Annex 3

ANNEXE 3 - EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV
Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project
kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

1 Load balancing of the feeder 1 80 0.08 1.64 1.56

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 89 0.81 1.63 0.82

3 Changing the shekel point of feederE2 and 1 83 0.101 1.64 1.539

feederB1and load balancing

4 Changing the Tap position of TF 0 77 0 0 0

5 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 2 99 3.80 3.69 -0.11

balancing (1.2 km Racoon line)
6 Introducing a separate feeder and selected 1ph 2 98 0.75 3.69 2.94
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing

(a) THALAMMEHERA FEEDER -A1 Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV

Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project
kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

1 Loads balancing of the feeders 0 73 0.19 0 -0.19

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 85 1.25 1.78 0.53

3 Changing the Tap positions of TFs and load 0 72 0 0 0

balancing
4 Changing the shekel point of feederE2 and 0 79 0.203 0 -0.07
feederB1and load balancing
5 Introducing separate feeders and selected 1ph 2 91 1.63 4.10 2.47
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing
of both feeders.
6 Filling the gap(0.070km) by fly conductor, 1 88 0.27 1.90 1.63
among section E34 and B18 and load
balancing
7 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 4 98 2.80 8 5.2
balancing (0.350km Racoon line)

Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV

Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project

LV Development Study
 kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

1 Loads balancing of the feeders 0 73 0.21 0 -0.21

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 90 1.45 1.63 0.22

3 Changing the Tap positions of TFs and load 0 76 0 0 0

balancing
4 Changing the jumper point of feederD1and 0 79 0.255 0 -0.255
feederB2 and load balancing
5 Introducing separate feeders and selected 1ph 2 94 1.51 3.38 1.87
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing
of both feeders.
6 Filling the gap(0.390km) by fly conductor, 2 96 0.854 3.38 2.53
among section E34 and B18 and load
balancing
7 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 2 98 3.12 3.38 0.26
balancing (1.05 Racoon line)
Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV
Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project
kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

1 Load balancing of the feeder 1 88 0.07 1.63 1.56

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 90 1.23 1.63 0.82

3 Changing the Tap position of TF 0 82 0 0 0

4 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 2 99 3.40 3.08 -0.32

balancing (1.35km Racoon line)
5 Introducing a separate feeder and selected 1ph 2 97 0.25 3.08 2.83
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing

(c) KEKILLAPITIYAFEEDER- D1& MAHOLOWA FEEDER-B2

Annex 3

Loss V.I as% NP NP 0f NPV

Proposed action Savin of Cost of Loss of
g Nominal Project Saving Project
kW voltages (MRs) (MRs) (MRs)

LV Development Study
 1 Load balancing of the feeder 0 93 0.065 0 -1.065

2 All 1Ph and 2Ph lines are conversion to 3Ph 1 95 1.34 3.52 2.2

3 Changing the Tap position of TF 0 92 0 0 0

4 Establishing a TF for feeder end and load 1 99 3.40 3.54 -0.32

balancing (1.35km Racoon line)
5 Introducing a separate feeder and selected 1ph 1 99 0.63 3.54 2.91
lines are conversion to 3Ph and load balancing

(e) DEBARALIYADDA FEEDER -C3

LV Development Study