Republic of Yemen

Ministry of Public Works & Highways

General corporation for roads & bridges ‫وزارة األشغال العامة والطرق‬
General Department ForCentral laboratory ‫المؤسسة العامة للطرق والجسور‬
Sana'a ‫االدارة العامة المختبر المركزي‬
202286: ‫صنعاء ت‬

SIEVE ANALYSIS TEST FOR WET-MIX ROAD MATERIALS

AASHTO DESIGNATION: (AASHTO-M-145)

‫ مشروع مارب‬- ‫بارك‬

Project Name: ‫ت''وسع'ة وسفلتة ش''وارع مارب‬
Job work:-‫ردم' مستع'ار‬ Sample No- R33- 269
Location / Sources : ‫محفر ا''لروضة‬ Date of Sample: 14/3/2013
Sampled by: ‫ اسماعيلا''لمتوكل‬/‫م‬+‫ س''ميح ا''لبع'داني‬/‫م‬ Tested on:- 19/3/2013

Sieve Wt. Rt. Rt. Pass. Specifications

mm Inch g % % A B

75 2.5 599 10.41 89.59 100.0

50 2 433 7.53 92.47 100 100.0
25 1 2072 36.01 63.99 75.0 95.0
10 ⅜ 3188 55.40 44.60 40.0 75.0
4.75 No. 4 3562 61.90 38.10 30.0 60.0
2 No.10 4065 70.65 29.35 20.0 45.0
0.425 No.40 4509 78.36 21.64 15.0 30.0
0.075 No.200 5115 88.89 11.11 5.0 20.0
Pan
Total 5754

100

90
Passing %

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10
Grain Size mm
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00

Lab. Tech. Mat. Eng. Gen. Manager

 Republic of Yemen
Ministry of Public Works & Highways
General corporation for roads & bridges
‫وزارة األشغال العامة والطرق‬
General Department ForCentral laboratory ‫المؤسسة العامة للطرق والجسور‬
Sana'a ‫االدارة العامة المختبر المركزي‬
202286: ‫صنعاء ت‬

DETERMINING THE LIQUID LIMIT & PLASTIC LIMIT OF SOILS

AASHTO DESIGNATION: T 89-761

Project Name: ‫ت''وسع'ة وسفلتة ش''وارع مارب‬ ‫ مشروع مارب‬-

Job work:-‫ردم' مستع'ار‬ Sample No- R33- 269
Location / Sources : ‫محفر ا''لروضة‬ Date of Sample: 14/3/2013
Sampled by: ‫ اسماعيل ا''لمتوكل‬/‫م‬+‫ س''ميح ا''لبع'داني‬/‫م‬ Tested on:- 19/3/2013

Test Liquid Limit Plastic Limit

a No. of Blows 10 18 26 35
b No. of Can 73 25 2 6 15 42
c Can + Wet Soil g 35.560 37.160 37.130 36.440 11.30 11.16
d Can + Dry Soil g 31.200 32.700 32.800 32.360 10.780 10.63
e Wt. Of Water c-d g 4.360 4.460 4.330 4.080 0.5 0.5
f Mass of Can g 14.080 14.440 14.280 14.140 7.9 7.7
g Mass of dry soil d-f g 17.120 18.260 18.520 18.220 2.870 2.910
h Water Content e/g % 25.467 24.425 23.380 22.393 18.118 18.213
i Average 18.166
Moisture Content %

27
Results:

26 1) Liquid Limit: 23.410 %

f(x) = − 2.42930736694227 ln(x) + 31.2081515434868
2) Plastic Limit: 18.166 %
25

3) Plasticity Index 5.245 %

24
Classification of Soils:
23
Classification of Soil due to
soil –aggregate mixture is:
22
(A-1-a ) fragments Gravel
and Sand .
21
No. of Blows

20
10 100

Lab. Tech. Mat. Eng. Gen. Manager

 Republic of Yemen
Ministry of Public Works & Highways
General corporation for roads & bridges ‫وزارة األشغال العامة والطرق‬
General Department ForCentral laboratory ‫المؤسسة العامة للطرق والجسور‬
Sana'a ‫االدارة العامة المختبر المركزي‬
202286: ‫صنعاء ت‬

MOISTURE – DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOILS - TEST

AASHTO DESIGNATION: T 180 - 97

Project Name: ‫ت''وسع'ة وسفلتة ش''وارع مارب‬ ‫ مشروع مارب‬- ‫مبارك‬

Job work:-‫ردم' مستع'ار‬ Sample No- R33- 269
Location / Sources : ‫محفر ا''لروضة‬ Date of Sample: 14/3/2013
Sampled by: ‫ اسماعيل ا''لمتوكل‬/‫م‬+‫ س''ميح ا''لبع'داني‬/‫م‬ Tested on:- 19/3/2013

Trail No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
a Mass of Soil + Mold g 8739 8864 8986 9320 9185 9399
b Mass of Mold g 4464
c Mass of Wet Soil g 4275 4400 4522 4856 4721 4935
d Volume of Mold cm³ 2100
e Density c/d g/cm³ 2.036 2.095 2.153 2.312 2.248 2.350
f Dry Density e/(1+m %)g/cm³ 1.920 1.969 1.993 2.091 1.992 2.043

MOISTURE CONTENT DETERMINATION

g Tin No. g E4 190 15 B T 707

h Tin + Wet Soil g 201 206 213 182 259 247
i Tin + Dry Soil g 191 195 199 167 233 219
j Moisture g 10 11 14 15 26 28
k Tin g 25 24 25 25 31 33
l Dry Soil g 166.00 171.00 174.00 142.00 202.00 186.00
m Moisture Content % 6.024 6.433 8.046 10.563 12.871 15.054

2.150
RESULTS:
Dry Density g/cm3

2.100
1) Maximum Dry Density:
f(x) = − 0.00225 x³ + 0.05555 x² − 0.41139 x + 2.89202 2.092
2.050
2) Optimum Moisture Content:
2.000
10.700

Remarks:
1.950

1.900

1.850

Moisture Content %
1.800
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Lab. Tech. Mat. Eng. Gen. Manager

 Republic of Yemen
Ministry of Public Works & Highways
General corporation for roads & bridges ‫وزارة األشغال العامة والطرق‬
General Department ForCentral laboratory ‫المؤسسة العامة للطرق والجسور‬
Sana'a ‫االدارة العامة المختبر المركزي‬
202286: ‫صنعاء ت‬
The California Bearing Ratio (CBR) AASHTO DESIGNATION: T 193 -99

Project Name: ‫ت''وسع'ة وسفلتة ش''وارع مارب‬ ‫ مشروع مارب‬- ‫سة مقبل مبارك‬
Job work:-‫ردم' مستع'ار‬ Sample No- R33- 269
Location / Sources : ‫محفر ا''لروضة‬ Date of Sample: 14/3/2013
Sampled by: ‫ ا'سماعيل ا''لمتوكل‬/‫م‬+‫ س''ميح ا''لبع'داني‬/‫م‬ Immersed on : 16/3/2013
Tested on: 19/3/2013
Max. Dry Density: 2.236 Optimum Moistrue Content : 6.800
95 % of max Dry Density 2.191
No. of Blows 10 30 65 30.00

Dail Reading Knf

Volume of Mould g/cm³ 2124 2124 2124
Mould + Wet Soil g 10888 10914 11257 f(x) = 9.58642819322227 ln(x) + 3.13453165611462

Mould g 6354 6164 6182 25.00

Wet. Soil g 4534 4750 5075
Wet Density g/cm³ 2.135 2.236 2.389
Dry Density g/cm³ 1.999 2.094 2.237 20.00

Compaction % 89.389 93.647 100.055

Expansion %
15.00
Final Dial Reading
f(x) = 5.24876038828221 ln(x) + 1.23564801511941
Initial Dial Reading
Swell
10.00
Expansion %
TEST DATA
Penetration mm Cont. Dial Reading
5.00
0.025 in. 0.6 0.60 1.90 3.80 f(x) = 1.75618012259971 ln(x) + 0.400534452792025
0.050 in. 1.3 0.80 2.40 4.80
Penetration mm
0.075 in. 1.9 1.20 3.60 7.20
0.00
0.100 in. 2.5 1.50 4.50 9.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
0.125 in. 3.2 1.90 5.70 11.40
0.150 in. 3.8 2.30 6.80 13.60 140
0.175 in. 4.4 2.60 7.90 15.80
0.200 in. 5 2.80 8.40 16.80
120
0.250 in. 6.4 3.80 11.40 22.80
CBR Value %

0.300 in. 7.5 4.20 12.60 25.20

100
0.400 in. 10 4.90 14.70 29.40
0.500 in. 12.5 5.60 16.80 33.60 3
f(x) = 664.422034638868 ln(x) − 445.109232275684
CBR % 15.18 45.66 90.02 80

60
Tin No. 26 33 28
Tin + Wet Soil g 214 192 278 2
Tin + Dry Soil g 202 182 263 40

Moisture g 12 10 15
Tin g 31 28 28 20
1
Dry Soil g 171 154 235
Dry Density as Moulded %
Moisture Content % 7.018 6.494 6.383 0
Average M/C 6.631 1.900 1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100 2.150 2.200 2.250 2.300

Remarks: The CBR Value at 95.00 % of Maximum Dry Density after 24 hours is 76.1

Lab. Tech. Mat. Eng. Gen. Manager

 Republic of Yemen
Ministry of Public Works & Highways
General corporation for roads & bridges ‫وزارة األشغال العامة والطرق‬
General Department ForCentral laboratory ‫المؤسسة العامة للطرق والجسور‬
Sana'a ‫االدارة العامة المختبر المركزي‬
202286: ‫صنعاء ت‬
The California Bearing Ratio (CBR) AASHTO DESIGNATION: T 193 -99

Project Name: ‫ت''وسع'ة وسفلتة ش''وارع مارب‬ ‫ مشروع مارب‬- ‫سة مقبل مبارك‬
Job work:-‫ردم' مستع'ار‬ Sample No- R33- 269
Location / Sources : ‫محفر ا''لروضة‬ Date of Sample: 14/3/2013
Sampled by: ‫ ا'سماعيل ا''لمتوكل‬/‫م‬+‫ س''ميح ا''لبع'داني‬/‫م‬ Immersed on : 16/3/2013
Tested on: 19/3/2013
Max. Dry Density: 2.092 Optimum Moistrue Content : 10.700
95 % of max Dry Density 1.987
No. of Blows 10 30 65
20.00

Dail Reading Knf

Volume of Mould g/cm³ 2300 2300 2300
Mould + Wet Soil g 10920 11110 11250 f(x) = 6.88127776209196 ln(x) + 1.22667000374309

Mould g 6107 6078 6008

Wet. Soil g 4813 5032 5242
Wet Density g/cm³ 2.093 2.188 2.279 15.00

Dry Density g/cm³ 1.892 1.977 2.070

Compaction % 90.437 94.495 98.971
Expansion %
Final Dial Reading 10.00
f(x) = 3.83355418683815 ln(x) + 0.327309812425579
Initial Dial Reading
Swell
Expansion %
TEST DATA 5.00
Penetration mm Cont. Dial Reading f(x) = 1.91677709341908 ln(x) + 0.163654906212789
0.025 in. 0.6 0.48 0.95 1.90
0.050 in. 1.3 0.53 1.05 2.10
Penetration mm
0.075 in. 1.9 0.75 1.50 3.00
0.00
0.100 in. 2.5 1.45 2.90 5.80
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
0.125 in. 3.2 1.93 3.85 7.70
0.150 in. 3.8 2.35 4.70 9.40
100
0.175 in. 4.4 2.65 5.30 10.60
0.200 in. 5 2.98 5.95 11.90
0.250 in. 6.4 3.65 7.30 14.60
80
CBR Value %

0.300 in. 7.5 4.05 8.10 16.20 3

0.400 in. 10 5.06 10.13 20.25 f(x) = 611.457860124293 ln(x) − 372.935455923682
0.500 in. 12.5 6.00 12.00 24.00
60
CBR % 19.36 38.74 74.37

Tin No. G 21 55 40 2
Tin + Wet Soil g 201 207 254
Tin + Dry Soil g 184 190 233
Moisture g 17 17 21 20 1
Tin g 24 31 25
Dry Soil g 160 159 208
Dry Density as Moulded %
Moisture Content % 10.625 10.692 10.096 0
Average M/C 10.471 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.950 2.000 2.050 2.100 2.150 2.200

Remarks: The CBR Value at 95.00 % of Maximum Dry Density after 24 hours is 46.9

Lab. Tech. Mat. Eng. Gen. Manager

 Republic of Yemen
Ministry of Public Works & Highways ‫وزارة األشغال العامة والطرق‬
General corporation for roads & bridges ‫المؤسسة العامة للطرق والجسور‬
General Department ForCentral laboratory ‫االدارة العامة المختبر المركزي‬
Sana'a 202286: ‫صنعاء ت‬

LOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST AASHTO DESIGNATION T-96

=============================================================================
Project Name: ‫ت''وسع'ة وسفلتة ش''وارع مارب‬ ‫ مشروع مارب‬- ‫مبارك‬
Project Name:
Job work:-‫ردم' مستع'ار‬ Ad was – Sa ah Road Project Sample No- Sample No.:
R33- 269 01
Job Work: Fraction
Location / Sources : ‫محفر ا''لروضة‬ of Aggregate for Job Mix Design No. 01 Prepared
Date of Sample: 14/3/2013 on:
21/06/2003
Sampled by: ‫ اسماعيلا''لمتوكل‬/‫م‬+‫ س''ميح ا''لبع'داني‬/‫م‬ Tested on:- 19/3/2013
Location / Source: Crusher Plant at 29 Km (Mukalla –Seiyun Road ) Date of Test:
26/06/2003
Sampled By: Lab. Tech Drawing by: Eng. Al-Shamiri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sieve Size Grading And Weight of Test Sample, g
Passing Ret. on -------------------------------------------------------
A B C d E F G
3˝ 2½˝ - -
COARSE AGGREGATE
- - 2500 - -
2½˝ Items Fraction
2˝ No. 04 (- 20 – 14 mm - ) Fraction
- No. 03- ( 14 – 08 2500
mm ) - -
2˝ 1½˝ Trail- 1 2 Average
- 1 2 Average
- - 2500 5000 -
a Wt. in Air of Sat. Surf. Dry Sample SSD g 2327.4 2335.7 2232 2215.8
1½˝ 1˝ 1250 - - - - 5000 5000
b Wt. in Air of Oven Dried Sample g 2317.8 2326.4 2215.2 2197.8
1˝c Wt. of Sample
¾˝ in Water1250 - -
g 1446.1 -
1452.8 1387.2- 1377.2 - 5000
d Absorption
¾˝ (a –
½˝ b ) / b *100
1250 2500 % 0.414
- 0.400 0.407
- 0.758- 0.819 0.789
- -
e Bulk
½˝ Specific Gravity
3/8˝ ( b / a – c
1250 ) 2500 g/cm³ 2.630
- 2.635- 2.632 2.622
- 2.621 2.621
- -
f Bulk Specific Gravity, SSD ( a / a – c ) g/cm³ 2.641 2.645 2.643 2.642 2.642 2.642
3/8˝
g Apparent No.3
Specific Gravity (b /- b – c ) - g/cm³ 2500
2.659 2.663- 2.661 2.675
- 2.678 -2.677 -
No.3 No.4 - - 2500 - - - -
No. 4 No.8 - FINE AGGREGATE
- - 5000 - - -
Total
Items Fraction No. 02 (08 – 04 mm ) Fraction No 01 (04 – Minus)
Trial 1 2 Average 1 2 Average
Note :The Test Sample Shall conform to Dry
a Wt. in Air of Sat. Surf. Sample
the Grading SSD
in the g 712.5 718.6 683.4 678.9
above table
b Wt. in Air of Oven Dried Sample g 705.1 711.2 672.5 668.3
Speed Grading No. of Spheres Weight of Charge, g
c Wt. of Pycnometer Filled With Water g 786 788.3 786 788.3
d Pycnometer + Water + Sample A 12
g 1227.5 1233.8 1205.9 1205.8 5000 ± 25
e Absorption (a– B 11 4584 ± 25
Rotate at 30 to 33 rpm forb500
) / brevolutions.
*100
C
% 1.049 1.040 1.045 1.621 1.586 1.603
f Bulk Spe. Grav. b / ( a )+( c ) – ( d ) g/cm³ 2.602 2.604 2.603 8 2.552 2.5573330
2.554 ± 20
g Bulk Spe. Grav. SSD a / ( a ) + ( c ) – ( d ) g/cm³ D 2.629 2.631 2.630 6 2.594 2.597 2.595
2500.0 ± 15
h Apparent Spe. Grav. b / ( b ) + ( c ) – ( d ) g/cm³ 2.675 2.677 2.676 2.662 2.665 2.663
The Abrasive Test Charge Shall Consist of Cast-Iron or Steel Spheres Approximately 1-7/8˝ in Diameter And Each Weighting
Remarks:
Between 390 And 445 grams. The Charge Depending Upon Grading of The Sample Shall be as Tabulated Above.
Water Absorption for Job Mix Design (Coarse Aggregate) is 1.0 % Max.
Calculation:
A 5000.00
Abrasion Loss, A-B / A *100
B 3899.00
Lab. Tech. Mat. Eng. Res. Eng.
A-B 1101.00 22.02
Cons. Eng.
Where A = Original Oven Dried Weight
B = Oven Dried Weight Retained on No. 12 (1.70mm) Sieve After Abrasion
Specification Limit Not Exceed About 35.0 %

Lab. Tech. Mat.Eng. Gen. Manager

‫و‬

‫الجهة المنفذة ‪ :‬مؤسسة مقبل مبارك ‪ -‬م‬

‫‪3502‬‬
‫‪0‬‬
 `QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ

Republic of Yemen
Ministry of Public Works &Highways ‫وزارة األشغال العامة والطرق‬
General corporation for roads &bridges ‫المؤسسة العامة للطرق والجسور‬
General Department For Central laboratory ‫االدارة العامة المختبر المركزي‬
Sana'a 202286: ‫صنعاء ت‬

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ON BORROW MATERIALS

Project Name: ‫ت''وسع'ة وسفلتة ش''وارع مارب‬ ‫ مشروع مارب‬- ‫ مؤسسة مقبل مبارك‬: ‫الجهة المنفذة‬
Job work:-‫ردم' مستع'ار‬
Location / Sources : ‫محفر ا''لروضة‬ Sample No- R33- 269
Sampled by: ‫ ا'سماعيل ا''لمتوكل‬/‫م‬+‫ س''ميح ا''لبع'دا'ني‬/‫م‬ Date of Sample: 14/3/2013
Tested on: 19/3/2013

Classification
Loss Angeles
PERCENT PASSING SIEVE SIZES Modified
Atterberg

AASHTO
Compaction CBR
Limits
2 1 ⅜ 4 10 40 200 Test 95%
50 25 10 4.75 2 0.425 0.075 LL PI MDD OMC

92.47 63.99 44.6 38.10 29.35 21.64 11.11 23.41 5.24 2.092 10.700 46.9 22.02 Classification of Soil due to
soil –aggregate mixture is:
(A-1-a ) fragments Gravel and
Sand .

Lab. Tech. Mat. Eng. Gen. Manager

`
`QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ

Classification of Soil due to

soil –aggregate mixture is: 717 1500
(A-7-5) Clayey soil .
1417
83
344 0.055333
Classification of Soil due to
soil –aggregate mixture is:
2.084302 (A-7-5) Clayey soil .

NP

1346
Classification of Soil due to
soil –aggregate mixture is:
(A-2-4)Silty or Clayey 731
Gravel and Sand. 615
242
2.541322
Classification of Soil due to
soil –aggregate mixture is:
(A-2-4)Silty or Clayey
Gravel and Sand.

Tast of Bit. Con.by

Wt.of Mix %
number
1.000 24.44
2.000 24.06
3.000 24.83
4.000 24.79