An Analytic Scoring Rubric for Assessing AUTHENTIC LEARNING PERFORMANCE OUTPUTS ASSESSMENT RUBRICS

Grade Level Intended Quarter Theme

Title of Scoring Rubric Final Performance Evidence

Content Areas Intended MELCs

Names of Developers

Gradations Score
Criteria Percentage Descriptors 4 3 2 1 Self Peer Supervisor

Highly Acceptable Acceptable Fairly Acceptable Needs Improvement 20% 35% 45%

• Criteria items align well with All item 5 descriptors 3-4 descriptors are Less than 3
the performance through descriptors are are evident. evident. descriptors are
which the targeted MELCs are evident. evident.
achieved.
• The rubric helps promote
authentic, meaningful learning
Effectiveness 40% and student achievement.
• The rubric should have clear
gradations of quality based on
the degree to which a
standard has been met. The
gradations should include
specific descriptions of what
constitutes "excellent",

This material was developed by Prof. Maria Ruth M. Regalado, Associate Professor, Philippine Normal University-Manila and Mr. Carlos Correos, Education Program Specialist of DepEd-Surigao del Sur in December 2020.
Referenced from https://www.teachersfirst.com/lessons/rubrics/characteristics.cfm
 Gradations Score
Criteria Percentage Descriptors 4 3 2 1 Self Peer Supervisor

Highly Acceptable Acceptable Fairly Acceptable Needs Improvement 20% 35% 45%

"good", "fair", and "needs

improvement".
• The rubric describes exactly
what makes an assignment
quality.
• The rubric scores what is
central to the performance
output.
• A reliable rubric will enable
various teachers who will use
it to assess a student
performance to arrive at
similar scores.
• Language used is appropriate All item 3 descriptors 1-2 descriptors are No descriptor is
and easy to comprehend. descriptors are are evident. evident. evident.
• Both teachers and students evident.
will be able to verify and make
accurate interpretation of the
meaning of their scores.
Efficiency 35% • Requires minimum time to
complete and arrive at precise
assessment.
• Encourages multiple
participants to assess the
performance (e.g., peers,
teachers).

This material was developed by Prof. Maria Ruth M. Regalado, Associate Professor, Philippine Normal University-Manila and Mr. Carlos Correos, Education Program Specialist of DepEd-Surigao del Sur in December 2020.
Referenced from https://www.teachersfirst.com/lessons/rubrics/characteristics.cfm
 Gradations Score
Criteria Percentage Descriptors 4 3 2 1 Self Peer Supervisor

Highly Acceptable Acceptable Fairly Acceptable Needs Improvement 20% 35% 45%

• Prescribed format of the rubric All item All item Only 1 descriptor is Only 1 descriptor is
is observed. descriptors are descriptors are fully evident. evident with some
• Provides sufficient space for fully evident. evident but with specific parts
indicating name of student, some specific missing.
Form 25%
performance sub-total and parts missing.
total scores, remarks,
signatures of assessors, and
student’s conforme.

Sub-total Score

Final Score

Remarks

Signatures of Assessors: Signatures of Rubrics Developers:

Date Signed: Date Signed:

This material was developed by Prof. Maria Ruth M. Regalado, Associate Professor, Philippine Normal University-Manila and Mr. Carlos Correos, Education Program Specialist of DepEd-Surigao del Sur in December 2020.
Referenced from https://www.teachersfirst.com/lessons/rubrics/characteristics.cfm