were weighted differently for the individual criteria and
US ultimately added together. The countries with the highest readings
YE are shown in the accompanying figure. The outcome shows us that
BE the top rankings are held by three rich countries Qatar, the United
AU
Arab Emirates and Bahrain which in addition are located in arid
SY
regions of the world and are relatively stable politically. Saudi Arabia
NG
and Kuwait are two further countries that fulfil these criteria and rank
KR
ES
in the Top 10. The Top 20 countries include two major industrial
GB
CZ populous nations, India and China. Moreover, the latter show only a
NO small standard deviation for all eleven criteria, which suggests a
CH certain degree of robustness in the results.
PK
Limits of our model
IR
FI This scoring model has its limits, of course. It is only one first step
SE that may merely serve as a guideline for the choice of potentially
ZA lucrative markets. The scoring model does not, for instance, take
FR into consideration that the demands and needs of the individual
JP countries differ greatly from one another. A uniform scoring model
TN cannot do this heterogeneity justice. For example, industrial
DZ countries require expensive modernisation work, whereas
CA developing countries need low-cost new installations. For this
EG
reason it comes as no surprise that many countries in our scoring
IE
model have a high standard deviation over the chosen criteria, i.e.
KE
on some criteria they perform excellently, but on others rather
NL
MA
poorly. This necessitates a closer look at the respective investment
projects.
0 1 2 3 4 5
Besides, the list of criteria is incomplete: the quality of the political
*Maximum score: 5 relations between the countries participating in water-sector
Industrial countries in grey
investments is of major importance. Furthermore, for certain
Source: DB Research
companies or investment projects the weightings applied to the
22
For some criteria (e.g. population, renewable water resources per capita and ratio
of water withdrawals to renewable water resources), we cut off the upper limit of
the interval below the actual maximum value (e.g. for the population figure at 600
million). Otherwise the interval between the countries with the highest values (in
the population example: China and India) and the rest of the world would have
become unjustifiably large.
26 June 1, 2010
World water markets
Selected literature
Cartwright, Anton et al. (2009). Understanding water risks. A primer
on the consequences of water scarcity for government and
business. WWF Water Security Series 4. Godalming.
DB Climate Change Advisors (2009). Investing in agriculture: far-
reaching challenge, significant opportunity. London, New York.
Ebrahimi, Nava (2009). Klare Geschäftsideen. In Markets Das
Servicemagazin für Außenwirtschaft 6/09. Cologne.
FAO (2008). Water and the rural poor. Interventions for improving
livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa. Rome.
FAO (2007). Irrigation management transfer. Worldwide efforts and
results. Rome.
FAO (2004). Water charging in irrigated agriculture. An analysis of
international experience. Rome.
Grimm, Vera et al. (2008). Wasserknappheit & Technologie.
Übersichtsstudie im Auftrag des VDI. Dusseldorf.
June 1, 2010 27
Current Issues
© Copyright 2010. Deutsche Bank AG, DB Research, D-60262 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. All rights reserved. When quoting please cite Deutsche Bank
Research .
The above information does not constitute the provision of investment, legal or tax advice. Any views expressed reflect the current views of the author, which do
not necessarily correspond to the opinions of Deutsche Bank AG or its affiliates. Opinions expressed may change without notic e. Opinions expressed may differ
from views set out in other documents, including research, published by Deutsche Bank. The above information is provided for informational purposes only and
without any obligation, whether contractual or otherwise. No warranty or representation is made as to the correctness, completeness and accuracy of the
information given or the assessments made.
In Germany this information is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG Frankfurt, authorised by Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht.
In the United Kingdom this information is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG London, a member of the London Sto ck Exchange regulated by
the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of investment business in the UK. This information is distributed in Hong Kong by Deutsche Bank AG, Hong
Kong Branch, in Korea by Deutsche Securities Korea Co. and in Singapore by Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch. In Japan this information is approved
and/or distributed by Deutsche Securities Limited, Tokyo Branch. In Australia, retail clients should obtain a copy of a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS)
relating to any financial product referred to in this report and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product.
Printed by: HST Offsetdruck Schadt & Tetzlaff GbR, Dieburg